Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: A review

Desalination

Volumn 259, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 1-10

  Al Amoudi, Ahmed Saleh ^a  

^a SALINE WATER CONVERSION CORPORATION   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Fouling; Nanofiltration membrane; Scaling

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL INTERACTIONS; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; DIVALENT IONS; EQUILIBRIUM SOLUBILITIES; FEED SOLUTION; FLUID BOUNDARY; HETEROGENEOUS CRYSTALLIZATION; INORGANIC AND ORGANIC MATERIALS; INORGANIC SALTS; IONIC SALTS; MEMBRANE CHARACTERISTICS; MEMBRANE FLUXES; MONOVALENT IONS; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER FOULING; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTERS; NF MEMBRANES; OPERATING CONDITION; PERMEATE FLUX; SCALE FORMATION; SCALING; SEAWATER DESALINATION; SURFACE CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; TRANSFER PROPERTIES;

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION; DESALINATION; IONIC STRENGTH; MEMBRANE FOULING; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PH; SCALE (DEPOSITS); SEAWATER; SEWAGE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE STRUCTURE; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WATER FILTRATION;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FOULING; MEMBRANE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; ORGANIC MATTER; PH; REACTION KINETICS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 77957886416     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.003     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Flux decline during nanofiltration of organic components in aqueous solution. Environmental Science & Technology 2001, 35(17):3535-3540.
2. Van der Bruggen B., et al. The use of nanofiltration for the removal of pesticides from ground water: an evaluation. Water Science and Technology 2001, 1:99-106.
3. Van der Bruggen B., et al. Nanofiltration as a treatment method for the removal of pesticides from ground waters. Desalination 1998, 117(1-3):139-147.
4. Sombekke H.D.M., Voorhoeve D.K., Hiemstra P. Environmental impact assessment of groundwater treatment with nanofiltration. Desalination 1997, 113(2-3):293-296.
5. Shankararaman C., et al. Effect of pretreatment on surface water nanofiltration. J. AWWA 1997, 10:77-89.
6. Jacangelo J.G., Rhodes Trussell R., Watson M. Role of membrane technology in drinking water treatment in the United States. Desalination 1997, 113(2-3):119-127.
7. Yildiz E., et al. Water softening in a crossflow membrane reactor. Desalination 2003, 159(2):139-152.
8. Weber R., Chmiel H., Mavrov V. Characteristics and application of new ceramic nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2003, 157(1-3):113-125.
9. Mohsen M.S., Jaber J.O., Afonso M.D. Desalination of brackish water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination 2003, 157(1-3):167.
10. Bellona C., et al. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment - a literature review. Water Research 2004, 38:2795-2809.
11. Long F., et al. Membrane flux and CaCO3 crystallization in the unstirred dead-end nanofiltration of magnetic solution. Desalination 2005, 186(1-3):243-254.
12. Lapointe J.F., et al. Fouling of a nanofiltration membrane by a beta-lactoglobulin tryptic hydrolysate: impact on the membrane sieving and electrostatic properties. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 253(1-2):89-102.
13. Thorsen T. Concentration polarisation by natural organic matter (NOM) in NF and UF. Journal of Membrane Science 2004, 233(1-2):79-91.
14. Lee S., Lueptow R.M. Control of scale formation in reverse osmosis by membrane rotation. Desalination 2003, 155(2):131-139.
15. Koros W.J. Stochastic approach to modeling surface fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1993, 85(2):218.
16. Farooque A.M., Al-Amoudi A.S., Hassan A.M. Chemical cleaning experiments for performance restoration of NF membranes operated on seawater feed 2002, IDA Conference, Bahrain.
17. Al-Amoudi A.S., Farooque A.M. Performance, restoration and autopsy of NF membranes used in seawater pretreatment. Desalination 2005, 178:261-271.
18. Van der Bruggen B., et al. A review of pressure-driven membrane processes in wastwater treatment and drinking water production. Environmental Progress 2003, 22:46-56.
19. Vrouwenvelder H., et al. Biofouling of membranes for drinking water production. Desalination 1998, 118:157-166.
20. Huiting H., Kappelhof J., Bosklopper T. Operartion of NF/RO plants from reactive to proactive. Desalination 2001, 139:183-189.
21. Van de Lisdonk C.A.C., et al. Predicition of supersaturation and monitoring of scaling in reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane system. Desalination 2001, 138:259-270.
22. Baker J., et al. Characterization of fouling of membrane used to treat surface water. Environmental Technology 1995, 16:977-985.
23. Boerlag S.F.E., et al. Prediction of flux decline in membrane systems due to particulate fouling. Desalination 1997, 113(2-3):231-233.
24. Fu P., Ruize H. Pilot plant study on ground water natural organic removved by low pressure. Desalination 1995, 102:47-56.
25. Aiken G.R., et al. Humic Substance in Soil, Sediment, and Water 1985, Wiley, New York.
26. Hong S.K., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 132(2):159-181.
27. Ghosh K., Schnitzer M. Macromolecular structures of humic substances. Soil Science 1980, 129(5):266-276.
28. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1996, 119(2):253-268.
29. Al-Amoudi A.S., Bob R. Cleaning results of new and fouled nanofiltration membrane characterized by zeta potential and permeability. 1Centre for Complex Fluids Processing, Multidisclinpary Nanotechnology Centre, School of Engineering, University of Wales Swansea 2006, 1-12.
30. Elimelech M., Chen W.H., Waypa J.J. Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer. Desalination 1994, 95(3):269-286.
31. Caceci M.S., Billon A. Evidence for large organic scatterers (50-200nm diameter) in humic-acid samples. Organic Geochemistry 1990, 15(3):335-350.
32. Elimelech M., et al. Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 127(1):101-109.
33. Roudman A.R., DiGiano F.A. Surface energy of experimental and commercial nanofiltration membranes: effects of wetting and natural organic matter fouling. Journal of Membrane Science 2000, 175(1):61-73.
34. Van Houtte E., et al. Treating different types of raw water with micro- and ultrafiltration for further desalination using reverse osmosis. Desalination 1998, 117(1-3):49-60.
35. Tchobanoglous G., et al. Ultrafiltration as an advanced tertiary treatment process for municipal wastewater. Desalination 1998, 119(1-3):315-321.
36. Porter J.J. Recovery of polyvinyl alcohol and hot water from the textile wastewater using thermally stable membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1998, 151(1):45-53.
37. Hagen K. Removal of particles, bacteria and parasites with ultrafiltration for drinking water treatment. Desalination 1998, 119(1-3):85-91.
38. Vera L., et al. Cross-flow microfiltration of biologically treated wastewater. Desalination 1997, 114(1):65-75.
39. Hong S., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 132:159-181.
40. Potts D.E., Ahlert R.C., Wang S.S. A critical review of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 1981, 36(3):235-264.
41. Champlin T.L. Using circulation tests to model natural organic matter adsorption and particle deposition by spiral-wound nanofiltration membrane elements. Desalination 2000, 131(1-3):105-115.
42. Schafer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Nanofiltration - Principle and Applications 2005, 1-543. Elsevier Advanced Technology.
43. Knyazkova T.V., Maynarovich A.A. Recognition of membrane fouling: testing of theoretical approaches with data on NF of salt solutions containing a low molecular weight surfactant as a foulant. Desalination 1999, 126(1-3):163-169.
44. Zhu H., Nystrom M. Cleaning results characterized by flux, streaming potential and FTIR measurements. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 1998, 138(2-3):309-321.
45. Braghetta A., DiGiano F.A., Ball W.P. Nom accumulation at NF membrane surface: impact of chemistry and shear. Journal of Environmental Engineering-Asce 1998, 124(11):1087-1098.
46. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., Belfort G. Flux decline during nanofiltration of naturally-occurring dissolved organic matter: effects of osmotic pressure, membrane permeability, and cake formation. Journal of Membrane Science 2004, 239(1):39-53.
47. Jucker C., Clark M.M. Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 1994, 97:37-52.
48. Manttari M., et al. Fouling effects of polysaccharides and humic acid in nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 2000, 165(1):1-17.
49. Childress A.E., Deshmukh S.S. Effect of humic substances and anionic surfactants on the surface charge and performance of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 1998, 118(1-3):167-174.
50. Suess E. Interaction of organic compounds with calcium-carbonate. 2. organo-carbonate association in recent sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 1973, 37(11):2435-2447.
51. Song L., Elimelech M. Particle deposition onto a permeable surface in laminar flow. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 1995, 173(1):165-180.
52. Schafer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: removal, fouling and the influence of multivalent ions. Desalination 1998, 118:109-122.
53. Schafer A.I., et al. Natural organic matter removal by nanofiltration: effects of solution chemistry on retention of low molar mass acids versus bulk organic matter. Journal of Membrane Science 2004, 242(1-2):73-85.
54. Jarusutthirak C., Mattaraj S., Jiraratananon R. Influence of inorganic scalants and natural organic matter on nanofiltration membrane fouling. Journal of Membrane Science 2007, 287(1):138-145.
55. Lee S., Cho J.W., Elimelech M. Combined influence of natural organic matter (NOM) and colloidal particles on nanofiltration membrane fouling. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 262(1-2):27-41.
56. Schafer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T. Fouling effect on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural water. Desalination 2000, 131:215.
57. Yuan W., Zydney A.L. Humic acid fouling during microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 1999, 157(1):1-12.
58. Nilson J.A., DiGiano F.A. Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration. Journal American Water Works Association 1996, 88(5):53-66.
59. Braeken L., et al. Influence of hydrophobicity on retention in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 252(1-2):195-203.
60. Van der Bruggen B., et al. Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 1999, 156(1):29-41.
61. Van der Bruggen B., Braeken L., Vandecasteele C. Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of organic compounds. Separation and Purification Technology 2002, 29(1):23-31.
62. Van der Bruggen B., Braeken L., Vandecasteele C. Evaluation of parameters describing flux decline in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containig organic compounds. Desalination 2002, 147:281-288.
63. Bouchard C.R., et al. Study of humic acid adsorption on nanofiltration membranes by contact angle measurements. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 1997, 75(2):339-345.
64. Vrijenhoek M.E., H.S., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes 2001, 188:115-128.
65. Wiesner M.R., Chellam S. The promise of membrane technologies. Environmental Science & Technology 1999, 33(17):360A-366A.
66. Van der Bruggen B., et al. Influence of MF pretreatment on NF performance for aqueous solutions containing particles and an organic foulant. Separation and Purification Technology 2004, 36(3):203-213.
67. Roux I.L., et al. Use of chitosan as an antifouling agent in a membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 248(1-2):127-136.
68. Wiesner M.R., et al. Committee Report: membrane processes in potable water. J. AWWA 1992, 59-64.
69. Hasson D., Drak A., Semiat R. Inception of CaSO4 scaling on RO membranes at various water recovery levels. Desalination 2001, 139(1-3):73-81.
70. Faller K.A. Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration 1999, AWWA, Denver.
71. Pervov A.G. Scale formation prognosis and cleaning procedure schedules in reverse osmosis systems operation. Desalination 1991, 83(1-3):77-118.
72. Lee S., Kim J., Lee C.-H. Analysis of CaSO4 scale formation mechanism in various nanofiltration modules. Journal of Membrane Science 1999, 163(1):63-74.
73. Gilron J., Hasson D. Calcium sulphate fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: flux decline mechanism. Chemical Engineering Science 1987, 42(10):2351-2360.
74. Her N., Amy G., Jarusutthirak C. Seasonal variations of nanofiltration (NF) foulants: identification and control. Desalination 2000, 132(1-3):143-160.
75. Dydo P., et al. The nucleation kinetic aspects of gypsum nanofiltration membrane scaling. Desalination 2004, 164(1):41-52.
76. Lee S., Lee C.-H. Effect of operating conditions on CaSO4 scale formation mechanism in nanofiltration for water softening. Water Research 2000, 34(15):3854-3866.
77. Lin C.-J., et al. Effects of operational parameters on cake formation of CaSO4 in nanofiltration. Water Research 2006, 40(4):806-816.
78. Vrijenhoek E.M., Hong S., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2001, 188(1):115-128.
79. Chong T.H., Sheikholeslami R. Thermodynamics and kinetics for mixed calcium carbonate and calcium sulfate precipitation. Chemical Engineering Science 2001, 56(18):5391-5400.
80. Dydo P., Turek M., Ciba J. Scaling analysis of nanofiltration systems fed with saturated calcium sulfate solutions in the presence of carbonate ions. Desalination 2003, 159(3):245-251.
81. Chong T.H., Yuen S., Sheikholeslami R. Composite Fouling in Seawater Desalination Precipitation of Calcium Sulfate and Calcium Carbonate 2004, 1-10. School of chemical engineering and industrial chemistry, Sydney.
82. Sheikholeslami R. Mixed salts - scaling limits and propensity. Desalination 2003, 154(2):117-127.
83. Andritsos N., et al. Calcium carbonate scale deposition in pips under isothermal conditions. Canadian Journal Chemical Engineering 1996, 74:911-919.
84. Matsuura T. Progress in membrane science and technology for seawater desalination - a review. Desalination 2001, 134(1-3):47-54.