Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2151-2155

  Chokshi, Reena V ^a   Hovis, Christine E ^a   Colditz, Graham A ^a   Early, Dayna S ^a   Wang, Jean S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adherence; Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING;

CATHARTICS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84881480570     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: 15732568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2642-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1296-1308.
2. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76-79.
3. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, Burnand B, Vader JP. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378-384.
4. Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, Denberg TD. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:438-442.
5. Ransohoff DF, Yankaskas B, Gizlice Z, Gangarosa L. Recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance in community practice. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2623-2630.
6. Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2680-2685.
7. Larsen M, Hills N, Terdiman J. The impact of the quality of colon preparation on follow-up colonoscopy recommendations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:2058-2062.
8. Hillyer GC, Basch CH, Lebwohl B, et al. Shortened surveillance intervals following suboptimal bowel preparation for colonoscopy: results of a national survey. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:73-81.
9. Rapuri S, Spencer J, Eckels D. Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening-review of literature. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:453-459.
10. Siddiqui AA, Patel A, Huerta S. Determinants of compliance with colonoscopy in patients with adenomatous colon polyps in a veteran population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:1623-1630.
11. Colquhoun P, Chen HC, Kim JI, et al. High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:158-161.
12. Brueckl WM, Fritsche B, Seifert B, et al. Non-compliance in surveillance for patients with previous resection of large (>or = 1 cm) colorectal adenomas. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:7313-7318.
13. Yood MU, Oliveria S, Boyer JG, Wells K, Stang P, Johnson CC. Colon polyp recurrence in a managed care population. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:422-426.
14. Salz T, Weinberger M, Ayanian JZ, et al. Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:256.
15. Cooper GS, Kou TD, Reynolds HL Jr. Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors: a population-based analysis. Cancer. 2008;113:2029-2037.
16. Aronchick C, Lipshutz W, Wright S, DuFrayne F, Bergman G. Validation of an instrument to assess colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2667.
17. Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM, et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1240-1245.
18. Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME, Leighton JA, Crowell MD. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:603-608.
19. Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:657-666.
20. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844-857.
21. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, et al. Colonoscopic enema as rescue for inadequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a prospective, observational study. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e735-e739.
22. Anderson JC, Fortinsky RH, Kleppinger A, Merz-Beyus AB, Huntington CG 3rd, Lagarde S. Predictors of compliance with free endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in uninsured adults. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:875-880.
23. Anderson AE, Henry KA, Samadder NJ, Merrill RM, Kinney AY. Rural vs urban residence affects risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.025.
24. Tan AS, Moldovan-Johnson M, Parvanta S, Gray SW, Armstron K, Hornik RC. Patient-clinician information engagement improves adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance after curative treatment: results from a longitudinal study. Oncologist. 2012;17:1155-1162.