Dissociable mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff during visual perceptual learning are revealed by a hierarchical drift-diffusion model

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue 8 APR, 2014, Pages

  Zhang, Jiaxiang ^a   Rowe, James B ^a,b,c  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian parameter estimation; Drift diffusion model; Motion discrimination; Perceptual learning; Speed accuracy tradeoff

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DRIFT DIFFUSION MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MODEL; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; SPEED ACCURACY TRADEOFF; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VELOCITY; VISION;

EID: 84904662769     PISSN: 16624548     EISSN: 1662453X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00069     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Adini, Y., Wilkonsky, A., Haspel, R., Tsodyks, M., and Sagi, D. (2004). Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination: the effect of contrast uncertainty. J. Vis. 4, 993-1005. doi: 10.1167/4.12.2
2. Ahissar, M., and Hochstein, S. (1997). Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning. Nature 387, 401-406. doi: 10.1038/387401a0
3. Ahissar, M., and Hochstein, S. (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 457-464. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.011
4. Balci, F., Simen, P., Niyogi, R., Saxe, A., Hughes, J. A., Holmes, P., et al. (2011). Acquisition of decision making criteria: reward rate ultimately beats accuracy. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 640-657. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0049-7
5. Bao, M., Yang, L., Rios, C., He, B., and Engel, S. A. (2010). Perceptual learning increases the strength of the earliest signals in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 30, 15080-15084. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5703-09.2010
6. Barnett, S. D., Heinemann, A. W., Libin, A., Houts, A. C., Gassaway, J., Sen-Gupta, S., et al. (2012). Small N designs for rehabilitation research. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 49, 175-186. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.12.0242
7. Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., and Ilgen, D. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: toward a contingency approach. Acad. Manag. J. 46, 572-590. doi: 10.2307/30040650
8. Berger, J. O., and Bayarri, M. J. (2004). The Interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis. Stat. Sci. 19, 58-80. doi: 10.1214/088342304000000116
9. Blumen, H. M., Gazes, Y., Habeck, C., Kumar, A., Steffener, J., Rakitin, B. C., et al. (2011). Neural networks associated with the speed-accuracy tradeoff: evidence from the response signal method. Behav. Brain Res. 224, 397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.06.004
10. Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P., and Cohen, J. D. (2006). The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol. Rev. 113, 700-765. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700
11. Bogacz, R., Hu, P. T., Holmes, P. J., and Cohen, J. D. (2010). Do humans produce the speed-accuracy trade-off that maximizes reward rate? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 863-891. doi: 10.1080/17470210903091643
12. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433-436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
13. Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., and Movshon, J. A. (1993). Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Vis. Neurosci. 10, 1157-1169. doi: 10.1017/S0952523800010269
14. Brown, S., and Heathcote, A. (2005). A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychol. Rev. 112, 117-128. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.117
15. Brown, S. D., and Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn. Psychol. 57, 153-178. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002
16. Bulté, I., and Onghena, P. (2008). An R package for single-case randomization tests. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 467-478. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.2.467
17. Burnham, K., and Anderson, D. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
18. Chittka, L., Dyer, A. G., Bock, F., and Dornhaus, A. (2003). Psychophysics: bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature 424:388. doi: 10.1038/424388a
19. Chittka, L., Skorupski, P., and Raine, N. E. (2009). Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 400-407. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010
20. Coolican, H. (2009). Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology, 5th Edn. London: Hodder Education.
21. Dosher, B. A., and Lu, Z.-L. (2007). The functional form of performance improvements in perceptual learning: learning rates and transfer. Psychol. Sci. 18, 531-539. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01934.x
22. Dutilh, G., Krypotos, A.-M., and Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice. Exp. Psychol. 58, 434-442. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000111
23. Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., and Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 1026-1036. doi: 10.3758/16.6.1026
24. Edgington, E. (1995). Randomization Tests, 4th Edn. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
25. Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 30, 146-156. doi: 10.3758/BF03209424
26. Fahle, M. (2005). Perceptual learning: specificity versus generalization. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.010
27. Fahle, M., and Poggio, T. (2002). Perceptual Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28. Fitts, P. M. (1966). Cognitive aspects of information processing: III. Set for speed versus accuracy. J. Exp. Psychol. 71, 849-857. doi: 10.1037/h0023232
29. Forstmann, B. U., Dutilh, G., Brown, S., Neumann, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Ridderinkhof, K. R., et al. (2008). Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 17538-17542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805903105
30. Franks, N. R., Dornhaus, A., Fitzsimmons, J. P., and Stevens, M. (2003). Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 270, 2457-2463. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2527
31. Furmanski, C. S., Schluppeck, D., and Engel, S. A. (2004). Learning strengthens the response of primary visual cortex to simple patterns. Curr. Biol. 14, 573-578. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.032
32. Gamerman, D., and Lopes, H. F. (2006). Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference. 2nd Edn. London: Taylor and Francis.
33. Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., and Rubin, D. (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd Edn. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
34. Gelman, A., and Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457-472. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136
35. Gilbert, C. D., Sigman, M., and Crist, R. E. (2001). The neural basis of perceptual learning. Neuron 31, 681-697. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00424-X
36. Gold, J. I., and Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535-574. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038
37. Green, C. S., and Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature 423, 534-537. doi: 10.1038/nature01647
38. Hanks, T. D., Ditterich, J., and Shadlen, M. N. (2006). Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 682-689. doi: 10.1038/nn1683
39. Heathcote, A., Brown, S., and Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000). The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7, 185-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03212979
40. Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S., and Ungerleider, L. G. (2008). The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 467-479. doi: 10.1038/nrn2374
41. Heitz, R. P., and Schall, J. D. (2012). Neural mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff. Neuron 76, 616-628. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.030
42. Ho, T. C., Brown, S., and Serences, J. T. (2009). Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex. J. Neurosci. 29, 8675-8687. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5984-08.2009
43. Huk, A. C., and Shadlen, M. N. (2005). Neural activity in macaque parietal cortex reflects temporal integration of visual motion signals during perceptual decision making. J. Neurosci. 25, 10420-10436. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4684-04.2005
44. Ivanoff, J., Branning, P., and Marois, R. (2008). fMRI evidence for a dual process account of the speed-accuracy tradeoff in decision-making. PLoS ONE 3:e2635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002635
45. Jahfari, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., and Scholte, H. S. (2013). Spatial frequency information modulates response inhibition and decision-making processes. PLoS ONE 8:e76467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076467
46. Karni, A., and Sagi, D. (1991). Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 4966-4970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4966
47. Kayser, A. S., Erickson, D. T., Buchsbaum, B. R., and D'Esposito, M. (2010). Neural representations of relevant and irrelevant features in perceptual decision making. J. Neurosci. 30, 15778-15789. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3163-10.2010
48. Kim, J. N., and Shadlen, M. N. (1999). Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 176-185. doi: 10.1038/5739
49. Kruschke, J. (2010). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial Introduction with R and BUGS. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
50. Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information Theory of Choice-Reaction Times. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
51. Law, C.-T., and Gold, J. I. (2008). Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 505-513. doi: 10.1038/nn2070
52. Lehmann, E. (1959). Testing Statistical Hypotheses. New York, NY: Wiley.
53. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., and Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125, 307-323. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.3.307
54. Lindley, D. V. (1965). Introduction to Probability and Statistics from a Bayesian Viewpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511662973
55. Li, W., Piëch, V., and Gilbert, C. D. (2004). Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 651-657. doi: 10.1038/nn1255
56. Link, S. W. (1975). The relative judgment theory of two choice response time. J. Math. Psychol. 12, 114-135. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(75)90053-X
57. Link, S. W., and Heath, R. A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika 40, 77-105. doi: 10.1007/BF02291481
58. Liu, C. C., and Watanabe, T. (2012). Accounting for speed-accuracy tradeoff in perceptual learning. Vision Res. 61, 107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.007
59. Liu, Z., and Weinshall, D. (2000). Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning. Vision Res. 40, 97-109. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00140-6
60. Logan, G. D. (1992). Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 18, 883-914. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.883
61. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62. Marshall, J. A. R., Dornhaus, A., Franks, N. R., and Kovacs, T. (2006). Noise, cost and speed-accuracy trade-offs: decision-making in a decentralized system. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 243-254. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0075
63. Masaki, H., Wild-Wall, N., Sangals, J., and Sommer, W. (2004). The functional locus of the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 41, 220-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00150.x
64. Matzke, D., Dolan, C. V., Logan, G. D., Brown, S. D., and Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 1047-1073. doi: 10.1037/a0030543
65. Mazurek, M. E., Roitman, J. D., Ditterich, J., and Shadlen, M. N. (2003). A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cereb. Cortex 13, 1257-1269. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg097
66. Mulder, M. J., Bos, D., Weusten, J. M. H., van Belle, J., van Dijk, S. C., Simen, P., et al. (2010). Basic impairments in regulating the speed-accuracy tradeoff predict symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 1114-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.031
67. Mulder, M. J., Keuken, M. C., van Maanen, L., Boekel, W., Forstmann, B. U., and Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 75, 1048-1058. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0447-8
68. Nosofsky, R. M., and Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychol. Rev. 104, 266-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.266
69. Osman, A., Lou, L., Muller-Gethmann, H., Rinkenauer, G., Mattes, S., and Ulrich, R. (2000). Mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff: evidence from covert motor processes. Biol. Psychol. 51, 173-199. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00045-9
70. Pachella, R. G., and Pew, R. W. (1968). Speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: effect of discrete criterion times. J. Exp. Psychol. 76, 19-24. doi: 10.1037/h0021275
71. Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., and Shadlen, M. N. (2005). The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J. Vis. 5, 376-404. doi: 10.1167/5.5.1
72. Petrov, A. A., Van Horn, N. M., and Ratcliff, R. (2011). Dissociable perceptual-learning mechanisms revealed by diffusion-model analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 490-497. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0079-8
73. Pilly, P. K., and Seitz, A. R. (2009). What a difference a parameter makes: a psychophysical comparison of random dot motion algorithms. Vision Res. 49, 1599-1612. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.019
74. Ploran, E. J., Nelson, S. M., Velanova, K., Donaldson, D. I., Petersen, S. E., and Wheeler, M. E. (2007). Evidence accumulation and the moment of recognition: dissociating perceptual recognition processes using fMRI. J. Neurosci. 27, 11912-11924. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3522-07.2007
75. Rae, B., Heathcote, A., Donkin, C., Averell, L., and Brown, S. (in press). The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
76. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol. Rev. 85, 59-108. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
77. Ratcliff, R. (2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 278-291. doi: 10.3758/BF03196283
78. Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., and McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychol. Rev. 111, 159-182. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159
79. Ratcliff, R., and McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 20, 873-922. doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
80. Ratcliff, R., and Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol. Sci. 9, 347-356. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00067
81. Ratcliff, R., and Rouder, J. N. (2000). A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 127-140. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.127
82. Ratcliff, R., and Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychol. Rev. 111, 333-367. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333
83. Ratcliff, R., and Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 438-481. doi: 10.3758/BF03196302
84. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., and McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychol. Rev. 106, 261-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.261
85. Rinkenauer, G., Osman, A., Ulrich, R., Muller-Gethmann, H., and Mattes, S. (2004). On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133, 261-282. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.261
86. Roitman, J. D., and Shadlen, M. N. (2002). Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J. Neurosci. 22, 9475-9489.
87. Schall, J. D. (2002). The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 357, 1073-1082. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1098
88. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süss, H.-M., and Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136, 414-429. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414
89. Schouten, J. F., and Bekker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 27, 143-153. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90054-6
90. Shadlen, M. N., and Newsome, W. T. (2001). Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (Area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 1916-1936.
91. Simen, P., Cohen, J. D., and Holmes, P. (2006). Rapid decision threshold modulation by reward rate in a neural network. Neural Netw. 19, 1013-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.05.038
92. Simen, P., Contreras, D., Buck, C., Hu, P., Holmes, P., and Cohen, J. D. (2009). Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: empirical tests of theoretical predictions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35, 1865-1897. doi: 10.1037/a0016926
93. Smith, P. L., and Ratcliff, R. (2004). Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci. 27, 161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.01.006
94. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., and van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Stat. Methodol. 64, 583-639. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353
95. Starns, J. J., and Ratcliff, R. (2014). Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: a diffusion model analysis. J. Mem. Lang. 70, 36-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.005
96. Stone, M. (1960). Models for choice-reaction time. Psychometrika 25, 251-260. doi: 10.1007/BF02289729
97. Townsend, J. T., and Ashby, F. (1983). The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
98. Trobalon, J. B., Chamizo, V. D., and Mackintosh, N. J. (1992). Role of context in perceptual learning in maze discriminations. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B. 44, 57-73.
99. Uchida, N., and Mainen, Z. F. (2003). Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1224-1229. doi: 10.1038/nn1142
100. Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., and Lee, M. D. (2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychol. Methods 16, 44-62. doi: 10.1037/a0021765
101. Van Veen, V., Krug, M. K., and Carter, C. S. (2008). The neural and computational basis of controlled speed-accuracy tradeoff during task performance. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 1952-1965. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20146
102. Voss, A., Rothermund, K., and Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: an empirical validation. Mem. Cognit. 32, 1206-1220. doi: 10.3758/BF03196893
103. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 641-671. doi: 10.1080/09541440802205067
104. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., and McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. J. Mem. Lang. 58, 140-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.006
105. Wald, A. (1947). Sequential Analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
106. Watanabe, T., Náñez, J. E., and Sasaki, Y. (2001). Perceptual learning without perception. Nature 413, 844-848. doi: 10.1038/35101601
107. Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 41, 67-85. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9
108. Wiecki, T. V, Sofer, I., and Frank, M. J. (2013). HDDM: hierarchical bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in python. Front. Neuroinform. 7:14. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00014
109. Wylie, S. A., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Bashore, T. R., Powell, V. D., Manning, C. A., et al. (2009). The effect of speed-accuracy strategy on response interference control in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 47, 1844-1853. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.025
110. Yang, T., and Maunsell, J. H. R. (2004). The effect of perceptual learning on neuronal responses in monkey visual area V4. J. Neurosci. 24, 1617-1626. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4442-03.2004
111. Zhang, J. (2012). The effects of evidence bounds on decision-making: theoretical and empirical developments. Front. Psychol. 3:263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00263
112. Zhang, J., Hughes, L. E., and Rowe, J. B. (2012). Selection and inhibition mechanisms for human voluntary action decisions. Neuroimage 63, 392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.058
113. Zhang, J., and Kourtzi, Z. (2010). Learning-dependent plasticity with and without training in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 13503-13508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002506107
114. Zhang, J., Meeson, A., Welchman, A. E., and Kourtzi, Z. (2010). Learning alters the tuning of functional magnetic resonance imaging patterns for visual forms. J. Neurosci. 30, 14127-14133. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2204-10.2010