The Influence of Cue Reliability and Cue Representation on Spatial Reorientation in Young Children

Journal of Cognition and Development

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 402-413

  Lyons, Ian M ^a   Huttenlocher, Janellen ^b   Ratliff, Kristin R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c Western Psychological Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904358212     PISSN: 15248372     EISSN: 15327647     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2012.736110     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andres, M., Davare, M., Pesenti, M., Olivier, E., & Seron, X. (2004). Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction. NeuroReport, 15, 2773 - 2777.
2. Bisazza, A., Piffer, L., Serena, G., & Agrillo, C. (2010). Ontogeny of numerical abilities in fish. PLoS: One, 5, e15516.
3. Braddick, O., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Development of brain mechanisms for visual global processing and object segmentation. Progress in Brain Research, 164, 151 - 168.
4. Brannon, E. M., Lutz, D., & Cordes, S. (2006). The development of area discrimination and its implications for number representation in infancy. Developmental Science, 9, F59 - F64.
5. Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 1831 - 1840.
6. Cheng, K. (2008). Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (9), 355 - 360.
7. Cheng, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1 - 23.
8. Cornell, E. H. (1979). The effects of cue reliability on infants' manual search. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 81 - 91.
9. Culham, J. C., & Valyear, K. F. (2006). Human parietal cortex in action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 205 - 212.
10. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56, 384 - 398.
11. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583 - 597.
12. Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. M. (2002). Mathematical formulations of Hebbian learning. Biological Cybernetics, 87, 404 - 415.
13. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87 - B95.
14. Giessing, C., Thiel, C. M., Rösler, F., & Fink, G. R. (2006). The modulatory effects of nicotine on parietal cortex activity in a cued target detection task depend on cue reliability. Neuroscience, 137, 853 - 864.
15. Gottlieb, J. (2007). From thought to action: The parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition. Neuron, 53, 9 - 16.
16. Gottlieb, J., Balan, P. F., Oristaglio, J., & Schneider, D. (2009). Task specific computations in attentional maps. Vision Research, 49, 1216 - 1226.
17. Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2005). The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys. Journal of Anatomy, 207, 3 - 17.
18. Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the 'number sense': The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457 - 1465.
19. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435 - 448.
20. Huttenlocher, J. (1967). Discrimination of figure orientation: Effects of relative position. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63, 359 - 361.
21. Huttenlocher, J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2007). Coding location in enclosed spaces: Is geometry the principle? Developmental Science, 10, 741 - 746.
22. Jacobs, R. A. (2002). What determines visual cue reliability? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 345 - 350.
23. Learmonth, A. E., Nadel, L., & Newcombe, N. S. (2002). Children's use of landmarks: Implications for modularity theory. Psychological Science, 13, 337 - 341.
24. Learmonth, A. E., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2001). Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 225 - 244.
25. Lee, S. A., & Spelke, E. (2010). A modular geometric mechanism for reorientation in children. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 152 - 176.
26. Lew, A. R., Gibbons, B., Murphy, C., & Bremner, J. G. (2010). Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetric spaces. Developmental Science, 13, 490-498.
27. Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Girardi, G., & Bekkering, H. (2007). Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1400 - 1409.
28. Lourenco, S. F., Addy, D., & Huttenlocher, J. (2009). Location representation in enclosed spaces: What types of information afford young children an advantage? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 313 - 325.
29. Maltz, M., & Shinar, D. (2003). New alternative methods of analyzing human behavior in cued target acquisition. Human Factors, 45, 281 - 295.
30. Miller, N. Y., & Shettleworth, S. J. (2007). Learning about environmental geometry: an associative model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 191 - 212.
31. Morgan, M. L., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2008). Multisensory integration in macaque visual cortex depends on cue reliability. Neuron, 59, 662 - 673.
32. Muller, C. M. P., Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2009). Different cue weights at the same place. Journal of Vision, 9, 1 - 5.
33. Munakata, Y., & Pfaffly, J. (2004). Hebbian learning and development. Developmental Science, 7, 141 - 148.
34. Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2006). Development of spatial cognition. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.) and D. Kuhn & R. Seigler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language (, 6th ed., pp. 734 - 776). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Patel, G. H., Shulman, G. L., Baker, J. T., Akbudak, E., Snyder, A. Z., Snyder, L. H., & Corbetta, M. (2010). Topographic organization of macaque area LIP. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: USA, 107, 4728 - 4733.
36. Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499 - 503.
37. Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. S. (2003). Inference and computation with population codes. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 26, 381 - 410.
38. Previtali, P., de Hevia, M. D., & Girelli, L. (2010). Placing order in space: The SNARC effect in serial learning. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 599 - 605.
39. Ratliff, K. R., & Newcombe, N. S. (2008a). Is language necessary for human spatial reorientation? Reconsidering evidence from dual task paradigms. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 142 - 163.
40. Ratliff, K. R., & Newcombe, N. S. (2008b). Reorienting when cues conflict: Evidence for an adaptive combination view. Psychological Science, 19, 1301 - 1307.
41. Riggio, L., & Kirsner, K. (1997). The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 885 - 899.
42. Rugani, R., Kelly, D. M., Szelest, I., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2010). Is it only humans that count from left to right? Biology Letters, 6, 290 - 292.
43. Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Vallini, B., & Regolin, L. (2011). Asymmetrical number-space mapping in the avian brain. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 95, 231 - 238.
44. Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Gallese, V. (2007). Numbers within our hands: Modulation of corticospinal excitability of hand muscles during numerical judgment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 684 - 693.
45. Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 328 - 331.
46. Silver, M. A., & Kastner, S. (2009). Topographic maps in human frontal and parietal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 488 - 495.
47. Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Numeric comparison in a visually guided manual reaching task. Cognition, 106, 994 - 1003.
48. Trillenberg, P., Sprenger, A., Petersen, D., Kömpf, D., Heide, W., & Helmchen, C. (2007). Functional dissociation of saccade and hand reaching control with bilateral lesions of the medial wall of the intraparietal sulcus: Implications for optic ataxia. Neuroimage, 36, T69 - T76.
49. Twyman, A. D., & Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Five reasons to doubt the existence of a geometric module. Cognitive Science, 34, 1315 - 1356.
50. Wise, S. P., & Murray, E. A. (2000). Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions. Trends in Neuroscience, 23, 271 - 276.