Feature binding in zebrafish

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 485-493

  Neri, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Danio rerio; Feature conjunction; Shoaling; Vision; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

CYPRINID; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; NERVOUS SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; VISION; VISUAL CUE;

AVES; DANIO RERIO; HEXAPODA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84864132093     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1985, 2:284-299.
2. Alsop B., Rowley R., Fon C. Human symbolic matching-to-sample performance: effects of reinforcer and sample-stimulus probabilities. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1995, 63:53-70.
3. Baker C.L. Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1999, 9:461-466.
4. Bernstein L.J., Cooper L.A. Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1997, 23:721-737.
5. Bernstein L.J., Robertson L.C. Illusory conjunctions of color and motion with shape following bilateral parietal lesions. Psychological Science 1998, 9:167-175.
6. Blough D.S., Blough P.M. Form perception and attention in pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior 1997, 25:1-20.
7. Botly L.C., De Rosa E. Cholinergic deafferentation of the neocortex using IgG-saporin impairs feature binding in rats. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:4120-4130.
8. Cachat J., Stewart A., Grossman L., Gaikwad S., Kadri F., Chung K.M., Wu N., Wong K., Roy S., Suciu C., et al. Measuring behavioral and endocrine responses to novelty stress in adult zebrafish. Nature Protocols 2010, 5:1786-1799.
9. Collett T.S., Collett M. Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:542-552.
10. Cook R.G. Dimensional organization and texture discrimination in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1992, 18:354-363.
11. D'Amato M.R., Salmon D.P., Colombo M. Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1985, 11:35-51.
12. Del Bene F., Wyart C., Robles E., Tran A., Looger L., Scott E.K., Isacoff E.Y., Baier H. Filtering of visual information in the tectum by an identified neural circuit. Science 2010, 330:669-673.
13. Engeszer R.E., Patterson L.B., Rao A.A., Parichy D.M. Zebrafish in the wild: a review of natural history and new notes from the field. Zebrafish 2007, 4:21-40.
14. Engeszer R.E., Wang G., Ryan M.J., Parichy D.M. Sex-specific perceptual spaces for a vertebrate basal social aggregative behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2008, 105:929-933.
15. Ewert J.P., Arend B., Becker V., Borchers H.W. Invariants in configurational prey selection by Bufo bufo (L.). Brain Behavior and Evolution 1979, 16:38-51.
16. Fauria K., Colborn M., Collett T.S. The binding of visual patterns in bumblebees. Current Biology 2000, 10:935-938.
17. Feldman J., Tremoulet P.D. Individuation of visual objects over time. Cognition 2006, 99:131-165.
18. Friedrich R.W., Jacobson G.A., Zhu P. Circuit neuroscience in zebrafish. Current Biology 2010, 20:R371-381.
19. Giese M.A., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003, 4:179-192.
20. Hansel D., Sompolinsky H. Chaos and synchrony in a model of a hypercolumn in visual cortex. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 1996, 3:7-34.
21. Hill A., Howard C.V., Strahle U., Cossins A. Neurodevelopmental defects in zebrafish (Danio rerio) at environmentally relevant dioxin (TCDD) concentrations. Toxicological Sciences 2003, 76:392-399.
22. Horton J.C., Adams D.L. The cortical column: a structure without a function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2005, 360:837-862.
23. Ibbotson M.R. Reshaping the binding problem of form and motion vision. Journal of Physiology 2007, 585:319.
24. Jarvis E.D., Gunturkun O., Bruce L., Csillag A., Karten H., Kuenzel W., Medina L., Paxinos G., Perkel D.J., Shimizu T., et al. Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:151-159.
25. Katz J.S., Cook R.G., Magnotti J.F. Toward a framework for the evaluation of feature binding in pigeons. Behavioural Processes 2010, 85:215-225.
26. Kawai H., Arata N., Nakayasu H. Three-dimensional distribution of astrocytes in zebrafish spinal cord. Glia 2001, 36:406-413.
27. Klar M., Hoffmann K.P. Visual direction-selective neurons in the pretectum of the rainbow trout. Brain Research Bulletin 2002, 57:431-433.
28. McDowell A.L., Dixon L.J., Houchins J.D., Bilotta J. Visual processing of the zebrafish optic tectum before and after optic nerve damage. Visual Neuroscience 2004, 21:97-106.
29. McIvor A. Background subtraction techniques. Proceedings of Image and Movie Computing 2000, 6:147-153.
30. Masseck O.A., Hoffmann K.P. Responses to moving visual stimuli in pretectal neurons of the small-spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula). Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 99:200-207.
31. Masseck O.A., Hoffmann K.P. Question of reference frames: visual direction-selective neurons in the accessory optic system of goldfish. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102:2781-2789.
32. Miller N.Y., Gerlai R. Shoaling in zebrafish: what we don't know. Reviews in the Neurosciences 2011, 22:17-25.
33. Mueller T., Wullimann M.F. An evolutionary interpretation of teleostean forebrain anatomy. Brain Behavior and Evolution 2009, 74:30-42.
34. Muto A., Orger M.B., Wehman A.M., Smear M.C., Kay J.N., Page-McCaw P.S., Gahtan E., Xiao T., Nevin L.M., Gosse N.J., et al. Forward genetic analysis of visual behavior in zebrafish. PLoS Genetics 2005, 1:e66.
35. Neri P., Levi D.M. Spatial resolution for feature binding is impaired in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006, 96:142-153.
36. Neri P., Luu J.Y., Levi D.M. Sensitivity to biological motion drops by approximately 1/2 log-unit with inversion, and is unaffected by amblyopia. Vision Research 2007, 47:1209-1214.
37. Nishida S. Advancement of motion psychophysics: review 2001-2010. Journal of Vision 2011, 11:11.
38. Norton W., Bally-Cuif L. Adult zebrafish as a model organism for behavioural genetics. BMC Neuroscience 2010, 11:90.
39. Oram M.W., Perrett D.I. Integration of form and motion in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76:109-129.
40. Orger M.B., Smear M.C., Anstis S.M., Baier H. Perception of Fourier and non-Fourier motion by larval zebrafish. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:1128-1133.
41. Pritchard V.L., Lawrence J., Butlin R.K., Krause J. Shoal choice in zebrafish, Danio rerio: the influence of shoal size and activity. Animal Behaviour 2001, 62:1085-1088.
42. Robertson L.C. Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness. Reviews Neuroscience 2003, 4:93-102.
43. Rosenthal G.G., Ryan M.J. Assortative preferences for stripes in danios. Animal Behaviour 2005, 70:1063-1066.
44. Roskies A.L. The binding problem. Neuron 1999, 24:7-9.
45. Sajovic P., Levinthal C. Visual response properties of zebrafish tectal cells. Neuroscience 1982, 7:2427-2440.
46. Saverino C., Gerlai R. The social zebrafish: behavioral responses to conspecific, heterospecific, and computer animated fish. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191:77-87.
47. Schubert M., Lachnit H., Francucci S., Giurfa M. Nonelemental visual learning in honeybees. Animal Behaviour 2002, 64:175-184.
48. Shafritz K.M., Gore J.C., Marois R. The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2002, 99:10917-10922.
49. Shepard R.N., Hovland C.I., Jenkins H.M. Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs 1961, 75:1-42.
50. Shettleworth S.J. Cognition, Evolution and Behavior 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
51. Smith J.D., Minda J.P., Washburn D.A. Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:398-414.
52. Sovrano V.A., Bisazza A. Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish. Animal Cognition 2008, 11:161-166.
53. Sovrano V.A., Bisazza A. Perception of subjective contours in fish. Perception 2009, 38:579-590.
54. Sovrano V.A., Bisazza A., Vallortigara G. Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition 2002, 85:B51-59.
55. Srinivasan M.V. Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition. Annual Review of Entomology 2010, 55:267-284.
56. Treisman A. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1996, 6:171-178.
57. Vallortigara G., Regolin L. Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Current Biology 2006, 16:R279-280.
58. Van Essen D.C., Anderson C.H., Felleman D.J. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science 1992, 255:419-423.
59. Vargas J.P., Lopez J.C., Salas C., Thinus-Blanc C. Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 2004, 118:206-216.
60. Ward A.J., Axford S., Krause J. Cross-species familiarity in shoaling fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2003, 270:1157-1161.
61. Wolfe J.M., Cave K.R. The psychophysical evidence for a binding problem in human vision. Neuron 1999, 24:11-17.
62. Zeki S., Shipp S. The functional logic of cortical connections. Nature 1988, 335:311-317.
63. Zhang S.W., Lehrer M., Srinivasan M.V. Honeybee memory: navigation by associative grouping and recall of visual stimuli. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 1999, 72:180-201.