The changing structure of the US national innovation system: Implications for international conflict and cooperation in R & D policy

Research Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 639-654

  Mowery, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Defense related R D spending; Federal government; Federal programs; R D policy; US national innovation system

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000559750     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00060-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Caves, R.E., Crookell, H., Killing, J.P., 1983. The Imperfect Market for Technology Licenses. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 45, 249-268.
2. Cohen, W., Florida, R., Goe, R., 1994. University-Industry Research Centers in the United States. Technical report, Center for Economic Development, Carnegie-Mellon University.
3. Cohen, W., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., Walsh, J., 1997. Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In: Noll, R. (Ed.), Challenge to the Research University (forthcoming). Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
4. David, P.A., Foray, D., 1995. Accessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Knowledge Base. STI Review #16, pp. 13-68.
5. David and Foray, 1996.
6. David, P.A., Mowery, D.C., Steinmueller, W.E., 1992. Analyzing the Economic Payoffs From Basic Research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
7. Edquist, C., Jacobsson, S., 1988. Flexible Automation. Blackwell, Oxford.
8. Eisenberg, R., 1996. Public research and private development: patents and technology transfer in government-sponsored research. Virginia Law Review 82, 1663-1727.
9. Evenson, R.E., 1982. Agriculture. In: Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-Industry Analysis. Pergamon, New York.
10. Florida, R., 1997. The Globalization of R&D: Results of a Survey of Foreign-Affiliated Laboratories in the USA. Research Policy 26, 85-103.
11. Freeman, C., 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter, London.
12. Ham, R.M., Mowery, D.C., 1995. Enduring dilemmas in U.S. technology policy and the Clinton administration. California Management Review.
13. Ham, R.M., Mowery, D.C., 1997. The U.S. response to globalization: searching for the keys under the lamp post. In: Dunning, J. (Ed.), Governments, Globalization, and Competitiveness. Oxford Univ. Press.
14. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., 1994. Numbers Up, Quality Down? Trends in University Patenting, 1965-1992. Presented at the CEPR conference on University Goals, Institutional Mechanisms, and the 'Industrial Transferability' of Research. Stanford University, March 18-20.
15. Katz, M.L., Ordover, J.A., 1990. R&D competition and cooperation. Brookings Papers Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 137-192.
16. Kortum, S., Lerner, J., 1997. Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?, NBER Working Paper #6204.
17. Link, A.N., 1996. Research Joint Ventures: Patterns from Federal Register Filings. Review of Industrial Organization 11, 617-628.
18. Mowery, D.C., 1983. The Relationship Between Intrafirm and Contractual Forms of Industrial Research in American Manufacturing, 1900-1940. Explorations in Economic History, 1983, 351-374.
19. Mowery, D.C. (Ed.), 1988. International Collaborative Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing. Ballinger Publishers, Cambridge, MA.
20. Mowery, D.C., 1997. U.S. postwar technology policy and the creation of new industries. In: Creativity, Innovation, and Job Creation. OECD, Paris.
21. Mowery, D.C., Rosenberg, N., 1989. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
22. Mowery, D.C., Rosenberg, N., 1993. The U.S. national innovation system. In: Nelson, R.R., (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
23. Mowery, D.C., Ziedonis, A.A., 1998. Market failure or market magic? Structural change in the U.S. national innovation system, forthcoming in STI Review #22.
24. National Science Board, 1996. Science and engineering indicators: 1996. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
25. National Science Foundation, 1996. National patterns of R&D resources: 1996. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
26. Nelson, R.R., 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 297-306.
27. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1993. National Systems of Innovation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
28. Nelson, R.R., Romer, P., 1997. Science, economic growth, and public policy. In: Smith B., Barfield, C. (Eds.), Technology, R&D, and the Economy. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
29. Normile, D., 1997. War on Debt Puts Big Science Under Fire. Science 276, 5/2/97, p. 670.
30. OECD, 1996. Technology and Industrial Performance. OECD, Paris.
31. Ostry, S., 1990. The Political Economy of Policy Making: Trade and Innovation Policies in the Triad. Council on Foreign Relations, New York.
32. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., 1994. University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Inventions. CEPR Working Paper #372, Stanford University.
33. U.S. Department of Defense, 1995. Dual Use Technology: A Defense Strategy for Affordable, Leading-Edge Technology. Defense Department, Washington, DC.
34. Williamson, O.E., 1979. Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 233-262.
35. Williamson, O.E., 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press).
36. Yager, L., Schmidt, R., 1997. The Advanced Technology Program: A Case Study in Federal Technology Policy. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC.