The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort

Breast Cancer Research

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Olson, Janet E ^a   Sellers, Thomas A ^b   Scott, Christopher G ^a   Schueler, Beth A ^a   Brandt, Kathleen R ^a   Serie, Daniel J ^a   Jensen, Matthew R ^a   Wu, Fang Fang ^a   Morton, Marilyn J ^a   Heine, John J ^b   Couch, Fergus J ^a   Pankratz, V Shane ^a   Vachon, Celine M ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORMONE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; VITAMIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER TISSUE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FILM; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MENOPAUSE; POSTMENOPAUSE; RISK FACTOR; THICKNESS; TREND STUDY; X RAY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMARY GLAND; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84868685948     PISSN: 14655411     EISSN: 1465542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/bcr3357     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kelemen LE, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, Brandt KR, Wang A, Janney C, Fredericksen ZS, Cerhan JR, Vachon CM. Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Am J Epidemiol 2008, 167:1027-1036. 10.1093/aje/kwn063, 18385204.
2. Vachon CM, Kuni CC, Anderson K, Anderson VE, Sellers TA. Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2000, 11:653-662. 10.1023/A:1008926607428, 10977110.
3. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15:1159-1169. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034, 16775176.
4. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010, 102:1224-1237. 10.1093/jnci/djq239, 2923218, 20616353.
5. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K. Mammographic breast density and the gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005, 94:115-122. 10.1007/s10549-005-5152-4, 16261410.
6. Ziv E, Tice J, Smith-Bindman R, Shepherd J, Cummings S, Kerlikowske K. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004, 13:2090-2095.
7. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994, 39:1629-1638. 10.1088/0031-9155/39/10/008, 15551535.
8. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. Automated analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1996, 41:909-923. 10.1088/0031-9155/41/5/007, 8735257.
9. Cummings SR, Tice JA, Bauer S, Browner WS, Cuzick J, Ziv E, Vogel V, Shepherd J, Vachon C, Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K. Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009, 101:384-398. 10.1093/jnci/djp018, 2720698, 19276457.
10. Heine JJ, Fowler EE, Flowers CI. Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements. Acad Radiol 2011, 18:1430-1436. 10.1016/j.acra.2011.07.011, 3190123, 21971260.
11. Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Ma L, Duewer F, Fan B, Wang J, Malkov S, Vittinghoff E, Cummings SR. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011, 20:1473-1482. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1150, 3132306, 21610220.
12. Boyd N, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, Maudsley G, Peressotti C, Yaffe M, Minkin S. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18:1754-1762. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0107, 19505909.
13. Ding J, Warren R, Warsi I, Day N, Thompson D, Brady M, Tromans C, Highnam R, Easton D. Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008, 17:1074-1081. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2634, 18483328.
14. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 174:1769-1777.
15. Binder DA. Fitting Cox's proportional hazards models from survey data. Biometricka 1992, 79:139-147.