Quantitative comparison of dynamic physiological feeding profiles for recombinant protein production with Pichia pastoris

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1163-1172

  Spadiut, Oliver ^a   Zalai, Denes ^a   Dietzsch, Christian ^a   Herwig, Christoph ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Dynamic feeding profile; Fed batch cultivation; Pichia pastoris; Recombinant protein; Stress

Indexed keywords

BATCH DATA PROCESSING; CYTOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; METHANOL; PHYSIOLOGY; PRODUCTIVITY; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; STRESSES; YEAST;

FED-BATCH CULTIVATION; FEEDING PROFILE; INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; PICHIA PASTORIS; QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN PRODUCTIONS; SPECIFIC PRODUCTIVITY;

FEEDING;

METHANOL; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; CULTURE MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BATCH PROCESS; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FED BATCH CULTURE; FUNGAL CELL; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GROWTH RATE; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; NONHUMAN; PICHIA PASTORIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOSYNTHESIS; CULTURE MEDIUM; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHARMACOLOGY; PICHIA;

PICHIA PASTORIS;

CULTURE MEDIA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PICHIA; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS;

EID: 84905675639     PISSN: 16157591     EISSN: 16157605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-013-1087-z     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Orman MA, Calik P, Ozdamar TH (2009) The influence of carbon sources on recombinant-human-growth-hormone production by Pichia pastoris is dependent on phenotype: a comparison of Mut(s) and Mut(+) strains. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 52:245-255. doi:10.1042/Ba20080057
2. Pla IA, Damasceno LM, Vannelli T, Ritter G, Batt CA, Shuler ML (2006) Evaluation of Mut(+) and Mut(S) Pichia pastoris phenotypes for high level extracellular scFv expression under feedback control of the methanol concentration. Biotechnol Prog 22(3):881-888. doi:10.1021/Bp060012+ (Pubitemid 43877458)
3. Zhang W, Sinha J, Smith LA, Inan M, Meagher MM (2005) Maximization of production of secreted recombinant proteins in Pichia pastoris fed-batch fermentation. Biotechnol Prog 21(2):386-393. doi:10.1021/bp049811n (Pubitemid 40466409)
4. Romanos MA, Scorer CA, Clare JJ (1992) Foreign gene-expression in Yeast - a review. Yeast 8(6):423-488
5. van den Burg HA, de Wit PJGM, Vervoort J (2001) Efficient C-13/N-15 double labeling of the avirulence protein AVR4 in a methanol-utilizing strain (Mut(+)) of Pichia pastoris. J Biomol NMR 20(3):251-261 (Pubitemid 32747190)
6. Kim SJ, Lee JA, Kim YH, Song BK (2009) Optimization of the functional expression of Coprinus cinereus peroxidase in Pichia pastoris by varying the host and promoter. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19(9):966-971. doi:10.4014/Jmb.0901. 018
7. Chiruvolu V, Cregg JM, Meagher MM (1997) Recombinant protein production in an alcohol oxidase-defective strain of Pichia pastoris in fedbatch fermentations. Enz Microb Technol 21(4):277-283 (Pubitemid 27448295)
8. Krainer FW, Dietzsch C, Hajek T, Herwig C, Spadiut O, Glieder A (2012) Recombinant protein expression in Pichia pastoris strains with an engineered methanol utilization pathway. Microb Cell Fact 11:22. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-11- 22
9. Trinh LB, Phue JN, Shiloach J (2003) Effect of methanol feeding strategies on production and yield of recombinant mouse endostatin from Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Bioeng 82(4):438-444. doi:10.1002/bit.10587 (Pubitemid 36505882)
10. Sinha J, Plantz BA, Zhang W, Gouthro M, Schlegel V, Liu CP, Meagher MM (2003) Improved production of recombinant ovine interferon-tau by mut(+) strain of Pichia pastoris using an optimized methanol feed profile. Biotechnol Prog 19(3):794-802. doi:10.1021/bp025744q (Pubitemid 36715124)
11. Plantz BA, Sinha J, Villarete L, Nickerson KW, Schlegel VL (2006) Pichia pastoris fermentation optimization: energy state and testing a growth-associated model. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72(2):297-305. doi:10.1007/s00253-005-0271-8 (Pubitemid 44273052)
12. Potgieter TI, Kersey SD, Mallem MR, Nylen AC, d'Anjou M (2010) Antibody expression kinetics in glycoengineered Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Bioeng 106(6):918-927. doi:10.1002/bit.22756
13. Jacobs PP, Inan M, Festjens N, Haustraete J, Van Hecke A, Contreras R, Meagher MM, Callewaert N (2010) Fed-batch fermentation of GM-CSF-producing glycoengineered Pichia pastoris under controlled specific growth rate. Microb Cell Fact 9:93. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-9-93
14. Dietzsch C, Spadiut O, Herwig C (2011) A dynamic method based on the specific substrate uptake rate to set up a feeding strategy for Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact 10:14. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-10-14
15. Dietzsch C, Spadiut O, Herwig C (2011) A fast approach to determine a fed batch feeding profile for recombinant Pichia pastoris strains. Microb Cell Fact 10:85. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-10-85
16. Zalai D, Dietzsch C, Herwig C, Spadiut O (2012) A dynamic fed batch strategy for a Pichia pastoris mixed feed system to increase process understanding. Biotechnol Prog. doi:10.1002/btpr.1551
17. Cregg JM (2007) Pichia Protocols. In: Cregg JM (ed) Methods Mol. Biol., 2nd edn Totowa, US, p 268
18. Spadiut O, Rittmann S, Dietzsch C, Herwig C (2013) Dynamic process conditions in bioprocess development. Eng Life Sci 13(1):88-101. doi:10.1002/elsc.201200026
19. Jazini M, Herwig C (2011) Effect of post-induction substrate oscillation on recombinant alkaline phosphatase production expressed in Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng 112(6):606-610. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.08.013