Planning innovation orientation in public research and development organizations: Using a combined Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process approach

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 87, Issue , 2014, Pages 245-256

  Meesapawong, Pawadee ^a   Rezgui, Yacine ^b   Li, Haijiang ^b  

^a NATIONAL ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY CENTER   (Thailand)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AHP; Delphi; Innovation management; Public R D

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; INNOVATION; RESEARCH;

AHP; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); DELPHI; DEVELOPING ECONOMIES; FUTURE INNOVATIONS; INNOVATION MANAGEMENT; PLANNING INNOVATIONS;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DELPHI ANALYSIS; INNOVATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

THAILAND;

EID: 84904117059     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.023     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Archibugi D., Filippetti A., Frenz M. Economic crisis and innovation: is destruction prevailing over accumulation?. Res. Policy 2013, 42:303-314.
2. Guellec D., Wunsch-Vincent S. Policy responses to the economic crisis: investing in innovation for long-term growth. Digital Economy Papers, No.159 2009, OECD Publishing, Paris.
3. Trott P. Innovation Management and New Product Development 2005, Financial Times Prentice Hall, NJ. 3rd ed.
4. Bodas Freitas I.M., von Tunzelmann N. Mapping public support for innovation: a comparison of policy alignment in the UK and France. Res. Policy 2008, 37:1446-1464.
5. Huang C.-C., Chu P.-Y., Chiang Y.-H. A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega 2008, 36:1038-1052.
6. Hsu Y.-G., Tzeng G.-H., Shyu J.Z. Fuzzy multiple criteria selection of government-sponsored frontier technology R&D projects. R&D Manag. 2003, 33:539-551.
7. Intarakumnerd P., Chaminade C. Innovation policies in Thailand: towards a system of innovation approach?. Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 2011, 17:241-256.
8. Berger M., Diez J.R. Can host innovation systems in late industrializing countries benefit from the presence of transnational corporations? Insights from Thailand's manufacturing industry. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2008, 16:1047-1074.
9. Emery S.L., Ellis W., Chulavatnatol M. Thailand Competitive Innovation Strategies 2005, Amarin Printing, Bangkok.
10. Şener S., Saridoǧan E. The effects of Science-Technology-Innovation on competitiveness and economic growth. Procedia- Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 24:815-828.
11. National Science Board Science and engineering indicators 2008. Two Volumes 2008, National Science Foundation Arlington, VA.
12. Freeman C., Soete L. Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: what we can learn from the past. Res. Policy 2009, 38:583-589.
13. Cozzarin B.P. Data and the measurement of R&D program impacts. Eval. Program Plan. 2008, 31:284-298.
14. Geffen C., Judd K. Innovation through initiatives-a framework for building new capabilities in public sector research organizations. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2004, 21:281-306.
15. Caloffi A., Mariani M. Shaping regional policy responses: the design of innovation poles. Policy Stud. 2011, 32:413-428.
16. Ronde P. Delphi analysis of national specificities in selected innovative areas in Germany and France. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70:419-448.
17. Shavinina L.V. The International Handbook on Innovation 2003, Pergamon, Oxford.
18. Turoff M. The design of a policy Delphi. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1970, 2:149-171.
19. Turoff M. Delphi and its potential impact on information systems. Fall Joint Computer Conference 1971, 317-326. The American Federation of Information Processing Societies (AFIPS), Las Vegas.
20. Linstone H.A., Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
21. Scott G.M. Critical technology management issues of new product development in high-tech companies. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2000, 17:57-77.
22. Hunter C.L. New Product Development Using the Principles of the Delphi Model 1999, Loughborough University, Leicestershire.
23. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
24. Saaty T.L., Ozdemir M.S. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Math. Comput. Model. 2003, 38:233-244.
25. Boyne G.A., Meier K.J., Laurence J., O'Toole J., Walker R.M. Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2005, 15:633-639.
26. Yasunaga Y., Watanabe M., Korenaga M. Application of technology roadmaps to governmental innovation policy for promoting technology convergence. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76:61-79.
27. Obrien P.W. The Delphi technique and educational planning. Ir. J. Educ 1978, 12:69-93.
28. Hayne S.C., Pollard C.E. A comparative analysis of critical issues facing Canadian information systems personnel: a national and global perspective. Inf. Manag. 2000, 38:73-86.
29. Zolingen S.J., Klaassen C.A. Selection processes in a Delphi study about key qualifications in senior secondary vocational education. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70:317-340.
30. Lambright W.H. Science, technology, and public administration: the government-university nexus. Public Adm. Rev. 1989, 49:206-207.
31. Holmes J.S. Societal and economic valuation of technology-transfer deals. Acta Astronaut. 2009, 65:834-840.
32. Hadjimanolis A. The barriers approach to innovation. The International Handbook on Innovation 2003, 559-573. Pergamon, Oxford. L.V. Shavinina (Ed.).
33. Miyata Y. An analysis of research and innovative activities of universities in the United States. The International Handbook on Innovation 2003, 715-738. Pergamon, Oxford. L.V. Shavinina (Ed.).
34. Melkers J., Willoughby K. The state of the states: performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Adm. Rev. 1998, 58:66-73.
35. Andrews R., Boyne G.A., Walker R.M. Strategy content and organizational performance: an empirical analysis. Public Adm. Rev. 2006, 66:52-63.
36. Boyne G.A. Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: an evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money Manag. 2002, 22:17-24.
37. Nadler D.A., Tushman M.L. A congruence model for organization problem solving. Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings 1997, 159-171. Oxford University Press, New York. M.L. Tushman, P.C. Anderson (Eds.).
38. Stacey R.D. Strategic Management & Organisational Dynamics 1996, Pitman, London. 2nd ed.
39. Twiss B. Managing Technological Innovation 1992, Pitman, London. 4th ed.
40. Chakrabarti A.K., Souder W.E. Critical factors in technological innovation and their policy implications. Technovation 1984, 2:255-275.
41. Hoonsopon D., Ruenrom G.P. The empirical study of the impact of product innovation factors on the performance of new products: radical and incremental product innovation. Bus. Rev. Camb. 2009, 12:155-162.
42. Vanderloop D.H. Success Factors and Patterns in Government-Supported Research and Development, in 2004, University of Southern California, California.
43. Mowery D.C. The changing structure of the US national innovation system: implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy. Res. Policy 1998, 27:639-654.
44. Tidd J., Bessant J. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 4th ed.
45. Lee M., Om K. Different factors considered in project selection at public and private R&D institutes. Technovation 1996, 16:271-275.
46. UNU-MERIT European innovation scoreboard 2008: comparative analysis of innovation performance. PRO INNO Europe 2008.
47. OECD Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data 1997, OECD Publications Service.
48. Carayannis E.G., Gonzalez E. Creativity and innovation=competitiveness? When, how, and why. The International Handbook on Innovation 2003, 587-606. Pergamon, Oxford. L.V. Shavinina (Ed.).
49. Bozeman B., Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Res. Policy 2004, 33:599-616.
50. Crane A., McWilliams A., Martten D., Moon J., Siegel D. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
51. Chen C.-J., Huang J.-W. Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance - the mediating role of knowledge management capacity. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62:104-114.
52. Smith J. From R&D to strategic knowledge management: transitions and challenges for national laboratories. R&D Manag. 2000, 30:305.
53. Blau J. Finland to implement new innovation strategy. Res. Technol. Manag. 2008, 51:1-3.
54. Snyder-Halpern R. Indicators of organizational readiness for clinical information technology/systems innovation: a Delphi study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001, 63:179-204.
55. Liebowitz J. Knowledge Management Handbook 1999, CRC Press, London.
56. Vorakulpipat C., Rezgui Y. Value creation: the future of knowledge management. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 2008, 23:283-291.
57. Rogers D.M.A. The challenge of fifth generation R&D. Res. Technol. Manag. 1996, 39:33-41.
58. Rowe G., Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int. J. Forecast. 1999, 15:353-375.
59. Saaty T.L., Tran L.T. On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Math. Comput. Model. 2007, 46:962-975.
60. Remenyi D., Williams B., Money A., Swartz E. Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method 1998, SAGE, London.
61. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2003, Sage Publications, London. 3rd ed.
62. Bryman A. Social Research Methods 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.