Filtration behavior of casein glycomacropeptide (CGMP) in an enzymatic membrane reactor: Fouling control by membrane selection and threshold flux operation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 469, Issue , 2014, Pages 127-139

  Luo, Jianquan ^a   Morthensen, Sofie T ^a   Meyer, Anne S ^a   Pinelo, Manuel ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Critical flux; EMR; Membrane fouling; Threshold flux; Whey protein

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; CASEIN; HYDROPHILICITY; MEMBRANE FOULING; MICROFILTRATION; SACCHARIFICATION;

CASEIN GLYCOMACROPEPTIDE; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; CRITICAL FLUX; EMR; ENZYMATIC MEMBRANE REACTORS; HUMAN MILK OLIGOSACCHARIDES; RESISTANCE-IN-SERIES MODEL; WHEY PROTEINS;

MEMBRANES;

CASEIN; CASEIN GLYCOMACROPEPTIDE; CYCLIC GMP; GALACTOSE OLIGOSACCHARIDE; GLYCOPROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CONTACT ANGLE; ENZYMATIC MEMBRANE REACTOR; ENZYME MECHANISM; ENZYME REACTOR; FOULING CONTROL; HUMAN; HYDROPHILICITY; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MEMBRANE RESISTANCE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER PERMEABILITY;

EID: 84904123026     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abd El-Salam M.H. Separation of casein glycomacropeptide from whey: methods of potential industrial application. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 1:93-99.
2. Silva-Hernandez E.R., Nakano T., Ozimek L. Isolation and analysis of κ-casein glycomacropeptide from goat sweet whey. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2002, 50:2034-2038.
3. Neelima R.Sharma, Rajput Y.S., Mann B. Chemical and functional properties of glycomacropeptide (GMP) and its role in the detection of cheese whey adulteration in milk: a review. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2013, 93:21-43.
4. Farías M.E., Martinez M.J., Pilosof A.M.R. Casein glycomacropeptide pH-dependent self-assembly and cold gelation. Int. Dairy J. 2010, 20:79-88.
5. Holck J., Larsen D.M., Michalak M., Li H., Kjærulff L., Kirpekar F., Gotfredsen C.H., Forssten S., Ouwehand A.C., Mikkelsen J.D., Meyer A.S. Enzyme catalysed production of sialylated human milk oligosaccharides and galactooligosaccharides by Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase. New Biotechnol. 2014, 31:156-165.
6. Michalak M., Larsen D.M., Jers C., Almeida J.R.M., Willer M., Li H., Kirpekar F., Kjærulff L., Gotfredsen C.H., Nordvang R.T., Meyer A.S., Mikkelsen J.D. Biocatalytic production of 3'-sialyllactose by use of a modified sialidase with superior trans-sialidase activity. Process. Biochem. 2014, 49:265-270.
7. Zeuner B., Luo J., Nyffenegger C., Aumala V., Mikkelsen J.D., Meyer A.S. Optimizing the biocatalytic productivity of an engineered sialidase from Trypanosoma rangeli for 3'-sialyllactose production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2014, 55:85-93.
8. Hickey R.M. The role of oligosaccharides from human milk and other sources in prevention of pathogen adhesion. Int. Dairy J. 2012, 22:141-146.
9. Rios G.M., Belleville M.P., Paolucci D., Sanchez J. Progress in enzymatic membrane reactors - a review. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 242:189-196.
10. Van der Bruggen B., Mänttäri M., Nyström M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
11. Wang Y.-N., Tang C.Y. Protein fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes-the role of hydrodynamic conditions, solution chemistry, and membrane properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 376:275-282.
12. Wemsy Diagne N., Rabiller-Baudry M., Paugam L. On the actual cleanability of polyethersulfone membrane fouled by proteins at critical or limiting flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 425-426:40-47.
13. Benhabiles M.S., Abdi N., Drouiche N., Lounici H., Pauss A., Goosen M.F.A., Mameri N. Fish protein hydrolysate production from sardine solid waste by crude pepsin enzymatic hydrolysis in a bioreactor coupled to an ultrafiltration unit. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2012, 32:922-928.
14. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Sanchez V. Model for colloidal fouling of membranes. AlChE J. 1995, 41:368-376.
15. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100:259-272.
16. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Field R.W. Critical and sustainable fluxes: theory, experiments and applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:42-69.
17. Field R.W., Pearce G.K. Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164:38-44.
18. Luo J., Zhu Z., Ding L., Bals O., Wan Y., Jaffrin M.Y., Vorobiev E. Flux behavior in clarification of chicory juice by high-shear membrane filtration: evidence for threshold flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 435:120-129.
19. Luo J., Ding L., Wan Y., Jaffrin M.Y. Threshold flux for shear-enhanced nanofiltration: experimental observation in dairy wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 409-410:276-284.
20. Stoller M., Bravi M., Chianese A. Threshold flux measurements of a nanofiltration membrane module by critical flux data conversion. Desalination 2013, 315:142-148.
21. Ochando-Pulido J.M., Hodaifa G., Victor-Ortega M.D., Martínez-Ferez A. Fouling control by threshold flux measurements in the treatment of different olive mill wastewater streams by membranes-in-series process. Desalination 2014, 343:162-168.
22. Miller D.J., Kasemset S., Wang L., Paul D.R., Freeman B.D. Constant flux crossflow filtration evaluation of surface-modified fouling-resistant membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452:171-183.
23. Wang Z., Field R.W., Qu F., Han Y., Liang H., Li G. Use of threshold flux concept to aid selection of sustainable operating flux: a multi-scale study from laboratory to full scale. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 123:69-78.
24. Guo W., Ngo H.-H., Li J. A mini-review on membrane fouling. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:27-34.
25. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
26. Drews A. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363:1-28.
27. Tang C.Y., Chong T.H., Fane A.G. Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164:126-143.
28. Al-Amoudi A.S. Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: a review. Desalination 2010, 259:1-10.
29. Mueller J., Davis R.H. Protein fouling of surface-modified polymeric microfiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 116:47-60.
30. Bowen W.R., Jenner F. Theoretical descriptions of membrane filtration of colloids and fine particles: an assessment and review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995, 56:141-200.
31. Chong T.H., Wong F.S., Fane A.G. The effect of imposed flux on biofouling in reverse osmosis: role of concentration polarisation and biofilm enhanced osmotic pressure phenomena. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:840-850.
32. Miller D.J., Kasemset S., Paul D.R., Freeman B.D. Comparison of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 454:505-515.
33. Luo J., Meyer A.S., Jonsson G., Pinelo M. Enzyme immobilization by fouling in ultrafiltration membranes: impact of membrane configuration and type on flux behavior and biocatalytic conversion efficacy. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 83:79-89.
34. Hadidi M., Zydney A.L. Fouling behavior of zwitterionic membranes: impact of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452:97-103.
35. Dai Z.-W., Wan L.-S., Xu Z.-K. Surface glycosylation of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane to improve its anti-fouling performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:479-485.
36. Chan R., Chen V., Bucknall M.P. Ultrafiltration of protein mixtures: measurement of apparent critical flux, rejection performance, and identification of protein deposition. Desalination 2002, 146:83-90.
37. Jaffrin M.Y. Dynamic shear-enhanced membrane filtration: a review of rotating disks, rotating membranes and vibrating systems. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:7-25.