Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish

Animal Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 559-575

  Nakayasu, Tomohiro ^a   Watanabe, Eiji ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BASIC BIOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biological motion; Fish; Medaka (Oryzias latipes); Motion information; Shoaling behaviour

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORYZIAS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORYZIAS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84905401483     PISSN: 14359448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0687-y     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abaid N, Spinello C, Laut J, Porfiri M (2012) Zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to images animated by mathematical models of animal grouping. Behav Brain Res 232: 406-410. doi: 10. 1016/j. bbr. 2012. 03. 028.
2. Agrillo C, Dadda M, Serena G (2008) Choice of female groups by male mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). Ethology 114: 479-488. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1439-0310. 2008. 01493. x.
3. Baldauf SA, Kullmann H, Thünken T, Winter S, Bakker TCM (2009) Computer animation as a tool to study preferences in the cichlid Pelvicachromis taeniatus. J Fish Biol 75: 738-746. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1095-8649. 2009. 02347. x.
4. Barclay CD, Cutting JE, Kozlowski LT (1978) Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Percept Psychophys 23: 145-152. doi: 10. 3758/BF03208295.
5. Beck JC, Gilland E, Tank DW, Baker R (2004) Quantifying the ontogeny of optokinetic and vestibuloocular behaviors in zebrafish, medaka, and goldfish. J Neurophysiol 92: 3546-3561. doi: 10. 1152/jn. 0 0311. 2004.
6. Blake R (1993) Cats perceive biological motion. Psychol Sci 4: 54-57. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 1993. tb00557. x.
7. Brown J, Kaplan G, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2010) Perception of biological motion in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): by females only. Anim Cogn 13: 555-564. doi: 10. 1007/s10071-009-0306-0.
8. Butkowski T, Yan W, Gray AM, Cui R, Verzijden MN, Rosenthal GG (2011) Automated interactive video playback for studies of animal communication. J Vis Exp 48: e2374. doi: 10. 3791/2374.
9. Cai P, Yang XY, Chen L, Jiang Y (2011) Motion speed modulates walking direction discrimination: the role of the feet in biological motion perception. Chin Sci Bull 56: 2025-2030. doi: 10. 1007/s11434-011-4528-6.
10. Carvalho PSM, Noltie DB, Tillitt DE (2002) Ontogenetic improvement of visual function in the medaka Oryzias latipes based on an optomotor testing system for larval and adult fish. Anim Behav 64: 1-10. doi: 10. 1006/anbe2002. 3028.
11. Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smith RJF (1995) Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas): implications for antipredator behaviour. Can J Zool 73: 955-960. doi: 10. 1139/z95-111.
12. Cutting JE (1978) A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays. Behav Res Meth Instrum 10: 91-94. doi: 10. 3758/BF03205105.
13. Cutting JE, Kozlowski LT (1977) Recognizing friends by their walk: gait perception without familiarity cues. Bull Psychonomic Soc 9: 353-356.
14. Dittrich WH (1993) Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception 22: 15-22. doi: 10. 1068/p220015.
15. Dittrich WH, Troscianko T, Lea SEG, Morgan D (1996) Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 25: 727-738. doi: 10. 1068/p250727.
16. Dittrich WH, Lea SEG, Barrett J, Gurr PR (1998) Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: visual concept discrimination and biological motion. J Exp Anal Behav 70: 281-299. doi: 10. 1901/jeab. 1998. 70-281.
17. Edenbrow M, Croft DP (2012) Kin and familiarity influence association preferences and aggression in the mangrove killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. J Fish Biol 80: 503-518. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1095-8649. 2011. 03181. x.
18. Engeszer RE, Ryan MJ, Parichy DM (2004) Learned social preference in zebrafish. Curr Biol 14: 881-884. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2004. 04. 042.
19. Foley AG, Gannon S, Rombach-Mullan N, Prendergast A, Barry C, Cassidy AW, Regan CM (2012) Class I histone deacetylase inhibition ameliorates social cognition and cell adhesion molecule plasticity deficits in a rodent model of autism spectrum disorder. Neuropharmacology 63: 750-760. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropharm. 2012. 05. 042.
20. Fox R, McDaniel C (1982) The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218: 486-487. doi: 10. 1126/science. 7123249.
21. Gerlai R, Fernandes Y, Pereira T (2009) Zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to the animated image of a predator: towards the development of an automated aversive task. Behav Brain Res 201: 318-324. doi: 10. 1016/j. bbr. 2009. 03. 003.
22. Giese MA, Poggio T (2003) Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 179-192. doi: 10. 1038/nrn1057.
23. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1997) Familiarity in schooling fish: how long does it take to acquire? Anim Behav 53: 945-949. doi: 10. 1006/anbe1996. 0315.
24. Herman LM, Morrel-Samuels P, Pack AA (1990) Bottlenosed dolphin and human recognition of veridical and degraded video displays of an artificial gestural language. J Exp Psychol Gen 119: 215-230. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 119. 2. 215.
25. Imada H, Hoki M, Suehiro Y, Okuyama T, Kurabayashi D, Shimada A, Naruse K, Takeda H, Kubo T, Takeuchi H (2010) Coordinated and cohesive movement of two small conspecific fish induced by eliciting a simultaneous optomotor response. PLoS ONE 5: e11248. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0011248.
26. Jastorff J, Popivanov ID, Vogels R, Vanduffel W, Orban GA (2012) Integration of shape and motion cues in biological motion processing in the monkey STS. NeuroImage 60: 911-921. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuroimage. 2011. 12. 087.
27. Johansson G (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 14: 201-211. doi: 10. 3758/BF03212378.
28. Kozlowski LT, Cutting JE (1977) Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Percept Psychophys 21: 575-580. doi: 10. 3758/BF03198740.
29. Krause J, Godin J-GJ (1994) Shoal choice in the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus, Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae): effects of predation risk, fish size, species composition and size of shoals. Ethology 98: 128-136. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1439-0310. 1994. tb01063. x.
30. Lachlan RF, Crooks L, Laland KN (1998) Who follows whom? Shoaling preferences and social learning of foraging information in guppies. Anim Behav 56: 181-190. doi: 10. 1006/anbe 1998. 0760.
31. Landeau L, Terborgh J (1986) Oddity and the 'confusion effect' in predation. Anim Behav 34: 1372-1380. doi: 10. 1016/S0003-3472(86)80208-1.
32. Lange J, Lappe M (2006) A model of biological motion perception from configural form cues. J Neurosci 26: 2894-2906. doi: 10. 1523/JNEUROSCI. 4915-05. 2006.
33. Luca RM, Gerlai R (2012) In search of optimal fear inducing stimuli: differential behavioral responses to computer animated images in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res 226: 66-76. doi: 10. 1016/j. bbr. 2011. 09. 001.
34. MacKinnon LM, Troje NF, Dringenberg HC (2010) Do rats (Rattus norvegicus) perceive biological motion? Exp Brain Res 205: 571-576. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-010-2378-0.
35. Mather G, West S (1993) Recognition of animal locomotion from dynamic point-light displays. Perception 22: 759-766. doi: 10. 1068/p220759.
36. Matsunaga W, Watanabe E (2010) Habituation of medaka (Oryzias latipes) demonstrated by open-field testing. Behav Process 85: 142-150. doi: 10. 1016/j. beproc. 2010. 06. 019.
37. Matsunaga W, Watanabe E (2012) Visual motion with pink noise induces predation behaviour. Sci Rep 2: 219. doi: 10. 1038/srep00219.
38. McRobert SP, Bradner J (1998) The influence of body coloration on shoaling preferences in fish. Anim Behav 56: 611-615. doi: 10. 1006/anbe 1998. 0846.
39. Miura M, Matsushima T (2012) Preference for biological motion in domestic chicks: sex-dependent effect of early visual experience. Anim Cogn 15: 871-879. doi: 10. 1007/s10071-012-0514-x.
40. Morgan MJ, Colgan PW (1987) The effects of predator presence and shoal size on foraging in bluntnose minnows, Pimephales notatus. Environ Biol Fish 20: 105-111. doi: 10. 1007/BF00005290.
41. Morgan MJ, Godin J-GJ (1985) Antipredator benefits of schooling behaviour in a Cyprinodontid fish, the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus). Z Tierpsychol 70: 236-246. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1439-0310. 1985. tb00515. x.
42. Nakamura Y (1952) Some experiments on the shoaling reaction in Oryzias latipes (Temminck et Schlegel). Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish 18: 93-101.
43. Neri P (2012) Feature binding in zebrafish. Anim Behav 84: 485-493. doi: 10. 1016/j. anbehav. 2012. 06. 005.
44. Neri P, Morrone MC, Burr DC (1998) Seeing biological motion. Nature 395: 894-896. doi: 10. 1038/27661.
45. Omori E (1997) Comparative study of visual perception using Johansson's stimuli. Bull Div Hum Relat Grad Sch Keio Univ Stud Sociol Psychol Educ 45: 27-30.
46. Oram MW, Perrett DI (1994) Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to "biological motion" stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 6: 99-116. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 1994. 6. 2. 99.
47. Parron C, Deruelle C, Fagot J (2007) Processing of biological motion point-light displays by baboons (Papio papio). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 33: 381-391. doi: 10. 1037/0097-7403. 33. 4. 381.
48. Pavlova M, Krägeloh-Mann I, Sokolov A, Birbaumer N (2001) Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception 30: 925-933. doi: 10. 1068/p3157.
49. Pavlova M, Krägeloh-Mann I, Birbaumer N, Sokolov A (2002) Biological motion shown backwards: the apparent-facing effect. Perception 31: 435-443. doi: 10. 1068/p3262.
50. Pitcher TJ, Magurran AE, Winfield IJ (1982) Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10: 149-151. doi: 10. 1007/BF00300175.
51. Pritchard VL, Lawrence J, Butlin RK, Krause J (2001) Shoal choice in zebrafish, Danio rerio: the influence of shoal size and activity. Anim Behav 62: 1085-1088. doi: 10. 1006/anbe 2001. 1858.
52. Ranta E, Lindström K (1990) Assortative schooling in three-spined sticklebacks? Ann Zool Fenn 27: 67-75.
53. Reebs SG, Saulnier N (1997) The effect of hunger on shoal choice in golden shiners (Pisces: Cyprinidae, Notemigonus crysoleucas). Ethology 103: 642-652. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1439-0310. 1997. tb00175. x.
54. Regolin L, Tommasi L, Vallortigara G (2000) Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Anim Cogn 3: 53-60. doi: 10. 1007/s100710050050.
55. Robinson-Wolrath SI (2006) Video playback versus live stimuli for assessing mate choice in a pipefish. Environ Biol Fish 75: 409-414. doi: 10. 1007/s10641-006-0024-2.
56. Rosenthal GG, Ryan MJ (2005) Assortative preferences for stripes in danios. Anim Behav 70: 1063-1066. doi: 10. 1016/j. anbehav. 2005. 02. 005.
57. Ruhl N, McRobert SP (2005) The effect of sex and shoal size on shoaling behaviour in Danio rerio. J Fish Biol 67: 1318-1326. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0022-1112. 2005. 00826. x.
58. Runeson S, Frykholm G (1981) Visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7: 733-740. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 7. 4. 733.
59. Saverino C, Gerlai R (2008) The social zebrafish: behavioral responses to conspecific, heterospecific, and computer animated fish. Behav Brain Res 191: 77-87. doi: 10. 1016/j. bbr. 2008. 03. 013.
60. Simion F, Regolin L, Bulf H (2008) A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 809-813. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0707021105.
61. Svendsen JC, Skov J, Bildsoe M, Steffensen JF (2003) Intra-school positional preference and reduced tail beat frequency in trailing positions in schooling roach under experimental conditions. J Fish Biol 62: 834-846. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1095-8649. 2003. 00068. x.
62. Swaney W, Kendal J, Capon H, Brown C, Laland KN (2001) Familiarity facilitates social learning of foraging behaviour in the guppy. Anim Behav 62: 591-598. doi: 10. 1006/anbe 2001. 1788.
63. Tobler M, Schlupp I (2008) Influence of black spot disease on shoaling behaviour in female western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis (Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Environ Biol Fish 81: 29-34. doi: 10. 1007/s10641-006-9153-x.
64. Tomonaga M (2001) Visual search for biological motion patterns in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychologia 44: 46-59.
65. Troje NF (2008) Biological motion perception. In: Albright TD, Masland R (eds) The senses: a comprehensive references, vol 2. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 231-238.
66. Troje NF, Aust U (2013) What do you mean with "direction"? Local and global cues to biological motion perception in pigeons. Vis Res 79: 47-55. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2013. 01. 002.
67. Tsubokawa T, Saito K, Kawano H, Kawamura K, Shinozuka K, Watanabe S (2009) Pharmacological effects on mirror approaching behavior and neurochemical aspects of the telencephalon in the fish, medaka (Oryzias latipes). Social Neurosci 4: 276-286. doi: 10. 1080/17470910802625215.
68. Turnell ER, Mann KD, Rosenthal GG, Gerlach G (2003) Mate choice in zebrafish (Danio rerio) analyzed with video-stimulus techniques. Biol Bull 205: 225-226.
69. Utne-Palm A, Hart PJB (2000) The effects of familiarity on competitive interactions between threespined sticklebacks. Oikos 91: 225-232. doi: 10. 1034/j. 1600-0706. 2000. 910203. x.
70. Vallortigara G, Regolin L (2006) Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Curr Biol 16: R279-R280. doi: 10. 1016/j. cub. 2006. 03. 052.
71. Vallortigara G, Regolin L, Marconato F (2005) Visually inexperienced chicks exhibit spontaneous preference for biological motion patterns. PLoS Biol 3: e208. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pbio. 0030208.
72. Vangeneugden J, Vancleef K, Jaeggli T, VanGool L, Vogels R (2010) Discrimination of locomotion direction in impoverished displays of walkers by macaque monkeys. J Vis 10: 1-19. doi: 10. 1167/10. 4. 22.
73. Watanabe K (2008) Behavioral speed contagion: automatic modulation of movement timing by observation of body movements. Cognition 106: 1514-1524. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2007. 06. 001.
74. Watanabe E, Matsunaga W, Kitaoka A (2010) Motion signals deflect relative positions of moving objects. Vis Res 50: 2381-2390. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2010. 09. 021.