Expertise and the mental simulation of action

Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 21-34

  Beilock, Sian L ^a   Lyons, Ian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904967398     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809846-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
2. Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., McCoy, A. M., & Carr, T. H. (2004). Haste does not always make waste: Expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills. Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 373-379.
3. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 701-725.
4. Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., & Starkes, J. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: Impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 6-16.
5. Beilock, S. L., & Gonso, S. (2008). Putting in the mind versus putting on the green: Expertise, performance time, and the linking of imagery and action The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 61, 920-932.
6. Beilock, S. L., & Holt, L. E. (2007). Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18, 51-57.
7. Beilock, S L, Wierenga, S A, & Carr, T H (2002) Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 1211-1240.
8. Calmels, C., Holmes, P, Lopez, E., & Naman, V. (2006). Chronometric comparison of actual and imaged complex movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38, 339-348.
9. Decety, J. (1996a). Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 87-93
10. Decety, J. (1996b). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behavioral Brain Research, 77, 45-52.
11. Decety, J., & Grezès, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172-178.
12. Decety, J., & Grezès, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research, 1079, 4-14
13. Decety, J., & Michel, F. (1989). Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks Brain and Cognition, 11, 87-97
14. Decety, J., Philippon, B., & Ingvar, D. (1988). RCBF landscapes during motor performance and motor ideation of a graphic gesture. European Psychiatric Neurological Science, 238, 33-38.
15. Dickstein R., & Deutsch, J. E. (2007). Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Physical Therapy, 87, 942-953.
16. Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481-492.
17. Feltz, D. L., & Landers, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 25-57.
18. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
19. Garbarini, F., & Adenzato, M. (2004). At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition, 56, 100-106.
20. Gentili, R, Papaxanthis, C, & Pozzo, T (2006) Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice. Neuroscience, 137, 761-772.
21. Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424-436
22. Glenberg, A M, & Kaschak, M P (2002) Grounding language in action Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565
23. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P (2003). The body’s contribution to language. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 93-126). New York: Elsevier Science.
24. Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1-26.
25. Garbarini, F, & Adenzato, M (2004) At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition, 56, 100-106.
26. Gray, R (2004) Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: Expertise differences, choking and slumps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 42-54.
27. Guillot, A, & Collet, C (2005) Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery Brain Research Reviews, 50, 387-397
28. Hall, J. C. (2002). Imagery practice and the development of surgical skills. American Journal of Surgery, 184, 465-470
29. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in the human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301-307.
30. Holt, L E, & Beilock, S L (2006) Expertise and its embodiment: Examining the impact of sensorimotor skill expertise on the representation of action-related text Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 694-701
31. Jackson R, Ashford K, & Norsworthy G (2006) Attentional focus, dispositional reinvestment, and skilled motor performance under pressure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 49-68.
32. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
33. Jeannerod, M., & Frak, V. (1999). Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 735-739
34. Klatzky, R. L., Pellegrino, J. W., McCloskey, B. P, & Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 56-77
35. MacKay, D. G. (1989). The organization of perception and action. New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. Martin, K. A., Moritz, S. E., & Hall, C. R. (1999). Imagery use in sport: A literature review and applied model. The Sport Psychologist, 13, 245-268
37. Maxwell, J. P, Masters, R. S. W., & Eves, F. F. (2000). From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. Journal of Sport Sciences, 18, 111-120.
38. Milton, J., Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P, & Small, S. L. (2007). The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused. Neuroimage, 35, 804-813.
39. Niedenthal P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184-211.
40. Packard M G, & Knowlton, B J (2002) Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 563-593.
41. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709-730.
42. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
44. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikolin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793-797.
45. Reed, C. L. (2002). Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: Visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1169-1178.
46. Rieger, M (2004) Automatic keypress activation in skilled typing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 555-565.
47. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese V., (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661-670.
48. Rogers, R. G. (2006). Mental practice and acquisition of motor skills: Examples from sports training and surgical education Obstetrics & Gynecology Clinics of North America, 33, 297-304
49. Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1-36.
50. Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perspective coding in event representation. Cognitive Processing, 8, 93-102.
51. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
52. Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153-156.
53. Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., & Scifo, P. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activations fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 17, 273-281.
54. Van den Bergh, O., Vrana, S., & Eelen, P. (1990). Letters from the heart: Affective categorization of letter combinations in typists and nontypists Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 16, 1153-1161.
55. Vogt, B A, Finch, D M, & Olson, C R (1992) Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: The anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions Cerebral Cortex, 2, 435-443
56. Vogt, S. (1995). On relations between perceiving, imagining and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 191-216.
57. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473
58. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shape of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168-171.
59. Zwaan, R A, & Taylor, L J (2006) Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1-11.