Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 667-672

  Lee, Seung Hwan ^a   Park, Kyung Kgi ^a   Choi, Kyung Hwa ^a   Lim, Beom Jin ^b   Kim, Joo Hee ^b   Lee, Seung Wook ^c   Chung, Byung Ha ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Eulji University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

A phased array coil MR imaging; Complication; Endorectal MR imaging; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BLOOD; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSTATE TUMOR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78049483238     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0579-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kim ET, Jeon SS, Chai SE, Kim BH, Choi HY (2001) The usefulness of endo-rectal coil MRI in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. Korean J Urol 42: 500-505.
2. Yancik R, Ries LA (2000) Aging and cancer in America. Demographic and epidemiologic perspectives. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 14: 17-23.
3. Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ, Laheij RJ, Verbeek AL, van Lier HJ, Barentsz JO (2002) Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 12: 2294-2302.
4. Jager GJ, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA et al (1997) Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results. Radiology 203: 645-652.
5. Presti JC Jr, Hricak H, Narayan PA, Shinohara K, White S, Carroll PR (1996) Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 103-108.
6. Huisman HJ, Engelbrecht MR, Barentsz JO (2001) Accurate estimation of pharmacokinetic contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI parameters of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 13: 607-614.
7. Futterer JJ, Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ et al (2007) Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging. Eur Radiol 17: 1055-1065.
8. Turkbey B, Albert PS, Kurdziel K, Choyke PL (2009) Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192: 1471-1480.
9. Kang SK, Chou RH, Dodge RK et al (2002) Gastrointestinal toxicity of transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53: 99-103.
10. Sanchez-Chapado M, Angulo JC, Ibarburen C et al (1997) Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 32: 140-149.
11. Kundel HL, Polansky M (2003) Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 228: 303-308.
12. Hricak H, Wang L, Wei DC et al (2004) The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 100: 2655-2663.
13. Jackson AS, Reinsberg SA, Sohaib SA et al (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization. Br J Radiol 82: 148-156.
14. Puech P, Potiron E, Lemaitre L et al (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 74: 1094-1099.
15. Mirowitz SA (1992) Seminal vesicles: biopsy-related hemorrhage simulating tumor invasion at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 185: 373-376.
16. Ikonen S, Kivisaari L, Vehmas T et al (2001) Optimal timing of post-biopsy MR imaging of the prostate. Acta Radiol 42: 70-73.
17. Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Lu Y et al (2004) Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging. AJR 183: 1079-1083.
18. Park KK, Lee SH, Lim BJ, Kim JH, Chung BH (2010) The effects of the time period between biopsy and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging on cancer staging in localized prostate cancer. BJU (in press).
19. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA et al (1990) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer: results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial. N Engl J Med 323: 621-626.
20. Zhang JQ, Loughlin KR, Zou KH, Haker S, Tempany CM (2007) Role of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in treatment of patients with prostate cancer and in determining radical prostatectomy surgical margin status: report of a single surgeon's practice. Urology 69: 1134-1137.
21. Manzone TA, Malkowicz SB, Tomaszewski JE, Schnall MD, Langlotz CP (1998) Use of endorectal MR imaging to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Radiology 209: 537-542.
22. Wieder JA, Soloway MS (1998) Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 160: 299-315.
23. Husband JE, Padhani AR, MacVicar AD, Revell P (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils. Clin Radiol 53: 673-681.
24. Raaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ, Wildhagen MF, Schrder FH (2002) Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology 60: 826-830.
25. Peyromaure M, Ravery V, Messas A, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L (2002) Pain and morbidity of an extensive prostate 10-biopsy protocol: a prospective study in 289 patients. J Urol 167: 218-221.
26. Daniel M, Jeffrey C (2007) MR imaging of the prostate: 1. 5T versus 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15: 433-448.
27. Burkhard FC, Studer UE (2008) The role of lymphadenectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. World J Urol 26: 231-236.