Design challenges for achieving reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation through conservation: Leveraging multiple paradigms at the tropical forest margins

Land Use Policy

Volumn 31, Issue , 2013, Pages 61-70

  Minang, Peter A ^a   van Noordwijk, Meine ^a  

^a WORLD AGROFORESTRY CENTRE ICRAF   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs); Nationally appropriate mitigation action (NAMA); Nested approaches; Payments for environmental services (PES); Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+)

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DEFORESTATION; DESIGN; DEVELOPING WORLD; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INVESTMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; LOCAL PLANNING; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; TROPICAL FOREST;

EID: 84871924996     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.025     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aoki M. On a generalization of Tinbergen's condition in the theory of policy to dynamic models. The Review of Economic Studies 1975, 42:293-296.
2. Angelsen A., Streck C., Peskett L., Brown J., Luttrell C. What is the right scale for REDD?. The Implications of National, Sub-national and Nested Approaches. Brief Info No. 15 2008, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 6 p.
3. Asquith N.M., Vargas M.T.R., Smith J. Can forest-protection carbon projects improve rural livelihoods? An analysis of the Noel Kempf Mercado climate action project, Bolivia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2002, 7:323-337.
4. Balmford A., Green R.E., Scharlemann J.P.W. Sparing land for nature: exploring the potential impact of changes in agricultural yield on the area needed for crop production. Global Change Biology 2005, 11:1594-1605.
5. Berkes F. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104:15188-15193.
6. Bishop J., Kapila S., Hicks F., Mitchell P., Vorhies F. New business models for biodiversity conservation. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2009, 28:285-303.
7. Blom B., Sunderland T., Murdiyaso D. Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science and Policy 2010, 13:164-172.
8. Boyd E., Hultman N., Timmons-Roberts J., Corbera E., Cole J., Bozmoski A., Tippman R., Manna P., Brown K., Liverman M.D. Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: lessons learned and policy futures. Environmental Science and Policy 2009, 12:820-831.
9. Brandon K.E., Wells M. Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Development 1992, 20:557-570.
10. Brandon K.E., Wells M. Lessons for REDD+ from protected areas and integrated conservation and development projects. Realizing REDD+. National strategy and policy options. 2008 Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications 2009, 225-235. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
11. Cerbu G., Minang P.A., Swallow B., Meadu V. Global Survey of REDD Projects: What Implications for Global Climate Objectives? 2009, ASB Partnerships for the Tropical Forest Margins, Nairobi.
12. Cerbu G.A., Swallow B.M., Thompson D.Y. Locating REDD: a global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14(2):168-180.
13. Clark W.C., Tomich T.P., van Noordwijk M., Guston D., Catacutan D., Dickson N.M., McNie E. Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011, 10.1073/pnas.0900231108.
14. Coomes O.T., Takasaki Y., Rhemtulla J.M. Land-use poverty traps identified in shifting cultivation systems shape long-term tropical forest cover. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108:13925-13930.
15. Corbera E., Soberanis C.G., Brown K. Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:743-761.
16. Cortez R., Saines R., Griscom B., Martin M., De Deo D., Fishbein G., Kerkering J., Marsh D. A Nested Approach to REDD+: Structuring Effective and Transparent Mechanisms for REDD+ Implementation at Multiple Scales 2010, The Nature Conservancy-Baker & McKenzie.
17. Daniels A.E., Bagstad K., Esposito V., Moulaert A., Rodriguez C.M. Understanding the impacts of Costa Rica's PES: are we asking the right questions?. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:2116-2126.
18. Dewi S., van Noordwijk M., Ekadinata A., Pfund J.L. Protected areas in relation to landscape multifunctionality: squeezing out intermediate land use intensities in the tropics?. Land Use Policy 2012, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.06.
19. DFID Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheet: Introduction 1999, Department for International Development-DFID. http://www.livelihoods.org/info/info_guidancesheets.html.
20. Ferraro P., Kiss A. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 2002, 298:1718-1719.
21. Fischer J., Brosi B., Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R., Goldman R., Goldstein J., Lindenmayer D.B., Manning A.D., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., Ranganathan J., Tallis H. Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming?. Frontiers in Ecological and the Environment 2008, 6:380-385.
22. Forest Trends and Climate Focus, 2011. Nested Projects and REDD+. Briefing Document. Retrieved from: http://www.gcftaskforce.org/documents/REDD_nested_projects.pdf.
23. Forestry Administration of the Royal Government of Cambodia, 2009. Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Oddar Meanchey Province, Cambodia: A Community Forestry Initiative for Carbon and Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Reduction. A Project Design Document submitted to the Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standard.
24. Frost F.G.H., Bond I. The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: payments for wildlife services. Ecological Economics 2007, 65:776-787.
25. Garnett S.T., Sayer J., DeToit J. Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: a conceptual framework. Ecology and Society 2007, 12(1):2. [online] URL:. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art2/.
26. Gene, E.I., Aliadi, A., 2009. The Ulu Masen REDD demonstration activity: challenges at the policy and implementation levels. Retrieved December 1 2009, from http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/rsis/nts/Events/climate_change/session3/concept%20paper-Enrique%20Ibarra%20Gene.pdf.
27. Grainger A., Boucher D.H., Frumhoff P.C., Laurence W.F., Lovejoy T., McNeely J., Niekisch M., Raven P., Sodhi N.V., Venter O., Pimm S.L. Biodiversity and REDD at Copenhagen. Current Biology 2009, 19:974-976.
28. Green R.E., Cornell S.J., Scharlemann J.P.W., Balmford A. Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 2005, 307:550-555.
29. Hajek F., Ventresca M.J., Scriven J., Castro A. Regime-building for REDD+: evidence from a cluster of local initiatives in south-eastern Peru. Environmental Science & Policy 2011, 14:201-215.
30. Hoang M.H., Hoan D.T., Thoa P.M., van Noordwijk M., Minang P.A. Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 2012, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.013.
31. Hughes R., Flintan F. Integrating Conservation and Development Experience: A Review of Bibliography of the ICDP Literature 2001, International Institute for Environment and Development - IIED, London.
32. Hughes-Hallett A.J. Econometrics and the theory of economic policy: the Tinbergen-Theil contributions 40 years on. Oxford Economic Papers 1989, 41:189-214.
33. Indonesian Forest Climate Alliance [IFCA], 2007. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in Indonesia: REDD methodology and strategies: summary for policy makers. Indonesia Forest Climate Alliance. http://www.dephut.go.id/INFORMASI/LITBANG/IFCA/Summary%204%20policy%20makers_final.pdf.
34. International Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry.
35. International Panel on Climate Change [IPCC], 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K. (Eds.), The National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, Japan.
36. Larson P., Freudenberger M., Wyckoff-Baird B. WWF Integrated Conservation and Development Projects: Ten Lessons from the Field 1985-1996 1998, World Wildlife Fund - WWF, Washington DC.
37. Martello R., Dargusch P., Medrilizam A systems analysis of factors affecting leakage in reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation projects in tropical forests in developing nations. Small-Scale Forestry 2010, 10.1007/s11842-010-9140-0.
38. Minang P.A., Bressers H.T.A., Skutsch M., McCall M. National forest policy as a platform for biosphere carbon management: the case of community forestry in Cameroon. Environmental Science and Policy 2007, 10:204-218.
39. Minang P.A., Swallow B., Meadu V. REDD Strategies for High-Carbon Rural Development. ASB Policy Brief No. 11 2008, ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins, Nairobi, Kenya.
40. The Provincial Government of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam [NAD], 2007. Reducing Carbon Emissions from Deforestation in the Ulu Masen Ecosystem, Aceh, Indonesia. A Triple-Benefit Project Design Note for CCBA Audit.
41. Naughton-Treves L., Holland M.B., Brandon K. The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2005, 30:219-252.
42. Nelson A., Chomitz K.M. Protected Area Effectiveness in Reducing Tropical Deforestation: A Global Analysis of the Impact of Protection Status. Evaluation Brief 2009, 7. The World Bank, Washington DC, pp. 42.
43. Pedroni L., Dutschke M., Streck C., Estrada M. Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach. Climate Policy 2009, 9:207-220.
44. Pedroni L., Estrada M.P., Cenamo M.C. A nested approach to REDD+: how could it be implemented?. Pathways for Implementing REDD+ 2010, UNEP RISOE Centre.
45. Phalan B., Balmford A., Green R.E., Scharlemann J.P.W. Minimizing the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally. Food Policy 2011, 36:S62-S71.
46. Phelps J., Webb E.L., Agrawal A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance. Science 2010, 328:312-313.
47. Plummer R. The adaptive co-management process: an initial synthesis of representative models and influential variables. Ecology and Society 2009, 14(2):14. [online] URL:. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art14/.
48. Preston A.J. A dynamic generalization of Tinbergen's theory of policy. The Review of Economic Studies 1974, 41:65-74.
49. Sanderson S. Poverty and conservation: the new century's peasant question?. World Development 2004, 33:323-332.
50. Sasaki N., Putz F.E. Critical need for new definitions of forest and forest degradation in global climate change agreements. Conservation Letters 2009, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00067.x.
51. Sayer J.A., Campbell B.M. The Science of Sustainable Development. Local Livelihoods and the Global Environment 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 288 pp.
52. Sills E., Madeira E.M., Sunderlin W.D., Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. The evolving landscape of REDD+ projects. Realizing REDD+. National strategy and policy options. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications 2009, 265-279. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
53. Streck C. Rights and REDD+: legal and regulatory considerations. Realizing REDD+. National strategy and policy options. 2008 Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications 2009, 151-162. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
54. Sunderlin W.D., Larson A.M., Cronkelton P. Forest tenure rights and REDD+: from inertia to policy solutions. Realizing REDD+. National strategy and policy options. 2008 Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications 2009, 139-149. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor. A. Angelsen (Ed.).
55. Swallow B.M., Kallesoe M.F., Iftikhar U.A., Van Noordwijk M., Bracer C., Scherr S.J., Raju K.V., Poats S.V., Duraiappah A.K., Ochieng B.O., Mallee H., Rumley R. Compensation and rewards for environmental services in the developing world: framing pan-tropical analysis and comparison. Ecology and Society 2009, 14:26. [online] URL:. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art26/.
56. Schwarze R., Niles J.O., Olander J. Understanding and managing leakage in forest-based greenhouse gas mitigation projects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A 2002, 1797:1685-1703.
57. Tomich T.P., Thomas D.E., van Noordwijk M. Environmental services and land use change in Southeast Asia: from recognition to regulation or reward?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2004, 104:229-244.
58. van Noordwijk M., Leimona B. Principles for fairness and efficiency in enhancing environmental services in Asia: payments, compensation, or co-investment?. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(4):17. [online] URL:. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art17/.
59. van Noordwijk M., Minang P.A. If we cannot define it, we cannot save it. European Tropical Forest Research Network- ETFRN News 2009, 50:5-10.
60. van Noordwijk M., Tomich T.P., Verbist B. Negotiation support models for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest margins. Conservation Ecology 2001, 5(2):21. [online] URL:. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art21.
61. van Noordwijk, M., Tata, H.L., Xu, J., Dewi, S., Minang, P.A. Segregate or integrate for multifunctionality and sustained change through landscape agroforestry involving rubber in Indonesia and China. In: Nair, P.K., Garrity, D. (Eds.), Agroforesry: The Way Forward. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, in press.
62. Waggoner P.E. How much land can ten billion people spare for nature?. Daedalus 1996, 125:73-93.
63. WWC, 2008. The Kisagau Corridor REDD Project. Phase I-Rukinga Sanctuary. Wildlife Works Carbon-WWC.
64. Zimmerer K.S. The reworking of conservation Geographies: nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2000, 90:356-369.