Susceptibility artefact correction using dynamic graph cuts: Application to neurosurgery

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1132-1142

  Daga, Pankaj ^a   Pendse, Tejas ^a   Modat, Marc ^a   White, Mark ^c   Mancini, Laura ^c   Winston, Gavin P ^b   McEvoy, Andrew W ^c   Thornton, John ^c   Yousry, Tarek ^c   Drobnjak, Ivana ^a   Duncan, John S ^b   Ourselin, Sebastien ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Graph cuts; Image guided neurosurgery; Magnetic resonance imaging; Phase unwrapping; Susceptibility

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; IMAGE REGISTRATION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CORRECTION OF DISTORTION; CORRECTION TECHNIQUES; GRAPH CUT; IMAGE-GUIDED NEUROSURGERY; IMAGE-GUIDED SURGERY SYSTEMS; MAGNETIC FIELD INHOMOGENEITIES; PHASE UNWRAPPING; PHASE UNWRAPPING ALGORITHM;

NEUROSURGERY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FIELD; NEUROSURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE; DEVICES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING PHANTOM; NEURONAVIGATION; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; UNCERTAINTY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; NEURONAVIGATION; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SOFTWARE; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84904489106     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrea G., Angelini A., Romano A., Di Lauro A., Sessa G., Bozzao A., Ferrante L. Intraoperative DTI and brain mapping for surgery of neoplasm of the motor cortex and the corticospinal tract: our protocol and series in BrainSUITE. Neurosurg. Rev. 2012, 35:401-412.
2. Atkinson D., Porter D.A., Hill D.L., Calamante F., Connelly A. Sampling and reconstruction effects due to motion in diffusion-weighted interleaved echo planar imaging. Magnet. Reson. Med. 2000, 44(1):101-109.
3. Bioucas-Dias J., Valadao G. Phase unwrapping via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2007, 16(3):698-709.
4. Boykov Y., Veksler O., Zabih R. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 2001, 23(11):1222-1239.
5. Cardoso, M., Winston, G., Modat, M., Keihaninejad, S., Duncan, J., Ourselin, S., 2012. Geodesic Shape-based averaging. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, MICCAI 2012, pp. 26-33.
6. Chen X., Weigel D., Ganslandt O., Buchfelder M., Nimsky C. Prediction of visual field deficits by diffusion tensor imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. NeuroImage 2009, 45(2):286-297.
7. Collins D., Zijdenbos A., Kollokian V., Sled J., Kabani N., Holmes C., Evans A. Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1998, 17(3):463-468.
8. Daga P., Winston G., Modat M., White M., Mancini L., Cardoso M., Symms M., Stretton J., McEvoy A., Thornton J., Micallef C., Yousry T., Hawkes D., Duncan J., Ourselin S. Accurate localization of optic radiation during neurosurgery in an interventional MRI suite. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2012, 31(4):882-891.
9. Drobnjak I., Gavaghan D., Sli E., Pitt-Francis J., Jenkinson M. Development of a functional magnetic resonance imaging simulator for modeling realistic rigid-body motion artifacts. Magnet. Reson. Med. 2006, 56(2):364-380.
10. Drobnjak I., Pell G., Jenkinson M. Simulating the effects of time-varying magnetic fields with a realistic simulated scanner. Magnet. Reson. Imag. 2010, 28(7):1014-1021.
11. Ford L.R., Fulkerson D.R. Flows in Networks 1962, Princeton University Press.
12. Funai A., Fessler J., Yeo D., Olafsson V., Noll D. Regularized field map estimation in MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2008, 27(10):1484-1494.
13. Glocker B., Komodakis N., Tziritas G., Navab N., Paragios N. Dense image registration through MRFs and efficient linear programming. Med. Image Anal. 2008, 12(6):731-741.
14. Gudbjartsson H., Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magnet. Reson. Med. 1995, 34(6):910-914.
15. Haacke E., Mittal S., Wu Z., Neelavalli J., Cheng Y.-C. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009, 30(1):19-30.
16. Huang H., Ceritoglu C., Li X., Qiu A., Miller M.I., van Zijl P.C., Mori S. Correction of B0 susceptibility induced distortion in diffusion-weighted images using large-deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. Magnet. Reson. Imag. 2008, 26(9):1294-1302.
17. Irfanoglu, M.O., Walker, L., Sammet, S., Pierpaoli, C., Machiraju, R., 2011. Susceptibility distortion correction for echo planar images with non-uniform B-spline grid sampling: a diffusion tensor image study. In: MICCAI, pp. 174-181.
18. Jenkinson M. Fast, automated, N-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm. Magnet. Reson. Med. 2003, 49(1):193-197.
19. Jenkinson M., Wilson J.L., Jezzard P. Perturbation method for magnetic field calculations of nonconductive objects. Magnet. Reson. Med. 2004, 52(3):471-477.
20. Jezzard P., Balaban R. Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magnet. Reson. Med. 1995, 34(1):65-73.
21. Kim D.-J., Park H.-J., Kang K.-W., Shin Y.-W., Kim J.-J., Moon W.-J., Chung E.-C., Kim I.Y., Kwon J.S., Kim S.I. How does distortion correction correlate with anisotropic indices? A diffusion tensor imaging study. Magnet. Reson. Imag. 2006, 24(10):1369-1376.
22. Kohli P., Torr P.H.S. Measuring uncertainty in graph cut solutions. Comput. Vis. Image Understand. 2008, 112(1):30-38.
23. Kolmogorov V., Zabin R. What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts?. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 2004, 26(2):147-159.
24. Kybic J., Thevenaz P., Nirkko A., Unser M. Unwarping of unidirectionally distorted EPI images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2000, 19(2):80-93.
25. Li, S.Z., 1994. Markov random field models in computer vision. In: Proceedings of the third European conference on Computer Vision, vol. II, pp. 361-370.
26. Merhof D., Soza G., Stadlbauer A., Greiner G., Nimsky C. Correction of susceptibility artifacts in diffusion tensor data using non-linear registration. Med. Image Anal. 2007, 11(6):588-603.
27. Modat M., Ridgway G., Taylor Z., Lehmann M., Barnes J., Hawkes D., Fox N., Ourselin S. Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2010, 98(3):278-284.
28. Papadakis N., Martin K., Mustafa M., Wilkinson I., Griffiths P., Huang C.-H., Woodruff P. Study of the effect of CSF suppression on white matter diffusion anisotropy mapping of healthy human brain. Magnet. Reson. Med. 2002, 48(2):394-398.
29. Pruessmann K.P. Encoding and reconstruction in parallel MRI. NMR Biomed. 2006, 19(3):288-299.
30. Rueckert D., Sonoda L., Hayes C., Hill D., Leach M., Hawkes D. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1999, 18(8):712-721.
31. Ruthotto L., Kugel H., Olesch J., Fischer B., Modersitzki J., Burger M., Wolters C.H. Diffeomorphic susceptibility artifact correction of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Phys. Med. Biol. 2012, 57(18):5715.
32. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H., Bannister P.R., Luca M.D., Drobnjak I., Flitney D.E., Niazy R.K., Saunders J., Vickers J., Zhang Y., Stefano N.D., Brady J.M., Matthews P.M. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 2004, 23:S208-S219. Suppl. 1(0).
33. So R.W.K., Tang T.W.H., Chung A.C.S. Non-rigid image registration of brain magnetic resonance images using graph-cuts. Pattern Recogn. 2011, 44(10-11):2450-2467.
34. Studholme C., Hill D., Hawkes D. An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recogn. 1999, 32(1):71-86.
35. Studholme C., Constable R., Duncan J. Accurate alignment of functional EPI data to anatomical MRI using a physics-based distortion model. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2000, 19(11):1115-1127.
36. Sun G., lei Chen X., Zhao Y., Wang F., Song Z.-J., bo Wang Y., Wang D., nan Xu B. Intraoperative MRI with integrated functional neuronavigation-guided resection of supratentorial cavernous malformations in eloquent brain areas. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2011, 18(10):1350-1354.
37. Tao, R., Fletcher, P., Gerber, S., Whitaker, T., 2009. A variational image-based approach to the correction of susceptibility artifacts in the alignment of diffusion weighted and structural MRI. In: IPMI, pp. 664-675.
38. Wiebe S., Blume W., Girvin J., Eliasziw M. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. New England J. Med. 2001, 345(5):311-318.
39. Winston G.P., Daga P., Stretton J., Modat M., Symms M.R., McEvoy A.W., Ourselin S., Duncan J.S. Optic radiation tractography and vision in anterior temporal lobe resection. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 71(3):334-341.
40. Wu, M., Chang, L., Walker, L., Lemaitre, H., Barnett, A., Marenco, S., Pierpaoli, C., 2008. Comparison of EPI distortion correction methods in diffusion tensor MRI using a novel framework. In: MICCAI, pp. 321-329.
41. Ying L., Liang Z.-P., Munson D.C., Koetter R., Frey B. Unwrapping of MR phase images using a Markov random field model. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2006, 25(1):128-136.
42. Zhuang X., Arridge S., Hawkes D., Ourselin S. A nonrigid registration framework using spatially encoded mutual information and free-form deformations. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2011, 1819-1828.