Gender influences decisions to change land use practices in the tropical forest margins of Jambi, Indonesia

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 733-755

  Villamor, Grace B ^a,b   Desrianti, Febrina ^b   Akiefnawati, Ratna ^b   Amaruzaman, Sacha ^c   van Noordwijk, Meine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Decision making; Emergence; Income differentiation; Matrilineal system; Role playing games; Rubber agroforests

Indexed keywords

AGROFORESTRY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; DEFORESTATION; EMISSION INVENTORY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GENDER ROLE; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; INVESTMENT; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; LOWLAND ENVIRONMENT; RUBBER; RURAL POPULATION; STEREOTYPIC BEHAVIOR; TROPICAL FOREST; WOMENS STATUS;

INDONESIA; JAMBI [INDONESIA];

ELAEIS; ELAEIS GUINEENSIS; HEVEA BRASILIENSIS;

EID: 84904246247     PISSN: 13812386     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11027-013-9478-7     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agarwal B (2001) Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev 29(10): 1623-1648.
2. Akiefnawati R, Villamor GB, Zulfikar F et al (2010) Stewardship agreement to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD): Lubuk Beringin's hutan desa as the first village forest in Indonesia. Int For Rev 12(4): 349-360.
3. Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Q J Econ 116(1): 261-292.
4. Behrman J, Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A (2012) The gender implications of large-scale land deals. J Peasant Stud 39(1): 49-79.
5. Castella J-C, Trung TN, Boissau S (2005) Participatory simulation of land use changes in the northern mountains of Vietnam: the combined use of agent-based model, a role playing game, and geographic information system. Ecol Soc 10(1): 27p.
6. Coates J (2012) The hour between dog and wolf: risk taking, gut feelings and the biology of boom and bust. Penguin Press.
7. Colfer CJP (2012) The complex forest: communities, uncertainty, and adaptive collaborative management. Routledge.
8. Colfer CJP, Minarchek RD (2012) Women, men and forest research: a review of approaches, resources and methods for addressing gender. CIFOR, Bogor, Occasional Paper 80.
9. Coomes OT, Burt GJ (1997) Indigenous market-oriented agroforestry: dissecting local diversity in western Amazonia. Agroforest Syst 37(1): 27-44.
10. D' Aquino P, Le Page C, Bousquet F, Bah A (2003) Using self-designed role-playing games and a multi-agent system to empower a local decision-making process for land use management: the selfcormas experiment in Senegal. J Articif Societes Soc Simul 6(3).
11. DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M (2010) Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 3(3): 178-181.
12. Denton F (2002) Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: why does gender matter? Gender Dev 10(2): 10-20.
13. Eckel C, De Oliveira A, Grossman PJ (2008) Gender and negotiation in the small: are women (perceived to be) more cooperative than men? Negotiation J 24(4): 429-445.
14. Ekadinata E, Vincent G (2011) Rubber agroforests in a changing landscape: analysis of land use/ cover trajectories in Bungo district, Indonesia. For Trees Livelihoods 20: 3-14.
15. Evans TP, Sun W, Kelley H (2006) Spatially explicit experiments for the exploration of land use decision-making dynamics. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(9): 1013-1037.
16. Feldstein HS, Jiggins J (1994) Tools for the field: methodologies handbook for gender analysis in agriculture. Kumarian Press, Connecticut.
17. Greiner R, Gregg D (2011) Farmers' Intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy 28(1): 257-265.
18. Hemmati M, Röhr U (2009) Engendering the climate-change negotiations: experiences, challenges, and steps forward. Gender Dev 17(1): 19-32.
19. IFPRI (2012) Engendering agricultural research, development and extension. International Food Policy Research Institute.
20. Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. P Natl A Sci 108(9): 3465-3472.
21. Le QB (2005) Multi-agent system for simulation of land use and land cover change: a theoretical framework and its first implementation for an upland watershed in the Central Coast of Vietnam. Center for Development Research. Bonn, University of Bonn. PhD in Geography.
22. Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu Rev Sociol 28(1): 143-166.
23. Mai Y, Mwangi E, Wan M (2011) Gender analysis in forestry research: looking back and thinking ahead. Int For Rev 13(2): 245-258.
24. Margono BA, Turubanova S, Zhuravleva I, Potapov P, Tyukavina A, Baccini A, Goetz S, Hansen MC (2012) Mapping and monitoring deforestation and forest degradation in Sumatra (Indonesia) using Landsat time series data sets from 1990-2010. Environ Res Lett 7(3): 034010.
25. Martial T, Helmi NE, Martius E (2012) Land and tree tenure rights on agroforestry (parak) system at communal land in West Sumatra, Indonesia. J Agric Ext Rur Dev 4(19): 486-494.
26. Miyamoto M (2007) Road construction and population effects on forest conversion in rubber villages in Sumatra, Indonesia. In: Dube YC, Schmithuesen F (eds) Cross-sectoral policy developments in forestry. CABI, Wallingford.
27. Moreland RL, Levine JM (2002) Socialization and trust in work groups. Group Process Intergroup Relat 5(3): 185-201.
28. Neef A (2010) Resources, knowledge and innovation management in montane mainland southeast asia: what have we learned in the past decade. International Symposium on Sustainable land use and rural development in mountainous regions of Southeast Asia. Hanoi, Vietnam.
29. Nelson V, Stathers T (2009) Resilience, power, culture, and climate: a case study from semi-arid Tanzania, and new research directions. Gend Dev 17(1): 81-94.
30. Otsuka K, Suyanto S, Sonobe T, Tomich TP (2001) Evolution of land tenure institutions and development of agroforestry: evidence from customary land areas of Sumatra. Agr Econ 25(1): 85-101.
31. Peach Brown H (2011) Gender, climate change and REDD + in the Congo Basin forests of Central Africa. Int For Rev 13(2): 163-176.
32. Plant S (2001) On the mobile: The effects of mobile telephones on social and individual life. Motorola.
33. Quisumbing MAR (2001) Land, trees, and women: evolution of land tenure institutions in Western Ghana and Sumatra. Intl Food Policy Res Inst.
34. Quisumbing AR, Otsuka K (2001) Land inheritance and schooling in matrilineal societies: evidence from Sumatra. World Dev 29(12): 2093-2110.
35. Robinson DT, Brown DG, Parker DC et al (2007) Comparison of empirical methods for building agent-based models in land use science. J Land Use Sci 2(1): 31-55.
36. Rothman KJ (2012) Epidemiology: an introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press Inc, New York.
37. Rudel TK, Defries R, Asner GP, Laurance WF (2009) Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation. Conserv Biol 23(6): 1396-1405.
38. Smajgl A, Brown DG, Valbuena D, Huigen M (2011) Empirical characterisation of agent behaviours in socio-ecological systems. Environ Model Softw 26: 837-844.
39. Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8): 1419-1439.
40. Suyanto S, Tomich TP, Otsuka K (2001a) Land tenure and farm management efficiency: the case of paddy and cinnamon production in customary land areas of Sumatra. Aust J Agr Resour Econ 45(3): 411-436.
41. Suyanto S, Tomich TP, Otsuka K (2001b) Land tenure and farm management efficiency: the case of smallholder rubber production in customary land areas of Sumatra. Agrofor Syst 52: 145-160.
42. Szumilas M (2010) Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19(3): 227-229.
43. Terry G (2009) No climate justice without gender justice: an overview of the issues. Gend Dev 17(1): 5-18.
44. van Noordwijk M, Murdiyarso D, Hairiah K, Wasrin U, Rachman A, Tomich T (1998) Forest soils under alternatives to slash-and-burn agriculture in Sumatra, Indonesia. In: Schulte A, Ruhiyat D (eds) Soils of tropical forest ecosystems. Springer, Berlin.
45. van Noordwijk M, Tata H, Xu J, Dewi S, Minang P (2012) Segregate or integrate for multifunctionality and sustained change through landscape agroforestry involving rubber in Indonesia and China. Nair PKR, Garrity D. Springer, Dordrecht.
46. Vanslembrouck I, van Huylenbroeck G, Verbeke W (2002) Determinants of the willingness to participate in agri-environmental measures. J Agr Econ 50(3): 489-511.
47. Vieira Pak M, Castillo Brieva D (2010) Designing and implementing a role-playing game: a tool to explain factors, decision making and landscape transformation. Environ Model Softw 25(11): 1322-1333.
48. Villamor GB (2012) Flexibility of multi-agent system models for rubber agroforest landscapes and social response to emerging reward mechanisms for ecosystem services in Sumatra. University of Bonn Press, Indonesia Bonn.
49. Villamor GB, van Noordwijk M (2011) Social role-play games vs individual perceptions of conservation and PES agreements for maintaining rubber agroforests in Jambi (Sumatra), Indonesia. Ecol Soc 16(3): 27.
50. Villamor GB, van Noordwijk M et al (2011) Diversity deficits in modelled landscape mosaics. Ecol Inform 6(1): 73-82.
51. Wossink GAA, van Wenum JH (2003) Biodiversity conservation by farmers: analysis of actual and contingent participation. Eur Rev Agr Econ 30: 461-485.
52. Zainudeen A, Iqbal T, Samarajiva R (2010) Who's got the phone? Gender and the use of the telephone at the bottom of the pyramid. New Media Soc 12(4): 549-566.
53. Zbinden S, Lee DR (2005) Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA Program. World Dev 33(2): 255-272.