Different cue weights at the same place

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1-5

  Muller, C M P ^a   Brenner, E ^a   Smeets, J B J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D surface and shape perception; Binocular vision; Space and scene perception; Spatial vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MONOCULAR VISION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 70449713533     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.11.1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Backus, B. T., & Banks, M. S. (1999). Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception, 28, 217-242.
2. Bradshaw, M. F., Parton, A. D., & Glennerster, A. (2000). The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information. Vision Research, 40, 3725-3734.
3. Deneve, S., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2001). Efcient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 826-831.
4. Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 162-169.
5. Glennerster, A., Rogers, B. J., & Bradshaw, M. F. (1996). Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task. Vision Research, 36, 3441-3456.
6. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12):1, 967-992, http://journalofvision.org/4/12/1/, doi:10.1167/4.12.1.
7. Jacobs, R. A. (2002). What determines visual cue reliability? Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 345-350.
8. Jacobs, R. A., & Fine, I. (1999). Experience-dependent integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Research, 39, 4062-4075.
9. Knill, D. C. (1998). Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: Human and ideal observers compared. Vision Research, 38, 1683-1711.
10. Knill, D. C. (2007). Learning Bayesian priors for depth perception. Journal of Vision, 7(8):13, 1-20, http://journalofvision.org/7/8/13/, doi:10.1167/7.8.13.
11. Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004). The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and compu- tation. Trends Neuroscience, 27, 712-719.
12. Koenderink, J. J., Kappers, A. M., Todd, J. T., Norman, J. F., & Phillips, F. (1996). Surface range and attitude probing in stereoscopically presented dynamic scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 869-878.
13. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young,M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
14. Louw, S., Smeets, J. B., & Brenner, E. (2007). Judging surface slant for placing objects: A role for motion parallax. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 149-158.
15. Muller, C. M. P., Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2007). Living up to optimal expectations. Journal of Vision, 7(3):2, 1-10, http://journalofvision.org/7/3/2/,doi:10.1167/7.3.2.
16. Tittle, J. S., Norman, J. F., Perotti, V. J., & Phillips, F. (1998). The perception of scale-dependent and scale-independent surface structure from binocular disparity, texture, and shading. Perception, 27, 147- 166.
17. van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., & Denier van der Gon, J. J. (1996). How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 253-261.
18. Young, M. J., Landy, M. S., & Maloney, L. T. (1993). A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Research, 33, 2685-2696.