Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: Evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 267, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 797-806

  Soylu, Fatma Nur ^a   Peng, Yahui ^a   Jiang, Yulei ^a   Wang, Shiyang ^a   Schmid Tannwald, Christine ^a   Sethi, Ila ^a   Eggener, Scott ^a   Antic, Tatjana ^a   Oto, Aytekin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EQUIPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ENDORECTAL COIL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPARAMETRIC ENDORECTAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMINAL VESICLE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR INVASION;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SEMINAL VESICLES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84878292247     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121319     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Masterson TA, Pettus JA, Middleton RG, Stephenson RA. Isolated seminal vesicle invasion imparts better outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prognostic stratification of pt3b disease by nodal and margin status. Urology 2005;66(1):152-155. (Pubitemid 41002205)
2. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002;167(2 Pt 1):528-534. (Pubitemid 34074521)
3. Ramsden AR, Chodak G. An analysis of risk factors for biochemical progression in patients with seminal vesicle invasion: validation of Kattan's nomogram in a pathological subgroup. BJU Int 2004;93(7):961-964. (Pubitemid 38758613)
4. Ohori M, Scardino PT, Lapin SL, Seale-Hawkins C, Link J, Wheeler TM. The mechanisms and prognostic significance of seminal vesicle involvement by prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17(12):1252-1261. (Pubitemid 23344629)
5. Osborn JR, Ramsden AR, Chodak GW, Persad RA. Should the therapeutic approach to prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion be reviewed: improving functional results without diminishing oncological outcome? BJU Int 2004;94(4):482-483. (Pubitemid 39256463)
6. Wang L, Hricak H, Kattan MW, Chen HN, Scardino PT, Kuroiwa K. Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms. Radiology 2006;238(2):597-603. (Pubitemid 43134372)
7. Bostwick DG, Qian J, Bergstralh E, et al. Prediction of capsular perforation and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer. J Urol 1996;155(4):1361-1367. (Pubitemid 26081240)
8. Koh H, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, et al. A nomogram to predict seminal vesicle invasion by the extent and location of cancer in systematic biopsy results. J Urol 2003;170(4 Pt 1):1203-1208. (Pubitemid 37108113)
9. Ikonen S, Kärkkäinen P, Kivisaari L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer. J Urol 1998;159(3):915-919. (Pubitemid 28106556)
10. Ikonen S, Kärkkäinen P, Kivisaari L, et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic cancer: comparison between fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin echo and three-dimensional dual-echo, steady-state sequences. Eur Radiol 2001;11(2):236-241. (Pubitemid 32755442)
11. May F, Treumann T, Dettmar P, Hartung R, Breul J. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2001;87(1):66-69.
12. Rørvik J, Halvorsen OJ, Albrektsen G, Ersland L, Daehlin L, Haukaas S. MRI with an endorectal coil for staging of clinically localised prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy. Eur Radiol 1999;9(1):29-34.
13. Cornud F, Flam T, Chauveinc L, et al. Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology 2002;224(1):203-210. (Pubitemid 34680396)
14. Quinn DI, Henshall SM, Brenner PC, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion. Cancer 2003;97(8):1884-1893. (Pubitemid 36397262)
15. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Riedel E, et al. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2003;170(6 Pt 1):2292-2295. (Pubitemid 37413978)
16. Zlotta AR, Djavan B, Petein M, Susani M, Marberger M, Schulman CC. Prostate specific antigen density of the transition zone for predicting pathological stage of localized prostate cancer in patients with serum prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml. J Urol 1998;160(6 Pt 1):2089-2095.
17. Perrotti M, Kaufman RP Jr, Jennings TA, et al. Endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in clinically localized prostate cancer: is it accurate? J Urol 1996;156(1):106-109. (Pubitemid 26185650)
18. Presti JC Jr, Hricak H, Narayan PA, Shinohara K, White S, Carroll PR. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166(1):103-108. (Pubitemid 26010231)
19. Bartolozzi C, Menchi I, Lencioni R, et al. Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Radiol 1996;6(3):339-345. (Pubitemid 126458081)
20. Wang L, Hricak H, Kattan MW, et al. Prediction of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: incremental value of adding endorectal MR imaging to the Kattan nomogram. Radiology 2007;242(1):182-188. (Pubitemid 44956023)
21. Wang L, Zhang J, Schwartz LH, et al. Incremental value of multiplanar cross-referencing for prostate cancer staging with endorectal MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(1):99-104. (Pubitemid 46012495)
22. Sala E, Akin O, Moskowitz CS, et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology 2006;238(3):929-937. (Pubitemid 43289924)
23. Ren J, Huan Y, Wang H, et al. Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: prediction with combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2009;19(10):2481-2486.
24. Kim CK, Choi D, Park BK, Kwon GY, Lim HK. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28(4):963-969.
25. Fütterer JJ, Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, et al. Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. Radiology 2005;237(2):541-549. (Pubitemid 41507892)
26. Ogura K, Maekawa S, Okubo K, et al. Dynamic endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for local staging and detection of neurovascular bundle involvement of prostate cancer: correlation with histopathologic results. Urology 2001;57(4):721-726.
27. Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology 2011;261(1):46-66.
28. White S, Hricak H, Forstner R, et al. Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images. Radiology 1995;195(2):385-390.
29. Schiebler ML, Yankaskas BC, Tempany C, et al. MR imaging in adenocarcinoma of the prostate: interobserver variation and efficacy for determining stage C disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158(3):559-562.
30. Hricak H, White S, Vigneron D, et al. Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal - pelvic phased-array coils. Radiology 1994;193(3):703-709. (Pubitemid 24366938)
31. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 1979;7(1):1-26.
32. Riffenburgh RH. Statistics in medicine. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press, 2006; 244, 274.
33. Metz CE, Pan X. "Proper" binormal ROC curves: theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. J Math Psychol 1999;43(1):1-33.
34. .Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27(9):723-731.
35. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
36. Cornud F, Hamida K, Flam T, et al. Endorectal color Doppler sonography and endorectal MR imaging features of non-palpable prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(4):1161-1168.
37. Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ, Laheij RJ, Verbeek AL, van Lier HJ, Barentsz JO. Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2002;12(9):2294-2302. (Pubitemid 36940327)
38. Berney DM, Wheeler TM, Grignon DJ, et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Mod Pathol 2011;24(1):39-47.