Timely activation of budding yeast APCCdh1 involves degradation of its inhibitor, Acm1, by an unconventional proteolytic mechanism

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Melesse, Michael ^a   Choi, Eunyoung ^a   Hall, Hana ^a   Walsh, Michael J ^a   Geer, M Ariel ^a,c   Hall, Mark C ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACM1 PROTEIN; ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; ENZYME INHIBITOR; POLYUBIQUITIN; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN UBA1; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UVOMORULIN; ACM1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; ATP DEPENDENT 26S PROTEASE; BENZYLOXYCARBONYLLEUCYL-LEUCYL-LEUCINE ALDEHYDE; CDH1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE; FIZZY RELATED PROTEIN; LEUPEPTIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DEFECT; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN TARGETING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

ANAPHASE; ANAPHASE-PROMOTING COMPLEX-CYCLOSOME; CDH1 PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASES; LEUPEPTINS; MITOSIS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEOLYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCETALES; SKP CULLIN F-BOX PROTEIN LIGASES; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

EID: 84904968816     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103517     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Hershko A, Ciechanover A (1998) The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 67: 425-479. (Pubitemid 28411135)
2. Skaar JR, Pagano M (2009) Control of cell growth by the SCF and APC/C ubiquitin ligases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21: 816-824.
3. Sullivan M, Morgan DO (2007) Finishing mitosis, one step at a time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 894-903. (Pubitemid 47622563)
4. Peters J-M (1998) SCF and APC: the yin and yang of cell cycle regulated proteolysis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 10: 759-768.
5. Vodermaier HC (2004) APC/C and SCF: Controlling each other and the cell cycle. Curr Biol 14: R787-796.
6. Willems AR, Schwab M, Tyers M (2004) A hitchhiker's guide to the cullin ubiquitin ligases: SCF and its kin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1695: 133-170. (Pubitemid 39574971)
7. Harper JW, Burton JL, Solomon MJ (2002) The anaphase-promoting complex: it's not just for mitosis any more. Genes Dev 16: 2179-2206. (Pubitemid 35013081)
8. Peters JM (2006) The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 644-656.
9. Pesin JA, Orr-Weaver TL (2008) Regulation of APC/C activators in mitosis and meiosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24: 475-499.
10. Dial JM, Petrotchenko EV, Borchers CH (2007) Inhibition of APCCdh1 activity by Cdh1/Acm1/Bmh1 ternary complex formation. J Biol Chem 282: 5237-5248. (Pubitemid 47093786)
11. Martinez JS, Jeong DE, Choi E, Billings BM, Hall MC (2006) Acm1 is a negative regulator of the Cdh1-dependent anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 26: 9162-9176. (Pubitemid 44904413)
12. Martinez JS, Hall H, Bartolowits MD, Hall MC (2012) Acm1 contributes to nuclear positioning by inhibiting Cdh1-substrate interactions. Cell Cycle 11: 384-394.
13. Enquist-Newman M, Sullivan M, Morgan DO (2008) Modulation of the mitotic regulatory network by APC-dependent destruction of the Cdh1 inhibitor Acm1. Mol Cell 30: 437-446. (Pubitemid 351672373)
14. Spellman PT, Sherlock G, Zhang MQ, Iyer VR, Anders K, et al. (1998) Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol Biol Cell 9: 3273-3297. (Pubitemid 28551928)
15. Hall MC, Jeong DE, Henderson JT, Choi E, Bremmer SC, et al. (2008) Cdc28 and Cdc14 Control Stability of the Anaphase-promoting Complex Inhibitor Acm1. J Biol Chem 283: 10396-10407.
16. Ostapenko D, Burton JL, Wang R, Solomon MJ (2008) Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acm1: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 28: 4653-4664.
17. Thornton BR, Toczyski DP (2003) Securin and B-cyclin/CDK are the only essential targets of the APC. Nat Cell Biol 5: 1090-1094. (Pubitemid 37509116)
18. Heinemeyer W, Gruhler A, Möhrle V, Mahé Y, Wolf DH (1993) PRE2, highly homologous to the human major histocompatibility complex-linked RING10 gene, codes for a yeast proteasome subunit necessary for chrymotryptic activity and degradation of ubiquitinated proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 268: 5115-5120. (Pubitemid 23081638)
19. Ghislain M, Udvardy A, Mann C (1993) S. cerevisiae 26S protease mutants arrest cell division in G2/metaphase. Nature 366: 358-362. (Pubitemid 23349365)
20. Ghaboosi N, Deshaies RJ (2007) A conditional yeast E1 mutant blocks the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and reveals a role for ubiquitin conjugates in targeting Rad23 to the proteasome. Mol Biol Cell 18: 1953-1963. (Pubitemid 46717574)
21. Palanimurugan R, Scheel H, Hofmann K, Dohmen RJ (2004) Polyamines regulate their synthesis by inducing expression and blocking degradation of ODC antizyme. EMBO J 23: 4857-4867. (Pubitemid 40069715)
22. Terrell J, Shih S, Dunn R, Hicke L (1998) A function for monoubiquitination in the internalization of a G protein-coupled receptor. Mol Cell 1: 193-202. (Pubitemid 128378660)
23. Choi E, Dial JM, Jeong D-E, Hall MC (2008) Unique D box and KEN box sequences limit ubiquitination of Acm1 and promote pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex. J Biol Chem 283: 23701-23710.
24. Voges D, Zwickl P, Baumeister W (1999) The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 1015-1068. (Pubitemid 29449214)
25. Wolf DH, Hilt W (2004) The proteasome: a proteolytic nanomachine of cell regulation and waste disposal. Biochim Biophys Acta 1695: 19-31. (Pubitemid 39574965)
26. Rock KL, Gramm C, Rothstein L, Clark K, Stein R, et al. (1994) Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell 78: 761-771. (Pubitemid 24294452)
27. Hoyt MA, Coffino P (2004) Ubiquitin-free routes into the proteasome. Cell Mol Life Sci 61: 1596-1600. (Pubitemid 38962042)
28. Jariel-Encontre I, Bossis G, Piechaczyk M (2008) Ubiquitin-independent degradation of proteins by the proteasome. Biochim Biophys Acta 1786: 153-177.
29. Orlowski M, Wilk S (2003) Ubiquitin-independent proteolytic functions of the proteasome. Arch Biochem Biophys 415: 1-5. (Pubitemid 36687910)
30. Baugh JM, Viktorova EG, Pilipenko EV (2009) Proteasomes can degrade a significant proportion of cellular proteins independent of ubiquitination. J Mol Biol 386: 814-827.
31. Asher G, Reuven N, Shaul Y (2006) 20S proteasomes and protein degradation "by default". BioEssays 28: 844-849. (Pubitemid 44433746)
32. Gandre S, Kahana C (2002) Degradation of ornithine decarboxylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is ubiquitin independent. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293: 139-144. (Pubitemid 34694182)
33. Murakami Y, Matsufuji S, Kameji T, Hayashi S, Igarashi K, et al. (1992) Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination. Nature 360: 597-599. (Pubitemid 23000711)
34. Coffino P (2001) Regulation of cellular polyamines by antizyme. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 188-194.
35. Li X, Coffino P (1993) Degradation of ornithine decarboxylase: exposure of the C-terminal target by a polyamine-inducible inhibitory protein. Mol Cell Biol 13: 2377-2383. (Pubitemid 23097716)
36. Zhang M, Pickart CM, Coffino P (2003) Determinants of proteasome recognition of ornithine decarboxylase, a ubiquitin-independent substrate. EMBO J 22: 1488-1496. (Pubitemid 36417398)
37. Newman RM, Mobascher A, Mangold U, Koike C, Diah S, et al. (2004) Antizyme targets cyclin D1 for degradation. A novel mechanism for cell growth repression. J Biol Chem 279: 41504-41511. (Pubitemid 39313591)
38. Lim SK, Gopalan G (2007) Antizyme1 mediates AURKAIP1-dependent degradation of Aurora-A. Oncogene 26: 6593-6603. (Pubitemid 47573681)
39. Asher G, Tsvetkov P, Kahana C, Shaul Y (2005) A mechanism of ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation of the tumor suppressors p53 and p73. Genes Dev 19: 316-321. (Pubitemid 40189294)
40. Chen X, Barton LF, Chi Y, Clurman BE, Roberts JM (2007) Ubiquitin-independent degradation of cell-cycle inhibitors by the REGgamma proteasome. Mol Cell 26: 843-852. (Pubitemid 46921008)
41. Chen X, Chi Y, Bloecher A, Aebersold R, Clurman BE, et al. (2004) N-acetylation and ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation of p21(Cip1). Mol Cell 16: 839-847. (Pubitemid 39586541)
42. Li X, Amazit L, Long W, Lonard DM, Monaco JJ, et al. (2007) Ubiquitin- and ATP-independent proteolytic turnover of p21 by the REGgamma-proteasome pathway. Mol Cell 26: 831-842. (Pubitemid 46921009)
43. Sheaff RJ, Singer JD, Swanger J, Smitherman M, Roberts JM, et al. (2000) Proteasomal turnover of p21Cip1 does not require p21Cip1 ubiquitination. Mol Cell 5: 403-410. (Pubitemid 30628097)
44. Kalejta RF, Shenk T (2003) Proteasome-dependent, ubiquitin-independent degradation of the Rb family of tumor suppressors by the human cytomegalovirus pp71 protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 3263-3268. (Pubitemid 36356571)
45. Sdek P, Ying H, Chang DL, Qiu W, Zheng H, et al. (2005) MDM2 promotes proteasome-dependent ubiquitin-independent degradation of retinoblastoma protein. Mol Cell 20: 699-708. (Pubitemid 41740692)
46. Ferrara P, Andermarcher E, Bossis G, Acquaviva C, Brockly F, et al. (2003) The structural determinants responsible for c-Fos protein proteasomal degradation differ according to the conditions of expression. Oncogene 22: 1461-1474. (Pubitemid 36390595)
47. Forster A, Hill CP (2003) Proteasome degradation: enter the substrate. Trends Cell Biol 13: 550-553. (Pubitemid 37311393)
48. Peth A, Kukushkin N, Bosse M, Goldberg AL (2013) Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasomal ATPases by binding to Usp14 or Uch37 homologs. J Biol Chem 288: 7781-7790.
49. Jaquenoud M, van Drogen F, Peter M (2002) Cell cycle-dependent nuclear export of Cdh1p may contribute to the inactivation of APC/C (Cdh1). EMBO J 21: 6515-6526.
50. Robbins JA, Cross FR (2010) Requirements and reasons for effective inhibition of the anaphase promoting complex activator CDH1. Mol Biol Cell 21: 914-925.
51. Janke C, Magiera MM, Rathfelder N, Taxis C, Reber S, et al. (2004) A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21: 947-962. (Pubitemid 39206863)
52. Tong AH, Boone C (2006) Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 313: 171-192.
53. Liu C, Apodaca J, Davis LE, Rao H (2007) Proteasome inhibition in wild-type yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Biotechniques 42: 158, 160, 162.
54. Leggett DS, Glickman MH, Finley D (2005) Purification of proteasomes, proteasome subcomplexes, and proteasome-associated proteins from budding yeast. Methods Mol Biol 301: 57-70.
55. Kisselev AF, Goldberg AL (2005) Monitoring activity and inhibition of 26S proteasomes with fluorogenic peptide substrates. Methods Enzymol 398: 364-378. (Pubitemid 41578898)
56. Bremmer SC, Hall H, Martinez JS, Eissler CL, Hinrichsen TH, et al. (2012) Cdc14 Phosphatases Preferentially Dephosphorylate a Subset of Cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) Sites Containing Phosphoserine. J Biol Chem 287: 1662-1669.