Reducing emissions from land use in Indonesia: Motivation, policy instruments and expected funding streams

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 677-692

  van Noordwijk, Meine ^a   Agus, Fahmuddin ^b   Dewi, Sonya ^a   Purnomo, Herry ^c  

^a WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

^b Indonesian Soil Research Institute   (Indonesia)

^c BOGOR AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Land based emissions; Multiple scales; NAMA; Policy analysis

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSION INVENTORY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FINANCIAL PROVISION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LAND RIGHTS; LAND TENURE; LAND USE; LANDOWNERSHIP; POLICY ANALYSIS;

INDONESIA;

EID: 84904153630     PISSN: 13812386     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-013-9502-y     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. 2 emissions from land use and land use change from the oil palm industry in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, Kuala Lumpur (in press).
2. Akiefnawati R, Villamor G, Zulfikar F et al (2010) Stewardship agreement to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD): case study from Lubuk Beringin's Hutan Desa, Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Int For Rev 12: 349-360.
3. ALREDDI (2011) Accountability and Local Level Initiative to Reduce Emission from Deforestation and Degradation in Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Southeast Asia Regional Program, Report 288-13, Bogor, Indonesia, p 114.
4. Angelsen A, Rudel T (2013) Designing and implementing effective REDD+ policies: a forest transition approach. Rev Environ Econ Pol 7(1): 91-113.
5. Bemelmans-Videc M, Rist R, Vedung E (eds) (1998) Carrots, sticks, and sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction, New Brunswick.
6. Brockhaus M, Obidzinski K, Dermawan A et al (2011) An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+? For Pol Econ. doi: 10. 1016/j. forpol. 2011. 09. 004.
7. Brown J, Peskett L (2011) Climate finance in Indonesia: lessons for the future of public finance for climate change mitigation. Working Paper no. 11. Overseas Development Institute, London.
8. Butler R, Koh L, Jaboury Ghazoul J (2009) REDD in the red: palm oil could undermine carbon payment schemes. Cons Lett 2: 67-73.
9. Chhatre A, Lakhanpal S, Larson A et al (2012) Social safeguards and co-benefits in REDD+: a review of the adjacent possible. Curr Op Sust. doi: 10. 1016/j. cosust. 2012. 08. 006.
10. Clark W, Tomich T, van Noordwijk M et al (2011) Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0900231108.
11. Contreras-Hermosilla A, Fay C (2005) Strengthening forest management in Indonesia through land tenure reform: issues and framework for action. World Agroforestry Centre Southeast Asia, Bogor, Indonesia, Forest Trends.
12. Corbera E (2012) Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. Curr Op Sust. doi: 10. 1016/j. cosust. 2012. 09. 010.
13. Costanza R, Fisher B, Ali S (2007) Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecol Econ 61: 267-276.
14. Culas R (2007) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: an institutional perspective. Ecol Econ 61: 429-437.
15. Danielsen F, Adrian T, Brofeldt S et al. (2013) Community monitoring for REDD+: international promises and field realities. Ecol Soc (in press).
16. Dermawan A, Petkova E, Sinaga A (2011) Preventing the risks of corruption in REDD+ in Indonesia: summary report. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Jakarta, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.
17. Dewi S, Ekadinata A, Galudra G, Agung P, Johana F (2011) LUWES: Land use planning for low emission development strategy. World Agroforestry Centre SEA Regional Office, Bogor.
18. Dewi S, van Noordwijk M, Ekadinata A (2013) Protected areas in relation to landscape multifunctionality: squeezing out intermediate land use intensities in the tropics? Land Use Policy 30: 38-56.
19. Drew J, Drew M (2010) Establishing additionality: fraud vulnerabilities in the clean development mechanism. Account Res J 23(3): 243-253.
20. Edwards D, Koh L, Laurance W (2012) Indonesia's REDD+ pact: saving imperilled forests or business as usual? Biol Cons 151(1): 41-44.
21. Ekadinata A, van Noordwijk M, Dewi S et al. (2010) Reducing emissions from deforestation, inside and outside the 'forest'. ASB Brief 16. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi.
22. Ekadinata A, Widayati A, Dewi S et al. (2011) Indonesia's land-use and land-cover changes and their trajectories 1990, 2000 and 2005. World Agroforestry Centre ICRAF, Bogor, Indonesia, p 6.
23. Fitter R, Kaplinksy R (2001) Who gains from product rents as the coffee market becomes more differentiated? A value-chain analysis. IDS Bull 32: 69-82.
24. Galudra G, van Noordwijk M, Suyanto et al (2011) Hot spots of confusion: contested policies and competing carbon claims in the peatlands of Central Kalimantan (Indonesia). Int For Rev 13: 431-441.
25. Galudra G, Agung P, Noordwijk M et al. (2013) Migrants, land markets and carbon emissions: the drivers of land tenure change and the prospect of REDD+ in Jambi, Indonesia. Mit Adap Strat Glob Ch doi: 10. 1007/s11027-013-9512-9.
26. Gupta J (2012) Global forest and REDD+ governance: win-win or lose-lose? Curr Op Sust. doi: 10. 1016/j. cosust. 2012. 09. 014.
27. Gupta A, Lövbrand E, Turnhout E et al (2012) In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification system. Curr Op Sust. doi: 10. 1016/j. cosust. 2012. 10. 004.
28. Hoang M, Do T, Pham M et al (2012) Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam. Land Use Policy. doi: 10. 1016/j. landusepol. 2011. 09. 013.
29. 2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences 7: 1505-1514.
30. Houghton R (2012) Carbon emissions and the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics. Curr Op Sust. doi: 10. 1016/j. cosust. 2012. 06. 006.
31. IFCA (Indonesia Forest Carbon Alliance) (2007) REDDI: Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation Indonesia. Jakarta. Ministry of Forestry.
32. Irawan S, Tacconi L, Ring I (2013) Stakeholders' incentives for land-use change and REDD+: the case of Indonesia. Ecol Econ 87: 75-83.
33. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Lane, London.
34. Krott M, Bader A, Schusser C et al. (2013) Actor-centred power: the driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. For Pol Econ. http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1389934113000804.
35. Larson A (2011) Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: lessons for REDD+. Glob Environ Change 21(2): 540-549. doi: 10. 1016/j. gloenvcha. 2010. 11. 008.
36. Lusiana B, van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G (2012) Land sparing or sharing? Exploring livestock fodder options in combination with land use zoning and consequences for livelihoods and net carbon stocks using the FALLOW model. Agric Ecosys Enviro 159: 145-160.
37. Lusiana B, van Noordwijk M, Johana F et al. (2013) Implication of uncertainty and scale in carbon emission estimates on locally appropriate designs to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+). Mit Adap Strat Glob Ch doi: 10. 1007/s11027-013-9501-z.
38. Luttrell C, Resosudarmo I A P, Muharrom E et al. (2012) The political context of REDD+ in Indonesia: constituencies for change. Environ Sci Pol. http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1462901112001724.
39. Lyster R (2011) REDD+, transparency, participation and resource rights: the role of law. Environ Sci Pol 14: 118-126.
40. Maslow A (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psych Rev 50: 370-396.
41. Melkas E (2002) Sovereignty and equity within the framework of the climate regime. Rev Eur Comm Intern Env Law 11: 115-128.
42. Mertz O, Muller D, Sikor T et al (2012) The forgotten D: challenges of addressing forest degradation in complex mosaic landscapes under REDD+. Danish J Geog. doi: 10. 1080/00167223. 2012. 709678.
43. Meyfroidt P, Lambin E (2011) Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Ann Rev Environ Res 36: 343-371.
44. Minang P, van Noordwijk M, Meyfroidt et al. (2010) Emissions Embodied in Trade (EET) and land use in tropical forest margins. ASB PolicyBrief 17. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins, Nairobi.
45. Minang P, van Noordwijk M (2012) Design challenges for achieving reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation through conservation: leveraging multiple paradigms at the tropical forest margins. Land Use Policy. doi: 10. 1016/j. landusepol. 2012. 04. 025.
46. Minang P, van Noordwijk M, Swallow B (2012) High-carbon-stock rural development pathways in Asia and Africa: How improved land management can contribute to economic development and climate change mitigation. In: Nair PKR, Garrity DP (eds) Agroforestry: the future of global landuse. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 127-143.
47. Mulia R, Widayati A, Suyanto S et al. (2013) Low carbon emission development strategies for Jambi, Indonesia: simulation and trade-off analysis using the FALLOW model. Mit Adap Strat Glob Ch doi: 10. 1007/s11027-013-9485-8.
48. Mulyani M, Jepson P (2013) REDD+ and forest governance in Indonesia: a multistakeholder study of perceived challenges and opportunities. J Env Dev. doi: 10. 1177/1070496513494203.
49. Murdiyarso D, van Noordwijk M, Puntodewo A et al (2008) District scale prioritization for A/R CDM project activities in Indonesia in line with sustainable development objectives. Agric Ecosys Env 126: 59-66.
50. Murdiyarso D, Brockhaus M, Sunderlin W et al (2012) Some lessons learned from the first generation of REDD + activities. Curr Op Env Sus 4: 678-685.
51. Newell P, Pattberg P, Schroeder H (2012) Multiactor governance and the environment. Ann Rev Env Res 37: 365-387.
52. Olander L, Galik C, Kissinger G (2012) Operationalizing REDD+: scope of reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Curr Op Env Sus 4: 661-669.
53. Peters G, Marland G, Le Quéré C et al (2012) Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. Nat Clim Ch 2: 2-4.
54. Phelps J, Friess D, Webb E (2012) Win-win REDD+ approaches belie carbon-biodiversity trade-offs. Biol Conserv 54: 53-60.
55. Pistorius T (2012) From RED to REDD+: the evolution of a forest-based mitigation approach for developing countries. Curr Op Sust. doi: 10. 1016/j. cosust. 2012. 07. 002.
56. Purnomo H, Arum G, Achdiawan R, Irawati R (2012) Rights and wellbeing: an analytical approach to global case comparison of community forestry. J Sus Dev 5(6): 35-45.
57. Purnomo H, Suyamto D, Irawati R (2013) Harnessing the climate commons: an agent-based modelling approach to making reducing emission from deforestation and degradation (REDD)+ work. Mit Adap Strat Glob Ch 18: 471-489.
58. Resosudarmo I, Atmadja S, Ekaputri A et al. (2013) Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five emerging sites in Indonesia. World Dev. http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0305750X13000211.
59. Romijn E, Ainembabazi J, Wijaya A et al (2013) Exploring different forest definitions and their impact on developing REDD+ reference emission levels: a case study for Indonesia. Environ Sci Policy 33: 246-259.
60. Santosa M, Khatarina J, Suwana A (2013) The progress on governing REDD+ in Indonesia. Int J Rural Law Policy. http://epress. lib. uts. edu. au/journals/index. php/ijrlp/article/view/3356.
61. Streck C (2012) Financing REDD+: matching needs and ends. Curr Op Sust. doi: 10. 1016/j. cosust. 2012. 10. 001.
62. Sunderlin W, Larson A, Duchelle A et al. (2013) How are REDD+ proponents addressing tenure problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and Vietnam. World Dev. http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0305750X13000193.
63. Tadjbakhsh S, Chenoy A (2007) Human security: Concepts and implications. Routledge, London.
64. Tata HL, van Noordwijk M, Ruysschaert D et al. (2013) Will reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+) funding stop peat swamp conversion to oil palm in orangutan habitat in Tripa (Aceh, Sumatra, Indonesia)? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (in press).
65. Thamrin S (2011) Indonesia's national mitigation actions: paving the way towards NAMAs. Presented at CCXG/Global Forum on Environment Seminar on MRV and Carbon Markets, 28-29 March 2011, Paris. http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/52/45/48304156. pdf.
66. Tomich TP, Chomitz K, Francisco H et al (2004) Asking the right questions: policy analysis and environmental problems at different scales. Agric Ecosys Env 104: 5-18.
67. Unger N (2012) Global climate forcing by criteria air pollutants. Ann Rev Env Res 37: 1-24.
68. van Kooten G, Bogle T, de Vries FP (2012) Rent seeking and the smoke and mirrors game in the creation of forest sector carbon credits: an example from British Columbia. Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group, Department of Economics, University of Victoria, Canada.
69. van Noordwijk M, Purnomo H, Peskett L et al. (2008a) Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) in Indonesia: options and challenges for fair and efficient payment distribution mechanisms. ICRAF Working Paper 81. World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor, Indonesia.
70. van Noordwijk M, Suyamto D, Lusiana B et al (2008b) Facilitating agroforestation of landscapes for sustainable benefits: tradeoffs between carbon stocks and local development benefits in Indonesia according to the FALLOW model. Agric Ecosys Env 126: 98-112. doi: 10. 1016/j. agee. 2008. 01. 016.
71. van Noordwijk M, Mulyoutami E, Sakuntaladewi N et al (2008c) Swiddens in transition: Shifted perceptions on shifting cultivators in Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre Southeast Asia Regional Program, Bogor.
72. van Noordwijk M, Minang P, Dewi S, et al. (2009) Reducing Emissions from All Land Uses (REALU): the case for a whole landscape approach. ASB PolicyBrief 13. ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins, Nairobi. http://www. asb. cgiar. org/pdfwebdocs/ASBPB13. pdf.
73. van Noordwijk M, Hoang M, Neufeldt H et al (2011) How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: Reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi.
74. van Noordwijk M, Leimona B, Jindal R et al (2012) Payments for Environmental Services: evolution towards efficient and fair incentives for multifunctional landscapes. Ann Rev Environ Res 37: 389-420.
75. Venter O, Koh L (2012) Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): game changer or just another quick fix? Anna New York Acad Sci 1249(1): 137-150.
76. Venter O, Possingham H, Hovani L et al. (2012) Using systematic conservation planning to minimize REDD+ conflict with agriculture and logging in the tropics. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1755-263X. 2012. 00287. x.
77. Villamor GB, Desrianti F, Akiefnawati R et al. (2013) Gender influences decisions to change land use practices in the tropical forest margins of Jambi, Indonesia. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. doi: 10. 1007/s11027-013-9478-7.
78. Wells P, Franklin N, Gunarso P et al. (2012) Indonesian constitutional court ruling number 45/PUU-IX/2011 in relation to forest lands; implications for forests, development and REDD+. Daemeter consulting and Tropenbos International, Indonesia. http://www. daemeter. org/wp-content/files/Policy_Brief_Constitutional_Court_Decision_No_45_PUUIX_2011. pdf.
79. World Bank (2007) Sustaining economic growth, rural livelihoods, and environmental benefits: Strategic options for forest assistance in Indonesia. World Bank, Jakarta.
80. Wösten JHM, Clymans E, Page SE, Rieley JO, Limin SH (2008) Peat-water interrelationships in a tropical peatland ecosystem in Southeast Asia. Catena 73: 212-224.