The evolution of genomic imprinting: Theories, predictions and empirical tests

Heredity

Volumn 113, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 119-128

  Patten, M M ^a   Ross, L ^b   Curley, J P ^c   Queller, D C ^d   Bonduriansky, R ^e   Wolf, J B ^f  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^f University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; GENOMICS; IMPRINTING; KINSHIP;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME IMPRINTING; HUMAN; MALE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84904470794     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.29     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Akashi H (2001). Gene expression and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11: 660-666. (Pubitemid 33000338)
2. Autran D, Baroux C, Raissig MT, Lenormand T, Wittig M, Grob S et al. (2011). Maternal epigenetic pathways control parental contributions to Arabidopsis early embryogenesis. Cell 145: 707-719.
3. Bonduriansky R (2007). The genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism: the potential roles of genomic imprinting and condition dependence. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds). Sex, Size, and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Dimorphism. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, pp 176-184.
4. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF (2009). Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 280-288.
5. Brandvain Y, Van Cleve J, Ubeda F, Wilkins JF (2011). Demography, kinship, and the evolving theory of genomic imprinting. Trends Genet 27: 251-257.
6. Burt A, Trivers R (1998). Genetic conflicts in genomic imprinting. Proc Biol Sci 265: 2393-2397. (Pubitemid 29015446)
7. Castillo-Davis CI, Mekhedov SL, Hartl DL, Koonin EV, Kondrashov FA (2002). Selection for shorter introns in highly expressed genes. Nat Genet 31: 415-418. (Pubitemid 35154453)
8. Connallon T, Cox RM, Calsbeek R (2010). Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection. Evolution 64: 1671-1682.
9. Curley JP (2011). Is there a genomically imprinted social brain? Bioessays 33: 662-668.
10. Day T, Bonduriansky R (2004). Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167: 1537-1546. (Pubitemid 39265894)
11. de Koning DJ, Bovenhuis H, van Arendonk JAM (2002). On the detection of imprinted quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses of outbred species. Genetics 161: 931-938. (Pubitemid 34705430)
12. Drewell RA, Lo N, Oxley PR, Oldroyd BP (2012). Kin conflict in insect societies: a new epigenetic perspective. Trends Ecol Evol 27: 367-373.
13. Foerster K, Coulson T, Sheldon BC, Pemberton JC, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB (2007). Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447: 1107-U1109.
14. Frank SA, Crespi BJ (2011). Pathology from evolutionary conflict, with a theory of X chromosome versus autosome conflict over sexually antagonistic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 10886-10893.
15. Gehring M, Missirian V, Henikoff S (2011). Genomic analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. PLoS One 6: e23687.
16. Glastad KM, Hunt BG, Yi SV, Goodisman MAD (2011). DNA methylation in insects: on the brink of the epigenomic era. Insect Mol Biol 20: 553-565.
17. Hager R, Cheverud JM, Leamy LJ, Wolf JB (2008). Sex dependent imprinting effects on complex traits in mice. BMC Evol Biol 8: 303.
18. Haig D (1992). Intragenomic conflict and the evolution of eusociality. J Theor Biol 156: 401-403.
19. Haig D (1996). Placental hormones, genomic imprinting, and maternal-fetal communication. J Evol Biol 9: 357-380. (Pubitemid 126617133)
20. Haig D (1997). Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc Biol Sci 264: 1657-1662. (Pubitemid 27504146)
21. Haig D (2000a). The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31: 9-32. (Pubitemid 32139451)
22. Haig D (2000b). Genomic imprinting, sex-biased dispersal, and social behavior. Ann NY Acad Sci 907: 149-163. (Pubitemid 30251613)
23. Haig D (2002). Genomic Imprinting and Kinship. Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
24. Haig D (2004). Genomic imprinting and kinship: how good is the evidence? Ann Rev Genet 38: 553-585. (Pubitemid 40013738)
25. Haig D (2006). Self-imposed silence: parental antagonism and the evolution of X-chromosome inactivation. Evolution 60: 440-447. (Pubitemid 44804529)
26. Haig D, Graham C (1991). Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor-II receptor. Cell 64: 1045-1046. (Pubitemid 121001191)
27. Haig D, Westoby M (1989). Parent-specific gene-expression and the triploid endosperm. Am Nat 134: 147-155.
28. Holland B, Rice WR (1998). Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1-7. (Pubitemid 28195144)
29. Holland B, Rice WR (1999). Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 5083-5088. (Pubitemid 29214539)
30. Hutter B, Bieg M, Helms V, Paulsen M (2010). Divergence of imprinted genes during mammalian evolution. BMC Evol Biol 10: 116.
31. Ikeda Y (2012). Plant imprinted genes identified by genome-wide approaches and their regulatory mechanisms. Plant Cell Physiol 53: 809-816.
32. Innocenti P, Morrow EH (2010). The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melano-gaster. PLoS Biol 8: e1000335.
33. Killian JK, Nolan CM, Wylie AA, Li T, Vu TH, Hoffman AR et al. (2001). Divergent evolution in M6P/IGF2R imprinting from the Jurassic to the Quaternary. Hum Mol Genet 10: 1721-1728. (Pubitemid 32899089)
34. McGlothlin JW, Moore AJ, Wolf JB, Brodie ED (2010). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 64: 2558-2574.
35. McKeown PC, Laouielle-Duprat S, Prins P, Wolff P, Schmid MW, Donoghue MTA et al. (2011). Identification of imprinted genes subject to parent-of-origin specific expression in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. BMC Plant Biol 11: 113.
36. McVean GT, Hurst LD (1997). Molecular evolution of imprinted genes: no evidence for antagonistic coevolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 739-746. (Pubitemid 27241362)
37. Miyake T, Takebayashi N, Wolf DE (2009). Possible diversifying selection in the imprinted gene, MEDEA, in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Evol 26: 843-857.
38. Moore AJ, Brodie ED, Wolf JB (1997). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process.1. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51: 1352-1362. (Pubitemid 27491133)
39. Moore AJ, Wolf JB, Brodie ED (1998). The influence of direct and indirect genetic effects on the evolution of behavior: social and sexual selection meet maternal effects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds). Maternal Effects as Adptations. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, pp 22-41.
40. Moore T, Haig D (1991). Genomic imprinting in mammalian development-a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet 7: 45-49. (Pubitemid 121001901)
41. Mousseau TA, Fox CW (1998). Maternal Effects as Adaptations. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.
42. O'Connell MJ, Loughran NB, Walsh TA, Donoghue MTA, Schmid KJ, Spillane C (2010). A phylogenetic approach to test for evidence of parental conflict or gene duplications associated with protein-encoding imprinted orthologous genes in placental mammals. Mamm Genome 21: 486-498.
43. Parker-Katiraee L, Carson AR, Yamada T, Arnaud P, Feil R, Abu-Amero SN et al. (2007). Identification of the imprinted KLF14 transcription factor undergoing human-specific accelerated evolution. PLoS Genet 3: 665-678. (Pubitemid 46833946)
44. Proudhon C, Bourc'his D (2010). Identification and resolution of artifacts in the interpretation of imprinted gene expression. Brief Funct Genomics 9: 374-384.
45. Queller DC (2003). Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects. BMC Evol Biol 3: 15.
46. Renfree MB, Hore TA, Shaw G, Graves JAM, Pask AJ (2009). Evolution of genomic imprinting: insights from marsupials and monotremes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10: 241-262.
47. Sinervo B, Svensson E (2002). Correlational selection and the evolution of genomic architecture. Heredity 89: 329-338. (Pubitemid 35404701)
48. Smith NGC, Hurst LD (1998). Molecular evolution of an imprinted gene: repeatability of patterns of evolution within the mammalian insulin-like growth factor type II receptor. Genetics 150: 823-833. (Pubitemid 28463058)
49. Spencer HG, Clark AG (2006). A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity. Genetics 174: 931-935. (Pubitemid 44656479)
50. Spencer HG, Clark AG (2014). Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting. Heredity 113: 112-118.
51. Spillane C, Schmid KJ, Laoueille-Duprat S, Pien S, Escobar-Restrepo JM, Baroux C et al. (2007). Positive Darwinian selection at the imprinted MEDEA locus in plants. Nature 448: 349-352. (Pubitemid 47080346)
52. Stringer JM, Suzuki S, Pask AJ, Shaw G, Renfree MB (2012). Selected imprinting of INS in the marsupial. Epigenetics Chromatin 5: 14.
53. Tier B, Solkner J (1993). Analyzing gametic variation with an animal model. Theor Appl Genet 85: 868-872.
54. Ubeda F, Gardner A (2010). A model for genomic imprinting in the social brain: juveniles. Evolution 64: 2587-2600.
55. Ubeda F, Gardner A (2011). A model for genomic imprinting in the social brain: adults. Evolution 65: 462-475.
56. Ubeda F, Gardner A (2012). A model for genomic imprinting in the social brain: elders. Evolution 66: 1567-1581.
57. Ubeda F, Haig D (2003). Dividing the child. Genetica 117: 103-110. (Pubitemid 36325818)
58. Urrutia AO, Hurst LD (2003). The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. Genome Res 13: 2260-2264. (Pubitemid 37265991)
59. Van Cleve J, Feldman MW, Lehmann L (2010). How demography, life history, and kinship shape the evolution of genomic imprinting. Am Nat 176: 440-455.
60. Wang X, Clark AG (2014). Using next-generation RNA sequencing to identify imprinted genes. Heredity 113: 156-166.
61. Wang X, Soloway PD, Clark AG (2011). A survey for novel imprinted genes in the mouse placenta by mRNA-seq. Genetics 189: 109-122.
62. Wilkins JF (2011). Genomic imprinting and conflict-induced decanalization. Evolution 65: 537-553.
63. Wilkins JF, Haig D (2001). Genomic imprinting of two antagonistic loci. Proc Biol Sci 268: 1861-1867. (Pubitemid 32897050)
64. Wilkins JF, Haig D (2002). Parental modifiers, antisense transcripts and loss of imprinting. Proc Biol Sci 269: 1841-1846. (Pubitemid 35015039)
65. Wilkins JF, Haig D (2003). What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specific gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 4: 359-368. (Pubitemid 36538360)
66. Wolf JB (1999). Indirect genetic effects and gene interactions. In: Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Wade MJ (eds). Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, pp 158-176.
67. Wolf JB (2000). Gene interactions from maternal effects. Evolution 54: 1882-1898. (Pubitemid 32113820)
68. Wolf JB (2013). Evolution of genomic imprinting as a coordinator of coadapted gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 5085-5090.
69. Wolf JB, Brodie ED (1998). The coadaptation of parental and offspring characters. Evolution 52: 299-308. (Pubitemid 28222711)
70. Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Moore AJ (1999a). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am Nat 153: 254-266. (Pubitemid 29186634)
71. Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Wade MJ (1999b). Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.
72. Wolf JB, Cheverud JM (2012). Detecting maternal effects by statistical cross fostering. Genetics 191: 261-277.
73. Wolf JB, Hager R (2006). A maternal-offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting. PLoS Biol 4: 2238-2243. (Pubitemid 44917613)
74. Wolf JB, Hager R (2009). Selective abortion and the evolution of genomic imprinting. J Evol Biol 22: 2519-2523.
75. Wolf JB, Wade MJ (2009). What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364: 1107-1115.
76. Wolff P, Weinhofer I, Seguin J, Roszak P, Beisel C, Donoghue MTA et al. (2011). Highresolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis Endosperm. PLoS Genet 7: e1002126.
77. Yi SV, Goodisman MAD (2009). Computational approaches for understanding the evolution of DNA methylation in animals. Epigenetics 4: 551-556.
78. Zhang M, Zhao HN, Xie SJ, Chen J, Xu YY, Wang KK et al. (2011). Extensive, clustered parental imprinting of protein-coding and noncoding RNAs in developing maize endosperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 20042-20047.