Equitable Access to Sustainable Development: Based on the comparative study of carbon emission rights allocation schemes

Applied Energy

Volumn 130, Issue , 2014, Pages 632-640

  Pan, Xunzhang ^a   Teng, Fei ^a   Ha, Yuejiao ^b   Wang, Gehua ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abatement costs; Allocation schemes; Carbon equity; Climate change

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COSTS; PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ABATEMENT COSTS; ALLOCATION SCHEMES; CARBON EMISSION RIGHTS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; CUMULATIVE EMISSIONS; INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY; MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST CURVES; TRADE-OFF RELATIONSHIP;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ABATEMENT COST; CARBON EMISSION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; POLLUTION TAX; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84904817371     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.072     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. UNFCCC. United Nations General Assembly, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York, the United States; 1992.
2. Stern N. The economics of climate change. Am Econ Rev: Paper Proc 2008, 98(2):1-37.
3. Baer P., Harte J., Haya B., Herzog A.V. Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science 2000, 289(5488):2287.
4. GCI. GCI Briefing: contraction-convergence; 2005. [accessed in December 2010]. http://www.gci.org.uk.
5. Rose, Stevens B., Edmonds J. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy. Environ Resour Econ 1998, 12(1):25-51.
6. UNFCCC. Paper no.1: Brazil, proposed elements of a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Bonn, Germany; 1997.
7. Jacoby H.D., Prinn R.G., Schmalensee R. Kyoto's unfinished business. Foreign Aff 2005, 77(4):1-8.
8. 2 emissions. Energy Policy 1999, 27(12):727-736.
9. GOI. National Action Plan on Climate Change-Prime Minister's Council on Climate Change; 2008. [accessed in August 2012]. http://www.india.gov.in.
10. Hohne N., den Elzen M., Weiss M. Common but differentiated convergence (CDC): a new conceptual approach to the long-term climate policy. Clim Policy 2006, 6:181-199.
11. den Elzen M, Lucas P. FAIR 2.0-A decision-support tool to assess the environmental and economic consequences of future climate regimes. RIVM, Report 550015001; 2003.
12. den Elzen M, Berk MGJ, Lucas MM. Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of commitments to achieve the EU climate target. RIVM, Report 728001023; 2003.
13. Muller B. Justice in global warming negotiations: how to obtain a procedurally fair compromise 1999, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford.
14. CSE. Definitions of equal entitlements. CSE-dossier, fact sheet5, Centre for Science and Environment. Delhi, India; 1998.
15. Lecocq F, Crassous R. International climate regime beyond 2012-Are quota allocation rules robust to uncertainty; 2003. [accessed in April 2011]. http://ideas.repec.org.
16. den Elzen M, Berk MM. Bottom-up approaches for defining future climate mitigation commitments. RIVM, Report 728001029; 2004.
17. Winkler H., Spalding-Fecher R., Tyani L. Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes. Clim Policy 2002, 2:303-318.
18. den Elzen M., Hohne N., Brouns B. Differentiation of countries' future commitments in a post-2012 climate regime: an assessment of the "South-North Dialogue" proposal. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:185-203.
19. Sijm J., Jansen J., Torvanger A. Differentiation of mitigation commitments: the multi-sector convergence approach. Clim Policy 2001, 1(4):481-497.
20. Groenenberg H., Blok K., van der Sluijs J. Global Triptych: a bottom-up approach for the differentiation of commitments under the climate convention. Clim Policy 2004, 4:153-175.
21. SEI. Calculations for the Greenhouse Development Rights calculator; 2008. [accessed in February 2011]. http://sei-us.org.
22. Experts from BASIC countries. Equitable access to sustainable development: Contribution to the body of scientific knowledge. Expert Forum: Beijing, Brasilia, Cape Town and New Delhi; 2011.
23. 2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2009, 106(29):11884-11888.
24. Xunzhang Pan., Fei Teng., Gehua Wang. Sharing emission space at an equitable basis: Allocation scheme based on the equal cumulative emission per capita principle. Appl Energy 2014, 113:1810-1818.
25. Jiahua Pan, Ying Chen The carbon budget scheme: an institutional framework for a fair and sustainable word climate regime. Soc Sci China 2009, 5(6):83-98. [Chinese].
26. Hedenus F., Azar C. Estimates of trends in global income and resource inequalities. Ecol Econ 2005, 55(3):351-364.
27. 2 emissions: a decomposition methodology by Kaya factors. Energy Econ 2006, 28:170-187.
28. 2 emissions across countries and relationship with income inequality: a distributive approach. Energy Policy 2006, 34:1762-1772.
29. Groot L. Carbon Lorenz curve. Resour Energy Econ 2010, 32:45-64.
30. 2 emissions and the impact of abatement proposals. Environ Resour Econ 2000, 17:163-181.
31. 2 emissions distribution in climate change integrated assessment modeling. Energy 2010, 35:298-313.
32. Vaillancourt K., Waaub J.P. A decision aid tool for equity issues analysis in emission permit allocations. Clim Policy 2006, 5:487-501.
33. Ekholm T., Soimakallio S., Moltmann S. Effort sharing in ambitious global climate change mitigation scenarios. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1797-1810.
34. Peterson S., Klepper G. Distribution matters-taxes vs. emissions trading in post Kyoto climate regimes. Kiel Working Paper 2007, 1380.
35. Ellerman AD, Decaux A. Analysis of post-Kyoto CO2 emissions trading using marginal abatement curves; 1998. [accessed in September 2012]. http://web.mit.edu.
36. 2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model. Energy Policy 1999, 27:585-601.
37. Morris J., Paltsev S., Reilly J. Marginal abatement costs and marginal welfare costs for greenhouse gas emissions reductions: results from the EPPA model. Environ Model Assess 2012, 17:325-337.
38. den Elzen M., Lucas P. The FAIR model: a tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of regimes of future commitments. Environ Model Assess 2005, 10:115-134.
39. Klepper G., Peterson S. Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: the influence of world energy prices. Resour Energy Econ 2006, 28(1):1-23.
40. 2 emission reduction quota trading in China. Appl Energy 2013, 112:1518-1528.
41. Market power in emissions trading Strategically manipulating permit price through fringe firms. Appl Energy 2012, 96:203-211.
42. Kesicki F., Ekins P. Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for cation. Clim Policy 2012, 12(2):219-236.
43. Yang Xi, Teng Fei, Wang Gehua Incorporating environmental co-benefits into climate policies: a regional study of the cement industry in China. Appl Energy 2013, 1446-1453.
44. 2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Appl Energy 2012, 198-208.
45. WRI. Climate Analysis Indicators Tool 9.0 database; 2012. [accessed in November 2012]. http://cait.wri.org.
46. World Bank. GDP; 2012. [accessed in December 2012]. http://data.worldbank.org.
47. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World population prospects; 2010. [accessed in September 2010]. http://esa.un.org.
48. PBL. Downscaling drivers of global environmental change. Enabling use of global SRES scenarios at the national and grid levels 2006. [accessed in August 2012]. http://www.pbl.nl.
49. Kim S.H., Edmonds J., Lurz J. The ObjECTS framework for integrated assessment: hybrid modeling of transportation. Energy J 2006, 2(Special Issue):51-80.
50. SiMCaP. EQW pathway set 1; 2003. [accessed in September 2010]. http://www.simcap.org/.
51. RCP Scenario data group. RCP concentration calculations and data. < [accessed in November 2012]. http://www.pik-potsdam.de.
52. Coase R. The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 1960, 3:1-44.
53. den Elzen M., Lucas P., van Vuuren D. Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes. Energy Policy 2005, 33:2138-2151.
54. Kemfert C., Tol R.S.J. Equity, international trade and climate policy. Int Environ agreement: Polit, Law Econ 2002, 2:23-48.
55. Nordhaus W., Boyer J., Turton H. ECLIPSE: an integrated energy-economy model for climate policy and scenario analysis. Energy 2008, 33:1754-1769.