Demography, kinship, and the evolving theory of genomic imprinting

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 251-257

  Brandvain, Yaniv ^a   Van Cleve, Jeremy ^b   Úbeda, Francisco ^c   Wilkins, Jon F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME IMPRINTING; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIBLING RELATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 79959368881     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 01689525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.005     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Reik W., Walter J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2:21-32.
2. Blagitko N., et al. Human GRB10 is imprinted and expressed from the paternal and maternal allele in a highly tissue- and isoform-specific fashion. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9:1587-1595.
3. Plagge A., et al. Imprinted Nesp55 influences behavioral reactivity to novel environments. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25:3019-3026.
4. Delaval K., Feil R. Epigenetic regulation of mammalian genomic imprinting. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2004, 14:188-195.
5. Feil R., Berger F. Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals. Trends Genet. 2007, 23:192-199.
6. Beukeboom L.W., Van De Zande L. Genetics of sex determination in the haplodiploid wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). J. Genet. 2010, 89:333-339.
7. Rowe S.J., et al. Detecting parent of origin and dominant QTL in a two-generation commercial poultry pedigree using variance component methodology. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:6.
8. Verhulst E.C., et al. Maternal control of haplodiploid sex determination in the wasp Nasonia. Science 2010, 328:620-623.
9. Barlow D.P., et al. The mouse insulin-like growth factor type-2 receptor is imprinted and closely linked to the Tme locus. Nature 1991, 349:84-87.
10. DeChiara T.M., et al. Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene. Cell 1991, 64:849-859.
11. Guillemot F., et al. Genomic imprinting of Mash2, a mouse gene required for trophoblast development. Nat. Genet. 1995, 9:235-242.
12. Haig D., Graham C. Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor II receptor. Cell 1991, 64:1045-1046.
13. Haig D., Westoby M. Genomic imprinting in endosperm - its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 1991, 333:1-13.
14. Mochizuki A., et al. The evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 1996, 144:1283-1295.
15. Rappolee D.A., et al. Insulin-like growth factor II acts through an endogenous growth pathway regulated by imprinting in early mouse embryos. Genes Dev. 1992, 6:939-952.
16. Isles A.R., et al. Genomic imprinting and the social brain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2006, 361:2229-2237.
17. Wilkinson L.S., et al. Genomic imprinting effects on brain development and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:832-843.
18. Lefebvre L., et al. Abnormal maternal behaviour and growth retardation associated with loss of the imprinted gene Mest. Nat. Genet. 1998, 20:163-169.
19. Li L., et al. Regulation of maternal behavior and offspring growth by paternally expressed Peg3. Science 1999, 284:330-333.
20. Garfield A.S., et al. Distinct physiological and behavioural functions for parental alleles of imprinted Grb10. Nature 2011, 469:534-538.
21. Chen D.Y., et al. A critical role for IGF-II in memory consolidation and enhancement. Nature 2011, 469:491-497.
22. Babak T., et al. Global survey of genomic imprinting by transcriptome sequencing. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1735-1741.
23. Wang X., et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of novel imprinted genes in neonatal mouse brain. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:13.
24. Gregg C., et al. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 2010, 329:643-648.
25. Gregg C., et al. Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 2010, 329:682-685.
26. Wittkopp P.J., et al. Parent-of-origin effects on mRNA expression in Drosophila melanogaster not caused by genomic imprinting. Genetics 2006, 173:1817-1821.
27. Haig D. Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc. R. Soc. B 1997, 264:1657-1662.
28. Úbeda F., Gardner A. A model for genomic imprinting in the social brain: juveniles. Evolution 2010, 64:2587-2600.
29. Úbeda F., Gardner A. A model for genomic imprinting in the social brain: adults. Evolution 2011, 65:462-475.
30. Brandvain Y. Matrisibs, patrisibs, and the evolution of imprinting on autosomes and sex chromosomes. Am. Nat. 2010, 176:511-521.
31. Van Cleve J., et al. How demography, life history, and kinship shape the evolution of genomic imprinting. Am. Nat. 2010, 176:440-455.
32. Wild G., West S.A. Genomic imprinting and sex allocation. Am. Nat. 2009, 173:E1-E14.
33. Queller D.C. Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 2003, 3:15.
34. Hamilton W.D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J. Theor. Biol. 1964, 7:1-16.
35. Úbeda F. Evolution of genomic imprinting with biparental care: implications for Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndromes. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:15.
36. Haig D. Genomic imprinting, sex-biased dispersal, and social behavior. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 907:149-163.
37. Grafen A. Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach 1984, 62-84. Blackwell Scientific Publications. 2nd edn. J.R. Krebs, N.B. Davies (Eds.).
38. Frank S. Foundations of Social Evolution 1998, Princeton University Press.
39. Taylor P.D. Altruism in viscous populations - an inclusive fitness model. Evol. Ecol. 1992, 6:352-356.
40. Queller D.C. Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evol. Ecol. 1994, 8:70-73.
41. Platt T.G., Bever J.D. Kin competition and the evolution of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:370-377.
42. Haig D. Asymmetric relations: internal conflicts and the horror of incest. Evol. Hum. Behav. 1999, 20:83-98.
43. Wilkins J.F., Haig D. Inbreeding, maternal care and genomic imprinting. J. Theor. Biol. 2003, 221:559-564.
44. Prugnolle F., de Meeus T. Inferring sex-biased dispersal from population genetic tools: a review. Heredity 2002, 88:161-165.
45. Lawson Handley L.J., Perrin N. Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex-biased dispersal. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:1559-1578.
46. Murphy G.P., Dudley S.A. Kin recognition: competition and cooperation in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96:1990-1996.
47. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press.
48. West S.A., et al. Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 2002, 296:72-75.
49. Johnstone R.A., Cant M.A. Sex differences in dispersal and the evolution of helping and harming. Am. Nat. 2008, 172:318-330.
50. Gardner A. Sex-biased dispersal of adults mediates the evolution of altruism among juveniles. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 262:339-345.
51. Greenwood-Lee J.M., et al. The inclusive fitness dynamics of genomic imprinting. Selection 2002, 2:103-118.
52. Úbeda F., Haig D. Dividing the child. Genetica 2003, 117:103-110.
53. Angiolini E., et al. Regulation of placental efficiency for nutrient transport by imprinted genes. Placenta 2006, 27:S98-S102.
54. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 1985, 125:1-15.
55. Pagel M. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. B 1994, 255:37-45.
56. Pagel M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 1999, 401:877-884.
57. Wilkins J.F., Haig D. Parental modifiers, antisense transcripts and loss of imprinting. Proc. R. Soc. B 2002, 269:1841-1846.
58. Wilkins J.F. Competitive signal discrimination, methylation reprogramming and genomic imprinting. J. Theor. Biol. 2006, 242:643-651.
59. Van Cleve J., Feldman M.W. Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting. Genetics 2007, 176:1101-1118.
60. Spencer H.G., Williams M.J.M. The evolution of genomic imprinting: two modifier-locus models. Genetics 1997, 51:23-35.
61. Murphy S.K., Jirtle R.L. Imprinting evolution and the price of silence. BioEssays 2003, 25:577-588.
62. Petit E., et al. Sex-biased dispersal in a migratory bat: a characterization using sex-specific demographic parameters. Evolution 2001, 55:635-640.
63. Nagy M., et al. Female-biased dispersal and patrilocal kin groups in a mammal with resource-defence polygyny. Proc. R. Soc. B 2007, 274:3019-3025.
64. Wolff J.O., Sherman P.W. Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective 2007, University of Chicago Press.
65. Latty T.M., et al. Harem size and oviposition behaviour in a polygynous bark beetle. Ecol. Entomol. 2009, 34:562-568.
66. Monard A.M., Duncan P. Consequences of natal dispersal in female horses. Anim. Behav. 1996, 52:565-579.
67. Wagner A.P., et al. Patterns of relatedness and parentage in an asocial, polyandrous striped hyena population. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16:4356-4369.
68. Cockburn A. Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 2006, 273:1375-1383.
69. Hurst L.D., McVean G.T. Growth effects of uniparental disomies and the conflict theory of genomic imprinting. Trends Genet. 1997, 13:436-443.
70. Haig D. Genomic imprinting and the theory of parent-offspring conflict. Semin. Dev. Biol. 1992, 3:153-160.
71. Day T., Bonduriansky R. Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 2004, 167:1537-1546.
72. Wolf J.B., Hager R. A maternal-offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:6.
73. Spencer H.G., Clark A.G. A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity. Genetics 2006, 174:931-935.
74. Beaudet A.L., Jiang Y.-H. A rheostat model for a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 70:1389-1397.
75. Taylor P.D., Frank S.A. How to make a kin selection model. J. Theor. Biol. 1996, 180:27-37.
76. Rousset F., Billiard S. A theoretical basis for measures of kin selection in subdivided populations: finite populations and localized dispersal. J. Evol. Biol. 2000, 13:814-825.
77. Rousset F. Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations 2004, Princeton University Press.
78. Roze D., Rousset F. The robustness of Hamilton's rule with inbreeding and dominance: kin selection and fixation probabilities under partial sib mating. Am. Nat. 2004, 164:214-231.
79. Taylor P.D. Allele-frequency change in a class-structured population. Am. Nat. 1990, 135:95-106.
80. Grafen A. A geometric view of relatedness. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 1985, 2:28-89.
81. Queller D. A general model for kin selection. Evolution 1992, 46:376-380.