A decision aid tool for equity issues analysis in emission permit allocations

Climate Policy

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 487-501

  Vaillancourt, Kathleen ^a   Waaub, Jean Philippe ^b  

^a GERAD   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Burden sharing; Energy model; Equity; Multicriteria decision aid; Permit trading; World MARKAL

Indexed keywords

EMISSION CONTROL; KYOTO PROTOCOL; POLLUTION POLICY;

EID: 33645311797     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685573     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aaheim, H. A., 1999. “ The appropriateness of economic approaches to the analysis of burden-sharing. ”. In Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. Edited by:Toth, F. L., 94–111. London:Earthscan Publications.
2. Banuri, T., Goran-Maler, K., Grubb, M., Jacobson, H. K., and Yamin, F., 1996. Équité et considérations sociales. In:Changement Climatique:Dimensions Économiques et Sociales. Contribution au Deuxième Rapport d'évaluation du Groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur l'évolution du climat (GIEC). GIEC, GT III. 79–124. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
3. Baumert, K. A., Perkaus, J. F., and Kete, N., 2003. Great expectations:can international emissions trading deliver en equitable climate regime?. Climate Policy, 3:137–148.
4. Bayer, J. L., 1999. “ Climate change and multiple views of fairness. ”. In Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. Edited by:Toth, F. L., 44–64. London:Earthscan Publications.
5. Berk, M. M., and den Elzen, M. G.J., 2001. Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy:how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals. Climate Policy, 1:465–480.
6. Blanchard, O., Criqui, P., Trommetter, M., and Viguier, L., 1998. Différenciation, équité internationale et efficacité dans la lutte contre le changement climatique global. Grenoble, IEPE, Cahier de Recherche No. 14.
7. Bode, S., 2004. Equal emissions per capita over time:a proposal to combine responsibility and equity of rights for post-2012 GHG emissions entitlement allocation. European Environment, 14:300–316.
8. Brans, J.-P., and Mareschal, B., 2002. PROMÉTHÉE-GAIA:une méthodologie d'aide à la décision en présence de critères multiples., Éditions Ellipses, Paris
9. Claussen, E., and McNeilly, L., 1998. The Complex Elements of Global Fairness. Washington, DC:Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
10. UNFCCC. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [available at http://unfccc.int]
11. UNFCCC. 1997. Kyoto Protocol to theUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [available at http://unfccc.int]
12. D'Avignon, G. R., Mareschal, B., and Soucy, M., 1996. Budget Allocation to Health Care Regions with Dynamic Multicriteria Approach. Research Report, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Service de Mathématiques de la Gestion Brussels
13. Grubb, M., Sebenius, J., Magalhaes, A., and Subak, S., 1992. “ Sharing the burden. ”. In Confronting Climate Change:Risks, Implications and Responses. Edited by:Mintzer, I. M., 305–322. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
14. 2 emissions. Energy Policy, 27:727–736.
15. Houghton, J. T., Filho, L. G.M., Griggs, D. J., and Maskell, K., 1997. Stabilisation des Gaz Atmosphériques à Effet de Serre:Conséquences physiques, biologiques et socio-économiques. GIEC, GT I. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
16. Hourcade, J.-C., and Shukla, P., 2001. Global, regional, and national costs and ancillary benefits of mitigation. In:Climate Change 2001 499–560. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Mitigation. IPCC, WG III
17. Jansen, J. C., Battjes, J. J., Sijm, J. P.M., Volkers, C. H., and Ybema, J. R., 2001. The Multi-Sector Convergence Approach:A Flexible Framework for Negotiating Global Rules for National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation Targets., Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN and CICERO
18. Kanudia, A., Labriet, M., Loulou, R., Vaillancourt, K., and Waaub, J.-P., 2005. “ The World-MARKAL model and its application to cost-effectiveness, permit sharing, and cost-benefit analyses. ”. In Energy and Environment. Edited by:Loulou, R., Waaub, J.-P., and Zaccour, G., 111–148. New York:Springer.
19. 2 concentrations:cost-effective emission reduction strategies. ”. In International Environmental Modeling and Assessment. Edited by:Carraro, C., 109–130. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Matthews, B. J.H., and van Ypersele, J. P., 2003. UNFCCC Article 2–Article 6, A Web-based Climate Model for Global Dialogue:Stabilisation Scenarios under Uncertainty Presentation. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium[available at http://www.chooseclimate.org/jcm/]
21. Morita, T., and Robinson, J., 2001. Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation Scenarios and Implications. Climate Change 2001 115–166. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. (coordinators),:Mitigation. IPCC, WG III
22. Nakicenovic, N., and Swart, R., eds. 2000. Emissions Scenarios. IPCC, WG III. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
23. Onigkeit, J., and Alcamo, J., 2000. “ A different perspective for global climate policy:combining burden sharing and climate protection. ”. In Efficiency and Equity of Climate Change Policy. Edited by:Carraro, C., 305–314. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24. Ramanathan, R., 1998. A multicriteria methodology for global negotiations on climate change. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics:Part C:Applications and Reviews, 28 (4):541–548.
25. Rayner, S., Malone, E. L., and Thompson, M., 1999. “ Equity issues and integrated assessment. ”. In Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. Edited by:Toth, F. L., 11–43. London:Earthscan Publications.
26. Reiner, D. M., and Jacoby, H. D., 1998. Annex I Differentiation Proposals:Implications for Welfare, Equity, and Policy. Boston, MA, USA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
27. Ridgley, M. A., 1996. Fair sharing of greenhouse gas burdens. Energy Policy, 24 (6):517–529.
28. Rose, A., Stevens, B., Edmonds, J., and Wise, M., 1998. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 12:25–51.
29. Roy, B., and Bouyssou, D., 1993. Aide Multicritère à la Décision:Méthodes et Cas. Paris:Economica.
30. Shukla, P. R., 1999. “ Justice, equity and efficiency in climate change:a developing country perspective. ”. In Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. Edited by:Toth, F. L., 145–159. London:Earthscan Publications.
31. Torvanger, A., and Godal, O., 1999. A Survey of Differentiation Methods for National Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets. University of Oslo, CICERO, Report 1999:5.
32. Vaillancourt, K., 2003. Équité et scénarios mondiaux de réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre:une approche multicritère dynamique combinée au modèle énergétique MARKAL. Thèse de doctorat. Montréal, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Département des Sciences de l'Environnement.
33. Vaillancourt, K., and Waaub, J.-P., 2003. Equity and efficiency in international greenhouse gas abatement scenarios:a multicriteria approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 153 (2):489–505.
34. Weyant, J. P., and Hill, J. N., 1999. “ Introduction and overview. ”. In The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol:A Multi-Model Evaluation., The Energy Journal (special issue) Edited by:Weyant, J. P.