Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes

Energy Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 16, 2005, Pages 2138-2151

  den Elzen, Michel ^a   Lucas, Paul ^a   van Vuuren, Detlef ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Abatement costs; Emissions trading; Future commitments

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); COSTS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT;

ABATEMENT COSTS; EMISSION INTENSITY; GREENHOUSE GASES; POST-KYOTO REGIMES;

ENERGY POLICY;

ABATEMENT COST; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; KYOTO PROTOCOL;

EID: 13844298937     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Banuri T. Göran-Mäler K. Grubb M. Jacobson H.K. Yamin F. Equity and social considerations In: Bruce J.P. Lee H. Haites E.F. (Eds.) Climate Change 1995-Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, IPCC Working Group III IPCC-SAR 1996 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
2. Baumert K. Blanchard O. Llose S. Perkaus J. Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for Protecting the Climate 2002 World Resource Institute Washington DC
3. Berk M.M. den Elzen M.G.J. Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: How to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? Climate Policy 1 4 2001 465-480
4. CBS/RIVM, 2001. Milieucompendium. Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands.
5. Criqui, P., 2002. GECS Final Report Section 6: Detail report. GECS-Research Project No. EVK2-CT-1999-00010. Thematic Programme: Environment and Sustainable Development, DG Research Fifth Framework Programme, CNRS-IEPE, Grenoble, France.
6. Criqui, P., Kitous, A., Berk, M.M., den Elzen, M.G.J., Eickhout, B., Lucas, P., van Vuuren, D.P., Kouvaritakis, N., Vanregemorter, D., 2003. Greenhouse gas reduction pathways in the UNFCCC Process up to 2025. Technical Report, CNRS-IEPE, Grenoble, France.
7. Criqui P. Kouvaritakis N. World energy projections to 2030 International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14 1-4 2000 116-136
8. den Elzen M.G.J. Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of future commitments to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations Integrated Assessment 3 4 2002 343-359
9. den Elzen, M.G.J., Berk, M.M., Lucas, P., 2004. Simplified multi-stage and per capita convergence: An analysis of two climate regimes for differentiation of commitments. RIVM-Report 728001024, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands (www.rivm.nl/ieweb).
10. den Elzen, M.G.J., Berk, M.M., Lucas, P., Eickhout, B., van Vuuren, D.P., 2003. Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of commitments to achieve the EU climate target. RIVM-Report 728001023, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
11. den Elzen, M.G.J., Lucas, P., 2003. FAIR 2.0: A decision-support model to assess the environmental and economic consequences of future climate regimes. RIVM-Report 550015001, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands (www.rivm.nl/fair)
12. den Elzen M.G.J. Schaeffer M. Responsibility for past and future global warming: Uncertainties in attributing anthropogenic climate change Climatic change 54 2002 29-73
13. den Elzen, M.G.J., Schaeffer, M., Eickhout, B., 2002. Responsibility for past and future global warming: Time horizon and non-linearities in the climate system. RIVM-Report 728001022, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
14. Depledge, J., 2000. Tracing the Origins of the Kyoto Protocol: An Article by Article Textual History. UNFCCC/TP/2000/2 UNFCCC, Bonn.
15. Eickhout, B., den Elzen, M.G.J.,van Vuuren, D.P., 2003. Multi-gas emission profiles for stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations. RIVM-Report 728001026, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
16. 2 emissions trading using marginal abatement curves. Report No. 40, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
17. Enting I.G. Wigley T.M.L. Heimann M. Future Emissions and Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide 1994 Mordialloc Australia
18. European-Council, 1996. Communication on Community Strategy on Climate Change, Council Conclusions. European Commission, Brussels.
19. Graveland, C., Bouwman, A.F., de Vries, H.J.M., Eickhout, B., Strengers, B.J., 2002. Projections of multi-gas emissions and carbon sinks, and marginal abatement cost functions modelling for land-use related sources. RIVM-Report 461502026, Bilthoven.
20. Gupta J. Encouraging Developing Country Participation in the Climate Change Regime 1998 Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
21. Höhne, N., Galleguillos, C., Blok, K., Harnisch, J.,Phylipsen, D., 2003. Evolution of commitments under the UNFCCC: Involving newly industrialized countries and developing countries. Research-Report 20141255, UBA-FB 000412, ECOFYS Gmbh, Berlin.
22. IMAGE-team, 2001. The IMAGE 2.2 Implementation of The SRES Scenarios. A Comprehensive Analysis of Emissions, Climate change and Impacts in the 21st Century. CD-ROM Publication 481508018, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
23. IPCC, 2001a. Climate change 2001.The science of climate change: summary for policymakers. IPCC Assessment Reports, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1-18.
24. IPCC, 2001b. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
25. Jacoby, H.D., Eckaus, R.S., Ellerman, A.D., Prinn, R.G., Reiner, D.M., Yang, Z., 1997. QELRO Impacts: Domestic markets, trade and distribution of burdens, and climate change. Energy Journal (18), 31-58.
26. Jacoby, H.D., Schmalensee, R., Wing, I.S., 1999. Toward a useful architecture for climate change negotiations. Report No. 49, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
27. Meyer, A., 2000. Contraction & Convergence. The Global Solution to Climate Change. Schumacher Briefings, Vol. 5. Green Books, Bristol, UK.
28. OECD/IEA, 2002. Beyond Kyoto, Energy Dynamics and Climate Stabilisation. OECD, Paris.
29. O'Neill B.C. Oppenheimer M. Climate change: Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto Protocol Science 296 2002 1971-1972
30. Reiner, D.M., Jacoby, H.D., 1997. Annex-I differentiation proposals: implications for welfare, equity and policy. MIT Global Change Joint Program Report 27, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
31. Ringius L. Torvanger A. Holtsmark B. Can multi-criteria rules fairly distribute climate burdens?-OECD results from three burden sharing rules Energy Policy 26 10 1998 777-793
32. Rose A. Stevens B. Edmonds J. Wise M. International Equity and differentiation in global warming policy Environmental & Resource Economics 12 1 1998 25-51
33. Torvanger, A., Godal, O., 1999. A survey of differentiation methods for national greenhouse gasa reduction targets. CICERO Report 1999, Center for International Climate and Environmental Research (CICERO), Oslo.
34. UNFCCC, 1992. United Nations General Assemby, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, http://www.unfccc.int/resources United Nations, New York.
35. UNFCCC, 1997a. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. FCCC/CP/L7/Add.1, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn, Germany.
36. UNFCCC, 1997b. Paper No. 1: Brazil; Proposed Elements of a Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UNFCCC/AGBM/1997/MISC.1/Add.3 GE.97, Bonn.
37. UNFCCC, 2002. Methodological issues, scientific and methodological assessment of contributions to climate change. Report of the Expert Meeting, Note by the Secretariat, FCCC/SBSTA/2002/INF.14 (http://www.unfccc.int)
38. van Vuuren, D., de Vries, H.J.M., Eickhout, B., Kram, T., 2004. Responses to technology and taxes in a simulated world. Energy Economics, forthcoming.
39. van Vuuren, D.P., den Elzen, M.G.J., Berk, M.M., Lucas, P., Eickhout, B., Eerens, H., Oostenrijk, R., 2003. Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes. RIVM-Report 728001025, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
40. WBGU, 2003. Climate Protection Strategies for the 21st Century. Kyoto and Beyond, WBGU, Berlin.
41. White-House, 2002. Executive Summary of Bush Climate Change Initiative, White-House, Washington, DC, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/climatechange.html last accessed in 05/2004.
42. Wieringa, K., 1995. Environment in the European Union 1995, Report for the Review of the Fifth Environmental Action Programme. European Environment Agency. Copenhagen