Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging staging of prostate cancer

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 77, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 860-865

  Chandra, Ronil V ^a   Heinze, Stefan ^a   Dowling, Richard ^a   Shadbolt, Clair ^b   Costello, Anthony ^a   Pedersen, John ^c  

^a ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b PETER MACCALLUM CANCER CENTRE   (Australia)

^c Tissupath Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

MRI; Neoplasm staging; Prostate; Prostatic neoplasms; Seminal vesicles

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOLOGIST; SEMINAL VESICLE; TISSUE SECTION; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; WHOLE BODY MRI;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34548390686     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04259.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) & Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (AACR). Cancer in Australia 2001. Canberra : AIHW, 2004. AIHW Cat. No. CAN 23.
2. Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sauvageot J, Walsh PC. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy: a multi-variate analysis of 721 men with long term follow up. Am. J. Surg. Path. 1996 20 : 286 92.
3. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993 71 : 3582 93.
4. Catalona WJ, Smith DS. 5-year tumour recurrence rates after anatomical radical retro-pubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Urol. 1994 152 : 1837 42.
5. Platt JF, Bree RL, Schwab RE. The accuracy of CT in the staging of carcinoma of the prostate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987 149 : 315 18.
6. Engeler CE, Wasserman NF, Zhang G. Preoperative assessment of prostatic carcinoma by computerised tomography. Weaknesses and new perspectives. Urology 1992 40 : 346 50.
7. Hricak H, Dooms GC, Jeffrey RB et al. Prostatic carcinoma: staging by clinical assessment, CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1987 162 : 331 6.
8. Hittelman AB, Purohit RS, Kane CJ. Update of staging and risk assessment for prostate cancer patients. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2004 14 : 163 70.
9. Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ, Laheij RJ, Verbeek AL, van Lier HJ, Barentsz JO. Local staging of prostate cancer during magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2002 12 : 2294 302.
10. Yu KK, Scheidler J, Hricak H et al. Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1999 213 : 481 8.
11. Engelbrecht MW, Barentsz JO, Jager JG et al. Prostate cancer staging using imaging. BJU Int. 2000 86 (Suppl. 1 123 34.
12. Sala E, Akin O, Moskowitz B et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology 2006 238 : 929 37.
13. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001 58 : 843 8.
14. Cornud F, Hamida K, Flam T et al. Endorectal colour Doppler sonography and endorectal MR imaging features of non-palpable prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000 175 : 1161 8.
15. Hersh MR, Knapp EL, Choi J. Newer imaging modalities to assess tumour in the prostate. Cancer Control 2004 11 : 353 7.
16. Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen H et al. Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology 2004 232 : 133 9.
17. Cornud F, Flam T, Chauveinc L et al. Extraprostatic spread of clinically localised prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumour and positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology 2002 224 : 203 10.
18. Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ, Laheij R et al. Local staging of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2002 12 : 2294 302.
19. Futterer JJ, Heijmink ST, Scheenen TWJ et al. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging - early experience. Radiology 2006 238 : 184 91.
20. D'Amico A, Whittington R, Malkowicz B et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localised prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2000 164 : 759 63.
21. Rorvik J, Halvorsen OJ, Albrektsen G, Ersland L, Daehlin L, Haukaas S. MRI with an endorectal coil. Eur. Radiol. 1999 9 : 29 34.
22. Soh S, Arakawa A, Suyama K et al. The prognosis of patients with seminal vesicle involvement depends upon the level of extraprostatic extension. J. Urol. 1998 159 : 296A.
23. Potter SR, Epstein JI, Partin AW. Seminal vesicle invasion by prostate cancer: prognostic significance and therapeutic implications. Rev. Urol. 2000 2 : 190 95.
24. Mullerad M, Hricak H, Wang L et al. Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 2004 232 : 140 46.
25. Wang L, Hricak H, Kattan MW et al. Prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms. Radiology 2006 238 : 597 603.
26. Jager GJ, Severens JL, Thornbury JR et al. Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used? A decision analytic approach. Radiology 2000 215 : 445 51.
27. Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC et al. The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 2004 100 : 2655 63.
28. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer Published erratum appears in N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 349 1010 N. Engl. J. Med. 2003 348 : 2491 9.