Sexual conflict, life span, and aging

Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2014, Pages

  Bonduriansky, Russell ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905484376     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19430264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017566     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Adkins-Regan E. 2005. Hormones and animal social behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Adler M. 2010. Sexual conflict inwaterfowl:Why do females resist extra-pair copulations? Behav Ecol 21: 182-192.
3. Adler MI, Bonduriansky R. 2011. The dissimilar costs of love and war: Age-specific mortality as a function of the operational sex ratio. J Evol Biol 24: 1169-1177.
4. Adler MI, Cassidy EJ, Fricke C, Bonduriansky R. 2013. The lifespan-reproduction trade-off under dietary restriction is sex-specific and context-dependent. Exp Gerontol 48: 539-548.
5. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6. Archer CR, Sakaluk SK, Selman C, Royle NJ, Hunt J. 2012a. Oxidative stress and the evolution of sex differences in life span and ageing in the decorated cricket, Gryllodes sigillatus. Evolution 67: 620-634.
7. Archer CR, Zajitschek F, Sakaluk SK, Royle NJ, Hunt J. 2012b. Sexual selection affects the evolution of lifespan and ageing in the decorated cricket Gryllodes sigillatus. Evolution 66: 3088-3100.
8. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
9. Baker RH, Denniff M, Futerman P, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A, Chapman T. 2003. Accessory gland size influences time to sexual maturity and mating frequency in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Behav Ecol 14: 607-611.
10. Berg EC, Maklakov A. 2012. Sexes suffer from suboptimal lifespan because of genetic conflict in a seed beetle. Proc Biol Sci 279: 4296-4302.
11. Bewley S, Davies M, Braude P. 2005.Which career first? The most secure age for childbearing remains 20-35. BMJ 331: 588-589.
12. Blay S, Yuval B. 1997. Nutritional correlates of reproductive success of male Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Anim Behav 54: 59-66.
13. Bonduriansky R. 2014. The ecology of sexual conflict: Background mortality can modulate the effects of male manipulation on female fitness. Evolution 68: 595-604.
14. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 280-288.
15. Bonduriansky R, Maklakov A, Zajitschek F, Brooks R. 2008. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and lifespan. Funct Ecol 22: 443-453.
16. Camus MF, Clancy DJ, Dowling DK. 2013. Mitochondria, maternal inheritance, and male ageing. Curr Biol 22: 1717-1721.
17. Candolin U. 1998. Reproduction under predation risk and the trade-off between current and future reproduction in the threespine stickleback. Proc Biol Sci 265: 1171-1175.
18. Cannon M. 2009. Contrasting effects of maternal and paternal age on offspring intelligence. PLoS Med 6: e1000042.
19. Carazo P, Molina-Vila P, Font E. 2011. Male reproductive senescence as a potential source of sexual conflict in a beetle. Behav Ecol 22.
20. Ceballos S, Kiørboe T. 2011. Senescence and sexual selection in a pelagic copepod. PLoS ONE 6: e18870.
21. Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241-244.
22. Chen HY, Maklakov AA. 2012. Longer life span evolves under high rates of condition-dependent mortality. Curr Biol 22: 2140-2143.
23. Clutton-Brock T. 2007. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318: 1882-1885.
24. Clutton-Brock T. 2009. Sexual selection in females. Anim Behav 77: 3-11.
25. Comfort A. 1979. The biology of senescence. Elsevier, New York.
26. Connalon T, Cox RM, Calsbeek R. 2010. Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64: 1671-1682.
27. Cox RM, Calsbeek R. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am Nat 173: 176-187.
28. Dean R, Cornwallis CK, Løvlie H, Worley K, Richardson DS, Pizarri T. 2010. Male reproductive senescence causes potential for sexual conflict over mating. Curr Biol 20: 1192-1196.
29. Dowling DK, Friberg U, Lindell J. 2008. Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 546-554.
30. Duffy DL, Bentley GE, Drazen DL, Ball GF. 2000. Effects of testosterone on cell-mediated and humoral immunity in non-breeding adult European starlings. Behav Ecol 11: 654-662.
31. Edward DA, Fricke C, Gerrard DT, Chapman T. 2010.Quantifying the life-history responses to increased male exposure in female Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 65: 564-573.
32. Finch CE. 1990. Longevity, senescence, and the genome. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
33. Foerster K, Kempenaers B. 2005. Effects of testosterone on male-male competition and male-female interactions in blue tits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57: 215-223.
34. Fricke C, Bretman A, Chapman T. 2008. Adult male nutrition and reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 62: 3170-3177.
35. Fricke C, Perry J, Chapman T, Rowe L. 2009a. The conditional economics of sexual conflict. Biol Lett 5: 671-674.
36. Fricke C, Wigby S, Hobbs R, Chapman T. 2009b. The benefits of male ejaculate sex peptide transfer in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 22: 275-286.
37. Fricke C, Bretman A, Chapman T. 2010. Female nutritional status determines the magnitude and sign of responses to a male ejaculate signal in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 23: 157-165.
38. Fricke C, Green D, Mills WE, Chapman T. 2013. Age-dependent female responses to a male ejaculate signal alter demographic opportunities for selection. Proc Biol Sci 280: 20130428.
39. Gaulden ME. 1992. Maternal age effect: The enigma of Down syndrome and other trisomic conditions. Mutat Res 296: 69-88.
40. Golinski A, John-Adler H, Kratochvil L. 2011. Male sexual behavior does not require elevated testosterone in a lizard (Coleonyx elegans, Eublepharidae). HormBehav 59: 144-150.
41. Gosden TP, Shastri KL, Innocenti P, Chenoweth SF. 2012. The B-matrix harbors significant and sex-specific constraints on the evolution of multicharacter sexual dimorphism. Evolution 66: 2106-2116.
42. Graves BM. 2007. Sexual selection effects on the evolution of senescence. Evol Ecol 21: 663-668.
43. Haig D. 2000. The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31: 9-32.
44. Hall MD, Bussiere LF, Brooks R. 2009. Diet-dependent female evolution influences male lifespan in a nuptial feeding insect. J Evol Biol 22: 873-881.
45. Hamilton WD. 1966. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol 12: 12-45.
46. Han CS, Jablonski PG. 2010. Male water striders attract predators to intimidate females into copulation. Nat Commun 1: 1-6.
47. Innocenti P, Morrow EH, Dowling DK. 2011. Experimental evidence supports a sex-specific selective sieve in mitochondrial genome evolution. Science 332: 845-848.
48. Isaac JL, Johnson CN. 2005. Terminal reproductive effort in a marsupial. Biol Lett 1: 271-275.
49. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A reviewof the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75: 21-64.
50. Johnson SL, Gemmell NJ. 2012. Are old males still good males and can females tell the difference? Bioessays 34: 609-619.
51. Johnstone RA, Keller L. 2000. How males can gain by harming their mates: Sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. Am Nat 156: 368-377.
52. Jones TM, Featherson R, Paris DBBP, Elgar MA. 2007. Agerelated sperm transfer and sperm competitive ability in the male hide beetle. Behav Ecol 18: 251-258.
53. Juntti SA, Tollkuhn J, Wu MV, Fraser EJ, Soderborg T, Tan S, Honda SI, Harada N, Shah NM. 2010. The androgen receptor governs the execution, but not programming, of male sexual and territorial behaviors. Neuron 66: 260-272.
54. Kawasaki N, Brassil CE, Brooks R, Bonduriansky R. 2008. Environmental effects on the expression of lifespan and aging: An extreme contrast between wild and captive cohorts of Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae). Am Nat 172: 346-357.
55. Kim SY, Velando A, Torres R, Drummond H. 2011. Effects of recruiting age on senescence, lifespan and lifetime reproductive success in a long-lived seabird. Oecologia 166: 615-626.
56. Kirkwood TBL. 1977. Evolution of ageing.Nature 270: 301-304.
57. Kokko H. 1997. Evolutionarily stable strategies of age-dependent sexual advertisement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41: 99-107.
58. Lahdenpera M, Russell AF, Lummaa V. 2007. Selection for long lifespan in men: Benefits of grandfathering? Proc Biol Sci 274: 2437-2444.
59. Lahdenpera M, Lummaa V, Russell AF. 2011. Selection on male longevity in a monogamous human population: Late-life survival brings no additional grandchildren. J Evol Biol 24: 1053-1063.
60. Lande R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
61. Lehtovaara A, Schielzeth H, Flis I, Friberg U. 2013. Heritability of life span is largely sex limited in Drosophila. Am Nat 182: 653-665.
62. Lemaitre JF, Gaillard JM. 2013. Male survival patterns do not depend on male allocation to sexual competition in large herbivores. Behav Ecol 24: 421-428.
63. Lewis Z, Wedell N, Hunt J. 2011. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Evolution 65: 2085-2097.
64. Long TAF, Rice WR. 2007. Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci 274: 3105-3112.
65. Long TAF, Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Rice WR. 2009. A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females. PLoS Biol 7: e10000254.
66. Magurran AE, Seghers BH. 1994. Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: Evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. Proc Biol Sci 255: 31-36.
67. Maklakov A, Lummaa V. 2013. Evolution of sex differences in lifespan and aging: Causes and constraints. Bioessays 35: 717-724.
68. Maklakov AA, Simpson SJ, Zajitschek F, Hall MD, Dessmann J, Clissold F, Raubenheimer D, Bonduriansky R, Brooks RC. 2008. Sex-specific fitness effects of nutrient intake on reproduction and lifespan. Curr Biol 18: 1062-1066.
69. Marler CA, Moore MC. 1988. Evolutionary costs of aggression revealed by testosterone manipulations in free-living male lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23: 21-26.
70. McGlothlin JW, Jawor JM, Greives TJ, Phillips JL, Ketterson ED. 2008. Hormones and honest signals:Males with larger ornaments elevate testosterone more when challenged. J Evol Biol 21: 39-48.
71. Medawar PB. 1946. Old age and natural death. ModQ 2: 30-49.
72. Michiels NK. 1998.Mating conflicts and sperm competition in simultaneous hermaphrodites. In Sperm competition and sexual selection (ed. Birkhead TR, Møller AP), pp. 219-254. Academic, London.
73. Mills SC, Koskela E, Mappes T. 2012. Intralocus sexual conflict for fitness: Sexually antagonistic alleles for testosterone. Proc Biol Sci 279: 1889-1895.
74. Moore T, Haig D. 1991. Genomic imprinting inmammalian development: A parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet 7: 45-49.
75. Morrow EH, Arnqvist G, Pitnick S. 2003. Adaptation versus pleiotropy: Why do males harm their mates? Behav Ecol 14: 802-806.
76. Mühlhäuser C, Blanckenhorn WU. 2004. The quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behaviour 141: 327-341.
77. Nussey DH, Kruuk LEB, Morris A, Clements MN, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH. 2009. Inter- and intrasexual variation in aging patterns across reproductive traits in a wild red deer population. Am Nat 174: 342-357.
78. Parker GA. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (ed. Blum MS, Blum NA), pp. 123-166. Academic, New York.
79. Pärt T, Gustafsson L, Moreno J. 1992. Terminal investment" and a sexual conflict in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Am Nat 140: 868-882.
80. Promislow D. 2003. Mate choice, sexual conflict, and evolution of senescence. Behav Genet 33: 191-201.
81. Réale D, Boussès P, Chapuis JL. 1996. Female-biased mortality induced by male sexual harassment in a feral sheep population. Can J Zool 74: 1812-1818.
82. Reddiex AJ, Gosden TP, Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF. 2013. Sex-specific fitness consequences of nutrient intake and the evolvability of diet preferences. Am Nat 182: 91-102.
83. Reinhardt K. 2007. Evolutionary consequences of sperm cell aging. Q Rev Biol 82: 375-393.
84. Reznick DA, Bryant M, Holmes D. 2006. The evolution of senescence and post-reproductive lifespan in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). PLoS Biol 4: e7.
85. Richard M, Lecomte J, De Fraipont M, Clober J. 2005. Agespecific mating strategies and reproductive senescence. Mol Ecol 14: 3147-3155.
86. Rodríguez-Graña L, Calliari D, Tiselius P, Hansen BW, Sköld HN. 2010. Gender-specific ageing and non-Mendelian inheritance of oxidative damage in marine copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401: 1-13.
87. Roff DA. 1992. Evolution of life histories: Theory and analysis. Chapman & Hall, New York.
88. Rowe L. 1994. The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim Behav 48: 1049-1056.
89. Sapienza P, Zaingales L, Maestripieri D. 2009. Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 15268-15273.
90. Schroderus E, Jokinen I, Koivula M, Koskela E, Mappes T, Mills SC, Oksanen TA, Poikonen T. 2010. Intra- and intersexual trade-offs between testosterone and immune system: Implications for sexual and sexually antagonistic selection. Am Nat 176: E90-E97.
91. Stanton SJ, Liening SH, Schultheiss OC. 2011. Testosterone is positively associated with risk taking in the Iowa Gambling Task. Horm Behav 59: 252-256.
92. Stearns SC. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
93. Stutt AD, Siva-Jothy MT. 2001. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98: 5683-5687.
94. Svensson E, Sheldon BC. 1998. The social context of life history evolution. Oikos 83: 466-477.
95. Tatarnic NJ, Cassis G, Siva-Jothy MT. 2014. Traumatic insemination in terrestrial arthropods. Ann Rev Entomol 59: 245-261.
96. Torres R, Velando A. 2007. Male reproductive senescence: The price of immune-induced oxidative damage on sexual attractiveness in the blue-footed booby. J Anim Ecol 76: 1161-1168.
97. van Doorn GS. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann NY Acad Sci 1168: 52-71.
98. Velando A, Torres R, Alonso-Alvarez C. 2008. Avoiding bad genes: Oxidatively damaged DNA in germ line and mate choice. BioEssays 30: 1212-1219.
99. Vinogradov AE. 1998. Male reproductive strategy and decreased longevity. Acta Biotheoretica 46: 157-160.
100. Wigby S, Chapman T. 2005. Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 15: 316-321.
101. Williams GC. 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11: 398-411.
102. Williams GC. 1966.Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's Principle. Am Nat 100: 687-690.
103. Zajitschek F, Hunt J, Zajitschek SRK, Jennions MD, Brooks R. 2007. No intra-locus sexual conflict over reproductive fitness or ageing in field crickets. PLoS ONE 2: e155.
104. Zajitschek F, Bonduriansky R, Zajitschek SRK, Brooks R. 2009a. Sexual dimorphism in life history: Age, survival, and reproduction in male and female field crickets Teleogryllus commodus under seminatural conditions. Am Nat 173: 792-802.
105. Zajitschek F, Brassil CE, Bonduriansky R, Brooks R. 2009b. Sex effects on life span and senescence in the wild when dates of birth and death are unknown. Ecology 90: 1698-1707.