Are old males still good males and can females tell the difference?: Do hidden advantages of mating with old males off-set costs related to fertility, or are we missing something else

BioEssays

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 609-619

  Johnson, Sheri L ^a   Gemmell, Neil J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Female mate preference; Fertility; Male age; Mating history; Sperm traits

Indexed keywords

REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

AGING; ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; COLOR; CONCEPTION; COPULATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA FRAGMENTATION; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOOT; GAMETE; GENETIC RISK; HATCHING; HUMAN; INBREEDING; LIFESTYLE; LONGEVITY; MALE FERTILITY; MATE CHOICE; MATING; MEIOSIS; MORTALITY; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PATERNAL AGE; PATERNITY; POLYANDRY; PROGENY; REPRODUCTION; SEX RATIO; SOCIAL STATUS; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; BIRDS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION; GENETIC FITNESS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 84862316049     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100157     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Maheshwari A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. 2008. Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility. Hum Reprod 23: 538.
2. Belloc S, Cohen-Bacrie P, Benkhalifa M, Cohen-Bacrie M, et al. 2008. Effect of maternal and paternal age on pregnancy and miscarriage rates after intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biomed Online 17: 392- 7.
3. Kidd SA, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ. 2001. Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 75: 237- 48.
4. Kühnert B, Nieschlag E. 2004. Reproductive functions of the ageing male. Hum Reprod Update 10: 327- 39.
5. Pizzari T, Dean R, Pacey A, Moore H, et al. 2008. The evolutionary ecology of pre- and post-meiotic sperm senescence. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 131- 40.
6. Sartorius GA, Nieschlag E. 2010. Paternal age and reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 16: 65- 79.
7. Sloter E, Schmid TE, Marchetti F, Eskenazi B, et al. 2006. Quantitative effects of male age on sperm motion. Hum Reprod 21: 2868- 75.
8. Rybar R, Kopecka V, Prinosilova P, Markova P, et al. 2011. Male obesity and age in relationship to semen parameters and sperm chromatin integrity. Andrologia 43: 286- 91.
9. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN, McLachlan RI. 2009. Biological and clinical significance of DNA damage in the male germ line. Int J Androl 32: 46- 56.
10. Brooks R, Kemp DJ. 2001. Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol Evol 16: 308- 13.
11. Kokko H, Lindstrom J. 1996. Evolution of female preference for old mates. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol 263: 1533- 8.
12. Proulx SR, Day T, Rowe L. 2002. Older males signal more reliably. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol 269: 2291- 9.
13. Buss DM. 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav Brain Sci 12: 1- 49.
14. Fieder M, Huber S. 2007. Parental age difference and offspring count in humans. Biol Lett 3: 689- 91.
15. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
16. Beck CW, Promislow DEL. 2007. Evolution of female preference for younger males. PLoS One 2: e939.
17. Manning JT. 1985. Choosy females and correlates of male age. J Theor Biol 116: 349- 54.
18. Hansen TF, Price DK. 1995. Good genes and old age: do old mates provide superior genes? J Evol Biol 8: 759- 78.
19. Hansen T, Price D. 1999. Age- and sex-distribution of the mutation load. Genetica 106: 251- 62.
20. Ellegren H. 2007. Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 274: 1.
21. Beck CW, Powell LA. 2000. Evolution of female mate choice based on male age: are older males better mates? Evol Ecol Res 2: 107- 18.
22. Syntin P, Robaire B. 2001. Sperm structural and motility changes during aging in the Brown Norway rat. J Androl 22: 235- 44.
23. Thongtip N, Saikhun J, Mahasawangkul S, Kornkaewrat K, et al. 2008. Potential factors affecting semen quality in the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 6: 9.
24. Gasparini C, Marino IAM, Boschetto C, Pilastro A. 2010. Effect of male age on sperm traits and sperm competition success in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). J Evol Biol 23: 124- 35.
25. Kanuga MK, Benner MJ, Doble JA, Wilson-Leedy JG, et al. 2011. Effect of aging on male reproduction in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Exp Zool Part A 315A: 156- 61.
26. Avent TD, Price TAR, Wedell N. 2008. Age-based female preference in the fruit fly Drosophila pseudoobscura. Anim Behav 75: 1413- 21.
27. Somashekar K, Krishna MS. 2011. Evidence of female preference for older males in Drosophila bipectinata. Zool Stud 50: 1- 15.
28. De Luca P, Cocroft R. 2008. The effects of age and relatedness on mating patterns in thornbug treehoppers: inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding tolerance? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62: 1869- 75.
29. Carazo P, Molina-Vila P, Font E. 2011. Male reproductive senescence as a potential source of sexual conflict in a beetle. Behav Ecol 22: 192- 8.
30. Jones TM, Elgar MA. 2004. The role of male age, sperm age and mating history on fecundity and fertilization success in the hide beetle. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol 271: 1311- 8.
31. Radwan J, Michalczyk L, Prokop Z. 2005. Age dependence of male mating ability and sperm competition success in the bulb mite. Anim Behav 69: 1101- 5.
32. Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ, Sloter E, Kidd SA, et al. 2003. The association of age and semen quality in healthy men. Hum Reprod 18: 447- 54.
33. Wyrobek AJ, Eskenazi B, Young S, Arnheim N, et al. 2006. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 9601- 6.
34. Rijsselaere T, Maes D, Hoflack G, de Kruif A, et al. 2007. Effect of body weight, age and breeding history on canine sperm quality parameters measured by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser. Reprod Domest Anim 42: 143- 8.
35. Dean R, Cornwallis CK, Lovlie H, Worley K, et al. 2010. Male reproductive senescence causes potential for sexual conflict over mating. Curr Biol 20: 1192- 6.
36. Hale JM, Elgar MA, Jones TM. 2008. Sperm quantity explains age-related variation in fertilization success in the hide beetle. Ethology 114: 797- 807.
37. Möller AP, Mousseau TA, Rudolfsen G, Balbontin J, et al. 2009. Senescent sperm performance in old male birds. J Evol Biol 22: 334- 44.
38. Wedell N, Ritchie MG. 2004. Male age, mating status and nuptial gift quality in a bushcricket. Anim Behav 67: 1059- 65.
39. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN, Finnie JM, Hedges A, et al. 2010. Analysis of the relationships between oxidative stress, DNA damage and sperm vitality in a patient population: development of diagnostic criteria. Hum Reprod 25: 2415- 26.
40. Agarwal A, Makker K, Sharma R. 2008. Clinical relevance of oxidative stress in male factor infertility: an update. Am J Reprod Immunol 59: 2- 11.
41. Koppers AJ, De Iuliis GN, Finnie JM, McLaughlin EA, et al. 2008. Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93: 3199- 207.
42. Cocuzza M, Athayde KS, Agarwal A, Sharma R, et al. 2008. Age-related increase of reactive oxygen species in neat semen in healthy fertile men. Urology 71: 490- 4.
43. Siva-Jothy MT. 2000. The young sperm gambit. Ecol Lett 3: 172- 4.
44. Spiropoulos J, Turnbull DM, Chinnery PF. 2002. Can mitochondrial DNA mutations cause sperm dysfunction? Mol Human Reprod 8: 719- 21.
45. Moreno-Loshuertos R, Acin-Perez R, Fernandez-Silva P, Movilla N, et al. 2006. Differences in reactive oxygen species production explain the phenotypes associated with common mouse mitochondrial DNA variants. Nat Genet 38: 1261- 8.
46. Song GJ, Lewis V. 2008. Mitochondrial DNA integrity and copy number in sperm from infertile men. Fertil Steril 90: 2238- 44.
47. May-Panloup P, Chretien MF, Savagner F, Vasseur C, et al. 2003. Increased sperm mitochondrial DNA content in male infertility. Hum Reprod 18: 550- 6.
48. Ruiz-Lopez MJ, Espeso G, Evenson DP, Roldan ERS, et al. 2010. Paternal levels of DNA damage in spermatozoa and maternal parity influence offspring mortality in an endangered ungulate. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 277: 2541- 6.
49. Ruiz-Pesini E, Lapeña A-C, Díez-Sánchez C, Pérez-Martos A, et al. 2000. Human mtDNA haplogroups associated with high or reduced spermatozoa motility. Am J Hum Genet 67: 682- 96.
50. Bonde JP. 2010. Male reproductive organs are at risk from environmental hazards. Asian J Androl 12: 152- 6.
51. Aitken RJ, Koopman P, Lewis SEM. 2004. Seeds of concern. Nature 432: 48- 52.
52. Kosova G, Abney M, Ober C. 2010. Heritability of reproductive fitness traits in a human population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 1772- 8.
53. Curley JP, Mashoodh R, Champagne FA. 2011. Epigenetics and the origins of paternal effects. Horm Behav 59: 306- 14.
54. Oakes CC, Smiraglia DJ, Plass C, Trasler JM, et al. 2003. Aging results in hypermethylation of ribosomal DNA in sperm and liver of male rats. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100: 1775- 80.
55. García-Palomares S, Pertusa JF, Miñarro J, García-Pérez MA, et al. 2009. Long-term effects of delayed fatherhood in mice on postnatal development and behavioral traits of offspring. Biol Reprod 80: 337- 42.
56. García-Palomares S, Navarro S, Pertusa JF, Hermenegildo C, et al. 2009. Delayed fatherhood in mice decreases reproductive fitness and longevity of offspring. Biol Reprod 80: 343- 9.
57. Simon L, Lewis SEM. 2011. Sperm DNA damage or progressive motility: which one is the better predictor of fertilization in vitro? Syst Biol Reprod Med 57: 133- 8.
58. Gasparini C, Pilastro A. 2011. Cryptic female preference for genetically unrelated males is mediated by ovarian fluid in the guppy. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 278: 2495- 501.
59. Liu XP, Xu J, He HM, Kuang XJ, et al. 2011. Male age affects female mate preference and reproductive performance in the cabbage beetle, Colaphellus bowringi. J Insect Behav 24: 83- 93.
60. Prokop ZM, Stuglik M, Zabinska I, Radwan J. 2007. Male age, mating probability, and progeny fitness in the bulb mite. Behav Ecol 18: 597- 601.
61. Pervez A. 2004. The influence of age on reproductive performance of the predatory ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta. J Insect Sci 4: 22.
62. Radwan J. 2003. Male age, germline mutations and the benefits of polyandry. Ecol Lett 6: 581- 6.
63. Crow JF. 2000. The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nat Rev Genet 1: 40- 7.
64. Torres R, Drummond H, Velando A. 2011. Parentalage and lifespan influence offspring recruitment: a long-term study in a seabird. PLoS One 6: e27245.
65. Velando A, Noguera JC, Drummond H, Torres R. 2011. Senescent males carry premutagenic lesions in sperm. J Evol Biol 24: 693- 7.
66. Olsson M, Schwartz T, Uller T, Healey M. 2007. Sons are made from old stores: sperm storage effects on sex ratio in a lizard. Biol Lett 3: 491- 3.
67. White J, Wagner RH, Helfenstein F, Hatch SA, et al. 2008. Multiple deleterious effects of experimentally aged sperm in a monogamous bird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 13947- 52.
68. Velando A, Torres R, Alonso Alvarez C. 2008. Avoiding bad genes: oxidatively damaged DNA in germ line and mate choice. BioEssays 30: 1212- 9.
69. Torres R, Velando A. 2003. A dynamic trait affects continuous pair assessment in the blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55: 65- 72.
70. Velando A, Drummond H, Torres R. 2006. Senescent birds redouble reproductive effort when ill: confirmation of the terminal investment hypothesis. Proc Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 273: 1443- 8.
71. Torres R, Velando A. 2007. Male reproductive senescence: the price of immune-induced oxidative damage on sexual attractiveness in the blue-footed booby. J Anim Ecol 76: 1161- 8.
72. Velando A, Drummond H, Torres R. 2010. Senescing sexual ornaments recover after a sabbatical. Biol Lett 6: 194- 6.
73. Kokko H. 1998. Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs. Evol Ecol 12: 739- 50.
74. Milonas PG, Andow DA. 2010. Virgin male age and mating success in Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Anim Behav 79: 509- 14.
75. Verburgt L, Ferreira M, Ferguson JWH. 2011. Male field cricket song reflects age, allowing females to prefer young males. Anim Behav 81: 19- 29.
76. Hunter FM, Birkhead TR. 2002. Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Curr Biol 12: 121- 3.
77. Moore PJ, Moore AJ. 2001. Reproductive aging and mating: the ticking of the biological clock in female cockroaches. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98: 9171.
78. Gonzalez-Solis J, Becker PH. 2002. Mounting frequency and number of cloacal contacts increase with age in common terns Sterna hirundo. J Avian Biol 33: 306- 10.
79. Jones TM, Featherston R, Paris D, Elgar MA. 2007. Age-related sperm transfer and sperm competitive ability in the male hide beetle. Behav Ecol 18: 251- 8.
80. Richard M, Lecomte J, De Fraipont M, Clobert J. 2005. Age-specific mating strategies and reproductive senescence. Mol Ecol 14: 3147- 55.
81. Harris WE, Uller T. 2009. Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation. Philos Trans Roy Soc B 364: 1039- 48.
82. Johnson SL, Brockmann HJ. 2012. Alternative reproductive tactics in female horseshoe crabs. Behav Ecol, in press, DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars063.
83. Härdling R, Kokko H. 2005. The evolution of prudent choice. Evol Ecol Res 7: 697- 715.
84. Holveck M-J, Riebel K. 2010. Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proc Roy Doc Lond B Biol 277: 153- 60.
85. Farrell ME, Briefer E, McElligott AG. 2011. Assortative mating in fallow deer reduces the strength of sexual selection. PLoS One 6: e18533.
86. Rosengrave P, Montgomerie R, Metcalf VJ, McBride K, et al. 2009. Sperm traits in chinook salmon depend upon activation medium: implications for studies of sperm competition in fishes. Can J Zoo 87: 920- 7.
87. Rosengrave P, Gemmell NJ, Metcalf V, McBride K, et al. 2008. A mechanism for cryptic female choice in chinook salmon. Behav Ecol 19: 1179- 85.
88. Gowaty PA, Anderson WW, Bluhm CK, Drickamer LC, et al. 2007. The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104: 15023- 7.
89. Alonso JC, Magana M, Palacin C, Martin CA. 2010. Correlates of male mating success in great bustard leks: the effects of age, weight, and display effort. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64: 1589- 600.
90. Hoikkala A, Saarikettu M, Kotiaho JS, Liimatainen JO. 2008. Age-related decrease in male reproductive success and song quality in Drosophila montana. Behav Ecol 19: 94- 9.
91. Birkhead T, Martinez J, Burke T, Froman D. 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol 266: 1759- 64.
92. Denk AG, Holzmann A, Peters A, Vermeirssen ELM, et al. 2005. Paternity in mallards: effects of sperm quality and female sperm selection for inbreeding avoidance. Behav Ecol 16: 825.
93. Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG, et al. 2004. Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr Biol 14: 44- 7.
94. Gasparini C, Simmons LW, Beveridge M, Evans JP. 2010. Sperm swimming velocity predicts competitive fertilization success in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri. PLoS One 5: e12146.
95. Schäfer MA, Uhl G. 2002. Determinants of paternity success in the spider Pholcus phalangioides (Pholcidae: Araneae): the role of male and female mating behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51: 368- 77.
96. Hoysak J, Liley NR, Eric BT. 2004. Raffles, roles, and the outcome of sperm competition in sockeye salmon. Can J Zoo 82: 1017- 26.
97. Dean R, Bonsall MB, Pizzari T. 2007. Aging and sexual conflict. Science 316: 383- 4.
98. Bonduriansky R, Maklakov A, Zajitschek F, Brooks R. 2008. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Funct Ecol 22: 443- 53.
99. Dean R, Nakagawa S, Pizzari T. 2011. The risk and intensity of sperm ejection in female birds. Am Nat 178: 343- 54.
100. Kleven O, Fossoy F, Robertson RJ, Rudolfsen G. 2010. Sperm quantity and quality effects on fertilization success in a highly promiscuous passerine, the tree swallow Tachycineta bicolor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64: 1473- 83.
101. Garcia-Gonzalez F, Simmons LW. 2005. Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition. Curr Biol 15: 271- 5.
102. Casselman S, Montgomerie R. 2004. Sperm traits in relation to male quality in colonial spawning bluegill. J Fish Biol 64: 1700- 11.
103. Gañán N, Sestelo A, Garde JJ, Martínez F, et al. 2010. Reproductive traits in captive and free-ranging males of the critically endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Reproduction 139: 275- 85.
104. Pukazhenthi BS, Togna GD, Padilla L, Smith D, et al. 2011. Ejaculate traits and sperm cryopreservation in the endangered Baird's tapir (Tapirus bairdii). J Androl 32: 260.
105. Fricke C, Maklakov AA. 2007. Male age does not affect female fitness in a polyandrous beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Anim Behav 74: 541- 8.
106. Krishna MS, Santhosh HT, Hegde SN. 2012. Offspring of older males are superior in Drosophila bipectinata. Zool Stud 51: 72- 84.
107. Burns JG, Mery F. 2010. Transgenerational memory effect of ageing in Drosophila. J Evol Biol 23: 678- 86.
108. Linder J, Rice W. 2005. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males. J Evol Biol 18: 568- 75.