Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: A pilot case-control study

Radiology

Volumn 260, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 42-49

  Wei, Jun ^a   Chan, Heang Ping ^a   Wu, Yi Ta ^a   Zhou, Chuan ^a   Helvie, Mark A ^a   Tsodikov, Alexander ^b   Hadjiiski, Lubomir M ^a   Sahiner, Berkman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER RISK; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTERIZED MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERN MEASURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PILOT STUDY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TREND STUDY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MICHIGAN; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PREVALENCE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79959572211     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101266     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2008. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society, 2008.
2. Byrne C, Smart CR, Chu KC, Hartmann WH. Survival advantage differences by age: evaluation of the extended follow-up of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. Cancer 1994;74(1 suppl):301-310. (Pubitemid 24187644)
3. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137(5 pt 1):347-360.
4. Seidman H, Gelb SK, Silverberg E, LaVerda N, Lubera JA. Survival experience in the breast cancer detection demonstration project. CA Cancer J Clin 1987;37(5):258-290. (Pubitemid 17153469)
5. Smart CR, Hendrick RE, Rutledge JH 3rd, Smith RA. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 years: current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Cancer 1995;75(7):1619-1626.
6. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001;91(9):1724-1731. (Pubitemid 32377958)
7. Gail MH, Costantino JP, Bryant J, et al. Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91(21):1829-1846.
8. Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA. Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93(5):358-366. (Pubitemid 32229380)
9. Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976;126(6):1130-1137.
10. Egan RL, Mosteller RC. Breast cancer mammography patterns. Cancer 1977;40(5):2087-2090. (Pubitemid 8239695)
11. Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 1975;293(13):642-646.
12. Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). N Engl J Med 1975;293(14):695-701.
13. Whitehead J, Carlile T, Kopecky KJ, et al. Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns: a study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller. Cancer 1985;56(6):1280-1286. (Pubitemid 15230569)
14. van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH. Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality? Eur J Epidemiol 1998;14(4):315-320. (Pubitemid 28288451)
15. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3):227-236. (Pubitemid 46143226)
16. Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(1):43-49. (Pubitemid 46174262)
17. Kerlikowske K. The mammogram that cried Wolfe. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3):297-300. (Pubitemid 46143234)
18. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(6):1159-1169.
19. Cummings SR, Tice JA, Bauer S, et al. Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101(6):384-398.
20. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System atlas (BI-RADS atlas). Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
21. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174(6):1769-1777.
22. Martin KE, Helvie MA, Zhou C, et al. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. Radiology 2006;240(3):656-665. (Pubitemid 44267320)
23. Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Lockwood GA, Little LE, Tritchler DL, Boyd NF. Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer 1997;80(1):66-74. (Pubitemid 27270921)
24. Zhou C, Chan HP, Petrick N, et al. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms. Med Phys 2001;28(6):1056-1069. (Pubitemid 32574690)
25. Wu YT, Sahiner B, Chan HP, et al. Comparison of mammographic parenchymal patterns of normal subjects and breast cancer patients. In: Giger ML, Karssemeijer N, eds. Pro ceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2008 - computer-aided diagnosis. Vol 6915. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2008; 201-208.
26. Zhou C, Chan HP, Paramagul C, et al. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis. Med Phys 2004;31(10):2871-2882. (Pubitemid 39431017)
27. Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Statistics for the behavioral sciences. 6th ed. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Publishing, 2003.
28. Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG. Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(10):680-691.
29. Brisson J, Diorio C, Mâsse B. Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12(8):728-732.
30. Julesz B. Experiments in the visual perception of texture. Sci Am 1975;232(4):34-43.
31. Julesz B, Gilbert EN, Victor JD. Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics. Biol Cybern 1978;31(3):137-140. (Pubitemid 9065753)
32. Caldwell CB, Stapleton SJ, Holdsworth DW, et al. Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. Phys Med Biol 1990;35(2):235-247. (Pubitemid 20057095)