Prediction of protein structure classes by incorporating different protein descriptors into general Chou's pseudo amino acid composition

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 360, Issue , 2014, Pages 109-116

  Nanni, Loris ^a   Brahnam, Sheryl ^c   Lumini, Alessandra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ensemble of classifiers; Machine learning; Protein descriptors; Protein structure class; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; DATA SET; ENSEMBLE FORECASTING; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEW CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SECONDARY STRUCTURE ELEMENT; SUBSTITUTION MATRIX REPRESENTATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; MODELS, GENETIC; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84904722553     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anfinsen C. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973, 181:223-230.
2. Birzele F., Kramer S. A new representation for protein secondary structure prediction based on frequent patterns. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2628-2634.
3. Bu W.S., et al. Prediction of protein (domain) structural classes based on amino-acid index. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 266:1043-1049.
4. Cao D.S., Xu Q.S, et al. Propy: a tool to generate various modes of Chou's PseAAC. Bioinformatics 2013, 29:960-962.
5. Chen L, Zeng W.M., et al. Predicting Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification of drugs by integrating chemical-chemical interactions and similarities. PLoS One 2012, 7:e35254.
6. Chen W, Feng PM, et al. (2013) iRSpot-PseDNC: identify recombination spots with pseudo dinucleotide composition, Nucleic Acids Res. 41: e69: open access at. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1093/nar/gks1450.
7. Chou K.-C. A novel approach to predicting protein structural classes in a (20-1)-d amino acid composition space. Proteins 1995, 21:319-344.
8. Chou K.-C. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo-amino acid composition. Proteins: Struct., Fucnt. Genet. 2001, 43:246-255.
9. Chou KC Using amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme subfamily classes. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:10-19.
10. Chou K.-C. Pseudo amino acid composition and its applications in bioinformatics, proteomics and system biology. Curr. Proteom. 2009, 6:262-274.
11. Chou K.-C. Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition (50th Anniversary Year Review). J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 273:236-247.
12. Chou KC Some remarks on predicting multi-label attributes in molecular biosystems. Mol. Biosyst. 2013, 9:1092-1100.
13. Chou K.-C., Cai Y.D. Predicting protein structural class by functional domain composition. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 321:1007-1009.
14. Chou K.-C., Shen H.B. Review: recent progresses in protein subcellular location prediction. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 370.
15. Chou, K.-C. Shen, H.B. (2009) Review: recent advances in developing web-servers for predicting protein attributes, Nat. Sci., 2, 63-92 (openly accessible at ). http://www.scirp.org/journal/NS/.
16. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and other Kernel-based Learning Methods 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17. Dai Q., et al. Comparison study on statistical features of predicted secondary structures for protein structural class prediction: from content to position. BMC Bioinf. 2013, 14:152.
18. Ding S., et al. A novel protein structural classes prediction method based on predicted secondary structure. Biochimie 2012, 94:1166-1171.
19. Du P, Wang X, et al. PseAAC-builder: a cross-platform stand-alone program for generating various special Chou's pseudo9amino acid compositions. Anal. Biochem. 2012, 425:117-119.
20. Du P, Gu S, et al. PseAAC-general: fast building various modes of general form of Chou's pseudo9amino acid composition for large9scale protein datasets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15:3495-3506.
21. Fan G.-L., Li Q.-Z. Predicting protein submitochondrion locations by combining different descriptors into the general form of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition. Amino Acids 2011, 20:1-11.
22. Ghanty P., Pal N.R. Prediction of protein folds: extraction of new features, dimensionality reduction, and fusion of heterogeneous classifiers. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 2009, 8:100-110.
23. Gribskov M., Mclachlan A.D., Eisenberg D. Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 1987, 4355-4358.
24. Jeong J.C., Lin X., Chen X.-W. On position-specific scoring matrix for protein function prediction. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 2011, 8:308-315.
25. Jones D.T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 292:195-202.
26. Kawashima S., Kanehisa M. AAindex: amino acid index database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 20.
27. Kong L., Zhang L., Lv J. Accurate prediction of protein structural classes by incorporating predicted secondary structure information into the general form of Chou's pseudo amino acid composition. J. Theor. Biol. 2014, 344:12-18.
28. Kurgan L.A., Homaeian L. Prediction of structural classes for protein sequences and domains-impact of prediction algorithms, sequence representation and homology, and test procedures on accuracy. Pattern Recognit 2006, 39:2323-2343.
29. Kurgan L.A., Cios K., Chen K. SCPRED: accurate prediction of protein structural class for sequences of twilight-zone similarity with predicting sequences. BMC Bioinf. 2008, 9:226.
30. Levitt M., Chothia C. Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature 1976, 261:552-558.
31. Lin SX, Lapointe J Theoretical and experimental biology in one. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. (JBiSE) 2013, 6:435-442.
32. Liu T., Jia C. A high-accuracy protein structural class prediction algorithm using predicted secondary structural information. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 267:272-275.
33. Mizianty M.J., Kurgan L.A. Modular prediction of protein structural classes from sequences of twilight-zone identity with predicting sequences. Bioinforma 2009, 10:414.
34. Mizianty MJ, Kurgan L Modular prediction of protein structural classes from sequences of twilight-zone identity with predicting sequences. BMC Bioinf. 2009, 10:414.
35. Nakashima H., Nishikawa K., Ooi T. The folding type of a protein is relevant to the amino acid composition. J. Biochem. 1986, 99:153-162.
36. Nanni L., Brahnam S., Lumini A. A high performance set of PseAAC descriptors extracted from the amino acid sequence for protein classification. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 266:1-10.
37. Paliwal K.K., Sharma A., Lyons J., Dehzangi A. A tri-gram based feature extraction technique using linear probabilities of position specific scoring matrix for protein fold recognition. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 2014, 44-50(March).
38. Rodriguez J.J., Kuncheva L.I., Alonso C.J. Rotation forest: a new classifier ensemble method. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006, 28:1619-1630.
39. Rost B., Sander C. Bridging the protein by structure predictions sequence-structure gap. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1996, 25:113-136.
40. Shen HB, Chou KC PseAAC: a flexible web-server for generating various kinds of protein pseudo amino acid composition. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 373:386-388.
41. Sharma A., et al. A feature extraction technique using bi-gram probabilities of position specific scoring matrix for protein fold recognition. J. Theor. Biol. 2013, 320:41-46.
42. Wang Z.X., Yuan Z. How good is prediction of protein structural class by the component-coupled method?. Proteins 2000, 38:165-175.
43. Xiao X, Wang P, et al. iAMP-2L: a two-level multi-label classifier for identifying antimicrobial peptides and their functional types. Anal. Biochem. 2013, 436:168-177.
44. Xu Y, Ding J, et al. iSNO-PseAAC: predict cysteine S-nitrosylation sites in proteins by incorporating position specific amino acid propensity into pseudo amino acid composition. PLoS One 2013, 8:e55844.
45. Xu Y, Shao XJ, et al. (2013a) iSNO-AAPair: incorporating amino acid pairwise coupling into PseAAC for predicting cysteine S-nitrosylation sites in proteins. PeerJ 1: e171: open access at. https://peerj.com/articles/171.pdf.
46. Yang J., Peng Z., Chen X. Prediction of protein structural classes for low homology sequences based on predicted secondary structure. BMC Bioinf. 2010, 11:S9.
47. Yang L., et al. Using auto covariance method for functional discrimination of membrane proteins based on evolution information. Amino Acids 2010, 38:1497-1503.
48. Yu X., et al. Predicting subcellular location of apoptosis proteins with pseudo amino acid composition: approach from amino acid substitution matrix and auto covariance transformation. Amino Acids 2011, 10.1007/s00726-00011-00848-00728.
49. Yuan Z, Huang B Prediction of protein accessible surface areas by support vector regression. Proteins 2004, 57:558-564.
50. Zhang S., Ding S., Wang T. High-accuracy prediction of protein structural class for low-similarity sequences based on predicted secondary structure. Biochimie 2011, 93:710-714.
51. Zhou HF, Javad R, Willy H, Gao S., Jin J., Fan M., Yong CH, Wozniak M, Wong.L Stringent DDI-based prediction of H. sapiens-M. tuberculosis H37Rv protein-protein interactions. BMC Syst. Biol. 2013, 7(no. 6):1-15. (2013).