MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 185, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1214-1220

  Beyersdorff, Dirk ^a   Taymoorian, Kasra ^a   Knösel, Thomas ^a   Schnorr, Dietmar ^a   Felix, Roland ^a   Hamm, Bernd ^a   Bruhn, Harald ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; BLOOD; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE TUMOR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 33644846439     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1584     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Dennis LK, Resnick MI. Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Prostate 2000; 42:247-252
2. Hricak H, Williams RD, Spring DB, et al. Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR 1983; 141:1101-1110
3. Bryan PJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP, et al. NMR scanning of the pelvis: initial experience with a 0.3 T system. AJR 1983; 141:1111-1118
4. Phillips ME, Kressel HY, Spritzer CE, et al. Prostatic disorders: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1987; 164:386-392
5. Quinn SF, Franzini DA, Demlow TA, et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 1994; 190:323-327
6. Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, Pollack HM, Imai Y, Kressel HY. Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1989; 172:570-574
7. Nicolas V, Beese M, Keulers A, Bressel M, Kastendieck H, Huland H. MR tomography in prostatic carcinoma: comparison of conventional and endorectal MRI [in German]. Rofo 1994; 161:319-326
8. Jager GJ, Barentsz JO, de la Rosette JJ, Rosenbusch G. Preliminary results of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. Radiologe 1994; 34:129-133
9. Schnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszewski J, Pollack HM, Lenkinski RE, Kressel HY. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 178:797-802
10. Hricak H, White S, Vigneron D, et al. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Radiology 1994; 193:703-709
11. Beyersdorff D, Darsow U, Stephan C, Schnorr D, Loening S, Taupitz M. MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging [in German]. Rofo 2003; 175:799-805
12. Presti JC Jr, Hricak H, Narayan PA, Shinohara K, White S, Carroll PR. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. AJR 1996; 166:103-108
13. Böni RA, Hutter BE, Trinkler F, Jochum W, Pestalozzi D, Krestin GP. Preoperative T-staging of prostatic carcinoma: endorectal magnetic resonance tomography compared with other imaging and clinical methods [in German]. Rofo 1996; 165:152-158
14. Colombo T, Schips L, Augustin H, et al. Value of transrectal ultrasound in preoperative staging of prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol 1999; 51:1-4.
15. Perrotti M, Han KR, Epstein RE, et al. Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostatic biopsy: a pilot study. J Urol 1999; 162:1314-1317
16. Beyersdorff D, Taupitz M, Winkelmann B, et al. Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging. Radialogy 2002; 224:701-706
17. Coakley FV, Hricak H, Wefer AE, Speight JL, Kurhanewicz J, Roach M. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: endorectal MR imaging of local treatment-related changes. Radiology 2001; 219:817-821
18. Sella T, Schwartz LH, Swindle PW, et al. Suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: endorectal coil MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 231:379-385
19. Jager GJ, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA, et al. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. AJR 1996; 166:845-852
20. Kim HW, Buckley DL, Peterson DM, et al. In vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 Tesla using a transceive pelvic phased array coil: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 2003; 38:443-451
21. Sosna J, Rofsky NM, Gaston SM, DeWolf WC, Lenkinski RE. Determinations of prostate volume at 3-Tesla using an external phased array coil: comparison to pathologic specimens. Acad Radiol 2003;10:846-853
22. Yu KK, Hricak H, Alagappan R, Cheraoff DM, Bacchetti P, Zaloudek CJ. Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: multivariate feature analysis. Radiology 1997; 202:697-702
23. Mullerad M, Hricak H, Wang L, Chen HN, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 232:140-146
24. Outwater EK, Petersen RO, Siegelman ES, Gomella LG, Chernesky CE, Mitchell DG. Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 1994; 193:333-339
25. Tempany CM, Rahmouni AD, Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Zerhouni EA. Invasion of the neurovascular bundle by prostate cancer: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 181:107-112
26. White S, Hricak H, Forstner R, et al. Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images. Radiology 1995; 195:385-390
27. Huch Böni RA, Boner JA, Lutolf UM, Trinkler F, Pestalozzi DM, Krestin GP. Contrast-enhanced endorectal coil MRI in local staging of prostate carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19:232-237
28. Jager GJ, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA, et al. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results. Radiology 1997; 203:645-652
29. Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node métastases in prostate cancer. N Eng l J Med 2003; 348:2491-2499
30. Bloch BN, Rofsky NM, Baroni RH, Marquis RP, Pedrosa I, Lenkinski RE. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils: initial experience. Acad Radiol 2004; 11:863-867