Enhancement of mammographic density measures in breast cancer risk prediction

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1314-1323

  Cheddad, Abbas ^a   Czene, Kamila ^a   Shepherd, John A ^b   Li, Jingmei ^c   Hall, Per ^a   Humphreys, Keith ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GENOME INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER RISK; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUMULUS; DENSITY; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEAN INTENSITY OF THE PECTORAL MUSCLE; PECTORAL MUSCLE; PERCENT DENSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELATIVE DENSITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

EID: 84904015422     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1240     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356: 227-6.
2. Schreer I. Dense breast tissue as an important risk factor for breast cancer and implications for early detection. Breast Care (Basel) 2009;4: 89-92.
3. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994;39: 1629-8.
4. Li J, Szekely L, Eriksson L, Heddson B, Sundbom A, Czene K, et al. High-Throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14: R114.
5. McCormack VA, Highnam R, Perry N, dos Santos Silva I. Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16: 1148-4.
6. Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske KM, Smith-Bindman R, Genant HK, Cummings SR. Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility. Radiology 2002;223: 554-7.
7. Heine JJ, Carston MJ, Scott CG, Brandt KR, Wu FF, Pankratz VS, et al. An automated approach for estimation of breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17: 3090-97.
8. Tice JA, Gummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K. Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;94: 115-2.
9. Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, Graubard B, Schairer C, Byrne C, et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 1215-6.
10. Darabi H, Czene K, Zhao W, Liu J, Hall P, Humphreys K. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14: R25.
11. Manduca A, Carston MJ, Heine JJ, Scott CG, Pankratz VS, Brandt KR, et al. Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 2009;18: 837-5.
12. Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, et al. Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19: 418-8.
13. Shepherd JA, Herve L, Landau J, Fan B, Kerlikowske K, Cummings SR. Novel use of single X-ray absorptiometry for measuring breast density. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4: 173-82.
14. Olson JE, Sellers TA, Scott CG, Schueler BA, Brandt KR, Serie DJ, et al. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo mammography health study cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14: R147.
15. Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg L, Humphreys K, Hall P. The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;134: 859-66.
16. LindstromS, Vachon CM, Li J, Varghese J, Thompson D, Warren R, et al. Common variants in ZNF365 are associated with both mammographic density and breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 2011;43: 185-87.
17. Michailidou K, Hall P, Gonzalez-Neira A, Ghoussaini M, Dennis J, Milne RL, et al. Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet 2013;45: 353-61.
18. Cheddad A, Dzulkifli M, Abd Manaf Z. Exploiting Voronoi diagram properties in face segmentation and features extraction. Pattern Recognit 2008;41: 3842-9.
19. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
20. Venables WN, Ripley BD.Modern applied statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
21. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and Sto analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12: 77.
22. Lang T, Cauley JA, Tylavsky F, Bauer D, Cummings S, Harris TB. Computed tomographic measurements of thigh muscle crosssectional area and attenuation coefficient predict hip fracture: the health, aging, and body composition study. J Bone Miner Res 2010;25: 513-9.
23. Haberle L, Wagner F, Fasching PA, Jud SM, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, et al. Characterizing mammographic images by using generic texture features. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14: R59.
24. Huo Z, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Wolverton DE, Weber BL, Metz CE, et al. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 2002;225: 519-6.
25. Li H, Giger M, Olopade O, Lan L. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Acad Radiol 2007;14: 513-1.
26. Wei J, Chan HP, Wu YT, Zhou C, Helvie MA, Tsodikov A, et al. Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study. Radiology 2011;260: 42-9.
27. Nielsen M, Karemore G, Loog M, Raundahl J, Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, et al. A novel and automatic mammographic texture resemblance marker is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 2011;35: 381-87.
28. Giger ML, Karssemeijer N, Schnabel JA. Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2013;15: 327-7.
29. Li XZ, Williams S, Bottema MJ. Texture and region dependent breast cancer risk assessment from screening mammograms. Pattern Recognit Lett 2014;36: 117-4.