Value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the local staging of prostate cancer

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 186, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 795-802

  Otto, J ^a   Thormer G ^a   Seiwerts, M ^a   Fuchs, J ^a   Garnov, N ^a   Franz, T ^a   Horn, L C ^b   Do, M H ^a   Stolzenburg, J U ^a   Kahn, T ^a   Moche, M ^a   Busse, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

MR imaging; neoplasms; prostate; staging

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDORECTAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; SEMINAL VESICLE DISEASE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR INVASION;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84904507546     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356186     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hoeks C. MA, Barentsz J. O., Hambrock T. et al. Prostate cancer: Multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology: 2011; 261 46 66
2. Zhang J. Q., Loughlin K. R., Zou K. H. et al. Role of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in treatment of patients with prostate cancer and in determining radical prostatectomy surgical margin status: Report of a single surgeon's practice. Urology: 2007; 69 1134 1137 (Pubitemid 46891567)
3. Renard-Penna R., Rouprêt M., Comperat E. et al. Accuracy of high resolution (1.5 tesla) pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging prostate cancer in candidates for radical prostatectomy: Results from a prospective study. Urol Oncol: 2013; 31 448 454
4. Tan J. SP, Thng C. H., Tan P. H. et al. Local experience of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of prostate with correlation to radical prostatectomy specimens. Ann Acad Med Singapore: 2008; 37 40 43 (Pubitemid 351428379)
5. Fütterer J. J., Barentsz J. O., Heijmink S. WTPJ. Value of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of prostate cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging: 2008; 19 285 289
6. Park B. K., Kim B., Kim C. K. et al. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for Prostate Cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 2007; 31 534 538 (Pubitemid 47457665)
7. Beyersdorff D., Taymoorian K., Knosel T. et al. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol: 2005; 185 1214 1220
8. Heijmink S. WTPJ, Fütterer J. J., Hambrock T. et al. Prostate Cancer: Body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T - comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. Radiology: 2007; 244 184 195 (Pubitemid 46981973)
9. Tempany C. M., Zhou X., Zerhouni E. A. et al. Staging of prostate cancer: results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology: 1994; 192 47 54 (Pubitemid 24191516)
10. Yu K. K., Hricak H., Alagappan R. et al. Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis. Radiology: 1997; 202 697 702 (Pubitemid 27093440)
11. Cornud F., Rouanne M., Beuvon F. et al. Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5Tesla: should we reconsider the indirects signs of extracapsular extension according to the D'Amico tumor risk criteria? Eur J Radiol: 2012; 81 e591 e597
12. Soylu F. N., Peng Y., Jiang Y. et al. Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging. Radiology: 2013; 267 797 806
13. Heidenreich A., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol: 2011; 59 61 71
14. Turkbey B., Pinto P. A., Mani H. et al. Prostate Cancer: Value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection - histopathologic correlation. Radiology: 2010; 255 89 99
15. Statistics DRG Diagnosis related groups, diagnoses and procedures of full-time patients in hospitals Fallpauschalenbezogene Krankenhausstatistik. Information System of (German) Federal Health Report, 2006. Available via www.gbe-bund.de
16. Stolzenburg J. U., Andrikopoulos O., Kallidonis P. et al. Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and outcome. Asian J Androl: 2012; 278 284
17. Brajtbord J. S., Lavery H. J., Nabizada Pace F. et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer. BJU Int: 2011; 107 1419 1424
18. Fütterer J. J., Heijmink S. WTPJ, Scheenen T. WJ et al. Prostate cancer: Local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging - early experience. Radiology: 2006; 238 184 191 (Pubitemid 43010595)
19. Fütterer J. J., Engelbrecht M. R., Huisman H. J. et al. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. Radiology: 2005; 237 541 549 (Pubitemid 41507892)
20. Torricelli P., Cinquantini F., Ligabue G. et al. Comparative evaluation between external phased array coil at 3 T and endorectal coil at 1.5 T: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr: 2006; 30 355 361 (Pubitemid 43922249)
21. Bloch B. N., Furman-Haran E., Helbich T. H. et al. Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging-initial results. Radiology: 2007; 245 176 185 (Pubitemid 47417801)
22. Roethke M. C., Lichy M., Kniess M. et al. Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy. World J Urol: 2013; Epub ahead of print: 10.1007/s00345-012-0826-0
23. Augustin H., Fritz G. A., Ehammer T. et al. Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the Partin tables. Acta Radiol: 2009; 50 562 569
24. Fütterer J. J., Engelbrecht M. R., Jager G. J. et al. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Eur Radiol: 2006; 17 1055 1065 (Pubitemid 46766887)
25. Bloch B. N., Furman-Haran E., Helbich T. H. et al. Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging-initial results. Radiology: 2007; 245 176 185 (Pubitemid 47417801)
26. Chandra R. V., Heinze S., Dowling R. S. et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging staging of prostate cancer. ANZ J Surg: 2007; 77 860 865 (Pubitemid 47353065)
27. Graser A., Heuck A., Sommer B. et al. Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol: 2007; 188 84 90 (Pubitemid 46012493)
28. Lee S. H., Park K. K., Choi K. H. et al. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging. World J Urol: 2010; 28 667 672
29. Park S. Y., Kim J. J., Kim T. H. et al. The role of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in predicting extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion in clinically localized prostate cancer. Korean J Urol: 2010; 51 308 312
30. Ruprecht O., Weisser P., Bodelle B. et al. MRI of the prostate: Interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Radiol: 2012; 81 456 460
31. Latchamsetty K. C., Borden L. S. Jr, Porter C. R. et al. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve? Can J Urol: 2007; 14 3429 3434