Market and technical challenges and opportunities in the area of innovative new materials and composites based on nanocellulosics

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 345-351

  Lindström, Tom ^a,b   Aulin, Christian ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b INNVENTIA AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

barriers; biocomposites; biodegradable plastics; biopolymers; coatings; market challenges; nanocellulose; nanocomposites

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERS; BIOPOLYMERS; CELLULOSE; COATINGS; COMMERCE; DISPERSIONS; NANOCOMPOSITES;

BARRIERS; BIO-COMPOSITES; BIODEGRADABLE PLASTICS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC; NANO-CELLULOSE; PRODUCTION PROCESS; STRENGTH ADDITIVES; TECHNICAL CHALLENGES;

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

EID: 84904807770     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2014.928365     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Ahola S, Österberg M, Laine J. 2008. Cellulose nanofibrils-adsorption with poly(amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive. Cellulose. 15:303-314. 10.1007/s10570-007-9167-3
2. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T. 2010. Oxygen and barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films. Cellulose. 17:559-574. 10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y
3. Aulin C, Johansson E, Wågberg L, Lindström T. 2010. Self-organized films from cellulose I nanofibrils using the layer-by-layer technique. Biomacromolecules. 11:872-882. 10.1021/bm100075e
4. Aulin C, Lindström T. 2011. Biopolymer coatings for paper and paperboard. Biopolymers-new materials for sustainable films and coatings. Plackett D, editor. Chichester (UK): Wiley.
5. Aulin C, Netrval J, Wågberg L, Lindström T. 2010. Aerogels from nanofibrillated cellulose with tunable oleophobicity. Soft Matter. 6:3298-3305. 10.1039/c001939a
6. Aulin C, Salazar-Alvarez G, Lindström L. 2012. High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose-nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale. 4:6622-6628. 10.1039/c2nr31726e
7. Browne MA. 2008. Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis. Envir Sci Technol. 42:5026-5031. 10.1021/es800249a
8. Dufresne A, Thomas S, Pothan LA. 2013. Biopolymer nanocomposite: processing, properties and applications. New York: Wiley.
9. Edgar CD, Gray DG. 2003. Smooth model cellulose I surfaces from nanocrystal suspensions. Cellulose. 10:299-306. 10.1023/A:1027333928715
10. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, et al. 2010. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci. 45:1-33. 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-0
11. Eriksen Ö, Syverud K, Gregerson Ö. 2008. The use of microfibrillataed cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J. 23:299-304. 10.3183/NPPRJ-2008-23-03-p299-304
12. European Commission. 2011. European commission (DG environment), plastic waste in the environment - final report. Paris: BIO Intelligence Service.
13. Fukuzimi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A. 2009. Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules. 10:162-165. 10.1021/bm801065u
14. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR. 1983. Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci Symp. 37:797-813.
15. Hirai H, Takada H, Ogata Y, Yamashita R, Mizukawa K, Saha Kwan C, Moore C, Gray H, Laursen D, Zettler ER, et al. 2011. Organic micropollutants in marine plastics debris from the open ocean and remote and urban beaches. Mar Pollut Bull. 62:1683-1692. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.06.004
16. Ikkala O, Ras RHA, Houbenov N, Roukolainen J, Pääkkö M, Laine J, Leskelä M, Berglund, LA, Lindström T, ten Brinke G, et al. 2009. Solid state nanofibers based on self-assemblies: From cleaving to self-assemblies to multilevel hierarchical constructs. Faraday Discuss (Soft Nanotechnol). 143:95-107. 10.1039/b905204f
17. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H. 2011. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale. 3:71-85. 10.1039/c0nr00583e
18. Iwamoto S, Kai W, Isogai A, Iwata T. 2009. Elastic modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules. 10:2571-2576. 10.1021/bm900520n
19. Johansson C, Bras J, Mondragon I, Nechita P, Plackett D, Simon P, Svetec DG, Virtanen S, Baschetti MG, Breen C, et al. 2012. Renewable fibres and bio-based materials for packaging applications - a review of recent developments. BioResources. 7:2506-2552.
20. Kjellgren H, Engström G. 2006. Influence of base paper on the barrier properties of chitosan-coated papers. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J. 21:685-689.
21. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A. 2011. Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed. 50:5438-5466. 10.1002/anie.201001273
22. Klyosov AA. 2007. Wood-plastic composites. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
23. Lange J, Wyser Y. 2003. Recent innovations in barrier technologies for plastic packaging-a review. Packag Technol Sci. 16:149-158. 10.1002/pts.621
24. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J. 2012. Microfibrillated cellulose - its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym. 90:735-764. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026
25. Lindström T. 1998. Agenda paper 2000 program. Stockholm: Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF), KTH.
26. Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Aulin C. 2013. Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) - an emerging material for large-scale applications. Paper presented at: NanoTech, May 2013; Washington, DC.
27. Lindström T, Aulin C, Naderi A, Ankerfors M. 2013. Microfibrillar cellulose. Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology. Chichester (UK): Wiley.
28. Lindström T, Winter L. 1988. Mikrofibrillär cellulosa som komponent vid papperstillverkning [Microfibrillated cellulose as a new component in papermaking]. Stockholm: STFI internal report C159.
29. Miller KS, Krochta JM. 1997. Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: a review. Trends Food Sci Tech. 8:228-237. 10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01051-0
30. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT. 2005. Natural fibers, biopolymers and biocomposites. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; p. 875.
31. Moon R, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. 2011. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev. 40:3941-3994. 10.1039/c0cs00108b
32. Naderi A, Lindström T, Sundström J. 2014. Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: rheological studies. Cellulose. 21:1561-1571. 10.1007/s10570-014-0192-8
33. Nygård P, Tanem BS, Karlsen T, Brachet P, Leinsvang. 2008. Extrusion-based wood fibre-PP composites: wood powder and pelletized wood fibres - a comparative study. Compos Sci Technol. 68:15-16.
34. Olszewska A, Eronen P, Johansson L-S, Malho JM, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Österberg M. 2011. The behaviour of cationic cellulose in aqueous media. Cellulose. 18:1213-1226. 10.1007/s10570-011-9577-0
35. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T. 2007. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules. 8:1934-1941. 10.1021/bm061215p
36. Pääkkö M, Vapaavuori J, Silvennoinen R, Kosonen H, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Berglund L, Ikkala O. 2008. Long and entangled native cellulose I nanofibers allow flexible aerogels and hierarchically templates for functionalities. Soft Matter. 4:2492-2499. 10.1039/b810371b
37. Plastics 2012. The facts 2012 - Plastic Europe and polyolefins moulding, thin wall packaging. Stenungsund (Sweden): Borealis.
38. Rochman CM, Browne MA, Halpern BS, Hentschel BR, Hoh E, Karpanagioti HK, Rios-Mendoza LM, Takada H, Teh S, Thompson RC. 2013. Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature. 494:169-171. 10.1038/494169a
39. Saito T, Kimura T, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A. 2007. Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 8:2485-2491. 10.1021/bm0703970
40. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Vignon M, Isogai A. 2006. Homogenous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules. 7:1687-1691. 10.1021/bm060154s
41. Schlosser H. 2008. Nano Disperse Cellulose und Nano Fibrillierte Cellulose-neue Produkte fuer die herstellung und Veredelung von Papier und Karton. [Nano disperse cellulose and nano-fibrillated cellulose - new products for the manufacturing and refining of paper and cardboard]. Wochenbl Papierfabr. 6:1-11. German.
42. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Ikkala O, Berglund LA. 2011. Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity. Biomacromolecules. 12:3638-3644. 10.1021/bm2008907
43. Shen L, Haufe J, Patel MK. 2009. Product overview and market projection of emerging bio-based plastics (PRO-BIB 2009, commissioned by EPNOE and European Bioplastics) group science, technology and society (STS). Utrecht (The Netherlands): Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and Innovation, Utrecht University.
44. Siró I, Plackett D. 2010. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose. 17:459-494. 10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y
45. Siró I, Plackett D, Hedenqvist M, Ankerfors M., Lindström T. 2011. Highly transparent films from carboxymethylated microfibrillated cellulose: the effect of multiple homogenization steps on key properties. J Appl Polym Sci Symp. 119:2652-2660. 10.1002/app.32831
46. Song H, Ankerfors M, Hoc M, Lindström T. 2010. Reduction of the linting and dusting propensity of newspaper using starch and microfibrillated cellulose. Nordic Pulp & Paper Res J. 25:495-504. 10.3183/NPPRJ-2010-25-04-p495-504
47. Suzuki K, Okumura H, Kitagawa K, Sato S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H. 2013. Development of continuous process enabling nanofibrillation of pulp and melt compounding. Cellulose. 20:201-210. 10.1007/s10570-012-9843-9
48. Suzuki K, Sato S, Okumura H, Hahimoto T, Nakagaito AN, Yano H. 2014. Novel high-strength, micro fibrillated cellulose-reinforced polypropylene composites using a cationic polymer as compatibilizer. Cellulose. 21:507-518.
49. Syverud K, Stenius P. 2009. Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose. 16:75-85. 10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2
50. Taipale T, Österberg M, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J. 2010. Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose. 17:1005-1020. 10.1007/s10570-010-9431-9
51. Tanpichai S, Quero F, Nogi M, Yano H, Young RJ, Lindström T, Sampson WW, Eichhorn SJ. 2012. Effective young's modulus of bacterial and microfibrillated cellulose fibrils in fibrous networks. Biomacromolecules. 13:1340-1349. 10.1021/bm300042t
52. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR. 1983. Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp. 37:815-827.
53. Uetani K, Yano H. 2011. Nanofibrillation of wood pulp using a high-speed blender. Biomacromolecules. 12:348-353. 10.1021/bm101103p
54. Uhrin AV, Schellinger J. 2011. Marine debris impacts to tidal fringing marsh in North - Carolina. J Mat Pollut Bull. 62:2605-2611. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.10.006
55. Van de Ven TGM. 2008. Capillary forces in wet paper. Ind Eng Chem. 47:7250-7256. 10.1021/ie800423r
56. Wågberg L, Decher G, Norgren M, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Axnaes K. 2008. The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir. 24:784-795. 10.1021/la702481v
57. Yang H-Y, Bolling L, Priolo MA, Grunlan JC. 2013. Super gas barrier and selectivity of graphene oxide-polymer multilayer thin films. Adv Mater. 25:503-508. 10.1002/adma.201202951