Are you smart enough to know what to eat? A critique of behavioural economics as justification for regulation

European Review of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 355-373

  Lusk, Jayson L ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

behavioural economics; food policy; paternalism

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; FOOD POLICY; GOVERNMENT; SOVEREIGNTY;

EID: 84904112312     PISSN: 01651587     EISSN: 14643618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbu019     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (57)

1. Akerlof, G. A. (1991). Procrastination and obedience. American Economic Review 81: 1-19.
2. Alevy, J. E., Haigh, M. S. and List, J. A. (2007). Information cascades: evidence from a field experiment with financial market professionals. Journal of Finance 62: 151-180.
3. Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: Harper.
4. Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G. and Prelec, D. (2003). Coherent arbitrariness: stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 73-105.
5. Arunachalam, A., Henneberry, S. R., Lusk, J. L. and Norwood, F. B. (2009). An empirical investigation into the excessive-choice effect. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91: 810-825.
6. Berg, N. and Gigerenzer, G. (2010). As-if behavioral economics: neoclassical economics in disguise? History of Economic Ideas 18: 133-166.
7. Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A. (2007). Toward choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. American Economic Review 97: 464-470.
8. Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A. (2009). Beyond revealed preference: choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124: 51-104.
9. Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team (2010). Applying Behavioural Insight to Health. London: Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment-data/file/60524/ 403936-BehaviouralInsight-acc.pdf.Accessed June 9 2013.
10. Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., ODonoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (2003). Asymmetric paternalism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151: 1211-1254.
11. Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, F. and Rabin, M. (eds)) (2011). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Cherry, T. L., Crocker, T. D. and Shogren, J. F. (2003). Rationality spillovers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 63-84.
13. Chiappori, P. A., Levitt, S. and Groseclose, T. (2002). Testing mixed-strategy equilibria when players are heterogeneous: the case of penalty kicks in Soccer. American Economic Review 92: 1138-1151.
14. Conly, S. (2012). Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dyer, D. and Kagel, J. H. (1996). Bidding in common value auctions: how the commercial construction industry corrects for the winners curse. Management Science 42: 1463-1475.
16. Dyer, D., Kagel, J. H. and Levin, D. (1989). A comparison of naive and experienced bidders in common value offer auctions: laboratory analysis. Economic Journal 99: 108-115.
17. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and ODonoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 351-401.
18. Fudenberg, D., Levine, D. K. and Maniadis, Z. (2012). On the robustness of anchoring effects in WTP and WTA experiments. American Economics Journal: Microeconomics 4: 131-145.
19. Grandin, T. and Johnson, C. (2005). Animals in Translation. New York: Scribner.
20. Just, D. R., Mancino, L. and Wansink, B. (2007). Could Behavioral Economics Help Improve Diet Quality for Nutrition Assistance Program Participants? US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Research Report No. (ERR-43), June (2007).
21. Kagel, J. H., Battalio, R. C. and Green, L. (1995). Economic Choice Theory: An Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kagel, J. H., Battalio, R. C., Rachlin, H. and Green, L. (1981). Demand curves for animal consumers. Quarterly Journal of Economics 96: 1-16.
23. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
24. Kahneman, D. and Thaler, R. H. (2006). Anomalies: utility maximization and experienced utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 221-234.
25. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Köszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2008). Choices, situations, and happiness. Journal of Public Economics 92: 1821-1832.
27. Kovalsky, K. L. and Lusk, J. L. (2013).Doconsumers really know how much they are willing to pay? Journal of Consumer Affairs 47: 98-127.
28. Lazarus, D. (2012). Its time to serve up some big incentives to curb obesity. Los Angeles Times. May 14, (2012). Available online at: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/may/14/business/la-fi-lazarus-20120515. Accessed 6 November 2012.
29. Levitt, S. D., List, J. A. and Reiley, D. (2010). What happens in the field stays in the field: exploring whether professionals play minimax in laboratory experiments. Econometrica 78: 1413-1434.
30. Levitt, S. D., List, J. A. and Sadoff, S. (2011). Checkmate: exploring backward induction among chess player. American Economic Review 101: 975-990.
31. List, J. A. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 41-71.
32. List, J. A. (2006). The behavioralist meets the market: measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. Journal of Political Economy 114: 1-37.
33. List, J. A. and Lucking-Reiley, D. (2002). Bidding behavior and decision costs in field experiments. Economic Inquiry 40: 611-619.
34. List, J. A. and Millimet, D. L. (2008). The market: catalyst for rationality and filter of irrationality. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis &Policy 8, Article 47.
35. Liu, P. J., Wisdom, J., Roberto, C. A., Liu, L. J. and Ubel, P. A. (2014). Using behavioral economics to design more effective food policies to address obesity. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 36: 6-24.
36. Loewenstein, G., Brennan, T. and Volpp, K. G. (2007). Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behaviors. Journal of the American Medical Association 298: 2415-2417.
37. Loewenstein, G. and Ubel, P. Economics behaving badly. New York Times, 15 July 2010.
38. Lusk, J. L. and Coble, K. O. (2008). Risk aversion in the presence of background risk: evidence from the lab. In J. C. Cox and G. W. Harrison (eds)), Risk Aversion in Experiments. Research in Experimental Economics, Volume 12. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
39. Lusk, J. L., Marette, S. and Norwood, F. B. (2014). The paternalist meets his match. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 36: 61-108.
40. Mises, L. Human Action. 2008. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute (originally published in 1954).
41. Norwood, F. B. and Lusk, J. L. (2011). A calibrated auction-conjoint valuation method: valuing pork and eggs produced under differing animal welfare conditions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62: 80-94.
42. ODonoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (2001). Choice and procrastination. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 121-160.
43. Pollan, M. (2006). The Omnivores Dilemma. New York: Penguin Press.
44. Roberts, D., Boyer, T. and Lusk, J. L. (2008). Preferences for environmental quality under uncertainty. Ecological Economics 66: 584-593.
45. Rubinstein, A. and Salant, Y. (2012). Eliciting welfare preferences from behavioural data sets. Review of Economic Studies 79: 375-387.
46. Santoni, A. and Kelshiker, A. R. (2010). Behavioral finance: an analysis of the performance of behavioral finance funds. Journal of Index Investing 1: 56-72.
47. Sen, A. K. (1995). Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
48. Sugden, R. (2003). Opportunity as a space for individuality: its value and the impossibility of measuring it. Ethics 113: 783-809.
49. Sugden, R. (2004). The opportunity criterion: consumer sovereignty without the assumption of coherent preferences. American Economic Review 94: 1014-1033.
50. Sugden, R. (2008). Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Constitutional Politics and Economics 19: 226-248.
51. Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review 93: 175-179.
52. Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
53. Wansink, B. (2006). Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More than We Think. New York: Bantam Books.
54. Wansink, B., Painter, J. E. and North, J. (2005). Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obesity 13: 93-100.
55. Wansink, B. and Sobal, J. (2007). Mindless eating: the 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Environment and Behavior 39: 106.
56. Wilkinson, W. (2008). Why opting out is no third way: the perplexing banality of libertarian paternalism. Reason Magazine, October, 2008.
57. Wright, C., Boney, V. and Banerjee, P. (2006). Behavioral Finance: Are the Disciples Profiting from the Doctrine? (22 August 2006). SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=930400. Accessed June 9 2013.