Examining the eco-technological knowledge of Smart Green IT adoption behavior: A self-determination perspective

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 88, Issue , 2014, Pages 140-155

  Koo, Chulmo ^a   Chung, Namho ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Eco technological knowledge; Motivation; Self determination theory; Smart device; Smart Green IT behavior; Social influence

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; MOTIVATION;

ECO-TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; GREEN IT; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORIES; SMART DEVICES; SOCIAL INFLUENCE;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MOTIVATION;

ADOPTION BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; THEORETICAL STUDY; INNOVATION; SELF DETERMINATION; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84904556795     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50(2):179-211.
2. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Alt R., Klein S. Twenty years of electronic markets research-looking backwards towards the future. Electron. Mark. 2011, 21(1):41-51.
4. Andrews J.C., Netemeyer R.G., Burton S. The nutrition elite: do only the highest levels of caloric knowledge, obesity knowledge, and motivation matter in processing nutrition ad claims and disclosures. J. Public Policy Mark. 2009, 28(1):41-55.
5. Axelrod L.J., Lehman D.R. Responding to environmental concerns: what factors guide individual action?. J. Environ. Psychol. 1993, 13:149-159.
6. Bagozzi R.P. The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Soc. Psychol. Bull. (Spec. Issue: Theor. Adv. Soc. Psychol.) 1992, 55(2):178-204.
7. Bamberg S. How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23:21-32.
8. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory 1986, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Bang Y., Lee D. Effects of transaction characteristics on distributive justice and purchase intention in the social commerce. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Syst. 2013, 23(2):1-20.
10. Cha H.S. Factors influencing the adoption of location-based smartphone applications: an application of the privacy calculus model. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Syst. 2012, 22(4):7-29.
11. Chen A.J.W., Boudreau M.-C., Watson R.T. Information systems and ecological sustainability. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2008, 10(3):186-201.
12. Chin W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research 1998, 295-336. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.).
13. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35:982-1002.
14. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1992, 22:1111-1132.
15. De Young R. Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: the role of intrinsic motivation. J. Environ. Syst. 1985, 15(4):1985-1986.
16. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. Perspectives on Motivation 1991, 38:237-288. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE. R. Dienstbier (Ed.).
17. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior 1985, Plenum, New York, NY.
18. Dedrick J. Green IS: concepts and issues for information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2010, 27(1):11-18.
19. Dijk M., Yarime M. The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: innovation path creation through co-evolution of supply and demand. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2010, 77:1371-1390.
20. Elliot S. Transdisciplinary perspective on environmental sustainability: a resource base and framework for IT-enabled business transformation. MIS Q. 2011, 35(1):197-236.
21. Fornell C.R., Larcker D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18:39-50.
22. Fryxell G.E., Lo C.W.H. The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviors on behalf of the environment: an empirical examination of managers in China. J. Bus. Ethics 2003, 46:45-69.
23. Gardner B., Abraham C. Going green? Modeling the impact of environmental concerns and perceptions of transportation alternatives on decisions to drive. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 40(4):831-849.
24. Gefen D., Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2005, 16:91-109.
25. Green-Demers I., Pelletier L.G., Menard S. The impact of behavioral difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviors. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 1997, 29(3):157-166.
26. Grunert S. Everybody seems concerned about the environment, but is this concern reflected in (Danish) consumers' food choice?. Eur. Adv. Consum. Res. 1993, 1:428-433.
27. Haenlein M., Kaplan A.M. A beginner's guide to partial least squares analysis. Underst. Stat. 2004, 3(4):283-297.
28. Hair J.F., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19(2):139-151.
29. Halal W.E., Kull M.D., Leftmann A. The George Washington University forecast of emerging technologies: a continuous assessment of the technology revolution. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1998, 59:89-110.
30. Han J., Kang S., Moon T. An empirical study on perceived value and continuous intention to use of smartphone, and the moderating effect of personal innovativeness. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Syst. 2013, 23(4):53-84.
31. Hedwig M., Malkowski S., Neumann D. Timing Energy Costs of Large Enterprise Systems through Adaptive Provisioning. Paper Presented at ICIS 2009, Phoenix, Arizona 2009.
32. Hilty L.M. Information technology and sustainability. Essays on the Relationship between Information Technology and Sustainable Development 2008, Books on Demand, Norderstedt.
33. Igbaria M., Parasuraman S., Baroudi J.J. A motivational model of microcomputer usage. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1996, 13(1):127-143.
34. Koestner R., Losier G.F., Vallerand R.J., Carducci D. Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: extending self-determination theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 7:1025-1036.
35. Koo C., Lim M.K., Park K. e-Smart health information adoption processes: Central versus Peripheral route. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Syst. 2014, 24(1):67-93.
36. Lee N., Jin Y., Kown O. Roles of treat and coping appraisal in adoption of green information technology: ordered protection motivation theory perspective. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Syst. 2013, 23(2):87-109.
37. Limayem M., Hirt S.G., Cheung C.M.K. How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of systems continuance. MIS Q. 2007, 35(4):705-737.
38. Lindenberg S., Steg L. Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. J. Soc. Issues 2007, 63(1):117-137.
39. Loock C.-M., Landwehr J., Staake T., Fleisch E., Pentland A. The influence of reference frame and population density on the effectiveness of social normative feedback on electricity consumption. Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando USA 2012.
40. McDonach K., Yaneske P.P. Environmental management systems and sustainable development. Environmentalist 2002, 22:217-226.
41. Melville N.P. Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Q. 2010, 34(1):1-21.
42. Mohrenfels H.W., Klapper D. The influence of mobile product information on brand perception and willingness to pay for green and sustainable products. Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando USA 2012.
43. Molla A. Organizational motivations for Green IT: exploring Green IT matrix and motivation models. Proceedings of PACIS 2009 2009.
44. Molla A., Cooper V.A., Pittayachawan S. IT and Eco-sustainability: Developing and Validating Green IT Readiness Model. Paper Presented at ICIS 2009, Phoenix, Arizona 2009.
45. Mostafa M.M. A hierarchical analysis of the green consciousness of the Egyptian consumer. Psychol. Mark. 2007, 24(5):445-473.
46. Murugesan San Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices. IT Pro. 2008, (Jan/Feb).
47. Oh W., Pinsonneault A. On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Q. 2007, 31(2):239-265.
48. Nishant R., Teo T.S.H., Goh M., Krishnan S. Does environmental performance affect organizational performance?. Evidence from Green IT Organizations, Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando 2012 2012, 24-33.
49. Nyborg K., Howarth R.B., Brekke K.A. Green consumers and public policy: on socially contingent moral motivation. Resour. Energy Econ. 2006, 28(4):351-366.
50. Osbaldiston R., Schott J.P. Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environ. Behav. 2012, 44(2):257-299.
51. Pelletier L.G. A motivational analysis of self-determination for pro-environmental behavior. Handbook of Self-determination Research 2002, The University of Rochester Press, NY, USA. E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan (Eds.).
52. Pelletier L.G., Tuson K.M., Green-Demers I., Noels K. Why are you doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 28(5):205-234.
53. Pelletier L.G., Dion S., Tuson K., Green-Demers I. Why do people fail to adopt environmental protective behaviors? Toward a taxonomy of environmental amotivation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 29(12):2481-2504.
54. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88(5):875-903.
55. Poortinga W., Steg L., Vlek C. Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: a study into household energy use. Environ. Behav. 2004, 36:70-93.
56. Rigby C.S., Deci E.L., Patrick B.C., Ryan R.M. Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: self-determination in motivation and learning. Motiv. Emot. 1992, 16:165-185.
57. Rogers Everett M. Diffusion of Innovations 1983, Free Press, New York.
58. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55(1):68-78.
59. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L., Grolnick W.S. Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: their relation to development and psychopathology. Developmental Psychopathology: Theory and Methods 1995, 618-655. Wiley, New York. D. Cicchetti, D.J. Cohen (Eds.).
60. Saade R., Bahli B. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 2005, 42:317-327.
61. Schmidt N.H., Schmidtchen T., Koray E., Kolbe L.M., Zarnekow R. Influence of Green IT in Consumers' Buying Behavior of Personal Computers: Implications from a Conjoint Analysis. Paper Presented to 18th European Conference on Information Systems, South Africa 2010.
62. Seguin C., Pelletier L., Hunsley J. Toward a model of environmental activism. Environ. Behav. 1998, 30:628-652.
63. Seligman C. Information and energy conservation. Marriage Fam. Rev. 1985, 9:135-149.
64. Shin G., Ahn J.H., Kim T. IPTV in Korea: the effect of perceived interactivity on trust, emotion, and continuous use intention. Asia Pac. J. Inf. Syst. 2013, 23(3):55-76.
65. Simmons D., Widmar R. Motivations and barriers to recycling: toward a strategy for public education. J. Environ. Educ. 1990, 22:13-18.
66. Srivastava R., Kogan A., Vasarhelyi M.A. Balanced scorecard approach to sustainability and value creation: a challenge for survival in the new economy. J. East. IILM Calcutta 2001, 1-17.
67. Starbuck W., Webster J. When is play productive?. Acc. Manag. Inf. Technol. 1991, 1:71-90.
68. Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna E. Measuring system usage: implications for IS theory testing. Manag. Sci. 1995, 41(8):1382-1342.
69. Taylor S., Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 1995, 6(2):144-176.
70. Thompson R.L., Higgins C., Howell J.M. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 1991, 15(1):125-143. (March).
71. Vallerand R.J. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Encycl. Appl. Psychol. 2004, 2:427-435.
72. Venkatesh V., Speier C. Computer technology training in the workplace: a longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1999, 79:1-28.
73. Venkatesh V., Speier C., Morris M.G. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decis. Sci. 2002, 33(2):297-316.
74. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27(3):425-478.
75. Venkatesh V., Brown S.A., Maruping L.M., Bala H. Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavior intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Q. 2008, 32(3):483-502.
76. Verbong G.P.J., Geels F.W. Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2010, 77:1214-1221.
77. Watson R.T., Boudreau M.-C., Chen A.J. Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Q. 2010, 34(1):23-38.
78. Williams G.C., Freedman Z.R., Deci E.L. Supporting autonomy to motivate glucose control in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998, 21:1644-1651.