Age-specific mating strategies and reproductive senescence

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 3147-3155

  Richard, M ^a   Lecomte, J ^b   De Fraipont, M ^a   Clobert, J ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Fitness; Mate choice; Mating strategy; Senescence; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

SQUAMATA; ZOOTOCA VIVIPARA;

DNA;

AGE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; DNA; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 26944480829     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02662.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson DJ Apanius V ( 2003) Actuarial and reproductive senescence in a long-lived seabird: preliminary evidence. Experimental Gerontology, 38, 757 760.
2. Andersson M ( 1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
3. Arnquist G Nilsson T ( 2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour, 60, 145 164.
4. Bateman A ( 1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349 368.
5. Beck CW Powell LA ( 2000) Evolution of female mate choice based on male age: are older males better mates? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2, 107 118.
6. Birkhead TR Moller AP ( 1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, London.
7. Boudjemadi K Lecomte J Clobert J ( 1999a) Influence of connectivity on demography and dispersal in two contrasting habitats: an experimental approach. Jounal of Animal Ecology, 68, 1207 1224.
8. Boudjemadi K Martin O Simon JC Estoup A ( 1999b) Development and crossspecies comparison of microsatellite markers in two lizard species, Lacerta vivipara and Podarcis muralis. Molecular Ecology, 8, 518 520.
9. Brooks R Kemp DJ ( 2001) Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 308 313.
10. Caswell H ( 2001) Matrix Population Models. Construction, Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
11. Chapman T Arnqvist G Bangham J Rowe L ( 2003) Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 41 47.
12. Clobert J Garland T Jr. Barbault R ( 1998) The evolution of demographic tactics in lizards: a test of some hypotheses concerning life history evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11, 329 364.
13. Eberhard WG Cordero C ( 2003) Sexual conflict and female choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 438 439.
14. Evans JP Magurran AE ( 2000) Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 10074 10076.
15. de Fraipont M Clobert J John-Alder H Melan S ( 2000) Pre-natal stress increases offspring philopatry. Jounal of Animal Ecology, 69, 404 413.
16. Gray DA ( 1999) Intrinsic factors affecting female choice in house crickets: time cost, female age, nutritional condition, body size, and size-relative reproductive investment. Journal of Insect Behavior, 12, 691 700.
17. Heulin B ( 1988) Observations sur l'organisation de la reproduction et sur les comportements sexuels et agonistiques chez Lacerta vivipara. Vie et Milieu, 38, 177 187.
18. Hosken DJ Blanckenhorn WU ( 1999) Female multiple mating, inbreeding avoidance and fitness: it's not only the magnitude of costs and benefice that count. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 462 464.
19. Hosken DJ Garner TWJ Tregenza T Wedel N Ward PI ( 2003) Superior sperm competitors sire higher-quality young. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 270, 1933 1938.
20. Hughes KA Alipaz JA Drnvich JM Reynolds RM ( 2002) A test of evolutionary theories of aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 14286 14291.
21. Jennions MD Petrie M ( 2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21 64.
22. Kern S Ackermann M Stearns SC Kawecki TJ ( 2001) Decline in offspring viability as a manifestation of aging in Drosophila melanogater. Evolution, 55, 1822 1831.
23. Kodric-Brown A Nicoletto PF ( 2001) Age and experience affect female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). American Naturalist, 157, 316 323.
24. Kokko H Lindström J ( 1996) Evolution of female preference for old mates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 263, 1533 1538.
25. Laloi D Richard M Lecomte J Massot M Clobert J ( 2004) Multiple paternity in clutches of common lizard Lacerta vivipara: data from microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology, 13, 719 723.
26. LeBas NR ( 2001) Microsatellite determination of male reproductive success in a natural population of the territorial ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Molecular Ecology, 10, 193 203.
27. Lecomte J Clobert J ( 1996) Dispersal and connectivity in populations of the common lizard Lacerta vivipara: an experimental approach. Acta Oecologica, 17, 585 598.
28. Lecomte J Clobert J Massot M Barbault R ( 1994) Spatial and behavioural consequences of a density manipulation in the common lizard. Ecoscience, 1, 300 310.
29. Lecomte J Boudjemadi K Sarrazin F Cally K Clobert J ( 2004) Connectivity and homogenisation of population sizes: an experimental approach in Lacerta vivipara. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 179 189.
30. Lopez P Aragon P Martin J ( 2003) Responses of female lizards, Lacerta monticola, to males' chemical cues reflect their mating preference for older males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 73 79.
31. Maklakov AA Bilde T Lubin Y ( 2005) Sexual conflict in the wild: elevated mating rate reduces female lifetime reproductive success. American Naturalist, 165, S38 S45.
32. Marshall TC Slate J Kruuk LEB Pemberton JM ( 1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639 655.
33. Massot M Clobert J Pilorge T Lecomte J Barbault R ( 1992) Density dependence in the common lizard: demographic consequences of a density manipulation. Ecology, 73, 1742 1756.
34. McCullagh P Nelder JA ( 1989) Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn, Vol. 37. Chapman & Hall, London.
35. Moore PJ Harris WE ( 2003) Is a decline in offspring quality a necessary consequence of maternal age? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 270 (suppl.), 192 194.
36. Moore PJ Moore AJ ( 2001) Reproductive aging and mating: the ticking of the biological clock in female cockroaches. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 9171 9176.
37. Morrison SF Keogh JS Scott IA ( 2002) Molecular determination of paternity in a natural population of the multiply mating polygynous lizard Eulamprus heatwolei. Molecular Ecology, 11, 535 545.
38. Oakes CC Smiraglia DJ Plass C Trasler JM Robaire B ( 2003) Aging results in hyper methylation of ribosomal DNA in sperm and liver of male rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 1775 1780.
39. Olsson M Shine R Madsen T Gullberg A Tegelstrom H ( 1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature, 383, 585 585.
40. Owens IPF Thompson DBA ( 1994) Sex-differences, sex-ratios and sex-roles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 258, 93 99.
41. Pizzari T Snook RR ( 2004) Sexual conflict and sexual selection: measuring antagonistic coevolution. Evolution, 58 ( 6 1389 1393.
42. Plas E Berger P Hermann M Pflüger H ( 2000) Effects of aging on male fertility? Experimental Gerontology, 35, 543 551.
43. Promislow DEL ( 1991) Senescence in natural populations of mammals: a comparative study. Evolution, 45, 1869 1887.
44. Promislow DE Smith EA Pearse L ( 1998) Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 10687 10692.
45. Ronce O Clobert J Massot M ( 1998) Natal dispersal and senescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 600 605.
46. Serre V Robaire B ( 1998) Paternal age affects fertility and progeny outcome in the brown Norway rat. Fertility and Sterility, 70, 625 631.
47. Sorci G Clobert J Belichon S ( 1996) Phenotypic plasticity of growth and survival in the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara). Jounal of Animal Ecology, 65, 781 790.
48. Stearns SC ( 1992) The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. Tregenza T ( 2003) The battle between sexes. Nature, 423, 928 929.
50. Trivers RL ( 1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In : Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971 (ed. Campbell B), pp. 136 179. Aldine, Chicago.
51. Yasui Y ( 1997) A 'good sperm' model can explain the evolution of polyandry. I. Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. American Naturalist, 149, 573 584.
52. Yasui Y ( 1998) The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 246 250.
53. Zamudio KR Sinervo B ( 2000) Polygyny, mate-guarding, and posthumous fertilization as alternative male mating strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 14427 14432.
54. Zeh JA Zeh DW ( 2001) Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1051 1063.