Perceived relative importance of pain-related functions among patients with low back pain

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 158-162

  Kemppi, Carita ^a,b   Laimi, Katri ^a,b   Salminen, Jouko J ^a   Tuominen, Risto ^b  

^a TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Low back pain; Oswestry Disability Index; Outcome; Perception; Quality; Relative importance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOCICEPTION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84856272772     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0902     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. World Health Organization (WHO). The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the Millennium: report of a WHO Scientific Group. Geneva: World Health Organization, WHO Technical Report Series; 2003.
2. Ehrlich GE. Back pain. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 26-31. (Pubitemid 36961219)
3. Ehrlich GE. Low back pain. Bull WHO 2003; 81: 671-676. (Pubitemid 37254689)
4. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1127-1131.
5. Carnes D, Underwood M. The importance of monitoring patient's ability to achieve functional tasks in those with musculoskeletal pain. Int J Osteopath Med 2008; 11: 26-32. (Pubitemid 351232339)
6. White AA, Gordon SL. Synopsis: workshop on idiopathic low-back pain. Spine 1982; 2: 141-149. (Pubitemid 12109323)
7. Deyo RA. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 1044-1053. (Pubitemid 19027328)
8. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001; 5: 363-370. (Pubitemid 32107646)
9. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271-273. (Pubitemid 11234479)
10. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000; 25: 2940-2952; discussion 2953.
11. Orthosurg.org. Oswestry Disability Index site with translations of ODI. Available from: http://www.orthosurg.org.uk/odi-.
12. Walsh T. Point of view. Spine 2000; 25: 2953.
13. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998; 23: 2003-2013. (Pubitemid 28473499)
14. Martin F, Camfield L, Rodham K, Kliempt P, Ruta D. Twelve years' experience with the patient generated index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 705-715. (Pubitemid 46474950)
15. O'Boyle CA, McGee H, Hickey A, O'Malley A, Joyce CRB. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. Lancet 1992; 339: 1088-1091.
16. Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Dziedzic K, Daws Peter. Patient centered assessment of ankylosing spondylitis-specific health related quality of life: evaluation of the patient generated index. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 764-773. (Pubitemid 36402771)
17. Tuominen R, Möttönen T, Suominen C, Valhberg T, Tuominen S. Relative importance of the functional abilities comprising Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatol Int 2010; 30: 1477-1482.
18. Tuominen R, Tuominen S, Suominen C, Möttönen T, Azbel M, Hemmilä J. Perceived functional disabilities among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatol Int 2010; 30: 643-649.
19. Frost H, Lamb SE, Stewart-Brown S. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. Spine 2008; 33: 2450-2457.
20. Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, Ariëns GA, van Mechelen W, Bouter LM. High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2002; 59: 323-328. (Pubitemid 34496845)
21. Paoli P. Merrle D. Third European survey on working conditions 2000. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions; 2001.
22. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J, Fernandez C, Spanish Back Pain Research Network. The transition from acute to subacute and chronic low back pain: a study based on determinants of quality of life and prediction of chronic disability. Spine 2005; 30: 1786-1792. (Pubitemid 41099494)
23. Mullis R, Barber J, Lewis M, Hay E. ICF core sets for low back pain: do they include what matters to patients? J Rehabil Med 2007; 39: 353-357.
24. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ, Lindeman E,van der Heijden G, et al. A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipul Physiol Therapeut 1999; 22: 144-148. (Pubitemid 29190578)
25. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, Harding G, Burke LB, Cella D, et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain 2008; 137: 276-285. (Pubitemid 351853291)
26. Bolton JE, Humphreys BK, van Hedel HJ. Validity of weekly recall ratings of average pain intensity in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010; 33: 612-617.
27. Bolton JE. Accuracy of recall of usual pain intensity in back pain patients. Pain 1999; 83: 533-539.