Zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to images animated by mathematical models of animal grouping

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 232, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 406-410

  Abaid, Nicole ^a   Spinello, Chiara ^a,b   Laut, Jeffrey ^a   Porfiri, Maurizio ^a  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computer animated stimuli; Fish schooling; Mathematical modeling; Social behavior; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ANIMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FISH BEHAVIOR; FISH SCHOOL; FORAGING; FREEZING BEHAVIOR; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MIGRATION; NONHUMAN; PREDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL LIFE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SWIMMING; TRASHING BEHAVIOR; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MASS BEHAVIOR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84861695761     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Pitcher T.J., Parrish J.K. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. Behaviour of teleost fishes 1993, Chapman and Hall, London. T.J. Pitcher (Ed.).
2. Krause J., Ruxton G.D. Living in groups 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
3. Partridge B.L. Structure and function of fish schools. Scientific American 1982, 246:114-123.
4. Reebs S.G. Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal?. Animal Behaviour 2000, 59:403-409.
5. Couzin I.D., Krause J., Franks N.R., Levin S.A. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 2005, 433:513-516.
6. Paragamian V.L., Kruse G. Kootenai river white sturgeon spawning migration behavior and a predictive model. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2001, 21:10-21.
7. Aoki I. A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 1982, 48:1081-1088.
8. Niwa H-S. Newtonian dynamical approach to fish schooling. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1996, 181:47-63.
9. Abaid N., Porfiri M. Fish in a ring: spatiotemporal pattern formation in one-dimensional animal groups. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2010, 7:1441-1453.
10. Woo K.L., Rieucau G. From dummies to animations: a review of computer-animated stimuli used in animal behavior studies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2011, 65:1671-1685.
11. D'Eath R.B. Can video images imitate real stimuli in animal behaviour experiments?. Biological Reviews 1998, 73:267-292.
12. Rosenthal G.G. Design considerations and techniques for constructing video stimuli. Acta Ethologica 2000, 3:49-54.
13. Rosenthal G.G. Using video playback to study sexual communication. Environmental Biology of Fishes 1999, 56:307-316.
14. Baldauf S.A., Kullmann H., Bakker T.C.M. Technical restrictions of computer-manipulated visual stimuli and display units for studying animal behaviour. Ethology 2008, 114:737-751.
15. Gerlai R. High-throughput behavioral screens: the first step towards finding genes involved in vertebrate brain function using zebrafish. Molecules 2010, 15:2609-2622.
16. Wright D., Krause J. Repeated measures of shoaling tendency in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and other small teleost fishes. Nature Protocols 2006, 1:1828-1831.
17. Mazzi D., Künzler R., Bakker T.C.M. Female preference for symmetry in computer-animated three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2003, 54:156-161.
18. Rosenthal G.G., Wagner W.E., Ryan M.J. Secondary reduction of preference for the sword ornament in the pygmy swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Animal Behaviour 2002, 63:37-45.
19. Butkowski T., Yan W., Gray A.M., Cui R., Verzijden M.N., Rosenthal G.G. Automated interactive video playback for studies of animal communication. Journal of Visualized Experiments 2011, 48:3-7.
20. Robinson-Wolrath S.I. Video playback versus live stimuli for assessing mate choice in a pipefish. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2006, 75:409-414.
21. Baldauf S.A., Kullmann H., Thunken T., Winter S., Bakker T.C.M. Computer animation as a tool to study preferences in the cichlid Pelvicachromis taeniatus. Journal of Fish Biology 2009, 75:738-746.
22. Saverino C., Gerlai R. The social zebrafish: behavioral responses to conspecific, heterospecific, and computer animated fish. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 191:77-87.
23. Pather S., Gerlai R. Shuttle box learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behavioural Brain Research 2009, 196:323-327.
24. Gerlai R., Fernandes Y., Pereira T. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to the animated image of a predator: towards the development of an automated aversive task. Behavioural Brain Research 2009, 201:318-324.
25. Luca R.M., Gerlai R. In search of optimal fear inducing stimuli: differential behavioral responses to computer animated images in zebrafish. Behavioural Brain Research 2012, 226:66-76.
26. Rosenthal G.G., Ryan M.J. Assortative preferences for stripes in danios. Animal Behaviour 2005, 70:1063-1066.
27. Turnell E.R., Mann K.D., Rosenthal G.G., Gerlach G. Mate choice in zebrafish (Danio rerio) analyzed with video-stimulus techniques. Biology Bulletin 2003, 205:225-226.
28. Miklosi A., Andrew R. The zebrafish as a model for behavioral studies. Zebrafish 2006, 3:227-234.
29. Macri S., Wurbel H. Developmental plasticity of HPA and fear responses in rats: a critical review of the maternal mediation hypothesis. Hormones and Behavior 2006, 50:667-680.
30. Westerfield M. The zebrafish book. A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio) 2000, University of Oregon Press, Eugene, OR. 4th ed.
31. Vicsek T., Czirok A., Ben-Jacob E., Cohen I., Shochet O. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters 1995, 75:1226-1229.
32. Balch T., Dellaert F., Feldman A., Guillory A., Isbell C.L., Khan Z., et al. How multirobot systems research will accelerate our understanding of social animal behavior. Proceedings of the IEEE 2006, 94:1445-1463.
33. Blaser R.E., Chadwick L., McGinnis G.C. Behavioral measures of anxiety in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behavioural Brain Research 2010, 208:56-62.
34. Egan R.J., Bergner C.L., Hart P.C., Cachat J.M., Canavello P.R., Elegante M.F., et al. Understanding behavioral and physiological phenotypes of stress and anxiety in zebrafish. Behavioural Brain Research 2009, 205:38-44.
35. Mann R.P. Bayesian inference for identifying interaction rules in moving animal groups. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e22827.
36. Quera V., Beltran F.S., Dolado R. Determining shoal membership: a comparison between momentary and trajectory-based methods. Behavioural Brain Research 2011, 225:363-366.