Self-imposed silence: Parental antagonism and the evolution of X-chromosome inactivation

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 440-447

  Haig, David ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dosage compensation; Genomic imprinting; Parental antagonism; Sexual antagonism; X chromosome inactivation

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANTAGONISM; CHROMOSOME; COMPENSATION; GENE EXPRESSION; MATERNAL EFFECT; NATURAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MALE; X CHROMOSOMAL INHERITANCE; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

ANIMALS; DOSAGE COMPENSATION, GENETIC; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENES, X-LINKED; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

EID: 33646902210     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-474.1     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Amrine-Madsen, H., K.-P. Koepfli, R. K. Wayne, and M. S. Springer. 2003. A new phylogenetic marker, apolipoprotein B, provides compelling evidence for eutherian relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28:225-240.
2. Cattanach, B. M. 1975. Control of chromosome inactivation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 9:1-18.
3. Charlesworth, B. 1978. Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:5618-5622.
4. _. 1996. The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr. Biol. 6:149-162.
5. Cooper, D. W., J. L. VandeBerg, G. B. Sharman, and W. E. Poole. 1971. Phosphoglycerate kinase polymorphism in kangaroos provides further evidence for paternal X inactivation. Nature New Biol. 230:155-157.
6. Cooper, D. W., P. G. Johnston, J. M. Watson, and J. A. M. Graves. 1993. X-inactivation in marsupials and monotremes. Semin. Dev. Biol. 4:117-128.
7. Falconer, D. S., and J. H. Isaacson. 1972. Sex-linked variegation modified by selection in brindled mice. Genet. Res. 20:291-316.
8. Falconer, D. S., J. H. Isaacson, and I. K. Gauld. 1982. Non-random X-chromosome inactivation in the mouse: difference of reaction to imprinting. Genet. Res. 39:237-259.
9. Goto, Y., and N. Takagi. 2000. Maternally inherited X chromosome is not inactivated in mouse blastocysts due to parental imprinting. Chromosome Res. 8:101-109.
10. Graves, J. A. M. 1996. Mammals that break the rules: genetics of marsupials and monotremes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30:233-260.
11. Hadjantonakis, A.-K., L. L. Cox, P. P. L. Tam, and A. Nagy. 2001. An X-linked GFP transgene reveals unexpected paternal X-chromosome activity in trophoblastic giant cells of the mouse placenta. Genesis 29:133-140.
12. Haig, D. 1996. Placental hormones, genomic imprinting, and maternal-fetal communication. J. Evol. Biol. 9:357-380.
13. _. 1997. Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc. R. Soc. B 264:1657-1662.
14. _. 2000a. The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:9-32. (see online errata: http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/ 10.1146/annurev.es.31.010100.200001).
15. _. 2000b. Genomic imprinting, sex-biased dispersal, and social behavior. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 907:149-163.
16. _. 2002. Genomic imprinting and kinship. Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
17. _. 2006. Intragenomic politics. Cytogenet. Genome Res. In press.
18. Harder, J. D., M. J. Stonerook, and J. Pondy. 1993. Gestation and placentation in two New World opossums: Didelphis virginiana and Monodelphis domestica. J. Exp. Zool. 266:463-479.
19. Harrison, K. B. 1989. X-chromosome inactivation in the human cytotrophoblast. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 52:37-41.
20. Hendrich, B. D., and H. F. Willard. 1995. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: the effect of altered chromatin structure from yeast to mammals. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4:1765-1777.
21. Hughes, R. L. 1993. Monotreme development with particular reference to the extraembryonic membranes. J. Exp. Zool. 266:480-494.
22. Huynh, K. D., and J. T. Lee. 2001. Imprinted X inactivation in eutherians: a model of gametic execution and zygotic relaxation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:690-697.
23. _. 2003. Inheritance of a pre-inactivated paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Nature 426:857-862.
24. _. 2005. X-chromosome inactivation: a hypothesis linking ontogeny and phylogeny. Nature Rev. Genet. 6:410-418.
25. Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski. 1999. Sex specific X chromosome expression caused by genomic imprinting. J. Theor. Biol. 197:487-495.
26. _. 2001. The evolution of X-linked genomic imprinting. Genetics 158:1801-1809.
27. Jegalian, K., and D. C. Page. 1998. A proposed path by which genes common to mammalian X and Y chromosomes evolve to become X inactivated. Nature 394:776-780.
28. Kelley, R. L., and M. I. Kuroda. 1995. Equality for X chromosomes. Science 270:1607-1610.
29. Killian, J. K., J. C. Byrd, J. V. Jirtle, B. L. Munday, M. K. Stoskopf, R. G. MacDonald, and R. L. Jirtle. 2000. M6P/IGF2R imprinting evolution in mammals. Mol. Cell 5:707-716.
30. Killian, J. K., C. M. Nolan, A. A. Wylie, T. Li, T. H. Vu, A. R. Hoffman, and R. L. Jirtle. 2001a. Divergent evolution in M6P/IGF2R imprinting from the Jurassic to the Quaternary. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:1721-1728.
31. Killian, J. K., C. M. Nolan, N. Stewart, B. L. Munday, N. A. Andersen, S. Nicol, and R. L. Jirtle. 2001b. Monotreme IGF2 expression and ancestral origin of genomic imprinting. J. Exp. Zool. 291:205-212.
32. Lee, J. T. 2000. Disruption of imprinted X inactivation by parentof-origin effects at Tsix. Cell 103:17-27.
33. _. 2003a. Molecular links between X-inactivation and autosomal imprinting: X-inactivation as a driving force for the evolution of imprinting? Curr. Biol. 13:R242-R254.
34. _. 2003b. Is Tsix repression of Xist specific to mouse? Reply. Nature Genet. 33:337-338.
35. Lehrke, R. 1972. A theory of X-linkage of major intellectual traits. Am. J. Mental Defic. 76:611-619.
36. Lifschytz, E., and D. L. Lindsley. 1972. The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69:182-186.
37. Lyon, M. F. 1974. Mechanisms and evolutionary origins of variable X-chromosome activity in mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 187:243-268.
38. Mager, J., N. D. Montgomery, F. Pardo-Manuel de Villena, and T. Magnuson. 2003. Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse Polycomb group protein Eed. Nature Genet. 33:502-507.
39. Mak, W., T. B. Nesterova, M. de Napoles, R. Appanah, S. Yamanaka, A. P. Otte, and N. Brockdorff. 2004. Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Science 303:666-669.
40. Migeon, B. R. 2003. Is Tsix repression of Xist specific to mouse? Nature Genet. 33:337.
41. Mills, W., and T. Moore. 2006. Evolution of mammalian X chromosome-linked imprinting. Cytogenet. Genome Res. In press.
42. Moore, T., and D. Haig. 1991. Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet. 7:45-49.
43. Moore, T., L. D. Hurst, and W. Reik. 1995. Genetic conflict and evolution of mammalian X-chromosome inactivation. Dev. Genet. 17:206-211.
44. Murphy, W. J., E. Eizirik, S. J. O'Brien, O. Madsen, M. Scally, C. J. Douady, E. Teeling, O. A. Ryder, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. de Jong, and M. S. Springer. 2001. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science 294:2348-2351.
45. Ohlsson, R., A. Paldi, and J. A. M. Graves. 2001. Did genomic imprinting and X chromosome inactivation arise from stochastic expression? Trends Genet. 17:136-141.
46. Okamoto, I., S.-S. Tan, and N. Takagi. 2000. X-chromosome inactivation in XX androgenetic mouse embryos surviving implantation. Development 127:4137-4145.
47. Okamoto, I., A. P. Otte, C. D. Allis, D. Reinberg, and E. Heard. 2004. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 303:644-649.
48. O'Neill, M. J., R. S. Ingram, P. B. Vrana, and S. M. Tilghman. 2000. Allelic expression of IGF2 in marsupials and birds. Dev. Genes Evol. 210:18-20.
49. Parkhurst, S. M., and P. M. Meneely. 1994. Sex determination and dosage compensation: lessons from flies and worms. Science 264:924-932.
50. Plath, K., S. Mlynarczyk-Evans, D. A. Nusinow, and B. Panning. 2002. XIST RNA and the mechanism of X chromosome inactivation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36:233-278.
51. Plenge, R. M., B. D. Hendrich, C. Schwartz, J. F. Arena, A. Naumova, C. Sapienza, R. M. Winter, and H. F. Willard. 1997. A promoter mutation in the XIST gene in two unrelated families with skewed X-chromosome inactivation. Nature Genet. 17:353-356.
52. Poirié, M., G. Périquet, and L. Beukeboom. 1992. The hymenopteran way of determining sex. Semin. Dev. Biol. 3:357-361.
53. Pugacheva, E. M., V. K. Tiwari, Z. Abdullaev, A. A. Vostrov, P. T. Flanagan, W. W. Quitschke, D. I. Loukinov, R. Ohlsson, and V. V. Lobanenkov. 2005. Familial cases of point mutations in the XIST promoter reveal a correlation between CTCF binding and pre-emptive choices of X chromosome inactivation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:953-965.
54. Queller, D. C. 2003. Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 3:15 (available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1471-2148/3/15).
55. Reik, W., and A. Lewis. 2005. Co-evolution of X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting in mammals. Nature Rev. Genet. 6:403-410.
56. Sapienza, C. 1989. Genome imprinting and dominance modification. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 564:24-38.
57. Sharman, G. B. 1971. Late DNA replication in the paternally derived X chromosomes of female kangaroos. Nature 230:231-232.
58. Silva, J., W. Mak, I. Zvetkova, R. Appanah, T. B. Nesterova, Z. Webster, A. H. F. M. Peters, T. Jenuwein, A. P. Otte, and N. Brockdorff. 2003. Establishment of histone H3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes. Dev. Cell 4:481-495.
59. Skuse, D. H. 1999. Genomic imprinting of the X chromosome: a novel mechanism for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 133:23-32.
60. Takagi, N., and M. Sasaki. 1975. Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse. Nature 256:640-642.
61. Turner, G. 1996. Finding genes on the X chromosome by which Homo may have become sapiens. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58:1109-1110.
62. Wake, N., N. Takagi, and M. Sasaki. 1976. Non-random inactivation of X chromosome in the rat yolk sac. Nature 262:580-581.
63. Willemsen, R., C. J. M. Bontekow, L.-A. Severijnen, and B. A. Oostra. 2002. Timing of the absence of FMR1 expression in full mutation chorionic villi. Hum. Genet. 110:601-605.
64. Wu, C.-I, and E. Y. Xu. 2003. Sexual antagonism and X inactivation: the SAXI hypothesis. Trends Genet. 19:243-247.
65. Xue, F., X. C. Tian, F. Du, C. Kubota, M. Taneja, A. Dinnyes, Y. Dai, H. Levine, L. V. Pereira, and X. Yang. 2002. Aberrant patterns of X chromosome inactivation in bovine clones. Nature Genet. 31:216-220.
66. Zeng, S.-M. and J. Yankowitz. 2003. X-inactivation patterns in human embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues. Placenta 24:270-275.