Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue , 2013, Pages 327-357

  Giger, Maryellen L ^a   Karssemeijer, Nico ^b   Schnabel, Julia A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biomechanical modeling; breast cancer; classification; computer aided detection; computer aided diagnosis; image processing; image registration; medical imaging; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL MODELING; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK ASSESSMENTS; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; FEATURE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES; IMAGE ANALYSIS METHOD; KINETIC CHARACTERISTICS; QUANTITATIVE IMAGE ANALYSIS;

BIOMECHANICS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASES; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN;

BIOMECHANICS; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC RISK; GENOMICS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; KINETICS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHENOTYPE; PHYSICAL MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGISTRATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; ULTRASOUND;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KINETICS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MOTION; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PHENOTYPE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84880524177     PISSN: 15239829     EISSN: 15454274     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152416     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. GigerM, Chan H, Boone J. 2008. Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: The role of medical physics and AAPM. Med. Phys. 35:5799-820
2. Elter M, Horsch A. 2009. CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: A review. Med. Phys. 36:2052-68
3. Hashimoto BE. 2010. Multimodality Breast Imaging: A Correlative Atlas. New York: Thieme. 2nd ed.
4. Byng JW, Critten JP, Yaffe MJ. 1997. Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images. Radiology 203:564-68
5. Snoeren PR, Karssemeijer N. 2004. Thickness correction ofmammographic images bymeans of a global parameter model of the compressed breast. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23:799-806
6. KallenbergM, van Gils C, LokateM, den Heeten G, Karssemeijer N. 2012. Effect of compression paddle tilt correction on volumetric breast density estimation. Phys. Med. Biol. 57:5155-68
7. Highnam R, Brady M. 1999. Mammographic Image Analysis. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
8. Malkov S, Wang J, KerlikowskeK,Cummings S, Shepherd J. 2009. Single X-ray absorptiometrymethod for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume. Med. Phys. 36:5525-36
9. Alonzo-Proulx O, Packard N, Boone JM, Al-Mayah A, Brock KK, et al. 2010. Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms. Phys. Med. Biol. 55:3027-44
10. van Engeland S, Snoeren PR, Huisman H, Boetes C, Karssemeijer N. 2006. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25:273-82
11. Wolfe JN. 1976. Risk for breast cancer development determined bymammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37:2486-92
12. Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabár L. 1997. The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur. J. Radiol. 24:131-36
13. Huo Z, Giger M, Olopade O, Wolverton D, Weber B, et al. 2002. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 225:519-26
14. Wei J, Chan H, Wu Y, Zhou C, Helvie M, et al. 2011. Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: A pilot case-control study. Radiology 260:42-49
15. Li H, Giger M, Olopade O, Lan L. 2007. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Acad. Radiol. 14:513-21
16. Manduca A, Carston M, Heine J, Scott C, Pankratz V, et al. 2009. Texture features frommammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 18:837-45
17. NielsenM, KaremoreG, Loog M, Raundahl J, Karssemeijer N, et al. 2011. A novel and automatic mammographic texture resemblance marker is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 35:381-87
18. Jing H, Yang Y, Nishikawa R. 2011. Detection of clustered microcalcifications using spatial point process modeling. Phys. Med. Biol. 56:1-17
19. JiangY,NishikawaRM,WolvertonDE, Metz CE,GigerML,et al. 1996. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: Automated feature analysis and classification. Radiology 198:671-78
20. Veldkamp WJ, Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Hendriks JH. 2000. Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types. Med. Phys. 27:2600-8
21. Oliver A, Freixenet J, Martí J, Pérez E, Pont J, et al. 2010. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images. Med. Image Anal. 14:87-110
22. Hong B, Sohn B. 2010. Segmentation of regions of interest in mammograms in a topographic approach. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 14:129-39
23. Velikova M, Lucas PJF, Samulski M, Karssemeijer N. 2012. A probabilistic framework for image information fusion with an application to mammographic analysis. Med. Image Anal. 16:865-75
24. Paquerault S, Petrick N, Chan H, Sahiner B, Helvie M. 2002. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: Fusion of two-view information. Med. Phys. 29:238-47
25. van Engeland S, Karssemeijer N. 2007. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. Med. Phys. 34:898-905
26. Wei J, Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Zhou C, Hadjiiski LM, et al. 2009. Computer-Aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: Dual system approach with two-view analysis. Med. Phys. 36:4451-60
27. Zheng B, Leader J, Abrams G, Lu A,Wallace L, et al. 2006. Multiview-based computer-Aided detection scheme for breast masses. Med. Phys. 33:3135-43
28. Samulski M, Karssemeijer N. 2011. Optimizing case-based detection performance in a multiview CAD system for mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30:1001-9
29. Wei J, Chan H, Zhou C, Wu Y, Sahiner B, et al. 2011. Computer-Aided detection of breast masses: Four-view strategy for screening mammography. Med. Phys. 38:1867-76
30. Marias K, Behrenbruch C, Parbhoo S, Seifalian A, Brady M. 2005. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24:782-90
31. Hadjiiski L, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Petrick N, Helvie MA. 2001. Automated registration of breast lesions in temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis-local affine transformation for improved localization. Med. Phys. 28:1070-79
32. Sanjay-Gopal S, Chan HP, Wilson T, Helvie M, Petrick N, Sahiner B. 1999. A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms. Med. Phys. 26:2669-79
33. Timp S, van Engeland S, Karssemeijer N. 2005. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs. Med. Phys. 32:2629-38
34. Filev P, Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan H, Helvie M. 2005. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. Med. Phys. 32:515-29
35. Timp S, Karssemeijer N. 2006. Interval change analysis to improve computer aided detection in mammography. Med. Image Anal. 10:82-95
36. Berg W, Blume J, Cormack J, Mendelson E, Lehrer D, et al. 2008. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography versus mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 299:2151-63
37. Kelly K, Dean J, Comulada W, Lee S. 2010. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur. Radiol. 20:734-42
38. Drukker K, Giger M, Metz C. 2005. Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. Radiology 237:834-40
39. Sahiner B, Chan H, Roubidoux M, Hadjiiski L, Helvie M, et al. 2007. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3DUS volumetric images: Effect of computer-Aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 242:716-24
40. Tan T, Platel B, Huisman H, Sánchez CI, Mus R, Karssemeijer N. 2012. Computer aided lesion diagnosis in automated 3D breast ultrasound using coronal spiculation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 31:1034-42
41. Chan H-P, Wei J, Sahiner B, Rafferty EA, Wu T, et al. 2005. Computer-Aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: Preliminary experience. Radiology 237:1075-80
42. Reiser I, Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Wu T, Rafferty EA, et al. 2006. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med. Phys. 33:482-91
43. Reiser I, Nishikawa RM, Edwards AV, Kopans DB, Schmidt RA, et al. 2008. Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: A preliminary study. Med. Phys. 35:1486-93
44. Sahiner B, Chan H, Hadjiiski L, Helvie M, Wei J, et al. 2012. Computer-Aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: A 3D approach. Med. Phys. 39:28-39
45. Chan H-P, Wei J, Zhang Y, Helvie MA, Moore RH, et al. 2008. Computer-Aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: Comparison of three approaches. Med. Phys. 35:4087-95
46. Chan H-P, Wu Y-T, Sahiner B, Wei J, Helvie MA, et al. 2010. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: Comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices. Med. Phys. 37:3576-86
47. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Boggis CR, McGee MA, Griffiths PM, et al 2008. Variable size computer-Aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions. Breast Cancer Res. 10:R72
48. Malich A, Fischer DR, Böttcher J. 2006. CAD for mammography: The technique, results, current role and further developments. Eur. Radiol. 16:1449-60
49. Alberdi E, Povykalo A, Strigini L, Ayton P. 2004. Effects of incorrect computer-Aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography. Acad. Radiol. 11:909-18
50. Roehrig J. 2005. The manufacturer's perspective. Br. J. Radiol. 78:S41-45
51. Nishikawa RM. 2007. Current status and future directions of computer-Aided diagnosis in mammo graphy. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 31:224-35
52. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MGC, Agbaje OF,Wallis MG, et al. 2008. Single reading with computeraided detection for screening mammography. N. Engl. J. Med. 359:1675-84
53. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, et al. 2007. Influence of computer-Aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N. Engl. J. Med. 356:1399-409
54. Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Carney PA, et al. 2011. Effectiveness of computer-Aided detection in community mammography practice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 103:1152-61
55. Manning DJ, Ethell SC, Donovan T. 2004. Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph. Br. J. Radiol. 77:231-35
56. Nodine CF, Mello-Thoms C, Weinstein SP, Kundel HL, Conant EF, et al. 2001. Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: An eye-position analysis. Radiology 221:122-29
57. Otten JDM, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, et al. 2005. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 97:748-54
58. Karssemeijer N, Otten JDM, Rijken H, Holland R. 2006. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support. Br. J. Radiol. 79:S123-26
59. Samulski M, Hupse R, Boetes C, Mus R, den Heeten G, Karssemeijer N. 2010. Using computer aided detection in mammography as a decision support. Eur. Radiol. 20:2323-30
60. Hupse R, SamulskiM, LobbesMB, Mann RM,Mus R, et al. 2013. Computer-Aided detection of masses at mammography: Interactive decision support versus prompts. Radiology 266:123-29
61. Dromain C, Boyer B, Ferré R, Canale S, Delaloge S, Balleyguier C. 2013. Computed-Aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer. Eur. J. Radiol. 82:417-23
62. Eadie LH, Taylor P, Gibson AP. 2012. A systematic review of computer-Assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging. Eur. J. Radiol. 81:e70-76
63. Taylor P, Potts HWW. 2008. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: Two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur. J. Cancer 44:798-807
64. Kupinski M, Giger M. 1998. Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17:510-17
65. Horsch K, Giger M, Venta LA, Vyborny C. 2001. Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med. Phys. 28:1652-59
66. Sahiner B, Petrick N, Chan H, Hadjiiski L, Paramagul C, et al. 2001. Computer-Aided characterization of mammographicmasses: Accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20:1275-84
67. Yuan Y, Giger M, Li H, Suzuki K, Sennett C. 2007. A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. Med. Phys. 34:4180-93
68. Chen W, GigerM, Bick U. 2006. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Acad. Radiol. 13:63-72
69. SuligaM, Deklerck R, Nyssen E. 2008. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 32:502-12
70. Cui Y, Tan Y, Zhao B, Liberman L, Parbhu R, et al. 2009. Malignant lesion segmentation in contrastenhanced breast MR images based on the marker-controlled watershed. Med. Phys. 36:4359-69
71. Ashraf AB, Gavenonis S, Daye D, Mies C, Feldman M, et al. 2011. A multichannel Markov random field approach for automated segmentation of breast cancer tumor in DCE-MRI data using kinetic observation model. MICCAI, Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 6893:546-53
72. Li H, Giger M, Yuan Y, Chen W, Horsch K, et al. 2008. Evaluation of computer-Aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset. Acad. Radiol. 15:1437-45
73. Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yao X, Yang Y, Li K. 2008. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography. Acta. Radiol. 49:618-22
74. Jing H, Yang Y, Wernick MN, Yarusso LM,Nishikawa RM. 2012. A comparison study of image features between FFDM and film mammogram images. Med. Phys. 39:4386-94
75. Horsch K, GigerM, Venta L, Vyborny C. 2002. Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound. Med. Phys. 29:157-64
76. Kuhl C, Schild H. 2000. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12:965-74
77. Hylton N. 2006. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker. J. Clin. Oncol. 24:3293-96
78. Giger M, Vyborny C, Schmidt R. 1994. Computerized characterization of mammographic masses: Analysis of spiculation. Cancer Lett. 77:201-11
79. Huo Z, Giger M, Vyborny C, Bick U, Lu P, et al. 1995. Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses. Med. Phys. 22:1569-79
80. Rangayyan RM, Mudigonda NR, Desautels JEL. 2000. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38:487-96
81. Varela C, Timp S, Karssemeijer N. 2006. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses. Phys. Med. Biol. 51:425-41
82. TanT, Platel B, HuismanH, Sanchez C, MusR,Karssemeijer N. 2012. Computer-Aided lesion diagnosis in automated 3-D breast ultrasound using coronal spiculation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 31:1034-39
83. Garra BS, Krasner BH, Horii SC, Ascher S, Mun SK, Zeman RK. 1993. Improving the distinction between benign andmalignant breast lesions: The value of sonographic texture analysis. Ultrason. Imaging 15:267-85
84. Chen W, Giger M, Li H, Bick U, Newstead G. 2007. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn. Reson. Med. 58:562-71
85. Holli K, Laaperi AL, Harrison L, Luukkaala T, Toivonen T, et al. 2010. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images. Acad. Radiol. 17:135-41
86. Huang S-F, Chang R-F, Moon WK, Lee Y-H, Chen D-R, Suri JS. 2008. Analysis of tumor vascularity using three-Dimensional power Doppler ultrasound images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27:320-30
87. Li Y, Karnaowski T, Tobin K, Gaincardo L, Morris S, et al. 2011. A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant ocular telehealth network for the remote diagnosis and management of diabetic retinopathy. Telemed. e-Health 17:627-34
88. Karahaliou A, Vassiou K, Arikidis NS, Skiadopoulos S, Kanavou T, Costaridou L. 2010. Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis. Br. J. Radiol. 83:296-309
89. Kupinski M, Giger M. 1999. Feature selection with limited datasets. Med. Phys. 26:2176-82
90. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Wagner R, Hadjiiski L. 2000. Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-Aided diagnosis: The effect of finite sample size. Med. Phys. 27:1509-22
91. Rakoczy M, McGaughey D, Korenberg M, Levman J, Martel A. 2012. Feature selection in computeraided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. J. Digit. Imaging 26:198-208
92. Jamieson AR, Giger ML, Drukker K, Li H, Yuan Y, Bhooshan N. 2010. Exploring nonlinear feature space dimension reduction and data representation in breastCADx with Laplacian eigenmaps and t-SNE. Med. Phys. 37:339-51
93. Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI, Likas A. 2005. Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using neural networks and support vector machines. Artif. Intell. Med. 34:141-50
94. Luo S-T, Cheng B-W. 2012. Diagnosing breast masses in digital mammography using feature selection and ensemble methods. J. Med. Syst. 36:569-77
95. Chang R-F, Wu W-J, Moon WK, Chen D-R. 2003. Improvement in breast tumor discrimination by support vectors machines and speckle-emphasis texture analysis. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29:679-86
96. Levman J, LeungT,Causer P, PlewesDB, Martel AL. 2008. Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27:688-96
97. Schlossbauer T, Leinsinger G, Wismuller A, Lange O, Scherr M, et al. 2008. Classification of small contrast enhancing breast lesions in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of morphological criteria and dynamic analysis based on unsupervised vector-quantization. Investig. Radiol. 43:56-64
98. Drukker K, Horsch K, Giger ML. 2005. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography. Acad. Radiol. 12:970-79
99. Yuan Y, Giger M, Li H, Bhooshan N, Sennett CA. 2010. Multimodality computer-Aided breast cancer diagnosis with FFDM and DCE-MRI. Acad. Radiol. 17:1158-67
100. Jamieson A, Giger M, Drukker K, Pesce L. 2010. Enhancement of breast CADx with unlabeled data. Med. Phys. 37:4155-72
101. Sahiner B, Chan H, Hadjiiski L, Roubidoux M, Paramagul C, et al. 2004. Multimodality CAD: Combination of computerized classification techniques based on mammograms and 3D ultrasound volumes for improved accuracy in breast mass characterization. SPIE Med. Imaging 5370:67-74
102. BhooshanN,Giger M, Edwards D, Yuan Y, Jansen S, et al. 2011. Computerized three-class classification of MRI-based prognostic markers for breast cancer. Phys. Med. Biol. 56:5995-6008
103. Horsch K, GigerM, Vyborny C, Lan L,Mendelson E, Hendrick R. 2006. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-Aided diagnosis: Observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology 240:357-68
104. Jiang Y, Nishikawa R, Schmidt R, Metz C, Giger M, Doi K. 1999. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-Aided diagnosis. Acad. Radiol. 6:22-33
105. Chan H-P, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, Petrick N, Roubidoux MA, et al. 1999. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-Aided diagnosis: An ROC study. Radiology 212:817-27
106. Leichter I, Fields S,Nirel R, Bamberger P,Novak B, et al. 2000. Improved mammographic interpretation of masses using computer-Aided diagnosis. Eur. Radiol. 10:377-83
107. Meinel L, StolpenA,Berbaum K, FajardoL,Reinhardt J. 2007. BreastMRIlesion classification: Improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-Aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 25:89-95
108. Sahiner B, Chan H, Hadjiiski L, Roubidoux M, Paramagul C, et al. 2009. Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images. Acad. Radiol. 16:810-18
109. Timp S, Varela C, Karssemeijer N. 2010. Computer-Aided diagnosis with temporal analysis to improve radiologists' interpretation of mammographic mass lesions. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 14:803-8
110. Shimauchi A, Giger M, Bhooshan N, Lan L, Pesce L, et al. 2011. Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-Aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: Reader study. Radiology 258:696-704
111. Jiang Y, Nishikawa R, Schmidt R, Toledano A, Doi K. 2001. Potential of computer-Aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations ofmammograms depictingmicrocalcifications. Radiology 220:787-94
112. Horsch K, GigerM,Metz C. 2008. Prevalence scaling: Applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acad. Radiol. 15:1446-57
113. Horsch K, GigerM,Metz C. 2008. Potential effect of different radiologist reporting methods on studies showing benefit of CAD. Acad. Radiol. 15:139-52
114. Horsch K, Pesce L, Giger M, Metz C, Jiang Y. 2012. A scaling transformation for classifier output based on likelihood ratio: Applications to a CAD workstation for diagnosis of breast cancer. Med. Phys. 39:2787-804
115. Hellman S. 1994. Karnofsky memorial lecture. Natural history of small breast cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 12:2229-34
116. Bonadonna G, Hortobagyi G, Valagussa P. 2006. Textbook of Breast Cancer: A Clinical Guide to Therapy. Abingdon, England: Taylor & Francis
117. BhooshanN,Giger M, Jansen SA, LiH, Lan L, Newstead G. 2010. Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: Computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology 254:680-90
118. Madabhushi A, Agner S, Basavanhally A, Doyle S, Lee G. 2011. Computer-Aided prognosis: Predicting patient and disease outcome via quantitative fusion of multi-scale, multi-modal data. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 35:506-14
119. Partridge S, Gibbs J, Lu Y, Esserman L, Tripathy D, et al. 2005. MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. Am. J. Roentgenol. 184:1774-81
120. Ah-See M-LW,Makris A, Taylor NJ, HarrisonM, Richman PI, et al. 2008. Early changes in functional dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predict for pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 14:6580-89
121. Giger ML. 2010. Update on the potential of computer-Aided diagnosis for breast cancer. Future Oncol. 6:1-4
122. Li H, GigerM, Sun C, Ponsukcharoen U,Huo D, et al. 2010. Preliminary association study between imagebased biomarkers and genomic biomarkers for breast cancer risk assessment. Presented at Assem. Annu. Meet. Radiol. Soc. N. Am., 96th, Chicago
123. Guo Y, Sivaramakrishna R, Lu CC, Suri JS, Laxminarayan S. 2006. Breast image registration techniques: A survey. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 44(1-2):15-26
124. Zitova B, Flusser J. 2003. Image registration methods: A survey. Image Vision Comput. 21(11):977-1000
125. Rueckert D, Schnabel JA. 2011. Medical image registration. In Biomedical Image Processing. ed. TM Deserno, pp. 131-54. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
126. Pluim JPW, Maintz J. 2003. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: A survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22(8):986-1004
127. Denton ERE, Sonoda L, Rueckert D, Rankin SC, Hayes C, et al. 1999. Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 23(5): 800-5
128. Meyer C, Boes J, Kim B, Bland P. 1998. Evaluation in control point selection in automatic, mutual information driven, 3D warping. MICCAI, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1496:944-51
129. Rueckert D, Sonoda L, Hayes C, Hill D, Leach M, Hawkes D. 1999. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(8):712-21
130. Fischer B, Modersitzki J. 2004. A unified approach to fast image registration and a new curvature based registration technique. Linear Algebr. Appl. 380:107-24
131. CrumWR,TannerC,HawkesD. 2005. Anisotropicmulti-scale fluid registration: Evaluation inmagnetic resonance breast imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 50(21):5153-74
132. Tanner C, Schnabel JA, ChungD, Clarkson MJ, RueckertD, et al. 2000. Volume and shape preservation of enhancing lesions when applying non-rigid registration to a time series of contrast enhancing MR breast images. MICCAI, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1935:327-37
133. Rohlfing T,Maurer CR Jr, Bluemke DA, Jacobs MA. 2003. Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22:730-41
134. Tanner C, Schnabel J, Karssemeijer N, Nielsen M, Giger M, Hawkes D, eds. 2011. Workshop on Breast Image Analysis. Copenhagen: Dep. Comput. Sci., Univ. Copenhagen. http://www.diku.dk/ BIA2011proceedings.pdf
135. Samani A, Bishop JA, Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB. 2001. Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(4):271-79
136. Tanner C, Schnabel JA, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ, Leach MO, Hose DR. 2006. Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. Med. Phys. 33(6):1758-69
137. Schnabel JA, Tanner C, Castellano-Smith AD, Degenhard A, Leach MO, et al. 2003. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-elementmethods: Application to breastMR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22:238-47
138. Tanner C, Schnabel JA, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ, Degenhard A, et al. 2007. Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Med. Phys. 34:1221-33
139. Hipwell JH, Tanner C, Crum WR, Schnabel J, Hawkes D. 2007. A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projectionmodel of breast X-ray compression. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(9):1190-200
140. Pathmanathan P, Gavaghan DJ, Whiteley J, Chapman SJ, Brady JM. 2008. Predicting tumor location by modeling the deformation of the breast. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55(10):2471-80
141. Ruiter NV, Stotzka R, Muller TO, Gemmeke H, Reichenbach JR, Kaiser WA. 2006. Model-based registration of X-ray mammograms and MR images of the female breast. IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci. 53(1):204-11
142. Mertzanidou T, Hipwell J, Cardoso MJ, Zhang X, Tanner C, et al. 2012. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation. Med. Image Anal. 16(5):966-75
143. Dey J, O'Connor JM, Chen Y, Glick SJ. 2008. Temporal change analysis for improved tumor detection in dedicated CT breast imaging using affine and free-form deformation. Proc. SPIE 6913:69131D
144. Bowen SL, Wu Y, Chaudhari AJ, Fu L, Packard NJ, et al. 2009. Initial characterization of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner during human imaging. J. Nuclear Med. 50(9):1401-8
145. Li X, Dawant BM, Welch EB, Chakravarthy AB, Freehardt D, et al. 2009. A nonrigid registration algorithm for longitudinal breast MR images and the analysis of breast tumor response. Magn. Reson. Med. 27:1258-70
146. Li X, Arlinghaus LR, Chakravarthy AB, Farley J, Mayer IA, et al. 2012. Early DCE-MRI changes after longitudinal registrationmay predict breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Biomed. Image Regist., Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 7359:229-35
147. Glocker B, Sotiras A, Komodakis N, Paragios N. 2011. Deformable medical image registration: Setting the state of the art with discrete methods. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 13:219-44
148. Wessel C, Schnabel J, Brady JM. 2012. Towards a more realistic biomechanical modelling of breast malignant tumours. Phys. Med. Biol. 57(3):631-48