Unsupervised domain adaptation using parallel transport on Grassmann manifold

2014 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, WACV 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 277-284

  Shrivastava, Ashish ^a   Shekhar, Sumit ^a   Patel, Vishal M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS;

CLASSIFICATION TASKS; DATA DISTRIBUTION; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; GRASSMANN MANIFOLD; MULTIPLE DOMAINS; PARALLEL TRANSPORT; SINGLE DOMAINS; UNION OF SUBSPACES;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 84904624083     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WACV.2014.6836088     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. USPS Handwriten Digit Database. http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-Aachen.de/ keysers/usps.html.
2. M. Aharon, M. Elad, and A. Bruckstein. K-SVD : An algorithm for designing of overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(11):4311-4322, 2006
3. J. Blitzer, R.McDonald, and F. Pereira. Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In EMNLP, 2006
4. R. Caruana. Multitask learning. Machine Learning, 28(1):41-75, 1997
5. O. Chapelle, B. Scholkopf, A. Zien, et al. Semi-supervised learning, volume 2. MIT press Cambridge, 2006
6. M. Chen, K. Weinberger, and J. Blitzer. Co-training for domain adaptation. In NIPS, 2011
7. Y. Chikuse. Statistics on Special Manifolds. Lecture notes in statistics. Springer, 2003
8. A. Edelman, T.A. Arias, and S.T. Smith. The geometry of algorithms with orthogonality constraints. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 20(2):303-353, 1998
9. E. Elhamifar and R. Vidal. Sparse subspace clustering. In CVPR, 2009
10. K. Gallivan, A. Srivastava, X. Liu, and P.V. Dooren. Efficient algorithms for inferences on grassmann manifolds. In In IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, 2003
11. B. Gong, K. Grauman, and F. Sha. Connecting the dots with landmarks: Discriminatively learning domaininvariant features for unsupervised domain adaptation. In ICML, 2013
12. B. Gong, Y. Shi, F. Sha, and K. Grauman. Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation. In CVPR, 2012
13. R. Gopalan, R. Li, and R. Chellappa. Domain adaptation for object recognition: An unsupervised approach. In ICCV, 2011
14. G. Griffin, A. Holub, and P. Perona. Caltech-256 object category dataset. In Technical Report, Caltech, 2007
15. J.J. Heckman. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometric, 47(1):153-161, 1979
16. N. Japkowicz and S. Stephen. The class imbalance problem: A systematic study. Intelligent Data Analysis, 6(5):429-450, 2002
17. J. Jiang. A literature survey on domain adaptation of statistical classifiers. Tech report, 2008
18. H. Karcher. Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing. In Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 1977
19. B. Kulis, K. Saenko, and T. Darrell. What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms. In CVPR, 2011
20. J. Mairal, F. Bach, J. Pnce, G. Sapiro, and A. Zisserman. Discriminative learned dictionaries for local image analysis. 2008
21. J. Ni, Q. Qiu, and R. Chellappa. Subspace interpolation via dictionary learning for unsupervised domain adaptation. In CVPR, 2013
22. S.J. Pan and Q. Yang. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10):1345-1359, 2010
23. Y.C. Pati, R. Rezaiifar, Y.C. P.R. Rezaiifar, and P.S. Krishnaprasad. Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In Proceedings of the 27 th Annual Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, pages 40-44, 1993
24. X. Pennec. Statistical computing on manifolds: From riemannian geometry to computational anatomy. In Emerging Trends in Visual Computing, 2008
25. K. Saenko, B. Kulis, M. Fritz, and T. Darrell. Adapting visual category models to new domains. In ECCV, volume 6314, pages 213-226, 2010
26. A. Sharma, A. Kumar, H. Daume, and D. Jacobs. Generalized multiview analysis: A discriminative latent space. In CVPR, pages 2160-2167, 2012
27. H. Shimodaira. Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 90(2):227-244, 2000
28. A. Shrivastava, H.V. Nguyen, V.M. Patel, and R. Chellappa. Design of non-linear discriminative dictionaries for image classification. In ACCV, 2012
29. A. Shrivastava, J.K. Pillai, V.M. Patel, and R. Chellappa. Learning discriminative dictionaries with partially labeled data. In ICIP, 2012
30. P.K. Turaga, A. Veeraraghavan, A. Srivastava, and R. Chellappa. Statistical computations on grassmann and stiefel manifolds for image and video-based recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 33(11):2273-2286, 2011
31. J. Wright, A.Y. Yang, A. Ganesh, S.S. Sastry, and Y. Ma. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. 2008
32. B. Zadrozny. Learning and evaluating classifiers under sample selection bias. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 114-121, 2004 .