Extensive recombination-induced disruption of genetic interactions is highly deleterious but can be partially reversed by small numbers of secondary recombination events

Journal of Virology

Volumn 88, Issue 14, 2014, Pages 7843-7851

  Monjane, Adérito L ^a   Martin, Darren P ^a   Lakay, Francisco ^a   Muhire, Brejnev M ^a   Pande, Daniel ^b   Varsani, Arvind ^a,c,d   Harkins, Gordon ^e   Shepherd, Dionne N ^a   Rybicki, Edward P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b MASENO UNIVERSITY   (Kenya)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VIRUS DNA;

ARTICLE; CHIMERA; COMPUTER MODEL; DNA ISOLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE DISRUPTION; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MAIZE STREAK VIRUS; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VIRUS GENOME; VIRUS INFECTIVITY; VIRUS RECOMBINANT; VIRUS VIRULENCE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; DNA, VIRAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MAIZE STREAK VIRUS; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; PLANT DISEASES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84904683552     PISSN: 0022538X     EISSN: 10985514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00709-14     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Felsenstein J. 1974. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78:737-756.
2. Keightley PD, Otto SP. 2006. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Nature 443:89-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05049.
3. Rice WR. 2002. Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:241-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038 /nrg760.
4. Liu H, Fu Y, Xie J, Cheng J, Ghabrial SA, Li G, Peng Y, Yi X, Jiang D. 2011. Widespread endogenization of densoviruses and parvoviruses in animal and human genomes. J. Virol. 85:9863-9876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00828-11.
5. Krupovic M, Forterre P. 2011. Microviridae goes temperate: microvirusrelated proviruses reside in the genomes of Bacteroidetes. PLoS One 6:e19893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019893.
6. Belyi VA, Levine AJ, Skalka AM. 2010. Sequences from ancestral singlestranded DNA viruses in vertebrate genomes: the Parvoviridae and Circoviridae are more than 40 to 50 million years old. J. Virol. 84:12458-12462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01789-10.
7. Gibbs MJ, Weiller GF. 1999. Evidence that a plant virus switched hosts to infect a vertebrate and then recombined with a vertebrate-infecting virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:8022-8027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073 /pnas.96.14.8022.
8. Diemer GS, Stedman KM. 2012. A novel virus genome discovered in an extreme environment suggests recombination between unrelated groups of RNA and DNA viruses. Biol. Direct 7:13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186 /1745-6150-7-13.
9. Saunders K, Stanley J. 1999. A nanovirus-like DNA component associated with yellow vein disease of Ageratum conyzoides: evidence for interfamilial recombination between plant DNA viruses. Virology 264:142-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/viro.1999.9948.
10. Rokyta DR, Wichman HA. 2009. Genic incompatibilities in two hybrid bacteriophages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:2831-2839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093 /molbev/msp199.
11. Martin DP, Rybicki EP. 2002. Investigation of Maize streak virus pathogenicity determinants using chimaeric genomes. Virology 300:180-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/viro.2002.1458.
12. Martin DP, Van Der Walt E, Posada D, Rybicki EP. 2005. The evolutionary value of recombination is constrained by genome modularity. PLoS Genet. 1:e51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010051.
13. Springman R, Kapadia-Desai DS, Molineux IJ, Bull JJ. 2012. Evolutionary recovery of a recombinant viral genome. G3 (Bethesda) 2:825-830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.112.002758.
14. Bull JJ, Springman R, Molineux IJ. 2007. Compensatory evolution in response to a novel RNA polymerase: orthologous replacement of a central network gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:900-908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093 /molbev/msm006.
15. Jain R, Rivera MC, Lake JA. 1999. Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96: 3801-3806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3801.
16. Galli A, Kearney M, Nikolaitchik OA, Yu S, Chin MPS, Maldarelli F, Coffin JM, Pathak VK, Hu W-S. 2010. Patterns of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 recombination ex vivo provide evidence for coadaptation of distant sites, resulting in purifying selection for intersubtype recombinants during replication. J. Virol. 84:7651-7661. http://dx.doi.org /10.1128/JVI.00276-10.
17. Escriu F, Fraile A, García-Arenal F. 2007. Constraints to genetic exchange support gene coadaptation in a tripartite RNA virus. PLoS Pathog. 3:e8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030008.
18. Lefeuvre P, Lett J-M, Reynaud B, Martin DP. 2007. Avoidance of protein fold disruption in natural virus recombinants. PLoS Pathog. 3:e181. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0030181.
19. Simon-Loriere E, Galetto R, Hamoudi M, Archer J, Lefeuvre P, Martin DP, Robertson DL, Negroni M. 2009. Molecular mechanisms of recombination restriction in the envelope gene of the human immunodeficiency virus. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000418.
20. Woo J, Robertson D, Lovell S. 2014. Constraints from protein structure and intra-molecular coevolution restrict recombination of HIV-1. Virology 454-455:34-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2014.01.029.
21. Elena SF, Solé RV, Sardanyés J. 2010. Simple genomes, complex interactions: epistasis in RNA virus. Chaos 20:026106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3449300.
22. Parera M, Perez-Alvarez N, Clotet B, Martínez MA. 2009. Epistasis among deleterious mutations in the HIV-1 protease. J. Mol. Biol. 392:243-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.015.
23. Van Opijnen T, Boerlijst MC, Berkhout B. 2006. Effects of random mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcriptional promoter on viral fitness in different host cell environments. J. Virol. 80:6678-6685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02547-05.
24. Sanjuán R, Moya A, Elena SF. 2004. The contribution of epistasis to the architecture of fitness in an RNA virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:15376-15379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404125101.
25. Lalić J, Elena SF. 2012. Magnitude and sign epistasis among deleterious mutations in a positive-sense plant RNA virus. Heredity (Edinb.) 109:71-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2012.15.
26. Van der Walt E, Rybicki EP, Varsani A, Polston JE, Billharz R, Donaldson L, Monjane AL, Martin DP. 2009. Rapid host adaptation by extensive recombination. J. Gen. Virol. 90:734-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.007724-0.
27. Monjane AL, van der Walt E, Varsani A, Rybicki EP, Martin DP. 2011. Recombination hotspots and host susceptibility modulate the adaptive value of recombination during maize streak virus evolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 11:350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-350.
28. Martin DP, Willment JA, Billharz R, Velders R, Odhiambo B, Njuguna J, James D, Rybicki EP. 2001. Sequence diversity and virulence in Zea mays of Maize streak virus isolates. Virology 288:247-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/viro.2001.1075.
29. Willment JA, Martin DP, Rybicki EP. 2001. Analysis of the diversity of African streak mastreviruses using PCR-generated RFLPs and partial sequence data. J. Virol. Methods 93:75-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0934(00)00299-8.
30. Willment JA, Martin DP, Van der Walt E, Rybicki EP. 2002. Biological and genomic sequence characterization of Maize streak virus isolates from wheat. Phytopathology 92:81-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.1.81.
31. Martin D, Rybicki E. 2000. Improved efficiency of Zea mays agroinoculation with Maize streak virus. Plant Dis. 84:1096-1098. http://dx.doi.org /10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.10.1096.
32. Lucy AP, Boulton MI, Davies JW, Maule AJ. 1996. Tissue specificity of Zea mays infection by maize streak virus. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 9:22-31.
33. Schnippenkoetter WH, Martin DP, Willment JA, Rybicki EP. 2001. Forced recombination between distinct strains of Maize streak virus. J. Gen. Virol. 82:3081-3090. http://vir.sgmjournals.org/content/82/12/3081.long.
34. Shepherd DN, Martin DP, McGivern DR, Boulton MI, Thomson JA, Rybicki EP. 2005. A three-nucleotide mutation altering the Maize streak virus Rep pRBR-interaction motif reduces symptom severity in maize and partially reverts at high frequency without restoring pRBR-Rep binding. J. Gen. Virol. 86:803-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.80694-0.
35. Martin DP, Rybicki EP. 1998. Microcomputer-based quantification of maize streak virus symptoms in Zea mays. Phytopathology 88:422-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.5.422.
36. Martin DP, Willment JA, Rybicki EP. 1999. Evaluation of maize streak virus pathogenicity in differentially resistant Zea mays genotypes. Phytopathology 89:695-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.8.695.
37. Inoue-Nagata AK, Albuquerque LC, Rocha WB, Nagata T. 2004. A simple method for cloning the complete begomovirus genome using the bacteriophage φ29 DNA polymerase. J. Virol. Methods 116:209-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.11.015.
38. Shepherd DN, Martin DP, Lefeuvre P, Monjane AL, Owor BE, Rybicki EP, Varsani A. 2008. A protocol for the rapid isolation of full geminivirus genomes from dried plant tissue. J. Virol. Methods 149:97-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.12.014.
39. Owor BE, Shepherd DN, Taylor NJ, Edema R, Monjane AL, Thomson JA, Martin DP, Varsani A. 2007. Successful application of FTA Classic Card technology and use of bacteriophage phi29 DNA polymerase for large-scale field sampling and cloning of complete maize streak virus genomes. J. Virol. Methods 140:100-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.11.004.
40. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121.
41. Owor BE, Martin DP, Rybicki EP, Thomson JA, Bezuidenhout ME, Lakay FM, Shepherd DN. 2011. A rep-based hairpin inhibits replication of diverse maize streak virus isolates in a transient assay. J. Gen. Virol. 92:2458-2465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.032862-0.
42. Ruschhaupt M, Martin DP, Lakay F, Bezuidenhout M, Rybicki EP, Jeske H, Shepherd DN. 2013. Replication modes of Maize streak virus mutants lacking RepA or the RepA-pRBR interaction motif. Virology 442: 173-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2013.04.012.
43. Markham NR, Zuker M. 2008. Software for nucleic acid folding and hybridization. Bioinformatics 453:1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-429-6_1.
44. Grimsley N, Hohn B, Hohn T, Walden R. 1986. "Agroinfection," an alternative route for viral infection of plants by using the Ti plasmid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83:3282-3286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.10.3282.
45. Owor BE, Martin DP, Shepherd DN, Edema R, Monjane AL, Rybicki EP, Thomson JA, Varsani A. 2007. Genetic analysis of maize streak virus isolates from Uganda reveals widespread distribution of a recombinant variant. J. Gen. Virol. 88:3154-3165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.83144-0.
46. Varsani A, Shepherd DN, Monjane AL, Owor BE, Erdmann JB, Rybicki EP, Peterschmitt M, Briddon RW, Markham PG, Oluwafemi S, Windram OP, Lefeuvre P, Lett JM, Martin DP. 2008. Recombination, decreased host specificity and increased mobility may have driven the emergence of maize streak virus as an agricultural pathogen. J. Gen. Virol. 89:2063-2074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.2008/003590-0.
47. Lefeuvre P, Martin DP, Harkins G, Lemey P, Gray AJA, Meredith S, Lakay F, Monjane A, Lett J-M, Varsani A, Heydarnejad J. 2010. The spread of tomato yellow leaf curl virus from the Middle East to the world. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001164.
48. Martin DP, Lefeuvre P, Varsani A, Hoareau M, Semegni J-Y, Dijoux B, Vincent C, Reynaud B, Lett J-M. 2011. Complex recombination patterns arising during geminivirus coinfections preserve and demarcate biologically important intra-genome interaction networks. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002203.
49. Albuquerque LC, Inoue-Nagata AK, Pinheiro B, Resende RO, Moriones E, Navas-Castillo J. 2012. Genetic diversity and recombination analysis of sweepoviruses from Brazil. Virol. J. 9:241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-9-241.
50. Lefeuvre P, Lett J-M, Varsani A, Martin DP. 2009. Widely conserved recombination patterns among single-stranded DNA viruses. J. Virol. 83: 2697-2707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02152-08.
51. García-Andrés S, Tomás DM, Sánchez-Campos S, Navas-Castillo J, Moriones E. 2007. Frequent occurrence of recombinants in mixed infections of tomato yellow leaf curl disease-associated begomoviruses. Virology 365:210-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2007.03.045.
52. Shepherd DN, Martin DP, Varsani A, Thomson JA, Rybicki EP, Klump HH. 2006. Restoration of native folding of single-stranded DNA sequences through reverse mutations: an indication of a new epigenetic mechanism. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 453:108-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2005.12.009.
53. Palmer K. 1997. Investigations into the use of Maize streak virus as a gene vector. Ph.D. thesis. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.