Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength

Cellulose

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1005-1020

  Taipale, Tero ^a   Österberg, Monika ^a   Nykänen, Antti ^a   Ruokolainen, Janne ^a   Laine, Janne ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Drainage; Fines; MFC; Microfibrillated cellulose; Paper; Strength

Indexed keywords

CATIONIC POLYELECTROLYTE; DRAINAGE BEHAVIOR; DRAINAGE RATE; FINES; HAND SHEETS; MATERIALS AND PROCESS; MFC; MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE; OPTIMUM SELECTION; PAPER STRENGTHS; PRODUCTION METHODS; PULP SUSPENSION; SALT CONCENTRATION; STRENGTH; STRENGTH PROPERTY;

CELLULOSE; KRAFT PROCESS; PAPER; PH EFFECTS; PRODUCTION; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

KRAFT PULP;

CELLULOSE; DISPERSIONS; DRAINAGE; FIBRILS; FINES; KRAFT PULPS; PAPER;

EID: 77956885929     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9431-9     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aaltio EA (1962) The effect of highly beaten birch pulp fraction on the properties of kraft paper. Paperi Puu 44: 217-222.
2. Ahola S (2008) Properties and interfacial behaviour of cellulose nanofibrils. Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, TKK, Espoo, Finland.
3. Ahola S, Österberg M, Laine J (2008a) Cellulose nanofibrils adsorption with poly(amide-amine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive. Cellulose 15: 303-314.
4. Ahola S, Salmi J, Johansson L-S, Laine J, Österberg M (2008b) Model films from native cellulose nanofibrils, preparation, swelling, and surface interactions. Biomacromolecules 9: 1273-1282.
5. Alén R (2000) Structure and chemical composition of wood. In: Stenius P, Pakarinen H (eds) Papermaking science and technology, book 3 forest products chemistry. Fapet Oy, Helsinki, pp 12-57.
6. Andersson K, Sandström A, Ström K, Barla P (1986) The use of cationic starch and colloidal silica to improve the drainage characteristics of kraft pulps. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 1: 26-30.
7. Andresen M, Johansson L-S, Tanem BS, Stenius P (2006) Properties and characterization of hydrophobized microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 13: 665-677.
8. Aulin C, Ahola S, Josefsson P, Nishino T, Hirose Y, Österberg M, Wågberg L (2009) Nanoscale cellulose films with different crystallinities and mesostructures-their surface properties and interaction with water. Langmuir 25: 7675-7685.
9. Berglund L (2005) Cellulose-based nanocomposites. In: Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (eds) Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 807-832.
10. Borsa J, Racz I, Obendorf SK, Bodor G (2000) Slight carboxymethylation of cellulose. Lenzinger Ber 79: 18-24.
11. Britt KW, Unbehend JE, Shridharan R (1986) Observations on water removal in papermaking. Tappi J 69: 76-79.
12. Buléon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S (1998) Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol 23: 85-112.
13. Campbell WB (1959) The mechanism of bonding. Tappi 42: 999-1001.
14. Carlsson G, Kolseth P, Lindström T (1983) Polyelectrolyte swelling behavior of chlorite delignified spruce wood fibers. Wood Sci Technol 17: 69-73.
15. Cole CA, Hubbe MA, Heitmann JA (2008) Water release from fractionated stock suspensions. Part 1-effects of the amounts and types of fiber fines. Tappi J 7: 28-32.
16. Davies LM, Harris PJ (2003) Atomic force microscopy of microfibrils in primary cell walls. Planta 217: 283-289.
17. Ding S-Y, Himmel M (2006) The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. J Agric Food Chem 54: 597-606.
18. Donnan FG, Harris AB (1911) The osmotic pressure and conductivity of aqueous solutions of Congo-red, and reversible membrane equilibria. J Chem Soc 99: 1554-1577.
19. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Toman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45: 1-33.
20. Eklund D, Lindström T (1991) Paper chemistry an introduction. DT Paper Science, Grankulla, Finland.
21. Eriksen Ø, Syverud K, Gregersen Ø (2008) The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23: 299-304.
22. Fors C (2000) The effect of fibre charge on web consolidation in papermaking. Licentiate thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
23. Grignon J, Scallan AM (1980) Effect of pH and neutral salts upon the swelling of cellulose gels. J Appl Polym Sci 25: 2829-2843.
24. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose Nanopaper Structures of High Toughness. Biomacromolecules 9: 1579-1585.
25. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J App Polym Sci Symp (Proc Cellul Conf, 9th, 1982, Part 2) 37: 797-813.
26. 13C CP-MAS NMR. Carbohydr Polym 40: 115-124.
27. Hubbe MA, Heitmann JA (2007) Review of factors affecting the release of water from cellulosic fibers during paper manufacture. Bioresourses 2: 500-533.
28. Jakob HF, Fengel D, Tschegg SE, Pratzl P (1995) The elementary cellulose fibril in picea abies: comparison of transmission electron microscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering, and wide-angle x-ray scattering results. Macromolecules 28: 8782-8787.
29. Kajanto I (1998) Structural mechanics of paper and board. In: Niskanen K (ed) Papermaking science and technology, book 16 paper physics. Fapet Oy, Helsinki, pp 193-221.
30. Ketola H, Andersson T (1999) Dry strength additives. In: Neimo L (ed) Papermaking Science and Technology, Book 4 Papermaking Chemistry. Fapet Oy, Helsinki, pp 269-287.
31. Krogerus B, Eriksson L, Sundberg A, Mosbye J, Ahlroth A, Östlund I, Sjöström L (2002) Fines in closed circuits-Final report. SCAN Forsk report 740. (http://www. nordicinnovation. net/_img/Fines-final_report. doc, in 23. 02. 2010).
32. Laine J, Lövgren L, Stenius P, Sjöberg S (1994a) Potentiometric titration of unbleached kraft cellulose fibre surfaces. Colloids Surf A 88: 277-287.
33. Laine J, Stenius P (1997) Effect of charge on the fiber and paper properties of bleached industrial kraft pulps. Paperi Puu 79: 257-266.
34. Laine J, Stenius P, Carlsson G, Ström G (1994b) Surface characterization of unbleached kraft pulps by means of ESCA. Cellulose 1: 145-160.
35. Lin T, Yin X, Retulainen E, Nazhad MM (2007) Effect of chemical pulp fines on filler retention and paper properties. Appita J 60: 469-473.
36. Lindström T (1992) Chemical factors affecting the behavior of fibers during papermaking. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 7: 181-192.
37. Lindström T, Carlsson G (1982) The effect of chemical environment on fiber swelling. Sven Papperstidn 85: R14-R20.
38. Lindström T, Wågberg L (1983) Effects of pH and electrolyte concentration on the adsorption of cationic polyacrylamides on cellulose. Tappi J 66: 83-85.
39. Lobben T (1977) Effects of the fines on the paper strength properties of chemical pulps. Nor Skogind 31: 93-97.
40. Lobben T (1978) On the influence of the pulp components on the shrinkage and elongation of paper. Nor Skogind 32: 80-84.
41. Lumiainen J (1998) Refining of chemical pulp. In: Paulapuro H (ed) Papermaking science and technology, book 8 papermaking part 1, stock preparation and wet end. Fapet Oy, Helsinki.
42. Manners DJ (1989) Recent developments in our understanding of amylopectin structure. Carbohydr Polym 11: 87-112.
43. Myllytie P (2009) Interactions of polymers with fibrillar structure of cellulose fibres: a new approach to bonding and strength in paper. Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki University of Technology, TKK, Espoo, Finland.
44. Nagakaito AN, Yano H (2005) Novel high-strength biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose having nano-order-unit web-like network structure. Appl Phys A 80: 155-159.
45. Neale SM (1929) The swelling of cellulose and its affinity relations with aqueous solutions. J Textile Inst 20: T373-T400.
46. Niskanen K, Kärenlampi P (1998) In-plane tensile properties. In: Niskanen K (ed) Papermaking science and technology, book 16 paper physics. Fapet Oy, Helsinki, pp 139-191.
47. Norell M, Johansson K, Persson M (1999) Retention and drainage. In: Neimo L (ed) Papermaking science and technology, book 4 papermaking chemistry. Fapet Oy, Helsinki, pp 43-81.
48. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8: 1934-1941.
49. Pääkkö M, Vapaavuori J, Silvennoinen R, Kosonen H, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Berglund LA, Ikkala O (2008) Long and entangled native cellulose I nanofibers allow flexible aerogels and hierarchically porous templates for functionalities. Soft Matter 4: 2492-2499.
50. Reid IJD, Daul GC (1947) The partial carboxymethylation of cotton to obtain swellable fibers. Text Res J 17: 554-561.
51. Retulainen E, Luukko K, Fagerholm K, Pere J, Laine J, Paulapuro H (2002) Papermaking quality of fines from different pulps-the effect of size, shape and chemical composition. Appita J 55: 457-467.
52. Retulainen E, Moss P, Nieminen K (1993a) Effect of fines on the properties of fibre networks. In: Baker CF (ed) Products of papermaking, Vol. 2, Transactions of the 10th fundamental research symposium September 1993. Pira Int, Oxford, pp 727-769.
53. Retulainen E, Nieminen K (1996) Fibre properties as control variables in papermaking? Part 2. Strengthening interfibre bonds and reducing grammage. Paperi Puu 78: 305-312.
54. Retulainen E, Nieminen K, Nurminen I (1993b) Enhancing strength properties of kraft and CTMP fibre networks. Appita 46: 33-38.
55. Retulainen E, Niskanen K, Nilsen N (1998) Fibers and bonds. In: Niskanen K (ed) Papermaking science and technology, book 16 paper physics. Fapet Oy, Helsinki, pp 55-87.
56. Reynolds WF (1980) Dry strength additives. Tappi press, Atlanta, GA, USA.
57. Salmi J (2009) Surface interactions in polyelectrolyte-cellulose systems and their implications for flocculation mechanisms. Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki University of Technology, TKK, Espoo, Finland.
58. Salmi J, Nypelö T, Österberg M, Laine J (2009) Layer structures formed by silica nanoparticles and cellulose nanofibrils with cationic polyacrylamide (C-PAM) on cellulose surface and their influence on interactions. Bioresourses 4: 602-625.
59. Scallan AM, Grignon J (1979) The effect of cations on pulp and paper properties. Sven Papperstidn 82: 40-47.
60. Shirazi M, van de Ven TGM, Garnier G (2003) Adsorption of modified starches on pulp fibers. Langmuir 19: 10835-10842.
61. Sjöström E (1989) The origin of charge on cellulosic fibers. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 4: 90-93.
62. Somerville C, Bauer S, Brininstool G, Facette M, Hamann T, Milne J, Osborne E, Paredez A, Persson S, Raab T, Vorwerk S, Youngs H (2004) Toward a systems approach to understanding plant cell walls. Science 306: 2206-2211.
63. Swerin A, Ödberg L, Lindström T (1990) Deswelling of hardwood kraft pulp fibres by cationic polymers. The effect of wet pressing and sheet properties. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 5: 188-196.
64. Taniguchi T, Okamura K (1998) New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibers. Polym Int 47: 291-294.
65. Tatsumi D, Ishioka S, Matsumoto T (2002) Effect of fiber concentration and axial ratio on the rheological properties of cellulose fiber suspensions. J Soc Rheol Japan 30: 27-32.
66. Towers M, Scallan AM (1996) Predicting the ion-exchange of kraft pulps using Donnan theory. J Pulp Pap Sci 22: J332-J339.
67. Turbak AF, Snyder FW, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J Appl Polym Sci 37: 815-827.
68. Unbehend JE, Britt KW (1982) Retention, drainage, and sheet consolidation. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 21: 150-153.
69. van de Steeg HGM (1992) Cationic starches on cellulose surfaces: a study of polyelectrolyte adsorption. Ph. D. thesis. University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.
70. van de Ven T (2000) A model for the adsorption of polyelectrolytes on pulp fibers: relation between fiber structure and polyelectrolyte properties. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 15: 494-501.
71. Wågberg L, Decher G, Norgren M, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Axnäs K (2008) The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. Langmuir 24: 784-795.
72. Wågberg L, Winter L, Ödberg L, Lindström T (1987) On the charge stoichiometry upon adsorption of a cationic polyelectrolyte on cellulosic materials. Colloids Surf 27: 163-173.
73. Walecka JA (1956) An investigartion of low degree of substitution carboxymethylcelluloses. Tappi 39: 458-463.
74. Xu Y, Pelton R (2005) A new look at how fines influence the strength of filled papers. J Pulp Pap Sci 31: 147-152.
75. Yano H, Nakahara S (2004) Bio-composites produced from plant microfiber bundles with a nanometer unit web-like network. J Mater Sci 39: 1635-1638.
76. Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E (2010) Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 79: 1086-1093.