Development of a functional magnetic resonance imaging simulator for modeling realistic rigid-body motion artifacts

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 364-380

  Drobnjak, Ivana ^a,b   Gavaghan, David ^b   Süli, Endre ^b   Pitt Francis, Joe ^b   Jenkinson, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bloch equations; FMRI simulation; Image analysis; Motion artifacts; Susceptibility artifacts

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL SHIFT; EDDY CURRENT TESTING; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; RIGID STRUCTURES; SIMULATORS;

ACQUISITION PROCESS; BLOCH EQUATION; FMRI SIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GEOMETRIC DEFINITION; MOTION ARTIFACT; NONINVASIVE METHODS; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS;

FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; BLOCH EQUATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GEOMETRY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SIMULATION;

EID: 33746773014     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20939     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hajnal J, Saeed N, Soar E, Oatridge A, Young I, Bydder G. A registration and interpolation procedure for subvoxel matching of serially acquired MR images, J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:289-296.
2. Jezzard P, Balaban R. Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:65-73.
3. Friston K, Holmes A, Worsley K, Poline J-B, Frith C, Frackowiak R. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Human Brain Mapp 1995;2:189-210.
4. Kim B, Boes J, Bland P, Chenevert T, Meyer C. Motion correction in fMRI via registration of individual slices into an anatomical volume. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:964-972.
5. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady J, Smith S. Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage 2002;17:825-841.
6. Petersson J, Christoffersson J-O, Golman K. MRI simulation using the k-space formalism. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11:557-568.
7. Bittoun J, Taquin J, Sauzade M. A computer algorithm for the simulation of any nuclear magentic resonance (NMR) imaging method. Magn Reson Imaging 1984;2:113-120.
8. Summers R, Axel L, Israel S. A computer simulation of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:363-376.
9. Olsson M, Wirestam R, Persson B. A computer simulation program for MR imaging: application to RF and static magnetic field imperfection. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:612-617.
10. Kwan R, Evans A, Pike G. MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999;18:1085-1097.
11. Yoder D, Zhao Y, Paschal C, Fitzpatrick M. MRI simulator with object-specific field map calculations. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:315-328.
12. Benoit-Cattin H, Collewet G, Belaroussi B, Saint-Jalmes H, Odet C. The SIMRI project: a versatile and interactive MRI simulator. J Magn Reson 2005;173:97-115.
13. Kwan R, Evans A, Pike G. fMRI simulation for quantitative evaluation of analysis methods. Third IntConf Func Mapp Human Brain 1997;3:S449.
14. MIDAS-Consortium:Boada F, Collins D, Drobnjak I, Eddy W, Evans A, Griffin M, Jenkinson M, Noll D, Pike B, Shi H, Shroff D, Stenger V, Worsley K. MIDAS-a multi-site fMRI simulator consortium. In: Tenth Int. Conf. on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, 2004.
15. Drobnjak I, Jenkinson M. Modelling FMRI motion artifacts using a simulated scanner. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Int. Soc. of Magnetic Kyoto, Japan, 2004.
16. Haacke E, Brown R, Thompson M, Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging, physical principles and sequence design. Wiley-Liss; 1999.
17. Jenkinson M, Wilson J, Jezzard P. A perturbation method for magnetic field calculations of non-conductive objects. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:471-477.
18. Kuipers J. Quaternions and rotation sequences. Princeton University Press; 2002.
19. Collins D, Zijdenbos A, Kollokian V, Sled J, Kabani N, Holmes C, Evans A. Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:463-468.
20. Cocosco C, Kollokian V, Kwan R-S, Evans A. Brain Web: online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database. In: Third Int. Conf. on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, 1997.
21. Muresan L, Renken R, Roerdink J, Duifhuis H. Position-history and spin-history artifacts in fMRI time-series. Proc Med Imaging 2002: Physiol Funct Multidimensional Image 2002;4683:444-451.
22. Deichmann R, Josephs O, Hutton C, Corfield DR, Turner R. Compensation of susceptibility-induced bold sensitivity losses in echo-planar fmri imaging. NeuroImage 2002;15:120-135.
23. Liang Z, Lauterbur P. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging: a signal processing perspective. IEEE Press Series in Biomdeical Engineering. New York: IEEE Press; 2000.
24. Woolrich M, Ripley B, Brady J, Smith S. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modelling of FMRI data. NeuroImage 2001;14:1370-1386.
25. Worsley K, Evans A, Marrett S, Neelin P. A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992;12:900-918.
26. Hajnal J, Myers R, Oatridge A, Schwieso J, Young I, Bydder G. Artefacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:283-291.
27. Hill D, Smith A, Simmons A, Maurer C, Cox T, Elwes R, Brammer M, Hawkes D, Polkey C. Sources of error in comparing functional mag-netic resonance imaging and invasive electrophysological recordings. J Neurosurg 2000;93:214-223.
28. Glover GH, Lee AT. Motion artifacts in fMRI: comparison of 2DFT with PR and spiral scan methods. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:624-635.
29. Lu H, Golay X, Pekar J, Zijl P. Functional magnetic resonance imaging based on changes in vascular space occupancy. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:263-274.