Modeling economic performance of interprovincial CO2 emission reduction quota trading in China

Applied Energy

Volumn 112, Issue , 2013, Pages 1518-1528

  Zhou, P ^a   Zhang, L ^a   Zhou, D Q ^a   Xia, W J ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

Author keywords

Abatement cost; China; Emission trading; Fairness; Nonlinear programming

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COMMERCE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING;

ABATEMENT COSTS; CARBON EMISSION REDUCTIONS; CHINA; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT; EMISSION TRADING; FAIRNESS; MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST CURVES; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING MODEL;

EMISSION CONTROL;

ABATEMENT COST; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; INVESTMENT; NONLINEARITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; QUOTA SYSTEM; SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

CHINA;

EID: 84884350594     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. IEA. 2011 Key world energy statistics. Paris: OECD/IEA; 2011.
2. Zhang Y. The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 2012, 39:2197-2203.
3. Braun M. The evolution of emissions trading in the European Union - the role of policy networks, knowledge and policy entrepreneurs. Acc Organ Soc 2009, 34:469-487.
4. Zhang Y., Wei Y.M. An overview of current research on EU ETS: evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Appl Energy 2010, 87:1806-1816.
5. Feng Z.H., Zou L.L., Wei Y.M. Carbon price volatility: evidence from EU ETS. Appl Energy 2011, 88:590-598.
6. Chevallier J., Le Pen Y., Sévi B. Options introduction and volatility in the EU ETS. Resour Energy Econom 2011, 33:855-880.
7. Palao F., Pardo A. Assessing price clustering in European carbon markets. Appl Energy 2012, 92:51-56.
8. Feng Z.H., Wei Y.M., Wang K. Estimating the risk for the carbon market via extreme value theory: an empirical analysis of EU ETS. Appl Energy 2012, 99:97-108.
9. Jaraite J., Di Maria C. Efficiency, productivity and environmental policy: a case study of power generation in the EU. Energy Econom 2012, 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.017.
10. 2 entitlements: implications for economic development. J Environ Develop 1993, 2:1-36.
11. Raufer R., Li S. Emission trading in China: a conceptual "leapfrog" approach?. Energy 2009, 34:904-912.
12. Cong R.G., Wei Y.M. Potential impact of (CET) carbon emission trading on China's power sector: a perspective from different allowance allocation options. Energy 2010, 35:3921-3931.
13. Chang Y.C., Wang N. Environmental regulations and emissions trading in China. Energy Policy 2010, 38:3356-3364.
14. Lin B., Jiang Z., Zhang P. Allocation of sulphur dioxide allowance - an analysis based on a survey of power plants in Fujian province in China. Energy 2011, 36:3120-3129.
15. Zhang B., Zhang Y., Bi J. An adaptive agent-based modeling approach for analyzing the influence of transaction costs on emission trading market. Environ Modell Software 2011, 26:482-491.
16. Wei D., Rose A. Interregional sharing of energy conservation targets in China: efficiency and equity. Energy J 2009, 30(4):81-111.
17. 2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Appl Energy 2012, 98:198-208.
18. Lee M. The shadow price of substitutable sulfur in the US electric power plant: a distance function approach. J Environ Manage 2005, 77:104-110.
19. Lee M., Zhang N. Technical efficiency, shadow price of carbon dioxide emissions, and substitutability for energy in the Chinese manufacturing industries. Energy Econom 2012, 34:1492-1497.
20. 2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry. J Cleaner Prod 2010, 18:1509-1518.
21. 2 abatement allocation among provinces in China: based on a nonlinear programming model. Manage Rev 2010, 22(6):54-60. [in Chinese].
22. Mackenzie I.A., Hanley A., Korenienko T. The optimal initial allocation of pollution permits: a relative performance approach. Environ Resource Econ 2004, 39:265-282.
23. Yuan Y.N., Shi M.J., Li N., Zhou S.L. Intensity allocation criteria of carbon emissions permits and regional economic development in China: based on 30 provinces/autonomous region computable general equilibrium model. Adv Clim Change Res 2012, 3(3):154-162.
24. Rose A., Zhang Z.X. Interregional burden-sharing of greenhouse gas mitigation in the United States. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 2004, 9:477-500.
25. Bohm P., Larsen B. Fairness in a tradable-permit treaty for carbon emission reductions in Europe and the former Soviet Union. Environ Resource Econ 1994, 4:219-239.
26. Rose A., Stevens B., Edmonds J., Wise M. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy: an application to tradable emission permits. Environ Resource Econ 1998, 12:25-51.