What's social about consumer behavior?

Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-18

  Wänke, Michaela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904770907     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781441605283     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Bartsch, R. A., Burnett, T., Diller, T. R., Rankin-Williams, E. (2000). Gender representation in television commercials: Updating an update. Sex-Roles, 43, 735-743.
2. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.
3. Botti, S., & Iyengar, S. S. (2004). The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: When people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 312-326.
4. Brendl, C. M., Chattopadhyay, A., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. (2005). Name letter branding: Valence transfers when product specific needs are active. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 405-415.
5. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Chernev, A. (2003). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170-183.
7. Cooper, W. H., & Kohn, P. M. (1989). The social image of the young female smoker. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 935-941.
8. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, 276-287.
9. Dominick, J. R., & Rauch, G. E. (1972). The image of women in network TV commercials. Journal of Broadcasting, 16, 259-265.
10. Eighmey, J., & Sar, S. (2007). Harlow Gale and the origins of the psychology of advertising. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 147-158.
11. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE Model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 75-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Fazio, R. H. (2008). Evaluative conditioning: The " how" question. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for Consumer Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
13. Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 280-288.
14. Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 97-116). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Fazio, R. H., & Williams C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitudeperception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
16. Forgas, J., Baumeister, R., & Tice, D. (Eds.) (in press). The psychology of self regulation. New York: Psychology Press.
17. Fullerton, R. A. (1994). Tea and the Viennese: A pioneering episode in the analysis of consumer behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 418-421.
18. Fullerton, R. A. (1999). An historic analysis of advertising's role in consumer decision-making: Paul F. Lazarsfeld's European research. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 498-503.
19. Furnham, A. & Mak, T. (1990). Sex-role stereotyping in television commercials: A review and comparison of fourteen studies done on five continents over 25 years. Sex-Roles, 41, 413-437.
20. Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety of sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? Journal of Retailing, 74, 491-513.
21. Hurtz, W., & Durkin, K. (2004). The effects of gender-stereotyped radio commercials. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1974-1992.
22. Jennings (Walstedt), J., Geis, R. L., & Brown, V. (1980). The influence of television commercials on women's self-confidence and independent judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 203-210.
23. Jones, B., & Caroll, M. (1998). The effect of a video character's smoking status on young females' perceptions of social characteristics. Adolescence, 33(131), 657-668.
24. Karremans, J., Stroebe, W., & Claus, J. (2006). Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming on brand choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 792-798.
25. Lanis, K., & Covell, K. (1995). Images of women in advertisements: Effects on attitudes related to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 32, 639-649.
26. Leong, S. M. (1989). A citation analysis of the journal of consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 492-497.
27. Maass, A. (2007). Representing people in space: The spatial agency bias. Presented at the European Social Cognition Network Meeting, Brno.
28. McKay, N. J., & Covell, K. (1997). The impact of women in advertisements on attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 36, 573-583.
29. Münsterberg, H. (1913). Psychology and industrial efficiency. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin. [Although not a direct translation, this work was based on Münsterberg, H. (1912). Psychologie und Wirtschaftsleben. Ein Beitrag zur angewandten Experimental-Psychologie. Leipzig: Barth].
30. North, A. C., Hargreaves, D. J., & McKendrick, J. (1997). In-store music affects product choice. Nature, 390, 132.
31. O'Donnell, W. J., & O'Donnell, K. J. (1978). Update: Sex-role messages in TV commercials. Journal of Communication, 28, 156-158.
32. Olson, J. M., & Maio, G. (Eds.). (2000). Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Packard, V. (1957). The hidden persuaders. London: Longmans, Green.
34. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
35. Phillips, D. M., Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (1999). Influence in the evolving citation network of the journal of consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research, 1999, 26(1), 203-210.
36. Plassmann, H., O'Doherty, J., Shiv, B., & Rangel, A. (2008). Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced utility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 1050-1054.
37. Pollay, R. W. (1987). On the value of reflections on the values in " the distorted mirror." Journal of Marketing, 51(3), 104-110.
38. Regan, D. T., & Fazio, R. H. (1977). On the consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to the method of attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 28-45.
39. Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493-517.
40. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
41. Schwarz, N., Wagner, D., Bannert, M., & Mathes, L. (1987). Cognitive accessibility of sex role concepts and attitudes toward political participation: The impact of sexist advertisements. Sex Roles, 17, 593-601.
42. Scott, W. D. (1904). Psychology of advertising. Atlantic Monthly, 93.
43. Scott, W. D. (1908). The psychology of advertising. New York: Arno Press.
44. Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 124-148.
45. Shavitt, S., & Nelson, M. (2000). The social-identity function in person perception: Communicated meanings of product preferences. In G. Maio & J.M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Function of attitudes (pp. 37-57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Snyder, M., & Kendzierski, D. (1982): Acting on one's attitudes: Procedures for linking attitude and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 165-183.
47. Vartanian, L. R., Herman, C. P., & Polivy, J. (2007). Consumption stereotypes and impression management: How you are what you eat. Appetite, 48(3), 265-277.