New paradigms in the establishment and maintenance of gradients during directed cell migration

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 33-40

  Majumdar, Ritankar ^a   Sixt, Michael ^b   Parent, Carole A ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMOATTRACTANT; STROMAL CELL DERIVED FACTOR 1;

CELL ACTIVITY; CELL CULTURE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL KINETICS; CELL MIGRATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TRANSPORT; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL CUE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMOREACTIVITY; CHEMOTAXIS; DIFFUSION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HAPTOTAXIS; MECHANOTAXIS; NONHUMAN; ORGANOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL MOTION; HUMAN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; CELL ADHESION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS;

CELL MOVEMENT; DIFFUSION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84904616687     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: 18790410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.05.010     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Sourjik V., Wingreen N.S. Responding to chemical gradients: bacterial chemotaxis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012, 24:262-268.
2. Iijima M., Huang Y.E., Devreotes P. Temporal and spatial regulation of chemotaxis. Dev Cell 2002, 3:469-478.
3. Van Haastert P.J. Chemotaxis: insights from the extending pseudopod. J Cell Sci 2010, 123:3031-3037.
4. Insall R.H. Understanding eukaryotic chemotaxis: a pseudopod-centred view. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:453-458.
5. Arrieumerlou C., Meyer T. A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. Dev Cell 2005, 8:215-227.
6. Devreotes P., Janetopoulos C. Eukaryotic chemotaxis: distinctions between directional sensing and polarization. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:20445-20448.
7. Shi C., Huang C.H., Devreotes P.N., Iglesias P.A. Interaction of motility, directional sensing, and polarity modules recreates the behaviors of chemotaxing cells. PLoS Comput Biol 2013, 9:e1003122.
8. Neilson M.P., Veltman D.M., van Haastert P.J., Webb S.D., Mackenzie J.A., Insall R.H. Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour. PLoS Biol 2011, 9:e1000618.
9. Schneider I.C., Haugh J.M. Mechanisms of gradient sensing and chemotaxis: conserved pathways, diverse regulation. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:1130-1134.
10. Turing A.M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 1952, 237:37-72.
11. Howard J., Grill S.W., Bois J.S. Turing's next steps: the mechanochemical basis of morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:392-398.
12. Myerscough M.R., Maini P.K., Painter K.J. Pattern formation in a generalized chemotactic model. Bull Math Biol 1998, 60:1-26.
13. Crick F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature 1970, 225:420-422.
14. Lacombe M.L., Podgorski G.J., Franke J., Kessin R.H. Molecular cloning and developmental expression of the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase gene of Dictyostelium discoideum. J Biol Chem 1986, 261:16811-16817.
15. Sucgang R., Weijer C.J., Siegert F., Franke J., Kessin R.H. Null mutations of the Dictyostelium cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase gene block chemotactic cell movement in developing aggregates. Dev Biol 1997, 192:181-192.
16. Garcia G.L., Rericha E.C., Heger C.D., Goldsmith P.K., Parent C.A. The group migration of Dictyostelium cells is regulated by extracellular chemoattractant degradation. Mol Biol Cell 2009, 20:3295-3304.
17. Van den Steen P.E., Proost P., Wuyts A., Van Damme J., Opdenakker G. Neutrophil gelatinase B potentiates interleukin-8 tenfold by aminoterminal processing, whereas it degrades CTAP-III, PF-4, and GRO-alpha and leaves RANTES and MCP-2 intact. Blood 2000, 96:2673-2681.
18. Opdenakker G., Van den Steen P.E., Dubois B., Nelissen I., Van Coillie E., Masure S., Proost P., Van Damme J. Gelatinase B functions as regulator and effector in leukocyte biology. J Leukocyte Biol 2001, 69:851-859.
19. Jin F., Zhai Q., Qiu L., Meng H., Zou D., Wang Y., Li Q., Yu Z., Han J., Li Q., et al. Degradation of BM SDF-1 by MMP-9: the role in G-CSF-induced hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transpl 2008, 42:581-588.
20. Yu S.R., Burkhardt M., Nowak M., Ries J., Petrasek Z., Scholpp S., Schwille P., Brand M. Fgf8 morphogen gradient forms by a source-sink mechanism with freely diffusing molecules. Nature 2009, 461:533-536.
21. Volpe S., Cameroni E., Moepps B., Thelen S., Apuzzo T., Thelen M. CCR2 acts as scavenger for CCL2 during monocyte chemotaxis. PLoS One 2012, 7:e37208.
22. Doitsidou M., Reichman-Fried M., Stebler J., Koprunner M., Dorries J., Meyer D., Esguerra C.V., Leung T., Raz E. Guidance of primordial germ cell migration by the chemokine SDF-1. Cell 2002, 111:647-659.
23. Knaut H., Werz C., Geisler R., Nusslein-Volhard C. A zebrafish homologue of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 is a germ-cell guidance receptor. Nature 2003, 421:279-282.
24. Boldajipour B., Mahabaleshwar H., Kardash E., Reichman-Fried M., Blaser H., Minina S., Wilson D., Xu Q., Raz E. Control of chemokine-guided cell migration by ligand sequestration. Cell 2008, 132:463-473.
25. Raz E., Mahabaleshwar H. Chemokine signaling in embryonic cell migration: a fisheye view. Development 2009, 136:1223-1229.
26. Lewellis S.W., Nagelberg D., Subedi A., Staton A., LeBlanc M., Giraldez A., Knaut H. Precise SDF1-mediated cell guidance is achieved through ligand clearance and microRNA-mediated decay. J Cell Biol 2013, 200:337-355.
27. Wang H., Beaty N., Chen S., Qi C.F., Masiuk M., Shin D.M., Morse H.C. The CXCR7 chemokine receptor promotes B-cell retention in the splenic marginal zone and serves as a sink for CXCL12. Blood 2012, 119:465-468.
28. Ulvmar M.H., Werth K., Braun A., Kelay P., Hub E., Eller K., Chan L., Lucas B., Novitzky-Basso I., Nakamura K., et al. The atypical chemokine receptor CCRL1 shapes functional CCL21 gradients in lymph nodes. Nat Immunol 2014.
29. Dambly-Chaudiere C., Cubedo N., Ghysen A. Control of cell migration in the development of the posterior lateral line: antagonistic interactions between the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7/RDC1. BMC Dev Biol 2007, 7:23.
30. Dona E., Barry J.D., Valentin G., Quirin C., Khmelinskii A., Kunze A., Durdu S., Newton L.R., Fernandez-Minan A., Huber W., et al. Directional tissue migration through a self-generated chemokine gradient. Nature 2013, 503:285-289.
31. Venkiteswaran G., Lewellis S.W., Wang J., Reynolds E., Nicholson C., Knaut H. Generation and dynamics of an endogenous, self-generated signaling gradient across a migrating tissue. Cell 2013, 155:674-687.
32. Scherber C., Aranyosi A.J., Kulemann B., Thayer S.P., Toner M., Iliopoulos O., Irimia D. Epithelial cell guidance by self-generated EGF gradients. Integr Biol (Camb) 2012, 4:259-269.
33. Sadik C.D., Luster A.D. Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascades orchestrate leukocyte recruitment in inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 2012, 91:207-215.
34. Kolaczkowska E., Kubes P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2013, 13:159-175.
35. McDonald B., Kubes P. Chemokines: sirens of neutrophil recruitment-but is it just one song?. Immunity 2010, 33:148-149.
36. Canetti C., Hu B., Curtis J.L., Peters-Golden M. Syk activation is a leukotriene B4-regulated event involved in macrophage phagocytosis of IgG-coated targets but not apoptotic cells. Blood 2003, 102:1877-1883.
37. Grespan R., Fukada S.Y., Lemos H.P., Vieira S.M., Napimoga M.H., Teixeira M.M., Fraser A.R., Liew F.Y., McInnes I.B., Cunha F.Q. CXCR2-specific chemokines mediate leukotriene B4-dependent recruitment of neutrophils to inflamed joints in mice with antigen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008, 58:2030-2040.
38. 4. J Leukoc Biol 2005, 78:167-177.
39. Peters-Golden M., Henderson W.R. Leukotrienes. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:1841-1854.
40. 4 is required for inflammatory arthritis. J Exp Med 2006, 203:837-842.
41. Saiwai H., Ohkawa Y., Yamada H., Kumamaru H., Harada A., Okano H., Yokomizo T., Iwamoto Y., Okada S. The LTB4-BLT1 axis mediates neutrophil infiltration and secondary injury in experimental spinal cord injury. Am J Pathol 2010, 176:2352-2366.
42. Chou R.C., Kim N.D., Sadik C.D., Seung E., Lan Y., Byrne M.H., Haribabu B., Iwakura Y., Luster A.D. Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascade drives neutrophil recruitment in a murine model of inflammatory arthritis. Immunity 2010, 33:266-278.
43. Afonso P.V., Janka-Junttila M., Lee Y.J., McCann C.P., Oliver C.M., Aamer K.A., Losert W., Cicerone M.T., Parent C.A. LTB4 is a signal-relay molecule during neutrophil chemotaxis. Dev Cell 2012, 22:1079-1091.
44. 4 and integrins at sites of cell death in vivo. Nature 2013, 498:371-375.
45. Kriebel P.W., Barr V.A., Parent C.A. Adenylyl cyclase localization regulates streaming during chemotaxis. Cell 2003, 112:549-560.
46. McCann C.P., Kriebel P.W., Parent C.A., Losert W. Cell speed, persistence and information transmission during signal relay and collective migration. J Cell Sci 2010, 123:1724-1731.
47. Kriebel P.W., Barr V.A., Rericha E.C., Zhang G., Parent C.A. Collective cell migration requires vesicular trafficking for chemoattractant delivery at the trailing edge. J Cell Biol 2008, 183:949-961.
48. Lo C.M., Wang H.B., Dembo M., Wang Y.L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J 2000, 79:144-152.
49. Roca-Cusachs P., Sunyer R., Trepat X. Mechanical guidance of cell migration: lessons from chemotaxis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013, 25:543-549.
50. Carter S.B. Haptotaxis and the mechanism of cell motility. Nature 1967, 213:256-260.
51. Arnold M., Hirschfeld-Warneken V.C., Lohmuller T., Heil P., Blummel J., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., Lopez-Garcia M., Walther P., Kessler H., Geiger B., et al. Induction of cell polarization and migration by a gradient of nanoscale variations in adhesive ligand spacing. Nano Lett 2008, 8:2063-2069.
52. Mai J., Fok L., Gao H., Zhang X., Poo M.M. Axon initiation and growth cone turning on bound protein gradients. J Neurosci 2009, 29:7450-7458.
53. von Philipsborn A.C., Lang S., Loeschinger J., Bernard A., David C., Lehnert D., Bonhoeffer F., Bastmeyer M. Growth cone navigation in substrate-bound ephrin gradients. Development 2006, 133:2487-2495.
54. Plotnikov S.V., Pasapera A.M., Sabass B., Waterman C.M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 2012, 151:1513-1527.
55. Rot A., von Andrian U.H. Chemokines in innate and adaptive host defense: basic chemokinese grammar for immune cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2004, 22:891-928.
56. Weber M., Hauschild R., Schwarz J., Moussion C., de Vries I., Legler D.F., Luther S.A., Bollenbach T., Sixt M. Interstitial dendritic cell guidance by haptotactic chemokine gradients. Science 2013, 339:328-332.
57. Sarris M., Masson J.B., Maurin D., Van der Aa L.M., Boudinot P., Lortat-Jacob H., Herbomel P. Inflammatory chemokines direct and restrict leukocyte migration within live tissues as glycan-bound gradients. Curr Biol 2012, 22:2375-2382.
58. Rogers K.W., Schier A.F. Morphogen gradients: from generation to interpretation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2011, 27:377-407.
59. Deshpande G., Swanhart L., Chiang P., Schedl P. Hedgehog signaling in germ cell migration. Cell 2001, 106:759-769.
60. Jeong J., McMahon A.P. Cholesterol modification of Hedgehog family proteins. J Clin Invest 2002, 110:591-596.
61. Gradilla A.C., Guerrero I. Hedgehog on the move: a precise spatial control of Hedgehog dispersion shapes the gradient. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013, 23:363-373.
62. Bischoff M., Gradilla A.C., Seijo I., Andres G., Rodriguez-Navas C., Gonzalez-Mendez L., Guerrero I. Cytonemes are required for the establishment of a normal Hedgehog morphogen gradient in Drosophila epithelia. Nat Cell Biol 2013, 15:1269-1281.
63. Schwank G., Dalessi S., Yang S.F., Yagi R., de Lachapelle A.M., Affolter M., Bergmann S., Basler K. Formation of the long range Dpp morphogen gradient. PLoS Biol 2011, 9:e1001111.
64. Luga V., Zhang L., Viloria-Petit A.M., Ogunjimi A.A., Inanlou M.R., Chiu E., Buchanan M., Hosein A.N., Basik M., Wrana J.L. Exosomes mediate stromal mobilization of autocrine Wnt-PCP signaling in breast cancer cell migration. Cell 2012, 151:1542-1556.
65. Pruenster M., Mudde L., Bombosi P., Dimitrova S., Zsak M., Middleton J., Richmond A., Graham G.J., Segerer S., Nibbs R.J., et al. The Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines transports chemokines and supports their promigratory activity. Nat Immunol 2009, 10:101-108.
66. Niethammer P., Grabher C., Look A.T., Mitchison T.J. A tissue-scale gradient of hydrogen peroxide mediates rapid wound detection in zebrafish. Nature 2009, 459:996-999.
67. 2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation. Nat Med 1997, 3:177-182.
68. Paradise R.K., Whitfield M.J., Lauffenburger D.A., Van Vliet K.J. Directional cell migration in an extracellular pH gradient: a model study with an engineered cell line and primary microvascular endothelial cells. Exp Cell Res 2013, 319:487-497.
69. Stroka K.M., Jiang H., Chen S.H., Tong Z., Wirtz D., Sun S.X., Konstantopoulos K. Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments. Cell 2014, 157:611-623.
70. 2, a necessary evil for cell signaling. Science 2006, 312:1882-1883.
71. Yoo S.K., Starnes T.W., Deng Q., Huttenlocher A. Lyn is a redox sensor that mediates leukocyte wound attraction in vivo. Nature 2011, 480:109-112.
72. Stock C., Mueller M., Kraehling H., Mally S., Noel J., Eder C., Schwab A. pH nanoenvironment at the surface of single melanoma cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 2007, 20:679-686.
73. Enyedi B., Kala S., Nikolich-Zugich T., Niethammer P. Tissue damage detection by osmotic surveillance. Nat Cell Biol 2013, 15:1123-1130.
74. 4: a lipid at the heart of inflammation. Med Sci (Paris) 2013, 29:1083-1085.