Important aspects of participation and participation restrictions in people with a mild intellectual disability

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 15, 2014, Pages 1264-1272

  Arvidsson, Patrik ^a,b   Granlund, Mats ^a,c   Thyberg, Ingrid ^d   Thyberg, Mikael ^a,d  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assessment; ICF; Intellectual disability; Participation; Self ratings

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SWEDEN;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SWEDEN;

EID: 84904479793     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.845252     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Text revision. Washingtonó DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000
2. Wehmeyer MLó Buntinx WHEó Lachapelle Yó et al. The intellectual disability construct and its relation to human functioning. Intellect Dev Disabil 2008;46:311-18
3. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Intellectual disability: Definitionó classificationó and systems of supports. 11th ed. Washingtonó DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities; 2010
4. Buntinx WHEó Schalock RL. Models of disabilityó quality of lifeó and individualized supports: Implications for professional practice in intellectual disability. J Pol Pract Intellect Disabil 2010;7:283-94
5. Schalock RL. The evolving understanding of the construct of intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2011;36:227-37
6. Arvidsson Pó Granlund Mó Thyberg M. Factors related to self-rated participation in adolescents and adults with mild intellectual disability: A systematic literature review. J Appl Res Intell Disabil 2008;21:277-91
7. Harrison PLó Oakland T. Adaptive behavior assessment system. 2nd ed. Swedish version. Stockholm: Pearson Assessment and Information; 2008
8. Thompson JRó Bradley Vó Buntinx WHEó et al. Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellect Dev Disabil 2009;47:135-46
9. WHO. International Classification of Functioningó Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
10. Cieza Aó Geyh Só Chatterji Só et al. Identification of candidate categories of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) for a Generic ICF Core Set based on regression modelling. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:1-16
11. Geyh Gó Cieza Aó Kollerits Bó et al. Content comparison of healthrelated quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioningó disability and health (ICF): A systematic review. Qual Life Res 2007;16:833-51
12. Stucki Gó Cieza Aó Melvin J. The International Classification of Functioningó Disability and Health: A unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:279-85
13. Prodinger Bó Cieza Aó Williams DAó et al. Measuring health in patients with fibromyalgia: Content comparison of questionnaires based on the International Classification of Functioningó Disability and Health. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:650-8
14. Kücükdevec AAó Tennant Aó Grimby Gó Franchignoni F. Strategies for assessment and outcome measurement in physical and rehabilitation medicine: An educational review. J Rehabil Med 2011;43: 661-72
15. Granlund Mó Arvidsson Pó Niia Aó et al. Differentiating activity and participation of children and youth with disability in sweden - A third qualifier in ICF-CY. Am J Phys Med Rehab 91:84-96
16. Cieza Aó Brockow Tó Ewert Tó et al. Linking health status measurements to the International Classification of Functioningó Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:205-10
17. Arvidsson Pó Granlund Mó Thyberg Ió Thyberg M. International Classification of Functioningó Disability and Health categories explored for assessing participation in Swedish adolecents and adults with a mild intellectual disability. J Rehabil Med 2012;44: 562-9
18. Arnadottir SAó Gunnarsdottir EDó Stenlund Hó Lundin-Olsson L. Participation frequency and perceived participation restrictions at older age: Applying the International Classification of Functioningó Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33: 2208-16
19. Kemppi Có Laimi Kó Salminen JJó Tuominen R. Perceived relative importance of pain-related functions among patients with low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:158-62
20. Nordenfelt L. Action theoryó disability and ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1075-9
21. Nordenfelt L. On healthó ability and activity: Comments on some basic notions in the ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1461-5
22. Maxwell Gó Augustine Ló Granlund M. Does thinking and doing the same thing amount to involved participation?. Empirical explorations for finding a measure of intensity for a third ICF-CY qualifier. Dev Neurorehabil 2012;15:274-83
23. Gustavsson A. The role of theory in Disability research - springboard or strait-jacket?. Scand J Disabil Res 2004;6:55-70
24. Bickenbach JEó Chatterji Só Badley EMó Üstünó TB. (1999). Models of disablementó universalism and the international classification of impairmentsó disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999;48: 1173-87
25. Bhaskar Ró Danermark B. Metatheoryó interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective. Scand J Disabil Res 2006;8:278-97
26. Thyberg Mó Nelson MCó Thyberg I. A definition of disability emphasizing the interaction between individual and social aspects that existed among Scandinavian precursors of rehabilitation medicine as early as 1912. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:182-3
27. Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:640-9
28. Sverker Aó Östlund Gó Thyberg Ió et al. Participation in work in early rheumatoid arthritis: A qualitative interview study interpreted in terms of the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.789086
29. Marx RGó Bombardier Có Hogg-Johnson Só Wright JG. Clinimetric and psychometric strategies for development of a health measurement scale. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:105-11
30. Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scales. 3rd ed. Swedish version. Stockholm: Pearson Assessment and Information; 2003
31. Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scales. 4th ed. Swedish version. Stockholm: Pearson Assessment and Information; 2010
32. Ibragimova Nó Lillvist Aó Pless Mó Granlund M. The utility of ICF for describing interaction in non-speaking children with disabilities: Caregiver ratings and perceptions. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29: 1689-700
33. Pless Mó Ibragimova Nó Adolfsson Mó et al. Evaluation of in-service training in using the ICF and ICF version for children and youth. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:451-8
34. Ibragimova Nó Granlund Mó Björck-Åkesson E. Field trial of ICF version for children and youth (ICF-CY) in Sweden: Logical coherenceó developmental issues and clinical use. Dev Neurorehabil 2009;12:3-11
35. Adolfsson Mó Granlund Mó Björck-Åkesson Eó et al. Exploring changes over time in habilitation professionals perceptions and applications of the International Classification of Functioningó Disability and Healthó version for Children and Youth (ICF-CY). J Rehabil Med 2010;42:670-8
36. Ellingsenó K. ICF-CY developmental code sets. 2011. Available from: Http://www.icf-cydevelopmentalcodesets.com/ [last accessed 23 Nov 2011].
37. Andrews FMó Withey SB. Social indicators of well-being: Americas perception of life quality. New York: Plenum; 1976
38. Pavot Wó Diener E. The affective and cognitive context of selfreported measures of subjective well-being. Soc Indicat Res 1993; 28:1-20
39. Diener Eó Lucas REó Oisho S. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In: Snyder CRó Lopez SJó eds. Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:63-73
40. Diener E. 2009. Assessing well-being. Social indicators research series 39. New York: Springer
41. Stiel Só Kues Kó Krumm Nó et al. Assessment of quality of life in patients receiving palliative care: Comparison of measurement tools and single item on subjective well-being. J Palliat Med 2011;14: 599-606
42. Paiva CEó Paiva BSR. Searching for a simple assessment tool capable estimating quality of life in palliative care clinical practice: Is a feeling of well-being a good candidate tool as a single item?. J Palliat Med 2011;14:1281-2
43. Badley EM. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioningó Disabilityó and Health. Soc Sci Med 2008;66: 2335-45
44. McConachie Hó Colver AFó Forsyth RJó et al. Participation of disabled children: How should it be characterised and measured?. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1157-64
45. Maxwell Gó Alves Ió Granlund M. Participation and environmental aspects in education and the ICF and the ICF-CY: Findings from a systematic literature review. Dev Neurorehabil 2012;15:63-78
46. Verdonschot MMó de Witte LPó Reichrath Eó et al. Impact of environmental factors on community participation of persons with an intellectual disability: A systematic review. J Intel Disabil Res 2009;53:54-64
47. Thyberg Ió Dahlström Öó Björk Mó et al. Potential of the HAQ score as clinical indicator suggesting comprehensive multidisciplinary assessments: The Swedish TIRA cohort 8 years after diagnosis of RA. Clin Rheumatol 2012;31:775-83