Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 269-276

  Calderwood, Audrey H ^a   Schroy III, Paul C ^a   Lieberman, David A ^b   Logan, Judith R ^b   Zurfluh, Michael ^b   Jacobson, Brian C ^a  

^a BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOSTON BOWEL PREPARATION SCALE SCORE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING TEST; VIDEORECORDING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLONIC POLYPS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; TIME;

LAXATIVE;

CATHARTICS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84904745632     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.031     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. F. Froehlich, V. Wietlisbach, and J.J. Gonvers et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 61 2005 378 384
2. G.C. Harewood, V.K. Sharma, and P. de Garmo Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia Gastrointest Endosc 58 2003 76 79
3. D. Lieberman, M. Nadel, and R.A. Smith et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable Gastrointest Endosc 65 2007 757 766
4. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, and T.H. Baron et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 873 885
5. D.A. Lieberman, D.K. Rex, and S.J. Winawer et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Gastroenterology 143 2012 844 857
6. A.H. Calderwood, and B.C. Jacobson Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Gastrointest Endosc 72 2011 686 692
7. E.J. Lai, A.H. Calderwood, and G. Doros et al. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 620 625
8. B.K. Enestvedt, M. Brian Fennerty, and A. Zaman et al. MiraLAX vs. Golytely: Is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34 2011 775 782
9. B.K. Enestvedt, M.B. Fennerty, and G.M. Eisen Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33 2011 33 40
10. A. Repici, R. Cestari, and V. Annese et al. Randomised clinical trial: low-volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy - a comparison between two different PEG-based formulations Aliment Pharmacol Ther 36 2012 717 724
11. J.B. Samarasena, V.R. Muthusamy, and M.M. Jamal Split-dosed MiraLAX/Gatorade is an effective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation in low-risk patients: a randomized controlled study Am J Gastroenterol 107 2012 1036 1042
12. B.W. Sipe, M. Fischer, and A.R. Baluyut et al. A low-residue diet improved patient satisfaction with split-dose oral sulfate solution without impairing colonic preparation Gastrointest Endosc 77 2012 932 936
13. D.A. Lieberman, J. Holub, and G. Eisen et al. Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium Gastrointest Endosc 62 2005 875 883
14. D.A. Lieberman, J.L. Holub, and M.D. Moravec et al. Prevalence of colon polyps detected by colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic black and white patients JAMA 300 2008 1417 1422
15. Calderwood AH, Logan JR, Zurfluh M, et al. Validity of a web-based educational program to disseminate a standardized bowel preparation rating scale. J Clin Gastroenterol. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
16. N.J. West, A.P. Poullis, and R.J. Leicester The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme - a realistic approach with additional benefits Colorectal Dis 10 2008 708 714
17. R.V. Chokshi, C.E. Hovis, and G.A. Colditz et al. Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy Dig Dis Sci 58 2013 2151 2155
18. S. Ben-Horin, S. Bar-Meir, and B. Avidan The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 2680 2685
19. M. Larsen, N. Hills, and J. Terdiman The impact of the quality of colon preparation on follow-up colonoscopy recommendations Am J Gastroenterol 106 2011 2058 2062
20. G.C. Hillyer, C.H. Basch, and B. Lebwohl et al. Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey Int J Colorectal Dis 28 2013 73 81
21. D.A. Lieberman, D.O. Faigel, and J.R. Logan et al. Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 645 653